Skip Navigation

Five Tips For Struggling First Time Buyers

<%=this._contentDocument.Byline%>
By Jane Baker | 28 April 2008

House prices are still falling. Today Hometrack reported prices fell again in April for the seventh month in a row. First time buyers up and down the country should be celebrating, but getting on the property ladder hasn't got any easier.

Unfortunately for first time buyers 100% mortgages are now a thing of the past, as banks tighten up their lending criteria in the wake of the credit crunch. It's no longer possible to get a mortgage without a deposit making it even harder to buy your first home.

To get a shot at a decent mortgage deal, you'll need a deposit of at least 5% these days. And if the current lending conditions worsen, you could find that you'll need even more.

Perhaps you have been saving as hard as you can only for the goal posts to be moved at the last minute. But even if your deposit is still looking pretty meagre despite months of squirreling money away, you don't necessarily have to kiss buying a home goodbye.

Take a look at these five tips for buying a home sooner rather than later:

1. Can The Bank Of Mum And Dad help?

This won't be possible for everyone but are your parents or other family members willing to help you financially? A bigger deposit means a better deal and therefore a cheaper mortgage. It's still possible to get a decent home loan if you have a 5% deposit, but the more you can put down, the better.

2. Get a legal agreement

If your parents can to help, it makes sense to draw up a formal agreement to give them more security. Let's say your parents lend you a 10% deposit which enables you to buy a home with your partner, but later you split up and the property is sold. Normally, after the mortgage has been paid any proceeds which remain would be divided between you and your ex-partner.

This means your parents risk losing the money they lent you. So to protect them, draw up an agreement where once the mortgage loan has been paid off your parent's loan has priority. This is before any cash is made available to you and your former partner.

This isn't a decision to be taken lightly by your parents. If house prices continue to slide, homes bought now could be at risk of falling into negative equity (where your home is worth less than the outstanding mortgage). In this case there may be no money left to repay your parent's loan if you have to sell up.

Most importantly, make sure you and your parents take legal advice and get any agreement drawn up by a solicitor.

3. Ask your parents to act as a guarantor

If you don't wish to ask for cash directly or your parents aren't able to stump up for a deposit on your behalf, perhaps they might consider acting as a guarantor for your mortgage. Lenders may be willing to lend you more and accept a lower deposit, because they are able take your parents' income into account too.

Crucially, your parents will become responsible for the mortgage if you are default on your repayments.

There are other implications to think about too. Your parent's home isn't directly at risk, but as a guarantor for you, it may restrict their ability to borrow themselves in the future. If they wish to remortgage their own property later on, their capacity to borrow will be affected if they are guarantors for you.

Your parents shouldn't do anything which would undermine their own financial security.

If your family aren't able to help you financially, there are still things you can do:

4. Temporarily  move back home

I know it's hard to go back if you have already flown the nest, but it's a good way to build up your savings fast by drastically cutting back your outgoings. Just imagine all that money in your savings account rather than a landlord's pocket.

5. Temporarily  take a second job

Before you baulk at the idea, think of it as a means to an end. You'll quickly build up a deposit by saving all the income you earn from a second job in a high interest savings account. This may not be possible if you already work long or irregular hours. But assuming your current employer is happy about it, and you have some free time, there's an opportunity to boost your deposit.

If you're really determined to buy a home without a deposit, you may be tempted to divide your loan between lenders. In other words, borrow to fund your deposit from one company while arranging a mortgage with another.

However, I really wouldn't advise doing this. If you have to resort to these measures your finances probably aren't ready for a mortgage. Plus affording both sources of borrowing could be a heavy burden for you and it won't go down too well with lenders either.

If you're really anxious to buy a home but the numbers just don't add up, your best option may be to hold off for a while and save as much as you can while you're waiting. This could turn out to be a far better strategy if house prices fall even further.

More: First Time Buyers Put Off Purchasing | Choose a great savings account to build up your deposit at The Motley Fool Savings Centre | Don't forget The Motley Fool Mortgage Service when you buy your first home.

Comments

The opinions expressed here are those of the individual writers and are not representative of The Motley Fool.

At 19:25 on April 28 2008, bond000 said:

Funny that 4 out of 5 of these tips rely on parents - shows the change in our society really. My parents were able to buy land and build their own house with no financial help from their parents, on one (initially low) income whilst raising 2 (later 3) kids.

And this was just 30 years ago!

How we first-time buyers are supposed to get 'on the ladder' these days is beyond me - and what of the next generation; will our kids stand any chance at all or will they depend on us even more?

At 21:02 on April 28 2008, Superskuller said:

Pretty irresponsible advice from the Fool considering David Kuo has predicted a 20% drop in house prices this year.

A bit like saying, "Hey, First Time Buyers; why not stretch yourself to buy into a falling asset class?".

Alternatively, save your deposit and wait 18 months and buy the same place at a realistic price instead.

At 22:55 on April 28 2008, Raasu said:

Here's my tip for first time buyers: wait until next year!

At 23:03 on April 28 2008, lathamd said:

Ive just managed to get on the Housing ladder,but that was through a company helping low income earners. I live in Devon - apparently the lowest income earners, and the highest house prices.
Although you have to register with local authority, and Home2Own, it can help, although I havent started paying the mortage yet!!

At 07:49 on April 29 2008, scotsman69 said:

Their is no guarantee where property prices are headed in the next 18 months. Who's to say if property prices fall in the next 12-18 months or not. Surely its better advice to take advantage of the buyers market we are in just now to find a property from a motivated seller and get it below market value, thus automatically giving you a cushion against any potential correction in the house prices.

At 09:07 on April 29 2008, DynamoHill said:

I would agree with scotsman69 - but only with a discount of 15% off market value which would be 20-25% off asking price [depending on how over blown it was originally]. Houses are TOO EXPENSIVE relative to earnings. The only reason they got that expensive wasn't primarily due to 'demand' or 'shortage of supply' but the huge splurge of cheap credit - that has gone for ever.

At 09:57 on April 29 2008, JointEquity said:

This a difficult one to call. If we only consider homes as assets then you do need to wait, however, that ignores the utility benefit of your own home.

Joint Equity recently conducted a very unscientific survey, I admit, of its Owner Partners and found that the biggest benefit of having your own home is not having a landlord “breathing down your neck”. And I remember this being my key driver when we bought our first home.

Also remember that property prices need to be considered over a longer term. A drop today compared to last year is just a smaller growth from 5 years ago.

Finally there is nothing wrong with parents helping their children if they can, it’s the First Time Buyers that cannot get parents help that we need to think about.

At 10:04 on April 29 2008, DianeCossie said:

I must say I am rather disappointed with this article on Fool today, I follow MF very closely in my line of work and it looks like you have run out of good advice. The UK used to be a nation of home owners, it is rapidly changing. Over the past ten years the spare income per person has dropped rapidly through the increased use of credit card borrowings. If the current generation is struggling with the increasingly high cost of living, what hope have the next ones got? What is required is a swift and serious introduction of financial education into schooling. It is the most expensive time to be alive in history and we have never as a nation been more unprepared.

At 10:07 on April 29 2008, Zweiblumen said:

Bond000, you are right, this is basically "beg it off the parents" advice. However, is this really surprising? After all, that is the generation that has made undreamt-of capital gains on their homes, which is precisely the reason that younger people struggle to buy!

At 10:20 on April 29 2008, Yukimaru said:

"How we first-time buyers are supposed to get 'on the ladder' these days is beyond me"

Save for a deposit. The culture of 100% mortgages is over and first-time buyers need to learn these are not the norm. 10% is hard but not impossible. Everyone in every decade had to scrimp for their deposit. Recent generations expect it to be easier.

At 11:15 on April 29 2008, sstudent said:

As much as I normally agree with most of the advice on this site I'm afraid I would be totally against asking parents to stump up a large part of my depsoit & most certainly NOT to stand gurantor! That for me is a very irresponsible thing to do

Sorry Jane but that is not a good suggestion at all. My feeling is simply to keep saving & increasing that deposit. The problem is also that people get too obsessed with buying, yes we all want our own home but not at the cost of mortgaging to the hilt or have someone else guarantoring such a huge amount of money!

At 13:39 on April 29 2008, soconnel said:

Pretty irresponsible advice from the Fool considering David Kuo has predicted a 20% drop in house prices this year

What absolute drivel! What evidence supports this? If you take the government published data from the biggest crash in history to date it was a drop of 3.5 per cent. Hardly worth bothering about when you consider that historically property doubles every 8/9 years at most.

First time buyers - save for a deposit! Yes - you'll have to forego the foreign holidays, the flash car, the take-aways and going out all the time but we've all done it. Also, be realistic about what you can afford to buy - you may want a 3 bed house but can only afford a 1 bed flat. Try using second hand shops to furnish your property and replace as and when you can afford it. It is not compulsory to have a DVD, CD, HD TV etc with Sky so cut your cloth accordingly.

At 14:31 on April 29 2008, Strebor19 said:

House prices may dip a little in the coming few years, but it is better to buy now as you can strike a good deal and pick the best property available in the best area, which is difficult to do in a rising market. So my advice is buy now if it is a home for the long term you are after. There are many ways to get on the ladder for the first time, and there are opposing comments made in the above posts none of which are wrong. However I would recommend buying the biggest property you can, so you can grow into it if needed (In the long run it will save you a small fortune and stress of having to move again). In my case after Divorcing and the Ex getting everything, I started again by getting a 95% Mortgage and at the last minute got the remaining Deposit via a personal loan. I purchased a 3 Bed House that no way I could afford on paper (CSA's and the likes to pay), but as soon as I moved in I let out the two spare rooms to two lodgers for a few years (which was a lot easier than I ever thought), there rents (£600 a month easy money) just about covered the Mortgage payments, so I could clear the personal loan and make a dent into the outstanding Mortgage. Seven years on it was the best thing I ever did and I have a substacial equity stake and no need to move House (or have lodgers anymore).If I had bought the affordable 1 bed flat I could not of taken in lodgers, and would have needed to move house at a cost of about £10000 which would be reflected in my equity now and a bigger Mortgage. Side issue, Stroke of luck (or MotleyFool advice!) I remorgaged just before Xmas to a Base rate Tracker +0.48%, and have seen 3 rate cuts passed on immediatly saving me over £100 per month ... which is very welcome to cover all the other increases going on at the moment. Anyway the point is, where there is a will and some lateral thinking, and a good deal of hard work and doing without it is acheivable. Just do it.

At 15:48 on April 29 2008, Kinkygirlinky said:

Forget about moving back with Mum & Dad (what a bore) rent from someone who is using the rent a room scheme...more homeowners should be doing this now that finances are so tight. If you are house trained, this is an ideal option as the rent should be fairly cheap. Get an evening job for 2/3 eves a week, this keeps you from spending money and helps you to save for a deposit. I saved for my first deposit this way.

My 30 something brother has just done the same.

At 16:00 on April 29 2008, DavidM31 said:

soconnel: This is very good advice,and its what my parents told me 30 years ago.

"First time buyers - save,save and save for a deposit! Yes - you'll have to forego the foreign holidays, the flash car, the take-aways and going out all the time but we've all done it. Also, be realistic about what you can afford to buy - you may want a 3 bed house but can only afford a 1 bed flat. Try using second hand shops to furnish your property and replace as and when you can afford it. It is not compulsory to have a DVD, CD, HD TV etc with Sky so cut your cloth accordingly "

Half the fun was having to make do for a few years, unfortunately the 18-30's these days want everything and all at the same time.

If you smoke stop immediately, if you drink restrict yourself severely,if you both have a car consider getting rid of one of them.

Just accept that a lot of sacrifices have to be made if you really want to get on the property ladder or even rent a place.

Unless your parents are super-rich don't expect them to help you raise the funds or act as guarantor, rather stay living at home for longer and keep saving. You will get there in the end and you will have learnt how to manage money by waiting.

At 16:44 on April 29 2008, Sorbicol said:

If you can all stop assuming that all first time buyers are out on the lash all the time and buying flash cars, etc then this would help the debate a long quite a bit. To be blunt, when most of you where saving your 10% deposit, this probably amounted to £5000-6000 (this was the amount my brother paid in 1999 when he bought his first house) Where I live in the South East, these days a 10% for a reasonable property is more in the region of £20000-25000! Massively disproprotionate to the 10% deposits of old. My partner and I both work very hard and have recent looked at getting a place of our own, and many for the lenders we went to were quoting deposits of 15-20% or incurring a penalty interest rate on the mortgage. While we can probably scrape a 10% deposit together (We're both in our 30s now) a 20% deposit is well beyond us and any help from our parents.
At every level these days first time buyers are on a hiding to nothing - house prices are massively out of step with wages and the cost of living, and it's going to leave a lot of people left out in the cold. You'll all be laughing on the other sides of your faces when it's you kids coming looking to you for 10% deposits in the future.

At 19:07 on April 29 2008, killickbecki said:

I'm in the process of buying my first house and have found it hard. Strangely even though me and my partner are currently earning almost £30k a year as PhD students, with excellent job prospects afterwards (science subjects) no bank would lend us any money. As we didn't fancy wasting 3 1/2 years paying a landlord we asked our parents to act as guarantors. Luckily they agreed, but only after we had showed them all the calculations to show we could afford the house.
We were fortunate enough to have been able to save our student loans through our undergraduate degrees by living off what we earned. Now we have a 22% deposit and should be able to re-mortgage when we get "proper" jobs so that our parents are no longer guarantors.

I'm glad the 100% mortgages have gone as it should teach people these days that they have to save for something they want. I just wish that they would consider individual circumstances more than just the figures / criteria they see infront of them.

At 19:25 on April 29 2008, operabunny said:

I'm a thirty-something teacher. I don't have foreign holidays, a fast car or a smoking habit. I don't go out that often (I'm usually in working). I can just about afford the rent on my small 1 bed flat which is in the cheapest area within reach of my school. It doesn't leave much for saving, though. The cost of everything is rising massively. There are no key worker schemes in my area. My parents are retired and not wealthy, so I'm not begging from them. I work until 11pm-midnight as it is, so no, a second job is not an option.
Those people lucky enough to be homeowners should get off their high horses and realise that there is a REAL problem. The difficulties in the property market are now driving the rents sky high making it hard for a lot of people to even keep a roof over their heads, let alone own that roof!
Emigration is looking attractive - oh, and my degree in maths and my teaching qualification and experience would be coming with me. So, before you start sermonising at would be f.t.b.s, ask yourself whether you want your children (or future professionals like doctors) to be educated by unqualified people who are not specialists in their subject. Because the combination of unobtainable housing, rising costs and low pay rises is driving many to look at other countries where they can earn more and be provided with FREE housing.

At 00:00 on April 30 2008, bodwod said:

I find these sort of comments fascinating. Many of these people ranting about first time buyers, and how they need to stop overspending are a little out of touch to say the least. As has already been pointed out, house prices have gone mad, while inflation (which doesn't include house prices) linked pay has climbed slowly. So the £60,000 house that you could buy a decade ago is now "worth" more than twice that, whilst wages have risen at a much slower rate.

As a matter of interest, it seems that by and large, the people who have benefitted most from the house price boom are over the age of 35, who co-incidentally, recieved a FREE university education, cheaper housing, and will recieve a state pension. Oh, and now own all the "buy to let" properties, so would not mind awfully if we youngsters were unable to get on the housing ladder and had to rent from them for a few years.

I'm 23, and after 5 years of medical school, £40,000 of student loan debt, and a lot of hard work, I don't think its unreasonable that I should be able to purchase a home. I may have to scrimp, I may have to save, but it should be possible, right? Seems I was born 20 years too late...

At 10:57 on April 30 2008, finch0 said:

bodwod, I can see the awful position University leavers are in these days. Most first time buyers who are struggling to get on the ladder are now in their late 20's and early 30's. How is someone leaving University now with £1000's of debt ever going to buy a house?

I'm 10 years older and still we've struggled - we're just buying a house now (well, a flat). We have been lucky enough for my mother to give us some money for a deposit, very lucky indeed. But before this we have scrimped and saved, run only one car, had holidays at parent's houses or cheap city breaks in the winter (don't go to Prague in January without your snow boots!). We are both on fair wages, maybe many people our age earn more, and still we could not come up with a 10% deposit due to rent, spiralling council tax, high water rates, fuel costs (we're forced to rent a cheap house with no insulation). We don't even owe money anywhere else, no credit card or student loans.

So yes - saving is one thing but not many people can afford to do it!

At 17:27 on April 30 2008, peediekate said:

DianeCossie is so right. Education about finances at a younger age is vitally important. If you show any ability at school the only advice you get is 'go to university and get a degree' what those people don't seem to realise is that degrees don't mean what they used to. They no longer guarantee a job offer at the end. If I had known back then that all a degree would give me is debt and four years of lost earnings, I would have got a job straight out of school and would probably own my own house by now rather than being almost 25, a teetotal, non-smoker who is very careful with money but still struggling to save a deposit. (Whilst working two low paid jobs, one to gain the experience that my degree didn't provide and another that is the only one flexible enough to fit around the first.)

At 13:02 on May 01 2008, spuddytat35 said:

Come on guys, just because people cant save a deposit together or dont want to wait the 3-5 years to do so or even 10 years doesnt mean they cant afford 100% mortgages....I got onto the housing ladder with a 125% mortgage which i used to purchase a run down property and do up and had no problem because...guess what....I could afford the repayments. This is the key!! The banks need to get smarter and see what people can actually afford, not just now but in 5 and 10 years when other factors may kick in (kids etc). Also my house was in the north of scotland which i now rent out but would have no impact on buying down in the south of England and the bit i did make wouldnt provide much of a deposit but i ask myself on a regular basis when i feel under pressure to buy.....why??? All thats going to happen when im old and i have slogged my guts out to purchase my own house for 25 years, is it will get old and sick and the house will be sold from underneath me to pay for my care......why are we so hell bent on mortgaging our lives away in this case....At the very least point this out to bank of mum and dad, you pay their repayments for them (it will be far cheaper!!) and ask them to help you.....they cant take it with them after all(callous i know but true!!). My gran has recently moved in with my mum so they can both have fun spending her inheritance with the little time they have together, this has enabled my mum to retire 4 years early which im happy about too. i will buy again probably at the unfortunate expense of others who have been too willing to supplement and encourage this over inflated housing market....If house sellers got smart they could offer to pay the deposit for buyers and so could the housebuilders........this frequently happens in scotland when people want to sell.

At 16:53 on May 01 2008, brummie3 said:

I agree with bodwod and other's similar comments above - my parents were working class, struggled hard but still could afford their own home - I have a PhD and two well paid jobs (a day job and I lecture in the evenings) but now have to live, in one room with our young baby, with my in-laws whilst we try and raise something near to the £25000 deposit you need to afford a 2 bedroom flat in London . . . how we are going to afford the payments on a mortgage once we find a place plus the childcare fees of £60 per day I'm not sure . . . it seems to me that something needs to be done for (not so young!) professionals like us who don't qualify as 'key workers' but still have some apparently impossible financial hills to climb before we can get a home of our own . . .

Join the conversation

Hello stranger. Please[log in]to comment.

Not yet registered? Register now.

 
Search by tag