Skip Navigation
 

A New Way To Boost Your Pension Income

My latest blog

My Ultimate Financial Pet Hates

Published in Retirement and Pensions on 26 June 2008

Making the most out of your pension fund is crucial. Could a 'third way' annuity be the answer?

When the time comes to take an income from your pension, most of you will probably buy an annuity. An annuity converts the lump sum from your pension scheme into a guaranteed income for life.

Sounds simple enough, doesn't it? But there are a few snags:

  • Annuity rates are set for you when you buy your annuity. Once you've bought the annuity, you're stuck with that rate until you die.
  • Right now, annuity rates are low. In the 90s, rates reached a high of 14-15 per cent, so a pension pot of say, £50,000 would provide an annual income of about £7,000. These days, annuity rates -- which are affected by interest rates and the returns on gilts (government bonds) -- have dropped to more like 7 per cent. This means the same pot will only give you an income of roughly half.
  • Your annuity usually only lasts as long as you do. If the worst were to happen, the value of your capital will be lost even if you have only received a small amount of income so far. You can add in guarantees which ensure your annuity pays out for five or ten years regardless. You can also add benefits for your spouse/civil partner, but this will reduce the income you can take in your own right. 
  • Annuities are not automatically inflation-proofed so the value of your income will erode over time. If you choose an annuity which is index-linked, the initial income you receive will be lower.

All this adds up to quite a conundrum if you want to make the most of your pension fund. If you don't want to be locked-in to an annuity, you could choose income drawdown -- or what is now known as unsecured pension (USP) -- instead. This allows you to draw an income from your pension fund while it remains invested.

USP has some great benefits. Because your pension is still invested, you can take advantage of any future stock market growth, and you may be able to draw a higher income. What's more, by not giving up your pension to an annuity company, you'll retain control over your fund.

But -- on the downside -- you'll still be exposed to investment risk. If your pension fund performs poorly it could jeopardise your income.  Because of this risk and the charges for running the plan, USP is only really suitable if you have a pension fund of £100,000 plus.

Third Way Annuities

So it would seem neither a conventional annuity nor USP are the perfect retirement solution. But a new product has been launched onto the UK market which could be the answer -- a ‘third way' annuity.

Only a few plans are available at the moment from a handful of companies including The Hartford and Aegon. But big players such as Standard Life and Prudential will soon be getting in on the act, meaning third way annuities should become more widespread.

In a nutshell, a third way annuity is a halfway-house between conventional annuities and USP. It provides exposure to riskier assets -- such as shares -- but also guarantees to provide you with a minimum level of income.

Even if your pension performs poorly, you'll still get the same income giving you peace of mind. But, crucially, if the assets in your pension do well your income could rise significantly.

How much income will you get?

Here's an example of the annual minimum guaranteed income you could receive, taken from Aegon's ‘Income for Life' plan.

Your age when you start taking an income

Guaranteed income: single-life option

Guaranteed income: joint-life option

55 to 59 years

4.5%

4.0%

60 to 64 years

5.0%

4.5%

65 to 69 years

5.5%

5.0%

70 to 74 years

6.0%

5.5%

75 years

6.5%

6.0%

These figures are a percentage of your pension fund. The guaranteed minimum income rises in line with the plan's highest ever cash-in value, which is recalculated every year. If your pension has performed well, your income will increase, but it will never fall below its guaranteed minimum level (as long as it continues to meet HMRC rules on maximum withdrawals).

Another plus is that you can switch to a conventional annuity at any time and you still have the option of taking up to 25% of your fund as tax-free cash, just as you would with a conventional annuity or USP. 

Here's a quick rundown of how third way annuities compare:

Third Way Annuity versus Conventional Annuity & USP

Third Way Annuity

Conventional Annuity

USP/Income Drawdown

Control over your fund

Yes

No

Yes

Guaranteed income

Yes

Yes

No

Exposure to future stock market gains

Yes

No

Yes

Protection against stock market falls

Yes

Yes

No

Guaranteed lump sum death benefits (up to age 75)

Yes

No

No

Source: Aegon

A third way annuity appears to tick all the boxes, but -- and here's the drawback -- the income guarantee doesn't come for free.

Cost of the income guarantee

Each year you'll be charged a fee that covers the cost of providing the guaranteed income. This varies so you'll need to compare how different plans measure up. With Aegon's plan the guarantee will cost between 0.5 and 1.6 per cent a year depending on the percentage of shares held in your pension fund (the greater the share content, the higher the cost). Meanwhile, with The Hartford's plan the guarantee costs 0.75 per cent.

There are other charges to consider on top, such as the cost of setting up your plan, management charges on the funds you invest in and payment to your financial adviser. This can make third way annuities expensive, so you'll need to decide whether the extra guarantee justifies the cost.

If you're thinking third way annuities seem like the best of both worlds, they're usually only available through financial advisers, so this should be your first port of call.

More: Will Your Postcode Affect Your Pension | How To Save For Retirement
Share & subscribe

Comments

The opinions expressed here are those of the individual writers and are not representative of The Motley Fool. If you spot any comments that are unsuitable hit the flag to alert our moderators.

Dhahran2001 27 Jun 2008, 5:53am

'Even if your pension performs poorly, you'll still get the same income giving you peace of mind. But, crucially, if the assets in your pension do well your income could rise significantly.' - writes Jane Baker.

This sounds remarkably like 'With Profits and smoothing' which TMF finds abominable in the context of 'Endowment' life assurance policies. Perhaps I was right not to join the 'damn the endowment' herd.

sujatel 27 Jun 2008, 8:32am

<< Annuity is guaranteed, but life is NOT!"

'Annuity rates are set for you when you buy your annuity. Once you've bought the annuity, you're stuck with that rate until you die...'
... which could be the week after starting to take pension, or even before your lump-sum funds are cleared in your bank account, straight to fall under 'Inheritance Tax'!

Pension would remain as 'state perpetuated fraud' unless and until 'the pensioner' gets the control of Pension-fund, with built-in safeguards that s/he can not liquidate it totally.

sujatel 27 Jun 2008, 8:33am

<< Annuity is guaranteed, but life is NOT!" >>

'Annuity rates are set for you when you buy your annuity. Once you've bought the annuity, you're stuck with that rate until you die...'
... which could be the week after starting to take pension, or even before your lump-sum funds are cleared in your bank account, straight to fall under 'Inheritance Tax'!

Pension would remain as 'state perpetuated fraud' unless and until 'the pensioner' gets the control of Pension-fund, with built-in safeguards that s/he can not liquidate it totally.

piggymillionaire 27 Jun 2008, 8:55am

I worked 25 years full time for my pension, which halves on my death, and finishes on the death of my wife (assuming that I go first). However, in just 4 years part time work I was able to build up a kind of 'royalties' based business, producing an income roughly equal to that pension, and this has continued to grow since then, trebling my income , based on the pension. Similar to royalties, the income does not die with me/the wife, but passes on in full to our estate.

Really, in times like these, unless we take steps to secure our income, we will only have ourselves to blame when we find we cannot afford to retire.

burgdorf 27 Jun 2008, 9:15am

"With Aegon's plan the guarantee will cost between 0.5 and 1.6 per cent a year depending on the percentage of shares held in your pension fund (the greater the share content, the higher the cost). Meanwhile, with The Hartford's plan the guarantee costs 0.75 per cent."

That is the drawback. If the annual pension payment on a guarateeed joint life income for people in the 60 - 64 year bracket is 4/5% then the annual charges quoted by Hartford and Aegon vary from an equivalent of 17% to 35% of the actual annual income that you are receiving from your pension fund !

debtwagon 27 Jun 2008, 9:50am

Conclusion - all pensions are a waste of time and annuities are little short of scandalous. Put your money somewhere else, where you have access and control over it. It's about time that the whole pensions rip-off had the rug pulled from under it.

lincup 27 Jun 2008, 10:07am

ive been paying money into teachers AVC with prudential. do you think i'd be better off just buying added years of service with the main fund? I don t have many years of contributions behind me and will have to work till 65 i think ( i have the option of going at 60)

nomatterwho 27 Jun 2008, 12:11pm

I don't really know the answer to this, Lincup. The answer will depend on, among other things, whether or not you expect to be promoted. I had the same dilemma that you face now, and opted for buying past added years. I still don't know whether this was the right thing to have done, though I did a little bit of asking around beforehand. At least with past added years what you will get is defined.

stuartpetergraha 27 Jun 2008, 12:38pm

ON the question of the AVC or the teachers pension, as a Finance teacher, I think you could ask yourself one simple question. Which do I think is best for me - a known 1/80 times final salary for each year I buy (costing around 12% of salary) or putting the same into a privately run fund that is at market rates. At the moment shares are cheap and they will recover, so if you have say 5-10 years to go you could think about the extra risk. Personally I would buy the extra years or put the money into a share ISA type fund. The ISA is yours and you can cash it if you need or even give it to your heirs or favourite charity. The stock exchange is in for a rough time probably, extra years are safe and sure - and if you aren't into finance etc, it could be your safest bet.
Hope that helps a little. PS see the Union if you are unsure they have finacial advise for free.

milton43 27 Jun 2008, 1:07pm

a new way to boost my pension would be if the goverment gave 200 per week stop taxing me on my money and what i inherate and stop sorting out other countries shit

stuartpetergraha 27 Jun 2008, 1:10pm

I would add one thing to the debate, that is pensions like the teachers are good simple structures that give a fair and known outcome, on average we probably get about what we pay in.
Most of these are now closed to new members, so I agree with the earlier statement, I would recommend owning shares or other assets. You own the asset it gives you an income all your life, OK the dividend is taxed, but pay this into a savings account and forget about it. Then at the end of the years pay out the tax and what is left is extra spending money or added to this years savings and you buy some more shares. Start at 18 or so with one 500 pound lot a year and by say 25 increase this to 1,000 pounds and just stick at it. At 65 you have a diversified portfolio of about 40+ shares (there will be duds, buy outs and so on). I have built up about 70,000 pounds worth of shares over ten years with my wife, all in her name as she is the homemaker and earns less. At 45 I plan to double this by 65, even if the shares never went up again at 4% yield they will give us about 5-6,000 p.a. in another 20 years.
Personally, I have all the dividends and a regular direct debit go into a seperate account with interest. It is declared and what is left I buy another share with.
I teach finance and have worked in a merchant bank, that is all a finance company will do. They charge us fees if they get it wrong and extra when they get it right. The Fool has high yield portfolios as a guide, there will be duds, but don't worry. I have stars and duds, over all my yield after ten years is well above a saving account of this same amount even after the recent drops. If you don't want to do it yourself get a tax shetered unit trust that indexes the market and just pay in a set monthly amount this money is yours for good.
My employer does not do the public teachers pension ( I would join that if I could) we have a private pension, I pay the minimum I have to under my contract.
But I am dead against private pensions that die with you, as they have so many more fees all the way - how can you get a fair deal. The pay out on a teachers / NHS pension at 1/80 for each year worked over average life expectancy should give you what you paid back over your life. If it didn't the government won't be closing them down they would be opening more to get extra revenue!!
A private pension is another game, only a very well run tracker or cheap and successful share picker is likely to give you all your money back - after all who pays for all those fancy wages and offices, but the pension buyer not the BMW driving sales reps. If they gave you back all your money there would be less of them each year not more.

ruisliprabbitt 27 Jun 2008, 1:20pm

I'm with debtwagon - if you're a member of a DC / money purchase pension plan put in the least you have to in order to ensure the highest amount goes in from your employer.

Thereafter do ISAs - you have control, you can take out what you want, when you want, it simplifies your tax affairs, you could retire before age 55 if you wanted to / were able to.

Tax breaks favour pensions slightly over ISAs - I think the ISA benefits outweigh this though.

RR

Tom067 27 Jun 2008, 2:02pm

I must agree with stuartpetergraha. 30 years ago I sold my house and whilst waiting to jump back on the property ladder I invested a small amount in the stock market. In the end I didn't need to cash in any of the investments and I still hold some of those initial investments. An initial outlay of around £5k was enhanced by later savings, dividends and SAYE share offers from my then employer. The portfolio, although at present down is still valued at more than £250k and I have total control.
I am now retired living on one indexed linked occupational pension and I have two further pension pots to take when I reach 65 later this year. I suppose I was lucky with my employers and also lucky to have put aside savings in the 'years of plenty' but I feel that I have done all this by chance. I was prudent but I had no teacher. Perhaps I could have done a lot better or indeed a lot worse. I never had ISAs and such like when I was starting out and the taxman was not as generous as he is today with such vehicles.
Help is now available from the Fool and others and should help the younger generation understand what they are getting into but one thing I fear most for my children is that they will not have sufficient savings for a comfortable retirement.

andysuth 27 Jun 2008, 2:02pm

Yes,

Save all your life so Gordon Brown and a Selection of City Boy Fund Managers can take it all.

You'd be an idiot not to work harder, because the less you save, the less Gordon and his city boys can take away from you.

-Andy.

vem43 27 Jun 2008, 6:47pm

I retired 5 years ago after paying money into teachers AVC's with Prudential. I accrued £16000 and bought annuity with Norwich Union. This gives me just over £200 into my bank account every 3 months ( after tax ). Still not sure if I did right thing but it's too late to change now. Hope this helps a little.

foolishone45 02 Jul 2008, 12:47am

I'm with Andy. I wouldn't recommend saving for a pension to anyone. Build up a nice pot and along comes another Gordon Brown type to take a big chunk away from you. Or even worse, you buy an annuity with an entity like Equitable Life that goes bust and there is no compensation forthcoming from the likes of Brown - he of the huge, gold plated index-linked pension.
AFO

dave02heasman 04 Jul 2008, 3:56pm

If you're paying 40% tax there's a lot to be said for a SIPP. You'll wait a long time before an ISA's benefits (and you can only contribute £7200 p.a.) catch up with an initial 40% discount on contributions.

rbloom66 06 Jul 2008, 12:52pm

I'm retired abroad, taking a private pension as well as my state pension, but they are taxed in the UK. Is there any way I can avoid paying the tax as I now consider myself a UK non-resident and have every intention of remaining so?
I'd appreciate some advice.

gillianswain 11 Jul 2008, 8:38pm

An annuity is hardly paying more in percentage terms than a normal savings account and appears to be lower than some so why hand over huge sums of money to them. I would say that investment in shares is best for most people providing you can keep them a fairly long time to allow for ups and downs in the market (after all what are the insurance companies doing with your money but to invest it in shares themselves whilst giving you a small percentage of what they get back when they sell them). My other half has been investing in shares regularly since he retired 3 years ago and he has outperformed most professional fund managers simly by doing his research, not putting all his eggs in one basket, plain common sense and being prepared to have some long term shares. Obviously it makes sense to keep some money in a high paying savings account or cash ISA for rainy days purposes. I might add that my other half didn't have a huge pot of money to play with so even with a modest amount of savings it is possible to beat inflation providing you do your homework and keep your wits about you. A SIPP also seems a good idea for those paying 40% tax. Anyway to all of you who are lucky enough to be retired I hope that you all enjoy your retirement to the full.

terensky 21 Aug 2008, 2:10pm

The concensus opinion seems to indicate that the key to funding retirement is diversification. I have tried to do this at age 69 by continuing to work part-time, having a small teachers pension, a SIPP, two small and cheap overseas flats (not affected by credit crunch)and wife who sometimes works and the not-to be-overlooked state pension.

Join the conversation

Instructions

Line breaks are converted automatically.

You may use the following tags in your post: <b>bold</b>, <i>quoted text</i>. All other tags will be removed from your post.

Hello stranger

To add your own comment, please login.

Not yet registered? Register now.