Skip Navigation
 

Will Your Postcode Affect Your Pension?

Cliff D'Arcy

By

Cliff D'Arcy

From the Fool blog

Turbulent markets

Published in Retirement and Pensions on 20 June 2008

From September, where you live could influence how much income your pension pot makes. We explain why.

What's the point of having a pension?

Put simply, pensions exist to provide income to workers after they retire. How pensions work is that you pay in money throughout your working life. These contributions, together with substantial investment gains made over decades, should create a fairly hefty pot of money. In most cases, this pot of capital is then turned into a guaranteed income for life by way of an annuity.

An annuity is a monthly or yearly income paid by an insurance company to an annuitant until s/he dies, in return for an upfront payment. The big problem with annuities is that, once you hand your pot over, you lose it forever. Thus, an annuity is a gamble by both life insurer and annuitant. If you live considerably longer than mortality statistics suggest, then you win the bet. However, if you die within a few years of buying an annuity, then the insurance company wins.

The level of annuity which you receive depends on a whole host of factors, including your age, gender (on average, women live longer than men), smoker status, marital status, and state of health. Other external factors also have an impact on the income paid, such as prevailing interest rates and whether your annuity income is flat or rises over time.

It's important to note that you do nothave to buy an annuity from the pension company with which you have saved. Indeed, pension companies are legally obliged to inform you of your right to shop around for a higher annuity rate, known as your ‘open market option'.

A new approach to annuities

There have been big changes in the world of annuities over the past decade. Much lower interest rates and increased life expectancy have led to a huge drop in annuity rates. Therefore, any factors which will help to improve annuity rates will be greatly welcomed by those approaching retirement.

One market trend is the increased tailoring of annuities in order to target particular groups of people, known as ‘individual pricing'. Of course, as with most financial-market changes, there will be winners and losers. For example, the introduction of ‘postcode annuities' by leading provider Norwich Union (NU) will mean lower annuities for some people and higher payouts for others.

Although the UK is one of the richest and most highly developed countries in the world, there are still extremes of life expectancy throughout our nation. By adjusting annuity rates to take into account the residential location of annuitants, payouts will improve in lowly areas. Likewise, annuity rates will fall for those living in affluent areas. Take a look at these figures:

City

Male life

Expectancy

(years)

Female life

Expectancy

(years)

Kensington & Chelsea

82.2

86.2

East Dorset

80.9

84.1

Manchester

72.5

78.3

Glasgow

69.9

76.7

As you can see, a gent living in swish Kensington & Chelsea can expect to live 12.3 years longer than, say, a man living in the deprived Gorbals area of Glasgow. Of course, the main reason for this huge gap is lifestyle, with the wealthy enjoying lower stress, better nutrition and superior healthcare. Thus, annuity rates can be made more accurate by adjusting them regionally.

This explains why, from 22 September, Norwich Union will follow in the footsteps of Legal & General by introducing postcode-rated annuities. NU plans to divide the UK into nine categories, based on local life expectancy. This could see a difference of up to 2% on the income paid to two identical customers living in very different postcode categories. The insurer calculates that seven in ten annuitants (70%) will be in a similar or better position, with the remaining 30% being slightly worse off.

Of course, as annuities become increasingly personalised, payouts will increase to people with poor life expectancy but fall for the healthy and wealthy. I'm sure most of us will welcome the end of this cross-subsidy to the wealthiest parts of the UK. Indeed, it seems likely that other insurers will adopt similar methods in order to improve the accuracy of the ‘annuity gamble'.

Hence, it is now more important than ever to shop around for an annuity that pays the very highest rate to you as an individual. Amazingly, only two in five pensioners (40%) make use of their open-market option. Alas, the remainder will be losing out on thousands of pounds during the later years of their lives. Oops!

More: Get your free pension guides today | How To Save For Retirement | Good News About Your Pension

Share & subscribe

Comments

The opinions expressed here are those of the individual writers and are not representative of The Motley Fool. If you spot any comments that are unsuitable hit the flag to alert our moderators.

drsusanna 21 Jun 2008, 6:11am

I find this annuity thing very confusing, and the older I get, the more confusing it seems. Do I now also have to move to Galsgow to increase my pension? For how long? If I were to move back after, say, a year, would my pension drop? Through circumstances, my pension is going to be very low, so I need a few ideas to increase it.

murtibing 21 Jun 2008, 8:17am

Get the cheapest buy to let in Glasgow or maybe Middlesborough or Hull. Then pretend to live there. That should settle any time of residence constraints.

Slopingjohnnie 21 Jun 2008, 9:33am

But then again is not the cost of living cheaper in Glasgow? And would it help if you decided to take up smoking for a few months before you retire and then drop it again afterwards?

terentius41 21 Jun 2008, 9:51am

Rip off Britain!Yet again the suited wideboys of Norwich Union come up with a scam to get your money and then pay out less. Several years ago it was a flood map for house insurance. Seems fair at a glance, but houses well above floodplain level are classed as floodable simply because they are near a river or threat. No account taken of actual level. Doubtless the pensions 'scam' will have the same anomalies advantaging NU.

sweetlikehoney 21 Jun 2008, 10:53am

I agree - this seems fair at a glance, but there are countless ways to scam the system...
Also, I appreciate the reference to OMO's (open market otions).
Working in a contact centre at a Pension Provider, I speak to countless people taking their pensions, who just want the money, can't be bothered with looking around and just end up sticking with what we offer them. Perhaps what we're offering is the best value for some of them, but things need to get a lot more open, and simple, where pensions are concerned
-most people I speak to don't even know what an annuity is! in fact, nor did I before I worked there, and I am by no means dense...

People can't make their own decisions about their money when they don't understand it.

Karada 21 Jun 2008, 10:57am

The whole pension business is a scam. Many years ago I converted a fairly substantial pension sum from the Unilever scheme into a pension plan with Guardian Royal Exchange. They promised a large increase over what was expected from the Unilever fund with a lump sum of £103,000 on retirement and a pension of £12,000 a year and a pension for my wife of £6,000. Then they got taken over several times ending up as Guardian Assurance.
My pension has now been reduced to next to nothing. No terminal bonus, no lump sum on retirement, no pension for my wife except as a widow (worth £2,000), and a pension of £4,000 a year.
This year the annual bonus was 1%. Just what do these pension fund managers do for their money? ONE percent is pathetic, I would do better sticking the money in almost any savings account if I could get it back. But as I am now only 6 months from retirement age there is not a lot I can do to recover the situation except continue working. Incidently, I hear that the Norwich Union name is going to disappear soon to be replaced with Aviva.

dilbert999 21 Jun 2008, 12:23pm

And what if you plan to retire abroad? What happens then?

Hells78 21 Jun 2008, 12:33pm

Interesting article, the best option is to seak professional advice before purchasing any annuity. Get an independent adviser to shop around for an Open Market Option or consider other options such as Unsecured Pension (previously income withdrawal).

Michalean 21 Jun 2008, 1:05pm

Recently had letter from bank pension to congratulate me on my expected pension of £80 per year.Thanks.
Cant see me ever being able to save enough for a comfortable retirement so is the answer to stuff it and get down the social for the handouts but ask them to hurry because the Mercs on a double yellow.

BagOfMonkeys 21 Jun 2008, 1:11pm

How intelligent are these Insurance Companies, doesn't take a brain surgeon to work out that people with annuities or pensions don't live in deprived areas, dooooh.

Beej40 21 Jun 2008, 4:08pm

"But then again is not the cost of living cheaper in Glasgow?"

Eh.. compared to where? I can tell you that there are many, many areas in England and Wales where it would be far cheaper to live!

Come up and try it some time - see for yourself.

russpw100 21 Jun 2008, 5:08pm

So, I have high blood pressure, cholesterol and am pre-diabetic - But I live in "affluent" Hampshire........Will my annuity be higher or lower than previously? - This is going to get VERY confusing and the insurance companies will use this to their benefit of course!

getcontrolback 21 Jun 2008, 6:12pm

"I'm sure most of us will welcome the end of this cross-subsidy to the wealthiest parts of the UK."

I am very disappointed in your comment above. You are assuming that all that live within the so called wealthiest parts of the country are wealthy - you do know that there are council estates and slums even in kensington and Chelsea where people struggle to survive and have not the means to move to your so called deprived areas to gain more income. I hadn't realised that the FOOL had the bigot bug that is sweeping this country - you'll be advocating pack mentality next

Zweiblumen 21 Jun 2008, 10:17pm

Hmm, I don't drink, I don't smoke, I'm in good health (for now, still many years from retirement), and I'm not very well-off but have a "good" postcode. Why on earth would a pension feature in my financial planning? My money would be better off in a cardboard box under my bed, where nobody can make me buy an annuity with it! (That's not where I really keep it, by the way...)

choirgirlsop1 22 Jun 2008, 12:39am

I would have thought the standard enquiries into a potential annuitant's state of health, weight, smoking history and alcohol consumption would provide all the information needed rather than the crude use of a postcode - isn't these factors that cause the increased mortality in the more deprived areas anyway?

douglasbuchanan 22 Jun 2008, 1:43pm

In your article you say the insurance company gains when the annuity holder dies early. Surely the gain is passed on to the annuity holder who lives longer than expected. Annuity saving is therefore a form of shared risk just as many other insurance products.

gillianswain 22 Jun 2008, 8:41pm

Yes, it is rip off Britain again and as usual. I live in quite an affluent area. My man-friend lives in a not so affluent area so guess where I would get my annuity sent to? It's ludicrous. If I use my hard-earned cash and gamble on an annuity, I want to pay and receive the same as the next person otherwise I will keep my cash and invest elsewhere myself and the annuity companies can go to you know where.

TheHeroTheDavid 23 Jun 2008, 4:26am

Cliff

Your life expectancy charts are misleading. They give life expectancy at birth not at pensionable age.

At age 60, the average person in the UK will live another 26 to 29 years according to the latest mortality studies.

It's only a matter of time perhaps until annuity companies start promising thrill seeking benefits like discounted viagra & bungee jumping to try & knock some of its elderly off, under the guise of life enhancement! ;p)

Hallucigenia 23 Jun 2008, 11:03pm

Surely the insurance companies are already encouraging one of the most efficient ways to kill yourself with impaired life annuities, effectively paying people to smoke. Then you move to Dundee and get paid by gov.uk not to smoke....

hughclinton1 24 Jun 2008, 11:57am

I do worry that paying an insurance company, pension premiums for decades, with no guarantee of any return is is the most foolish or least Foolish way to invest for the future. As Karada says 1% return is a joke - just like endowments for that matter.
But life is full of risks - all we need to do is reduce them - and I think many forms of insurance are things that can be left out of the mix, provided you don't mind looking after your money yourself.

tastyfish2000 26 Jun 2008, 2:07pm

I can't see why insurance companies introduce such huge generalisations, for example, the flood map mentioned above. Imagine if other aspects of life adopted the same principle. "I'm sorry, sir, but you live in Nottingham. We're sending you to prison because your postcode is a high-crime area which means you're more likely to be guilty."

How ridiculous. Whatever happened to case-by-case situations? Look up 'insurance' in any thesaurance and you should also see the words 'scam', 'rip-off' and 'theft'.

tastyfish2000 26 Jun 2008, 2:08pm

Thesaurance? Have I just invented a new word?!

milton43 01 Jul 2008, 2:37pm

why not just let the goverment give us all 250 a week no tax i think it has made the mess so some form of compansasion should be awarded and i am being polite in writing this misold sreps etc etc etc

Join the conversation

Instructions

Line breaks are converted automatically.

You may use the following tags in your post: <b>bold</b>, <i>quoted text</i>. All other tags will be removed from your post.

Hello stranger

To add your own comment, please login.

Not yet registered? Register now.