Skip Navigation

Pick This Pension Or Lose Out!

<%=_author %>
By Jane Baker | 6 March 2008

Personal pensions may have fallen out of favour but there is a better way of saving for your retirement.

Traditional personal pensions are increasingly seen as synonymous with high charges and poor performance. That's why a growing number of people are deciding against saving for retirement in the conventional way. Even the stakeholder pension initiative has failed to bring low-cost pensions to the masses.

But I don't think all pension schemes should be tarred with the same brush.

When it comes to choosing a pension you could go beyond traditional schemes and instead take a look at Self-Invested Personal Pensions or what are commonly known as SIPPs. SIPPs may sound more complicated but they operate under the same rules as ordinary pensions. Put simply, they're a do-it-yourself version. For a re-cap of the basics, take a look at Pensions For All The Family.

I'm not saying SIPPs are for everyone. But if you don't have much faith in pension providers to do a decent job on your behalf, why not take control yourself? Here's why I prefer SIPPs over personal pensions:

SIPPs Allow More Investment Freedom

Most personal and stakeholder pension schemes offer a very limited range of managed funds. If the pension company in question doesn't happen to have great fund managers, performance will suffer. The beauty of SIPPs is they can give you access to a huge range of funds from numerous different managers so you can cherry pick the best ones. This usually includes everything from simple trackers to more adventurous emerging markets funds.

What's more, confident investors can directly hold stocks and shares through a SIPP. Many schemes offer the opportunity to invest in more adventurous assets such as unquoted shares, AIM (Alternative Investment Market) listed shares, investment trusts, futures and options and even commercial property. You'll have to pay extra for the privilege, however.

Even if exotic investments aren't your cup of tea, I still think SIPPs are suitable for many of you who want to keep things simple but also want to take control of your own retirement planning.

SIPPs Can Be Cheaper

Once upon a time, SIPPs only really worked for people who were already pretty well off. When SIPPs were launched they, generally charged high flat fees which were only cost effective for those with large pension funds. But thankfully times have changed and the arrival of online and low-cost SIPPs means they are much cheaper now.

Charges are crucial because they can really pull down the performance of your pension. Take a look at these figures based on monthly contributions of £300 assuming annual growth of 7%:

Annual Management Charge

Pension fund value after 25 years

0.5%

£146,408

1.0%

£136,261

1.5%

£126,976

2.0%

£118,475

2.5%

£110,685

Source: Hargreaves Lansdown.

As you can see, even a 0.5% difference in charges can have a huge impact on your fund value. That's why it's so important to take a very close look at the charges on SIPPs. Some schemes remain pretty expensive -- charging several hundred pounds for both set-up and annual fees. This usually applies to full-blown SIPPs so make sure you go for the low-cost version if you don't want to invest in anything racy.

I like the low-cost Vantage SIPP from Hargreaves Lansdown (HL) and the Personal Pension from Fidelity (confusingly it's called the Personal Pension but it's still a SIPP!). SIPPs have been criticised for insisting on high contributions from investors. But this isn't always the case. HL requires a minimum monthly payment of just £50 gross. That's £39 net from you at current tax rates. If you want to invest a single sum you'll need to pay £1,000 gross (£780 net).

Both schemes charge absolutely nothing for set-up and annual administration. What's more, old pension schemes can be transferred into these SIPPs for free. That's a great way of consolidating everything into a single pension pot allowing you to keep track of how your fund is growing more easily.

But don't forget you will have to pay annual management charges (AMC) for the investment funds you choose. That said, HL tells me that around 1,500 of the funds they offer cost exactly the same through the SIPP as they would do outside it. 

Even Cheaper Trackers

Regular readers will know we're advocates of index-tracking funds here at The Fool. I think these can make a good core investment for a SIPP if you're looking for an uncomplicated investment.

Luckily my favourite tracker fund - the Legal & General UK Index Trust - is available at a low cost of 0.51% through the Vantage SIPP. This is exactly the same charge you'd pay if you invested directly with Legal & General. Likewise, the Fidelity Moneybuilder UK Index Fund is available at the same tiny charge of 0.28% through the Fidelity SIPP. 

But the prize for low cost goes to the Vantage SIPP for offering HSBC's FTSE All Share Tracker Index fund at the bargain basement charge of just 0.25%. This is actually 0.75% cheaper than investing directly with HSBC which charges a full 1%! Not surprisingly, the HSBC tracker is found amongst HL's ten most popular SIPP funds.

The Fool's Own Pension

We're so convinced that SIPPs are a better option that we're going to transfer our TMF staff stakeholder pension scheme. Our original plan is no longer competitive on charges and offers just a handful of funds. So we've decided to put our money where our mouth is and upgrade to a low-cost, flexible SIPP. Perhaps you should think about that too...

More: Choosing A Low Cost SIPP | If you fancy moving to a SIPP too why not take a look at The Motley Fool SIPP.

Comments

The opinions expressed here are those of the individual writers and are not representative of The Motley Fool.

At 10:20 on March 07 2008, thriftyjd said:

H-L are good for SIPPS but they charge 0.5% annual admin charge for any instrument which don't pay them renewal commission (some UT/OEIC funds and equities and investment trusts).
It is also debatable whether pensions are worthwhile if you are not a higher rate taxpayer. This will get worse from 6 April when when the basic rate of tax becomes lower. Try saving into ISAs instead; if you eventually move into higher rate tax band you could always then gradually switch funds into pension to get the extra tax relief.

At 08:07 on March 10 2008, PeterDuffy said:

Hi there,

I have a question please?

The L&G UK tracker is the backbone of my HL Sipp, but I'd like to also invest in a low cost tracker that focuses on international markets. Can anyone point me towards a list of some of the more popular low cost international trackers please?

Thank you very much

Kind regards

Peter

At 11:35 on March 10 2008, BritishKnite said:

I'd like to briefly address what thriftyid wrote. I don't think it's as advantageous to to go for an ISA over a pension whether or not you are a low or high income earner. With pensions, you are contributing pre-tax earnings and pay less tax on what's left of your earnings, whereas ISAs are bought with after tax monies. It would stand to reason that you can therefore go a lot further with the pension than with the ISA, for the same product of a tracker, or whatever other same type of fund is available for both. I say this as a like for like comparison of the same base fund used for each. Both do offer some tax benefits within the different vehicles, but ultimately, you do pay tax in one form or other. With pensions in general, you pay tax when you start drawing it, with stocks and shares ISAs you pay tax on income from interest, but cash ISAs are totally tax free. I don't pretend to know how tax is taken with SIPPs, but I guess it depends on what the asset(s) is/are, and at the time when they are used as income. I welcome any comments if I am wrong or misunderstood something. Incidentally, I have a company pension and a stocks and shares tracker ISA.

At 12:07 on March 10 2008, littleneut said:

" I don't pretend to know how tax is taken with SIPPs,"

You get taxed on the income drawn just like any other pension. For a basic rate tax payer this means there is very little in it between isa's and pensions in terms of tax. However with ISA's you maintain control of your capital.

At 17:17 on March 10 2008, AuntieJane said:

FAO PeterDuffy

The L&G UK tracker is the backbone of my HL Sipp, but I'd like to also invest in a low cost tracker that focuses on international markets.

Legal & General do nine different trackers as you can see from this list here:

http://www.legalandgeneral.com/investments/unit-trusts/index-tracking-unit-trust/the-charges.html

I presume HL would offer you access to any of them.

All the best

At 20:57 on March 13 2008, james60163 said:

SIPPS are all very well but you can access a reasonable range of trackers and managed funds through a number of bog-standard personal pensions from well-known insurers. If you buy funds through insurance companies they often offer reduced annual management charges as a result of special deals they have negotiated with fund managers. For a lot of people, a normal personal pension suits them just fine, but it has to be said a cheap SIPP is a great way of accessing ultra-cheap tracking instruments like ETFs, which cover more indices than tracker funds do, as well as the more esoteric managed funds (Neptune Russia, anyone?) With regard to the HL SIPP, just bear in mind that for managed funds, they only reduce the initial charge, not the annual charge, which has a greater impact over time (see table in the article), and they also keep the 0.5% commission that would normally be paid to an adviser for ongoing advice etc, but they don't provide any advice. A better option would be to use a discount broker like Cavendish Online, who rebate all annual commission after £10. I have my ISAs through them on FundsNetwork and get a nice rebate cheque of around £100/year from them.

At 09:05 on April 26 2008, ispy1 said:

I receive a small railway pension £180 p month (which goes straight to tax.) I am 56, standard rate tax payer, and work full time with a small company, I currently have a stakeholder pension £25 a month contributions. I am in need of a rethink, but am very confused. My Wife is self employed and also has the same stakeholder arrangement with Friends Provident.

At 19:38 on April 30 2008, scotsfool100 said:

What an awful muddle it all is. Swings and roundabouts, ups and downs etc etc but people shouldn't have to gamble with their pensions in order to try to accrue funds. Surely we should all be paying into a central Government-controlled fund from which people could draw their pension rather than all this investment "savvy" that we are all supposed to have! If people make the WRONG investment with the WRONG company then they are going to lose out and then what?!
If the Government would kindly stop wasting money on foreign wars and aid etc then they could pay retired people a decent pension and that is how it should be.

Join the conversation

Hello stranger. Please[log in]to comment.

Not yet registered? Register now.

 

Switch to a different topic area

Can't find what you need in Retirement And Pensions? Try one of our other personal finance areas.

Latest stories

Get all the latest news and editorial comment as it's published – check out our Latest Stories

© Copyright 1998-2008, The Motley Fool Limited. All rights reserved. This material is for personal use only.
The Motley Fool, Fool, and the "Fool" logo are registered trademarks of The Motley Fool, Inc.
Place of Reg: England & Wales. Company Reg No: 3736872. VAT Reg No: 735 7818 01. Registered Office: 30 Great Pulteney Street, London W1F 9LT.


USEQ\EQWEB08