Skip Navigation
 

Are 95% Mortgages Next For The Chop?

My latest blog

Halloween Should Be Banned

Published in Mortgages on 7 July 2008

With mortgage lenders cherry-picking borrowers, can you still get a good deal with a small deposit?

UK house prices have fallen 6.9% over the last year, according to Nationwide, and you'd have thought that would be good news for potential first-time buyers as homes should now be more affordable.

But sadly, for wannabe homeowners, while houses are getting cheaper, mortgages are getting more expensive. This week my Foolish colleague, Cliff D’Arcy, mourned the Death Of The 100% Mortgage as the last remaining 100% deal was finally withdrawn. This means no deposit, no mortgage -- simple as that.

We all know the credit crunch has led to far more restrictive lending criteria for mortgage borrowers. In fact, the situation is so dire these days that the best deals are usually reserved for those with a mighty 25% deposit.

It’s a huge challenge for most first-time buyers to build up this kind of cash up-front. So what happens if you only have a 5% deposit? Can you still get a decent mortgage deal then? Take a look at some of the lowest-rate 95% mortgages around at the moment:

Top 95% mortgage deals

Lender

Rate

Mortgage Type

Product Fee

Higher Lending Charge

Nationwide BS

6.34%

Variable rate tracker for 3 years*

£299

£0

Skipton BS

6.45%

Standard variable rate (SVR) mortgage

£799

£0

Halifax

6.94%

Variable rate tracker to 31.08.13

£799

£2,293

Direct Line

6.39%

Fixed to 31.08.10

£499

£2,351

Halifax

6.59%

Fixed to 31.08.13

£299

£2,393

NatWest

6.74%

Fixed to 31.08.10

£999

£2,409

 

Source: Moneyfacts, as at 3 July 2008. *Rate will not fall below 4.09%. Mortgages which are exclusive, i.e. are only for graduates or borrowers in specific regions, have been excluded.

The lowest rates for borrowers with a 25% deposit stand at around 5.75% for variable rate tracker mortgages and 6% for fixed rate mortgages. So -- as the table shows -- there is certainly a premium to pay if you need to borrow 95% of the value of your home.

Thankfully, the rates measure up reasonably well compared with the mortgage market as a whole. Given that, the average rate for a tracker mortgage is around 6.50% and 6.70% for a fixed-rate loan, 95% deals don’t look outrageously expensive, as long as you can get one of the best-buy deals.

And that applies to the product fees too. Since the average fee for all mortgages comes in at around £800 nowadays, 95% loans are often keenly priced too.

Beware of Higher Lending Charges (HLCs)

Unfortunately, adding on a higher lending charge (HLC) makes some of these deals look pricey. What is an HLC? Typically this charge only applies if you need to borrow a high proportion of the value of the property. And with a deposit of just 5%, you could well fall into this category.

The HLC compensates for the extra risk a lender is taking by giving you a mortgage when you only have a small deposit. The fee is often used to buy an insurance policy which protects the lender from financial loss if you default on your repayments.

HLCs usually disappear once you have a 10% deposit or more. But, don’t forget, not all lenders charge an HLC, even if you can’t stump up a larger deposit. 

Where HLCs are applied, expect an unwelcome extra cost of well over £2,000*. Given that the HLC can be pretty hefty, it’s worth looking out for when you weigh-up which deal to take.

Personally, I think HLCs are an unreasonable charge. Since the rates on 95% deals are already higher than say, 75% loans, you are effectively being penalised twice for having a small deposit. So, try to avoid paying the HLC if you can.

Fee-free deals

True, more than half of 95% deals charge an HLC now but it is still possible to get a fee-free home loan (that is, with no product fee or HLC). In fact, if you’re happy to go for a fixed rate, HSBC offer the most competitive fee-free deal, which lasts until 30.09.11. But -- on the downside -- the rate is well above average at 7.39%.

Meanwhile, Nationwide charge just £299 with no HLC, making the lender's mortgage deals pretty low-cost.

Even smaller deposit?

It’s become an endangered species, but there is one remaining 97% deal. For those of you with an even smaller deposit of 3%, Halifax is the last lender willing to stick its neck out by offering a loan of up to 97% of the property price. Fixed rates are between 6.59% and 7.04% until 31.08.13, with a product fee of £299 and an HLC of £2,393.

More often than not, the bigger your deposit, the better your mortgage will be. While it’s still possible to get a 95% mortgage, you will find the rates aren’t quite as competitive. And it's a concern that if the rates continue to climb, 95% loans will become too expensive for many first-timers.

Above all, it’s important to sign up to a mortgage deal that’s comfortably affordable for you. Over-stretching your budget to get on the property ladder isn't Foolish.

If the figures don’t add up, it may be a smart move to put off buying for now and save hard to boost your deposit. Who knows, in that time, house prices may have fallen even further, making dreams of owning your own home a reality.

If you need advice on choosing the right mortgage, speak to one of the brokers at The Motley Fool Mortgage Service .

*Based on a mortgage of £156,750 - 95% of £165,000 purchase price.

More: Watch Out For This Fee | Why Longer Fixed Rate Mortgages Makes Sense

Share & subscribe

Comments

The opinions expressed here are those of the individual writers and are not representative of The Motley Fool. If you spot any comments that are unsuitable hit the flag to alert our moderators.

caffeinhigh 07 Jul 2008, 6:58pm

It's interesting to see that there is still a 97% mortgage and a choice of 95% mortgages, though actually getting one of these is probably impossible without a low salary to value ratio.

The best advice is to wait for a few years while house prices continue to fall. Save up a larger deposit in the meantime, then you will get a lot more for your money and a lot less stress!

Hitman101 08 Jul 2008, 7:51am

It's interesting how these Building Societies seem somehow to have no need for the HLC.
I wonder in years gone by in previous downturns and recessions whether these charges and the cost of getting a mortgage were quite so high! Perhaps the rates were higher and fees lower. I think that the Banks are just using these downturn as an excuse to extort money out of money up front. At the end of the day, Banks are also vetting people more carefully before agreeing a mortgage so only exceptional circumstances (long term) will create a problem. Also it is usually the case that in the case of a default, banks will repossess the property. I would not be suprised then that it is relatively easy for them to recover their money within a few months since they will not make any particular effort to get the market value or above, and return the excess to the former occupant - In fact does the displaced occupany get a penny back?

Healosh 08 Jul 2008, 9:20am

A quick question for anyone who may know more than me... I have a £250k 100% interest only mortgage that I took out in January. Not the end of the world as our property is in a relatively growing area (Brockley - SE4 - very close to East London Line tube extension in 2010) and we've done quite a lot of cosmetic improvement to it since moving in.

Our mortgage runs out in Nov 2010 where I'm hoping the value of our property will have increased to 265k.

Will 95% mortgages be available for people re-mortgaging like me?

Healosh 08 Jul 2008, 9:20am

Make that 2009!

GRUMPYGRANDDAD 08 Jul 2008, 9:51am

The credit crunch is bad enough and brought about because of financial institutions' profligate spending not borrowers extravagent borrowing. 100% mortgages were brought in in the first place to stimulate the economy and taking them away has simply taken everyone back to square one but only worse because property values have been knocked back. Not good economics I think. Thank the banks for the credit crunch and the coming recession!

downaswellasup 08 Jul 2008, 10:11am

GrumpyGranddad

100% mortgages were not brought in to "stimulate the economy". Banks introduced them while they considered the risk to be acceptable in order to acquire new customers (and make a profit).

Now the risk is not considered acceptable (due to falling property prices) they have been withdrawn. Simple as that. If price falls pick up momentum I think we can expect to see 95% mortgages disappear too. Of course this too will drive prices lower still.

Eventually the market will hit the bottom (who knows when or where) and the prices will start to rise again (without being "stimulated" 100% mortgages) of course once house prices have risen consistently for a while everyone will forget that they can ever go down. People will be willing to payer higher and higher prices just to get on the property ladder, banks will loosen their lending criteria and increase there LTV and the chancellor of the time will declare an end to boom and bust and for a decade or more we will borrow and spend and of course house prices will never come down ......

ufo22jim 08 Jul 2008, 10:15am

Healosh, I suspect you will find it very difficult to switch lenders and borrow £250K in November 2009. The experts are saying average house prices could drop another 10% between now and then. Even if house prices stayed the same and your house was still worth £250K (which is the magic figure before the stamp duty ramps up from £2.5K to £7.5K), no new lender is likely to want to lend 100%. This means you will be tied to your current lender and the rate will revert to their SVR (probably over 7%). This is your best case scenario - if you try to apply for another deal and they carry out a valuation and see you have no equity or negative equity they could even withdraw their mortgage, although they are unlikely to do this as long as you continue to keep up with the loan repayments.

daydrea 08 Jul 2008, 10:36am

The thing that really gets on my t*ts is that those who have borrowed sensibly will be penalised for the lending and borrowing behaviours of others.

Banks need to make a reasonable profit by completing less transactions. Compounded by the fact that repossessions will increase as individuals find themselves trapped in negative equity. The banks even though they are insured for this are increasing there rates to compensate.

It is similar to shops making allowance for stolen stock. Those of us who pay and budget end up paying for the losses if the banks and those who have lossed out in the housing market.

I dont blame people who have landed in negative equity. It is not a pleasant place to be in, the feeling of being trapped. I considered handing keys back in the early nineties when my property had dropped by 40%. Maybe i should have like many others.

My hope is that the banks do not fuel a boom situation agian by making funds readily and easily available when the property market starts rising again. However i am sceptical that they will change there ways as competition will become fierce and offers will be in abundance.

Oh well may i take this opportunity to wish everyone a happy recession. Dig deep it will work out in the end.

mickgjames 08 Jul 2008, 11:01am

Reports of the "death" of high LTV, 100% or even 100%+ mortgages are exaggerated. At some point in the future the banks will need to start rebuilding market share and attract mortgage customers without quibbling over deposits and arrangement fees. There may be a few years of "never again" but anyone who thinks the banks will learn from history has learned nothing from history themselves.

soomark 08 Jul 2008, 11:44am

Healosh, I thought you might be interested in my experience of living in Brockley SE4, where I was born in 1959. I bought my first flat (Breakspears Rd) for £32,000 in 1986. Value in 1989 £85,000. Sold in 1993 for £59,500. In those days there there was talk of the DLR extension improving the area and keping prices up - it never works that way! On the plus side Brockley is a nice place to live, and I have fond memories.

fenemore 08 Jul 2008, 12:05pm

I don't understand what all the fuss is about - falling house prices are to be welcomed and embraced for it will allow new buyers into the market. Negative equity for those who purchased at the height of the boom, is only a problem if they need to move. Your repayments don't alter just because your property is now worth less. If you simply have to move (for your job etc), then at least the property you buy will probably have dropped in value by the same percentage!

A house is first and foremost a home. Having a roof over your family's heads should be the only consideration. Just about everything else you purchase in life will fall in value as it ages. I see people spend £30k on a new SUV which will devalue the moment it is driven out of the showroom, and will continue to do so every day - without complaint. Yet those same people squeal if their house value goes
down!
I really do wonder about people's priorities?

Healosh 08 Jul 2008, 2:55pm

Thanks for your input guys. I think I might just dig my head in the sand for a while..!
soomark, nice to see another Brockley-ite. We're very close to the station so I'm hoping it will make a difference in the end, bearing in mind how much easier it will be to get to Canary Wharf etc by then, and how much more recognisable a place beomes once its on the tube map. But that's another discussion and debate...

Healosh 08 Jul 2008, 4:14pm

Fenemore - the trouble is, in my potential case, negative equity when people need to remortgage. Fair enough, you might not need to move, but mortgage brokers and financial advisors were still forecasting minimal growth up to about 10 months ago, so a lot of people (me included) were more interested in the fixed rate offer thinking they'd be able to secure a better deal 2 years or so later when that deal ran out and there was more equity in the property. I MAY be staring down the barrel of a gun...

biteyseal 08 Jul 2008, 6:14pm

HSBC are doing a 2 year discounted rate of 5.69% for just £249 product fee and free legals and valuation for remortgages. This is the best deal I've seen on the current market. In 2 years hopefully the interbank liquidity problems will have sorted itself out!

This isn't offered by IFAs as you can only get it direct from HSBC.

Whoyoufooling 08 Jul 2008, 6:32pm

nhhhhnnnnmmnjjj

Whoyoufooling 08 Jul 2008, 6:33pm

bbnhjjjkuimjn

Whoyoufooling 08 Jul 2008, 6:35pm

lemajbggbnhhyyy665rrdgklmjnbv c c cvvbbhnjnkkjjjjbnnbnbbnhbbbbbbvbvvcbgvvgvvvvvvvvmkkllllkkkkjjkjjjjm

Whoyoufooling 08 Jul 2008, 6:41pm

Please excuse the above...never leave a three year old unattended on a computer!

burchp 08 Jul 2008, 8:00pm

I think I agree with whoyoufooling's first three comments!! I suspect that healosh will be able to continue with your present lender when the present deal expires. The interest rate might not be competitive or palatable but if you can afford to keep making the payments you can wait for an improvement in economic fortunes to bring along another bought of affordable mortgage deals. Conversly, sell now.

fenemore 10 Jul 2008, 9:42pm

Healosh - try as I might, I find it difficult to be sympathetic. You talk of "deals" & "remortgaging" which I admit seems to be the borrowerspeak of today - and "Financial Advisors forecasts". The latter being at the heart of the problem. Advisors are not in the business of talking the economy down - they are not going to vote for hunger. If offered advice was based on "reality", they would quickly go out of business. So it is up to YOU to do your own research and make up your own mind - for the moment you listen to an "advisor" you are no longer in control - all is lost!

The internet is a useful research tool - sign up for non subscription financial newsletters and you will find a whole wealth of impartial information from acredited sources. They are not trying to sell you anything and have no vested interest. A measure of a good source is when the big financial institutions use the courts to close down their websites - which so far they have failed to do. Expressing an opinion of any instution has yet to become a crime. Given Brown's penchant for total control, it may one day happen.

Going back to your original problem - my advice is to avoid fix-term "teaser" rates and go for a simple variable rate repayment mortgage and set about paying for your home over the full term. I did this in 1982 - refusing point blank to take out an endowment mortgage (which really did upset the bank manager). In the late 80's rates reached 15% - yes it was painful - but when the rates came back down, I did not reduce my repayments accordingly, but left them at the height they had reached (having gotten used to it) result, I knocked 8 years off my mortgage term.

Mortgages are now history for me - but I went through far more pain than the current complainants - and survived! You can too...

biteyseal 11 Jul 2008, 10:42am

Hi fenemore, what are these non subscription financial newsletters I can sign up for? Please can you suggest some links?

Thanks!

fenemore 11 Jul 2008, 11:58pm

Hi biteyseal,

I can recommend 2 newsletters, Fleet Street Daily at...
http://www.fspinvest.co.uk/free-e-letters/fleet-street-daily.html click on the Subscribe hotspot

and Money Morning at...
http://www.moneyweek.com/ click on yellow MoneyWeek signup banner at top of page

...both of them send out a daily newsletter, and they tell it like it is, not how the Financial Services sector would have us believe!

Enjoy

frankletank 24 Jul 2008, 1:06pm

Back to who's responsible for kick-starting the economy, it should be the government not the banks. It's not good business to move your operation from banking into charity, which is what would be happening if the banks were to stick their necks out to keep any countries economy going. The government should be giving incentives such as first home owner grants to help people to get onto the property ladder. Like they have done in Australia for years, $AUD 7,000 is available to any first time borrower so long as it remains their primary place of residence for 3 years. It would work here in the UK and put confidence back into the housing market.

https://www.mortgagechoice.com.au/buying-first-home/first-home-buyer-faqs.aspx

Join the conversation

Instructions

Line breaks are converted automatically.

You may use the following tags in your post: <b>bold</b>, <i>quoted text</i>. All other tags will be removed from your post.

Hello stranger

To add your own comment, please login.

Not yet registered? Register now.