Skip Navigation
 

Boost Your Pension By 52%!

<%=_author %>
By Jane Baker | 16 May 2008

Did you know by putting off taking your State Pension for five years, you could enjoy an increase to your weekly income of more than 50%? Defer your pension for longer and you could get even more.

When you reach State Pension age* you may decide you don't yet need the weekly income the State Pension provides. Perhaps you want to continue working, or you have enough income already from other sources.

Two Choices

If deferring your State pension makes sense, you have two choices: receive a higher weekly State Pension at a later date or take an extra lump sum payment. If you go for the lump sum option, you'll receive the State Pension at the normal rate when you eventually start taking it. 

Even if you have already started claiming, you can choose to stop receiving benefits for a time to build up an extra income or lump sum.

To receive extra weekly State pension, you must defer for at least five weeks. However, if you want to receive a lump sum payment, you must put it off for a minimum of a year.

The amount of extra income you could get is 0.2% of your weekly State Pension for each week you have deferred your claim. This works out at 1% extra for every five weeks, and roughly 10.4% for a full year. (That's 52% if you defer for five years.)

The extra lump sum is based on the amount of State pension you would have received plus interest. The interest rate is always 2% above the Bank of England base rate. The base rate is currently 5%, so any lump sums accruing now earn interest at a rate of 7%. This will alter as the base rate moves up and down.

Here's an example of how much better off you could be by deferring, if you had built up an entitlement of £90 per week at normal retirement age:

Benefits Of Deferring Your State Pension

Weekly State Pension

Number of Years Deferred

Amount of State Pension Given up

Extra Lump sum

Before Tax

Extra Weekly State Pension

Before Tax

£90

1 year

2 years

3 years

4 years

5 years

£4,680

£9,360

£14,040

£18,720

£23,400

£4,830

£9,980

£15,460

£21,300

£27,520

£9.36

£18.72

£28.08

£37.44

£46.80

Source: The Pension Service. The lump sum amounts are based on an interest rate of 6.5% for the whole period, but in reality this will change whenever the base rate moves. Interest is added each week to the amount of State Pension you have put off claiming in that week. The interest then compounds weekly.

Let's take a look at the difference in your total State Pension income if you took your State Pension at 65 years, compared with putting it off until you reach 70.

I'll assume in these examples that you live until you're 85. The annual inflation-linked increases in your State Pension income have been ignored.

If you were entitled to a weekly State Pension of £90 which you start taking at the age of 65, by the time you reach 85, you would have received payments totalling £93,600 (before tax).

But, if you defer until you're 70, you'll receive an enhanced State Pension of £136.80 per week. After paying that level of income to you for the next 15 years, you will have received a total of £106,704 (before tax). That's over £13,000 more than you would get if you had started taking benefits from 65 at the normal rate.

The benefits of deferring are less pronounced if you choose to take a lump sum. So using the same example, if you compare the total amount you would have received by taking your State Pension at 65 (£23,400, before tax) with the lump sum you could get by putting it off for five years (£27,520, before tax), you'll find you're just £3,850 better off.  

Remember, if you delay your State Pension for longer you could build up an even larger lump sum or weekly income.

What else do you need to know?

Tax - Any extra weekly income or lump sum is treated as income for tax purposes. The extra weekly income is taxed in the same way as the normal State Pension.

The lump sum is taxed at the highest tax rate that applies to your other sources of income, so it can't push you into a higher tax bracket. That means, if you're other income makes you a basic rate taxpayer, you're lump sum will only be taxed at 20% and no more.

Other Benefits - Any extra weekly income you receive will be taken into consideration when calculating your eligibility to means-tested benefits such as Housing Benefit, Council Tax Benefit, Pension Credit and Tax Credits. However, any extra lump sum payment will be disregarded.

When deferring won't earn you extra State Pension - Any period when you are receiving any of the following benefits won't count towards earning extra State Pension:

Carer's Allowance, Incapacity Benefit, Severe Disablement Allowance, Unemployability Supplement, Widow's Pension, Widow's Mother's Allowance, or any type of State Pension (except Graduated Retirement Benefit or Shared Additional Pension).

There's no doubt deferring your State Pension should enable you to enjoy an enhanced income in retirement. All you need to do is work out whether you can afford to put it off.

*State Pension age is currently set at 65 for men and 60 for women. For women born after 5 April 1950 but before 6 April 1955, State Pension age is rising from 60 to 65 between 2010 and 2020. Women born on or after 6 April 1955 but before 6 April 1959 will reach normal retirement age at 65. State Pension age will increase for both men and women from 65 to 68 between 2024 and 2046.

More: Why The Credit Crunch Is Good For Your Pension | Keeping Care Cost Under Control | For further information read the Pension Service's Guide To State Pension Deferral.

Comments

The opinions expressed here are those of the individual writers and are not representative of The Motley Fool.

At 06:57 on May 17 2008, Dhahran2001 said:

Just take care not to die during the deferred period, for the benefit of your Foolish heirs.

At 07:04 on May 17 2008, finniesp100 said:

An alternative would be to take the pension and invest it yourself. The calculations in the article do not take account of that.

At 07:52 on May 17 2008, Phillipo said:

I was thinking the same thing - take the money and invest it at better than 6.5% or whatever the current rate might be... On the other hand it's safer with the government right? I just read that the fund the govt. has put aside for recompensing people in the event of a bank collapsing is totally inadequate and that they would have to borrow if a large bank failed. Not very reassuring in the current climate is it?

At 09:13 on May 17 2008, dagear said:

How about deffering your state pension & collecting it in the form of pension credit if your circumstances allow it. So infact getting it twice.
Also on the point of dying while deffering I think your Spouse collects but if single your children etc don't.

At 09:18 on May 17 2008, Yousanem said:

It is rather naive to assume that government actuaries haven't looked at this and spotted a winner. ONS statistics for 2002 show average life expectancy of 81 for women and 76 for men. If you are an average man, you will loose £8,800 on a 5 year postponement and a boosted pension. 50% Women will come out at least £3,370 better off, but there again 50% will not. As Dirty Harry said, "Are you feelin' lucky, punk? Well are ya'?"

At 09:38 on May 17 2008, j1rharmer said:

You fail to emphasis the income tax payable on the extra pension, althoughn that may not matter if total income is less than the personal allowance.
But the major disadvantage is thta if you die during the deferrel period, the whole amount deferrred is lost and gone forever.
Your legatees will not like this.
By the way, make sure your pension is paid weekly. That has immense cash flow advantages.

At 09:44 on May 17 2008, aldeliman said:

Deferring is all very tempting but "money now is money now" and the sooner I get mine out of the hands of an ever-unreliable government, even though week by week, the better.

At 09:47 on May 17 2008, dagear said:

Please be clear here the deffered lumpsum/pension goes to your spouse, not gone forever, if your single however it does get lost.

At 09:57 on May 17 2008, usmillers said:

And should I die before I get old!
my wife works in the financial industry and it is take the money and run, her father died two years after taking retirement!So NO deferring here!

At 10:23 on May 17 2008, DionRinaldi said:

I'm suprised the state pension is so low. I don't know how a person can live on 90 or 140 GBP per week.

I think we should treat older people better, as in many cases they can't just go out and get a job like young people.

Staying in work longer is an ideal solution. The govt should tax older people less every year that they work over the usual retirement age.

At 10:39 on May 17 2008, miker103 said:

it takes 10 years to repay the amount you have lost through deferring for 1 year. In that time you will receive much less in real terms because of inflation. Doesnt look attractive to me.

the lump sum option looks a winner though.

At 10:52 on May 17 2008, Twonko said:

Whilst I partially agree with DionRinaldi, I don't see why I and millions of other working people should finance increased pensions for other people as well as trying to finance our own. If people wanted to be well off in their old age, they should have funded it while they were working. Too late to start bleating about it now.

At 11:37 on May 17 2008, Junebjh said:

You cannot receive Pension Credit if you are deliberately depriving yourself of income eg State Pension. It will be taken into account asd 'notional income' whether you actually receive it or not. Quite right too dagear. I hate greed.

At 12:08 on May 17 2008, js2008 said:

Everything I have read on this subject recommends taking the money now and saving it elsewhere. And when my time comes to collect the pittance they call a State Pension that is what I will do.

At 12:12 on May 17 2008, bob1023 said:

This is complicated and it’s different for every individual.

Tax is an important part of the calculation too. If you draw and invest (even tax free) you will have paid tax. Also, part of the lump sum (25%) is tax free.

It seems to me that if you look at your own family and they generally lived more than the average, then deferral is probably a good idea. Of course if you carry on working (and being paid) you not only get an increased tax allowance but you are exempt from NI so you can put that money in an ISA and leave the pension until you actually retire.

At 12:41 on May 17 2008, RogerM9 said:

Some good points already raised, but it's not just a matter of whether you die young or live to a ripe old age. In the normal course of events you will be able to do more between 65 - 75 than 75 - 85. The early years of retirement are when you are most likely to travel, follow interests or buy capital items to equip yourself for the change in lifestyle - new car, caravan, boat etc. I love trekking in wilderness areas, and it frightens me witless to think that the day will come when I will no longer be able to do it. These things do not creep up on you gradually - normally something happens to the health and fitness of either yourself or your spouse and suddenly it's over. So, take the money at the first opportunity and use it to do what you want. If you don't need it now, stash it so that you have it for when you do want it - and if you die prematurely it's still there for the benefit fo your spouse and children. If you don't draw it and you die prematurely, you have been "wearing a hair shirt" for nothing.

At 13:11 on May 17 2008, Phillipo said:

It certainly makes sense to defer if you're going to be earning and paying higher rate tax. When/if your income drops below the threshold for higher rate then take the pension either as a lump sum or at a higher rate. (Not sure this enough money to get excited about)

At 13:11 on May 17 2008, rinteln said:

some very good points already made, but its interesting to look at the crossover points when you start to make more money than you would have had you taken your pension earlier.

One would have thought that it would be the same no mater if you defer one year or 5 years but it isnt.

it always takes 11 years to get your money back so if you are female and 60 now and defer just 1 year you must wait until you are 71 to be better off, But if you are female and defer for 5 years you must wait until you are 76 before being in pocket.

similarly if you are a man and defer those 5 years you must wait until you are 81 before seeing a profit.

and all thats wihout taking into account what you could have been earning in interest had you taken the money and put it into a savings account.

so unless you have a long history of aged ancestors it doesnt look that attractive at all.

At 13:14 on May 17 2008, wotsthat said:

If you don't need the money from a pension why not simply take it anyway and save it?

The Government already hopes we all drop dead as soon as we need to claim any benefits - this just makes it more likely you'll be dead before taking a state pension.

At 13:25 on May 17 2008, dagear said:

Junebjh
"You cannot receive Pension Credit if you are deliberately depriving yourself of income eg State Pension. It will be taken into account asd 'notional income' whether you actually receive it or not. Quite right too dagear. I hate greed."
I agree it SHOULD be but are sure you know what your talking about.
I was only pointing out a loop hole my recently deciesed father had found without telling me or my mother.
BUT when I dealt with his affairs I found he'd deffered for over 2 years while claiming pension credit I was amazed myself that they let this happen but they said it was fine & paid my mother a lump sum then transfered my fathers state pension to my mother.
Obviously a loop hole that should be closed!!!

At 14:49 on May 17 2008, BashmentGirl said:

A marvellous idea - but if I defer my pension then how I am suppose to live? By the time one reaches pension age you feel you have worked 'nuff' years and are looking forward to putting your feet up & ENJOY - can't se how I will survive!

At 15:48 on May 17 2008, tedphill said:

I have defered my state pension because I am still working and I would lose out on the tax by taking it now. I plan to take the lump sum in 53 weeks time. We are all different and most people can not afford to put off their state pension. I thought about taking extra weekly pension but for me the lump sum works best. It's the same with a private pension, should you take the flat payment or go for the yearly increase. It all depends how long YOU THINK you will live for.

At 15:51 on May 17 2008, hungary said:

My mum died a mere 3 months after reaching pensionable age. However as we knew she was terminally ill, she opted for a lump sum payment and had some good days with it. She did have to pay tax over it (nearly 50%-this was in a different country), but I would say: take the money and enjoy it. Really enjoy retirement and it is not worth deferring. Life is too short!

At 21:35 on May 17 2008, gillianswain said:

Twonko, I would normally agree that everyone should try and save whilst working and that people are responsible for their own welfare, but life was different for people years ago. Many had fought in one or two world wars (hardly a time for "saving") and quite a few were caught out by governments and other people who enticed them into putting their money into pension schemes that were then raided - and there was no legal come back in those days - pension raiding had never been experienced before. They were also told that the state pension was good and would rise well if they contributed to it (and remember people who have a state pension did CONTRIBUTE). We now all know better. It's a bit like cigarettes. Years ago people were told they were calming and even sophisticated (look at old films to see how alluring the heroine looks whilst smoking). The health issues were well hidden by the companies concerned. So I don't mind if a few of my pennies of tax goes to help someone when they are old and maybe infirm. It will be my turn (and yours) one day. Let's just not give it to the young and able bodied who don't want to work. I know of many who go from educational course to educational course (they receive money for attending them on top of their dole payments), and never intend to work. They can then get all the other entitlements that go with being unemployed. Let's give the pensioners a reasonable income. After all they have worked for about 40 years plus if they get what is now the pittance that they call a FULL state pension. My father died one month after retirement and my late husband 18 months after being made redundant at the age of 52. Perhaps that is something to think about when deciding whether to defer your pension. Yousanem has got it right. The government actuaries will have worked out what is best for the government.

At 10:15 on May 18 2008, bonpense said:

What happens to the figures if you don't ignore the annual inflation-linked increases?

At 10:57 on May 18 2008, Kimmerblee said:

I think this article has been an eye-opener for a lot of people who didnt even realise how incredibly paltry the state pension truly is. We pay pensioners 11% of the average wage now. All the Governments that have allowed this to happen should hang their heads in shame.

What it does serve as is a wake up call to us all. Get yourself investing in other things (pensions, property etc) because the percentage rate will keep falling.

Just a point to think about here. Who has guaranteed us that the state pension is going on ad infinitum? I dont think any of us with more than 15 years to go till we reach retirement age should bank on that. Politicians are already saying that there will be too many retired and not enough paying in for it to continue. God help anyone that is relying solely on the state pension.

At 11:02 on May 18 2008, Kimmerblee said:

Forgot to add, for those of you contracted into the state second pension (what used to be SERPS) and earn over 25k a year, you are going to lose out big time soon.

Where your contributions were accumulated and paid out according to the extra that you paid in according to what you earned, when you come to receive them you will get a blanket flat rate. They are about to "unlink" it when it comes to paying out but not to the amount you pay in.

I raised this with my MP who contacted the minister in charge of work and pensions and he agreed that middle income people paying into the second state pension are going to miss out.

For those of you caught in this trap, take financial advice, check out the work and pension site for further details and then decide if its time to opt out and put your money elsewhere. Dont do it without taking advice though.

At 11:54 on May 18 2008, Montaillac said:

On financial advice I deferred my pension at 60, deciding to take it 65 as I continued working. I opted to take it at start of new tax year, BIG mistake, I was taxed at 20% whereas had I taken it prior to 6 April I would only have been taxed at 10%! My 'foolish' error but I know I would not have saved it even though on a decent salary in higher tax bracket. Lesson to learn, perhaps the bird in the hand is better.

At 13:09 on May 18 2008, gillianswain said:

I forgot to mention that I am 59 years old and self-employed. The tax office who had left me alone all the time I was working decided when I was almost 59 to check into my accounts. I don't have anything to hide from them but I also don't believe that it was accidental that they looked into my affairs just a year or so prior to my retirement age (actually they were wrong in that I may not retire yet). Perhaps I am just being cynical !!! or not?

At 13:50 on May 18 2008, MalcolmS60 said:

My wife has a reduced Pension, which will be increased when I take my Pension. If I deferr taking my pension, she won't be able to take the increased amount until I do take mine. Will her pension also be increased by the same percentage that mine is, or would she be entitled to a Lump Sum Payment if I defer for 12 months, or would the increase in her Pension when I take mine, be the same irrespective of when I take my Pension?
Obviously this could mean that our total Pension Income would actually be less if I defer taking my Pension.

At 09:33 on May 19 2008, Cloudwatcher2 said:

I asked on the Pensions Authority advice line what the benefits of deferment were and was advised that as I was only on an average(?) wage (just shy of £20k) deferring would have no benefit whatsoever, and that it was of more benefit to those in the higher wage brackets. So I went to an indipendent financial adviser before claiming my pension in February 2007 and was told most definitely to steer clear of deferring it! As I am still working I am investing my pension which, even at the current rates, offers a better return than the deferred option. Then on the other hand even if I 'kipper it' my spouse and children will get the FULL benefit of my investments.

At 10:20 on May 19 2008, bosun34 said:

But what if the spouse receives a full pension in their own right? Will they receive the extra?

At 10:22 on May 19 2008, bosun100 said:

But what if the spouse receives a full pension in their own right? They don't receive extra do they?

</