Skip Navigation

Half Of Home Loans Are History

<%=_author %>
By Cliff D'Arcy | 25 March 2008

I have grim news for homeowners and those looking to leap onto the property ladder. The worldwide credit crunch which began last summer has made banks very nervous and wary. Banks are no longer willing to lend to anyone with a pulse or anyone who can fill in a mortgage application, at least.

Lenders are going back to their roots by taking on borrowers who are sure to be a good risk. Therefore, the glory days of reckless lending and booming house prices are dead and buried!

How bad could it be?

For the record, there are around 11.8 million mortgages outstanding in the UK. Let's say that the credit crunch makes life difficult for just a quarter (25%) of mortgage borrowers. This means that around four million homeowners may find it tough to arrange a new mortgage when they decide to buy, move or remortgage. Ouch!

Alas, even after nine months of credit crises, there seems to be no end in sight. In fact, the problems in the mortgage market seem to be getting worse, not better. Here are a few brief reasons why homeowners should continue to be worried:

Thousands of deals have vanished

The number of mortgages on offer has plunged since last August. Seven months ago, borrowers could choose from nearly 13,000 different mortgages. Today, this figure has more than halved, with around 6,200 deals available. Thus, more than half of all home loans have vanished, so we're no longer spoilt for choice.

Rate cuts aren't working

The Bank of England cut its base rate by a quarter-point in December and February, reducing it to 5.25% a year. Alas, thanks to the credit crunch, this has had little or no effect on mortgage rates.

Indeed, for many people, effective mortgage costs are rising, not falling. This is because of a widening gap between the base rate and LIBOR, the London Interbank Offered Rate. For example, many tracker mortgages are linked to LIBOR, which is why they have become more expensive of late.

Competitive deals are swiftly pulled

With fewer home loans on offer, providers of Best Buy mortgages are being swamped with applications. Hence, some deals are being withdrawn at next to no notice. Earlier this month, some brokers were given just ten minutes' notice before Scottish Widows withdrew most of its mortgages.

Some lenders have pulled out completely

Some lenders (particularly specialist lenders) have closed down completely, because they cannot raise financing at reasonable rates. Others are restricting their lending to certain groups of individuals. For example, three small building societies last week announced that, due to a stampede of borrowers, they will lend only to local people for the time being.

Surveyors are being cautious, too

Last month, The Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors reported the worst decline in house valuations since mid-1990.

Clearly, surveyors are worried about future house prices, leading many to reduce valuations. Some homeowners are finding it impossible to remortgage or move lender, because their property's value has come down since they last arranged a mortgage. Thus, reduced valuations are set to become another thorn in the housing market's side.

These risky deals have disappeared

As lenders rediscover the relationship between risk and reward, some borrowers are being left in the lurch. If you fall into one or more of the following categories, then it will be tough to get a mortgage without paying a high price:

1.    No-deposit/100% mortgages: It used to be the case that homebuyers with no deposit had no trouble getting a 100% mortgage. These days, only two players remain: Abbey and Bank of Ireland. So, if you want to buy a home, you must first save up a deposit of 5% to 10% of the purchase price. For the very lowest rates, a deposit of 25% to 40% is required!

2.    'Negative equity' mortgages: In the boom times, lenders would lend you the entire purchase price of your property, plus an extra sum on top. No longer. Good riddance to bad rubbish!

3.    Self-certification: These so-called ‘liar loans' have been used by desperate or unscrupulous buyers and brokers to get substandard borrowers onto the property ladder. By inflating their incomes, buyers were able to borrow much more than they should have. This market is almost as dead as a dodo, which could prove a problem for self-employed borrowers and those on irregular incomes.

4.    High multiples of income: Before the crunch, borrowers could stretch themselves to the limit by borrowing six to seven times their income. In this new world, lenders are reluctant to lend more than five times income to even the very best borrowers.

5.    Subprime mortgages: In the good old days, lenders queued up to lend to those borrowers with stains on their credit records. Now the subprime market is in meltdown, with rates soaring and lenders leaving in droves. Indeed, seven out of ten subprime mortgages no longer exist. What's more, even a single missed payment could see you turned away by mainstream lenders and cast adrift on the subprime seas!

6.    Buy-to-let loans: The wheels are set to come off the buy-to-let bandwagon as lenders withdraw from this market, demand higher deposits, hike their interest rates, or charge much higher fees for these loans. For amateur landlords, getting a BTL mortgage is much harder, as lenders insist that rents must be 25% to 30% higher than mortgage payments. In today's overpriced housing market, this is a tough call.

Northern Rock RIP

In the first half of 2007, Northern Rock ruled supreme over the mortgage market, capturing almost a fifth (19%) of all new lending. Today, the building-society-turned-bank lies in ruins, having been nationalised in order to prevent its collapse. Indeed, as the Rock must shrink its bloated mortgage book, it now offers massively uncompetitive interest rates.

What's more, the UK's fifth-biggest mortgage lender is desperately trying to ditch its existing borrowers. As customers' special-rate mortgages come to an end, Rock is urging them to remortgage elsewhere. Several readers have shown these letters to me and asked for my advice. I say abandon the Rock if you can, or face a huge hike in your monthly repayments!

My final thoughts

For several years, I've warned that the twin bubbles in housing and lending put British borrowers at great risk. Now that the housing market is turning and the mortgage market is in meltdown, I get no pleasure from saying "I told you so".

The latest data from the US (the S&P/Case-Shiller index) shows that US home prices have dived more than a tenth (10.7%) in the past twelve months. Given that Britain's booms have been that much bigger, I fear for today's overstretched borrowers. Hence, I'd urge you to hope for the best, but prepare for the worst!

Lastly, if you need a new mortgage or have a special-rate deal which expires this year, then be sure to plan months ahead in order to avoid the worst of the mortgage massacre. By using a whole-of-market mortgage broker, such as our award-winning mortgage service, you can be sure of finding the best deals!

More: Search the market for magnificent mortgages | How Much Will Your Mortgage Cost? | Is Your Endowment A Letdown?

Comments

The opinions expressed here are those of the individual writers and are not representative of The Motley Fool.

At 18:45 on March 25 2008, sbaker9281 said:

Hi, just going back to the northern rock crisis. My deal comes to an end in May next year and as im new on the housing market (2 yrs may 09)i just wondered where this leaves me and what actions can i reasonably take? The problem is my mortgage has a 90% LTV at the moment but i took out an extra unsecured loan linked to the mortgage where i pay the same rate. The problem comes when i shift lenders and if i leave the loan behind with northern rock. the paperwork says that i will be charged SVR +8%. What can i do?

At 08:56 on March 26 2008, dontfoolme107 said:

Don't be so hard on the 125% mortgage! They are obviously a bad idea in a falling market, and obviously tempt irresponsible borrowers, but when the market was rising I wouldn't say they were universally bad.

After a business collapsed I had debt and no savings. By taking out a 125% mortgage, my outgoings were the same as rent+loan repayments, for a nice property as opposed to a skanky poorly maintained rented flat with damp. We sold the house 2 years later at over £50K profit, wiping out the unsecured part of the debt.

Yes it was a high risk strategy (though isn't buying a house always a gamble?) but if we'd taken your "sensible" route of paying off the debt and saving for a deposit, in just 2 years we'd have had to find an additional £50K to buy the same house!

At 08:56 on March 26 2008, pammsy said:

My 2 year deal ends next February and is for 75% of value. Currently it is fixed. What is the earliest I can begin to look for a new deal? Like the guy above this is my first go at finding a new mortgage. I need to borrow 4 times my salary.

At 09:16 on March 26 2008, heskethbang said:

"For the record, there are around 11.8 million mortgages outstanding in the UK. Let's say that the credit crunch makes life difficult for just a quarter (25%) of mortgage borrowers. This means that around four million homeowners may find it tough to arrange a new mortgage when they decide to buy, move or remortgage.."

To be honest I'm more worried the author believes 25% of 12million is 4 million. Doesn't exactly inspire confidence! lol

At 09:25 on March 26 2008, frank9254 said:

I want to cry!!! Our mortgage, which is with Northern Rock, is up in a couple of weeks and we're SELF CERT!!! And INTEREST ONLY!!!

It looks as if our monthly payments are going to double!

We took the Interest Only option as we're seld employed and wanted less pressure and it did help but now we're flumexed.

Does anyone have any constructive advice they can offer or know of any good Self Cert deals out there?????

PLEASE HELP......

At 09:49 on March 26 2008, townfan08 said:

Our mortgage with Rock ended in Febuary and we are in the exact same situation as frank9254.
All we had from them was advice to move lender.We have taken a payment holiday and have decided to cash in on the equity and downsize hopefully ridding ourselves of a mortgage once and for all.

At 10:29 on March 26 2008, Lex42 said:

In 1992, I had negative equity that was twice my annual income. It took me 10 very lean years to struggle out of that mess. With hindsight, I really wish I had gone with bankruptcy, which is easier these days than it was then.

At 10:31 on March 26 2008, pubtalk said:

Don't be too hard on 125% mortgages, they are only 95% mortgage and a 30% personal loan. a lot of people buying their first house have to source other forms of credit on top of the mortgage. The real problem lies with lending "targets" set by employers pushing the sale of such products beyond the sensible. Many products are wrongly sold because of sales targets.

At 10:42 on March 26 2008, Boshdadosh said:

Cliff, Your statment of " I told you so" is absolutely correct. I feel or fear ( for others) that we are a long way from the eye of the storm and even then we still have to come through the other side. Many will be crushed by this mess. People really need to wake up to this and I think it is a crime that people are not being warned of what is coming. The whole seedy affair needs to be dumbed down and portrayed in the national press in such a way that Joe Public understands what is going on. I think you said late 2007, that the only way to safely enter 2008 is debt free. Spot on again!!!

At 10:42 on March 26 2008, anagadowski said:

I am sure that nobody would wish the misery that loosing a house involves on anybody. Except, that is the banks. It must be clear to you now, finally, hopefully that you have been conned. You paid too much for a house and now the bank is your master. Yes we all have to have somewhere to live, but if we all refused to be duped and pay for expensive houses this wouldn't have happened. Another generation fooled. Is there any other commodity or investment that "we" take pride in paying over the odds for ? Nobody is blaming you but it is hard to have full sympathy for a group of people who even inadvertently became part of the problem, by aiding all the vested interests in raising house prices year after year. The only solution I can see is collective intelligence as opposed to a collective lack of forward thinking.

At 10:43 on March 26 2008, bananaslip said:

I sold my property 2 years ago!My wife 3 kids and a dog live in rented accommodation. It is difficult to find suitable well maintained properties that are fairly priced and allow pets. we have been kicked out of the first rental because the landlord wanted to sell and after 4 months the second property was put on the market and we are given 48 hours notice for viewings.Living in the current property which was dirty, cold and nothing works properly (£975 per month) you cannot complain because we have been given a letter telling us that we can be given 4 weeks notice.The rental market is not pleasant! but we are pleased that we do not have mortgage. I would like to know where families are going to live if their property is repossessed, especially if they have pets. We have been waiting for the market to crash for 2 years, the estate agents have always said the market will not go down and some agents are still promoting higher prices. Our first mortgage was difficult to set up and we had to prove income, savings and show that we were credit worthy, we borrowed 3 1/2 joint income.
The property market should not be used to create wealth.The potential fallout from falling house prices will create a massive shortage of rental properties and the greedy landlord will be able to raise prices and price out the low paid and families, the government will not be able to house these people which could number many thousands.
If you are likely to be repossessed I would suggest getting help earlier rather than later.

At 10:58 on March 26 2008, pubtalk said:

FRANK, As the article above said, you need a "Whole of market" mortgage broker. deals are being pulled at the drop of a hat so you need to be sitting with somone beside an online mortgagae search engine. Alot will depend on your loan to value NOW, and your credit history. You could try a HBOS (Halifax)mortgae advisor who could look at Birmingham Midshires, but they pull mortgages without notice too, and a whole of market broker is your best bet. GOOD LUCK

At 12:25 on March 26 2008, k861 said:

A little bit too much doom and gloom for my liking;Banks not wanting to lend money and make a profit?
Give it a month or so and things will blow over.
Why?
Because they know and we know that this crisis has arisen from poorly structured loans, and what they did with the proceeds of these loans. Attempting to scare us into paying more to cover their mistakes is not going to work.
Advice. If your bank will not give you a loan then change your bank!

At 12:33 on March 26 2008, whetley1 said:

I sold my house last August as I was in an incomplete chain but didn't want to lose my buyer so I completed and moved into rented. The chain only became complete for my purchase in January and the legal side of things dragged on until this week when I finally pulled the plug and backed out. I couldn't risk having a 240k mortgage with the prospect of high interest rates and a downturn in my business. So I am sitting pretty more by luck than judgment but it has already been the most unpleasant year of my life and it is still not over as I still have no home but my situation is far rosier than many.

At 13:23 on March 26 2008, Isotropic said:

I think this article is a little over the top. Half of home loan deals are history, but until you start seeing a precipitous drop in house prices I wouldn't be too worried. My feeling is that both demand and supply have dried up in tandem with demand still being slightly higher than supply and so prices are still being maintained and I suspect this will be the case for a while. There's just too much demand in the system to see serious house price deflation.

At 15:14 on March 26 2008, skuff said:

@frank9254 and others looking for mortgages. I've used London & Country (www.lcplc.co.uk) for free advice before. They take a commission from lenders, so back it up with your own research as always. HTH.

At 16:00 on March 26 2008, victortango said:

There's a demand for Ferrari's and Aston Martin's - don't mix up desire and demand. I want a 6 bedromm detached house in 2 acres but it ain't gonna happen! People have been suckered into the demand/supply bull - it simply isn't true! Well it is, if people all want six places to rent as well but that's now history.

This has been a credit explosion where you could get a mortgage if you could 'fog a mirror'. The explosion has now imploded and it is not going back to how if was for a very, very long time, if ever. No credit - no mortgage - no demand!

At 16:07 on March 26 2008, yrl10 said:

As first time buyers, my hubby and I have worked out how much we can comfortly afford in repayments working on a 7% interest rate, but until we apply for a mortgage we can't say what rate we will be offered! We are debt free (thanks to Fool and the fab advice) apart from a car loan with compound interest, and should have an excellent credit rating. Can anyone advise on our next step? If we offer on a property then find the repayments difficult we will regret it, but with offers disappearing from lenders every day what's our option? Any advice would be appreciated.

At 18:09 on March 26 2008, debtcollector said:

Hi Guys
The author says he doesn't like to say he told you so .he should
Approx 3 years ago a neighbor bought a terraced property in my area (Wales) for £30,000 and his conversation was always ,I have spent too much on this , 2 years later 2006 he sold it for £125 000 , any increase in the value of anything to this level must be a bubble , and the market will correct , it has always happened , from the south sea bubble to the dot com fiasco.
I have never known the situation of today where the market dries up to the lender and not the borrower , where the profit of the lender is restricted by the money markets.
The old system of one third of income on secured borrowing and the rest to accommodate unsecured and food , worked well.
When the average wage is £23000 and the average property is £150/£180000 and people were allowed to borrow 5 /6 times income and often self cert the crunch had to come when the value of the property is not going to rise the bubble has burst
Many are going to be in negative equity It is not only the first time buyer that will have problems, but those who have used the bubble as a money box on the property value ,equity and now wish to move , The lender is going to tighten up on multiples of income , take a lower risk profile , when this happens there will be crash and very little the interest rate tool can do about it.
the lender will increase his fees, long term trackers are a thing of the past , they cant judge the market fees will be high , i have just been quoted a fee of £1800 for a 2 year tracker , they are having a laugh , the good times are gone for now anyway
Who said never a lender or borrower be

REGARDS

At 20:36 on March 26 2008, furlane said:

I am in the process of remortgaging and I struggled. I'm self employed and run a Ltd company as well, I'm remortgaging for 3.5 times my income and for about 86% of the property. My credit rating is impeccable and yet I had many, many problems trying to find a new lender as the old one wouldn't even consider self cert. Hopefully, having received a garanted offer from the Halifax, I will be able to complete in the next couple of weeks. Guys keep your fingers crossed for me!

At 00:47 on March 27 2008, FAZERSIX said:

Q how do lenders stay in business ?
Q what happens if they do no business ?
Q stock market unstable problems ?
Q where do people invest ?
Q think about it ?
Q reality will prevail later, cut your cloth.

Because of bad press I decided to rent my second property/pension fund out and sell later as things become real again.

Cut your cloth sit tight cut back, manage your money better,a pound saved a pound earned, be prudent !

At 01:23 on March 27 2008, JonEBehr said:

Living in the current property which was dirty, cold and nothing works properly (£975 per month) you cannot complain because we have been given a letter telling us that we can be given 4 weeks notice.

If your fixed term of 6 or 12 months (or whatever) has ended then the minimum notice that your landlord must give you is two months (to a rent day). A letter sent to you can not alter that.

If your landlord is failing in his contractual (and implied) duties to maintain the property then you certainly can complain - but advise him of each fault in writing. If he chooses not to conduct the repairs and maintenance but to serve S21 notice on you then he must be extremely confident of getting at least the same level of rent for the property in its current condition very, very swiftly. If local demand is so high that this is likely to be the case then you would seem to be getting good value as determined by the market. If such isn't the case then he'll fix the problems to keep you in place and paying rent on time every month rather than expose himself to a void and the risk of unsuitable tenants getting past his screening procedures.

I would like to know where families are going to live if their property is repossessed, especially if they have pets.

Repossession doesn't involve destroying the property! It still forms part of the housing stock and will return to its rôle as a family home either bought by an intending owner-occupier or by a wicked landlord who will let it to a family who needs somewhere to live (perhaps because their former home has been repossessed).

Cheers!

At 11:01 on March 27 2008, legray22 said:

Recently widowed,26th feb 08,my husband who was only 50yrs old, has provided me with a lump sum in excess of £180,000. I have 3 children still at home and I live in rented accomodation at £800 per month. It may seem hasty, but I have bought a house within the space of 3 days (from collecting a schedule from estate agents to making a formal offer, which has been accepted.) I put in an offer of £153,000; £2000 less than fixed price. The property in question was originally on the market at offers over £165,00 in January. The present owners, two elderly ladies, have purchased a new build, which will be ready early May. They were anxious for a quick sale and needed to avoid a chain, hence reduction in price to fixed price, which was also negotiable. My surveyor had no problem in valueing the property at £150,000,(128 sq metres) although in need of internal updating, such as kitchen, bathroom, clockroom and decor( a lot of artex, flowery wallpaper, carpets, and avocado suites.} Having said that, the detached house/cottage is immaculate and we could live with these things for a while. The property is spacious and it means my younger son won't have to change school as we will be staying in the same town. My question is, should I spend money on updating the house this year with the money I have left, (circa £12,000)or should I invest whats left, or part of it, in an ISA or something a bit more risky? I will have a small income, (£180 per week) until I feel stong enough to go back to work on a minimum wage. Have I been too hasty? Reassurance would be greatly appreciated.

At 14:18 on March 27 2008, JonEBehr said:

Have I been too hasty?

Tricky for complete strangers to know what to say to you at this horribly difficult time. However, here's one of the various ways of looking at solely the topic of house purchase - rather dry and dispassionate, I should warn you, and there are many other valid viewpoints.

Let's say the cost of the house plus legal fees and disbursements is 156k. Let's say that, instead of buying a house, you put that sum in a high-interest one-year fixed term account on which you would receive 6.75%. That's an annual interest of about £10530 but it's subject to tax at 20% so that'll be £8424 in your pocket.

You're currently paying £800pm out of your pocket (which seems quite high if it's an equivalent property in terms of location and space for you and the kids to the one you're thinking of buying). That's 9600pa.

The net interest on the funds wouldn't pay the rent. Bear in mind that owning a house brings with it some expenditure that your landlord probably meets - repairs, buildings insurance and so on.

I'm the type of person who would have carried out a lot more research but if you and the kids really like that house and know that it is the right place to become your new home then that's your decision to make. You're also buying certainty of shelter rather than risking receiving notice of 2 months that you have to move out but there may be a danger that you're making a decision for the sake of making a decision.

If you really, really think that making this kind of decision at this time is the right thing to do and that this house is "the one" then see if you can get it a bit cheaper on the grounds that your surveyor valued it at less than the price you'd agreed. You can walk away from the deal at any time up until you formally exchange contracts.

Be aware that your savings may have an effect on any benefits to which you may be entitled but also remember that a cash reserve is invaluable (especially with a schoolkid around). I can't comment with any authority on how to use that cash - however.......

The Fool has other boards that would be more appropriate for your circumstances and your questions and from which you'll receive further pointers to other appropriate boards and other resources. Among them might be these, for starters:
http://boards.fool.co.uk/Messages.asp?bid=51065&mid=10986922 and
http://boards.fool.co.uk/Messages.asp?mid=10986830&bid=50096

Welcome to TMF and please take the time to check out (and post on) some of the boards where you'll find helpful and supportive people with experience and/or wisdom.

Cheers!

At 19:46 on March 30 2008, figurewizard said:

Its no surprise that the mortgage market is drying up. Just one reason is that by the end of 2007 UK personal debt stood at £1.35 trillion, which represents 101% of GDP. To put this into perspective this would mean that in the commercial world a business would have debts which exceeded its annual turnover. No such thing could really happen of course because it would have gone bust long before it had got to that level.

Join the conversation

Hello stranger. Please[log in]to comment.

Not yet registered? Register now.

 
Search by tag