Skip Navigation

How Much Will Your Mortgage Cost?

<%=_author %>
By Cliff D'Arcy | 7 March 2008

When it works well, a mortgage is a marvellous beast. You want to own a home, but don't have enough money to buy it outright. So, you put down a deposit and then take out a secured loan for the remainder. House prices tend to rise over time; the post-war average is about 8.5% a year. Thus, after 25 years or so, you end up owning an asset which is worth several times its purchase price. Lovely!

However, they say there's no such thing as a free lunch, and there are a few flies in this particular ointment. First, a mortgage isn't an interest-free loan -- if only! Mortgage lenders are businesses, not charities, so they aim to make a decent return on any money lent to borrowers. Thus, homeowners pay a market rate of interest on their home loans.

In addition, mortgage borrowers must bear other charges, such as:

•         application, booking or reservation fees;

•         deeds release, exit, sealing or discharge fees, alias ‘mortgage exit arrangement fees' (MEAFs);

•         higher lending charge (HLC) or mortgage indemnity premium (MIP); and

•         valuation or survey fees.

You can learn more about this feast of fees in Your Easy Guide To Mortgages and Your Easy Guide To Mortgages, Part 2.

The largest of the above levies is likely to be the upfront arrangement fee, which can add thousands to the cost of your loan. For example, a fee of 1.5% would add £2,250 to the cost of a £150,000 mortgage. What's more, if you add this fee (and others) to your loan, then you'll pay interest on it over 25 years.

When it comes to weighing up the affordability of a mortgage, most homebuyers don't look much beyond the monthly repayments. However, you should take all fees, charges and interest into account before making a decision on which mortgage is best for you.

What does it all add up to?

Let me show you just how the cost of a mortgage can stack up over its typical 25-year life. Let's assume that you borrow, say, £150,000 over 25 years on a property costing £200,000. As you're borrowing three-quarters (75%) of the value of the property, you're unlikely to pay a higher lending charge, which is good news.

As you want to guarantee that your home loan is paid off at the end of its life, you opt for a repayment mortgage, where you repay both interest and capital every month. Now let's assume that you sign up for a fixed interest rate of 6% a year for the life of your loan. Also, you decide to add the arrangement fee of 1.5% (£2,250) to your loan, to be repaid over the life of your mortgage.

In this example, here's how your monthly mortgage repayments stack up:

Advance

£150,000

Arrangement fee (1.5%)

£2,250

Total loan

£152,250

Interest rate

6% fixed for 25 years

Monthly repayments*

£966.45 x 300

Total amount repaid

£289,935

*Source: Fool.co.uk's mortgage calculator

So, you borrow £150,000 plus the arrangement fee of £2,250 and make three hundred monthly repayments of £966.45. As you can see, the total amount repaid is close to £290,000, or almost double (193%) what you borrowed to buy the house.

Of course, as your interest rate increases, so too does the total amount that you repay. Let's redo the above example with a mortgage rate more appropriate to the Eighties and Nineties, say, 10% a year:

Interest rate

10% fixed for 25 years

Monthly repayments*

£1,363.05 x 300

Total amount repaid

£408,915

*Source: Fool.co.uk's mortgage calculator

When your interest rate is fixed at 10% a year, the total rockets to £408,915, made up of your loan of £152,250 plus a further £256,665 in interest. In this example, you pay back almost £120,000 more than when your rate was 6%. Thus, you can see what a major impact interest rates have on how much you repay during the life of your mortgage.

At present, the Bank of England's base rate is fairly low in an historical context, just 5.25% a year. In the past two decades, the base rate peaked at 15% between October 1989 to October 1990 and, more recently, at 7.50% between June and October 1998. Indeed, the base rate today is as low as it was at any point between 1987 and 1997.

So, enjoy today's relatively low mortgage rates while you can. The collapse of the inter-bank lending market (and with it, Northern Rock) has significantly pushed up the cost of borrowing. Furthermore, as Donna Werbner warned in Death Of The Cheap Mortgage Deal, banks are pulling mortgages by the thousand and turning away new borrowers in droves. So, make the most of today's mortgages while you can, because tomorrow's market will be far less attractive!

More: Use our award-winning mortgage service for your ideal home loan | Is Your Endowment A Letdown? | A Mortgage With No Monthly Repayments!

Comments

The opinions expressed here are those of the individual writers and are not representative of The Motley Fool.

At 09:40 on March 10 2008, wayofthepear said:

The full cost of a mortgage may come as quite a shock to some, but should be compared to the comparative cost of renting. Rent is likely to rise with inflation over the 25 years but the real cost of the mortgage payments is eroded over time.

At 11:13 on March 10 2008, vushah said:

Rather than make the most of todays mortgage deals the current economic climate suggests its better to wait. What one has to consider is that a mortgage is for 25 years and in that space of time anything could happen to interest rates. Especially now when house prices are at their peak and decreasing month on month its cheaper to rent and save money for a larger deposit than to buy and pay higher mortgage payments for a property thats decreasing in value.

At 12:33 on March 10 2008, yocoxy said:

Usual mantra.. property is for fools.. you'd be better off renting, there's going to be a crash, ahh and mortgages are bad for you too..!

I guess it must be much better to watch your rent rise with inflation and pay it for the rest of your life with no asset at the end?

25 years of mortgage repayments (which can be fixed for the whole period) or 60 years of ever increasing rent.. (and no asset to pass on to the young D'Arcys).. Which sounds like the better investment?

At 15:36 on March 10 2008, Corban07 said:

I echo the comments made above. The monthly payment of nearly £1000 a month, made for 25 years, should be put in the context of inflation and expected increased earnings over the period.

Firstly, if current trends continue, you might expect your property to double every 8 years or so, making it worth around £1.6M in 25 years time! Not a bad return on your £400k investment.

Secondly, your income is expected to increase over the 25 year period at around 4% a year. Assuming your current income is around £40k a year (reasonable assumption for a £150k mortgage), in 25 years, for the same job, you might expect an annual salary of £106k. This doesn't even include any payrise due to career progression. This is based entirely on doing the same level work.

So in 25 years time, your gross monthly salary is around £9k, and yet you are now only paying £966 of that on the mortgage.

The combination of increased earnings and property inflation mean that each year you will likely be paying LESS as a proportion of your income on your mortgage, whilst your property increases in value by MORE, leaving you at the end with very low mortgage payments, and a very expensive asset!

At 20:45 on March 10 2008, MoofusMutt said:

Mr D'Arcy you wouldn't by any chance be one of those buy to let landlords, that are starting to sweat a bit now, would you?

At 22:06 on March 10 2008, izzykitten said:

We quite deliberately bought a house that would have a mortgage well under the limits of what we could afford - as a result at the moment we are paying a lot extra a month off the mortgage to avoid paying so much interest overall.

Even if you can't afford to pay much extra off, very little extra a month saves a great deal over time. There's a fab mortgage calculator here http://www.jeacle.ie/mortgage/uk/ which shows you how the savings add up.

At 20:45 on March 13 2008, james60163 said:

Interesting article but who has a 25-year fixed rate loan? No-one except Alistair Darling. Would have been much more useful to show the cost of a 2 and 5 year fix, because those are common types of mortgage and no-one in their right mind goes on to the SVR at the end of their special deal unless they never read their mortgage statement.

At 21:15 on March 13 2008, timbonbd said:

Reference house price rises - its amazing how people seem to be fascinated by how much their house is worth - e.g. comment above

" . . .if current trends continue, you might expect your property to double every 8 years or so, making it worth around £1.6M in 25 years time! Not a bad return on your £400k investment."

Ok - I have a question. Your house is worth 1.6M. So thats great. What are you going to do with this house to get hold of this money? I can see three options. Sell it and live in a cardboard box and make 1.6M. Sell it and move abroad where house prices are relatively cheaper . . . or finally sell it and . . . buy another house . . . which will cost how much? House prices are relative to each other. It matters not whether your house is worth £10k or £10M . . . unless you have more than one house of course!

Stop kidding yourselves that house price rises are somehow increasing your wealth. They're not! Ridiculous house price rises are due in part to a British obsession with how much everyones house is worth - as if it somehow advantages you. Stop for a second - step outside of the small minded, primary school playground attitudes and realise that it makes no difference!

At 00:46 on March 14 2008, JonEBehr said:

Stop kidding yourselves that house price rises are somehow increasing your wealth. They're not!

They are - if you already own a house. You're quite right that the proceeds of sale of your house will only buy you the place next door (subject to transaction costs) but those proceeds now buy many more Mars bars than the proceeds of sale of that same house 10 years ago. If you compare local house prices with local house prices then the situation is obviously neutral (as you suggest) but liquidate those funds and apply them to some other asset class or locality or goods/services and you get a different answer - increased wealth.

As you indicated, it's merely a notional increase in wealth if you don't realise the gain (or don't remortgage to liquidate some of the gain) so as to utilise the proceeds some other way. Downsizing (not necessarily all the way to a cardboard box) or moving to a lower-value area (not necessarily abroad) will release that notional gain and make it real so you can spend it on many more shedloads of beer'n'skittles than it could have provided a decade ago.

One obvious problem with house prices racing ahead is the inverse of the situation that makes downsizing attractive: the rungs on any property ladder move further apart so upsizing becomes more expensive/unattractive. The step in price from a 2-bed to a 3-bed in a particular geographic area used to be an affordable, specific fraction/multiple of the average local wage but it is now very much greater than that. The media (and therefore political) noise and fuss is all about first-time buyers but they're not the only ones who have nowhere to go on the property ladder.

Cheers!

At 22:00 on March 14 2008, timbonbd said:

Yep - you make a good point! However I think you get the gist of my rant!! People seem to think that their property value is somehow direct wealth. They forget the tiny fact that (as you mention) to realise it requires fairly large change in circumstance - downsizing/moving/remortgaging etc etc. For most people this is, at best not easy, and at worst is just totally impractical.

Tim

At 06:25 on May 08 2008, cocojambo2 said:

That is a fantastic article. And yes a higher interest rate could be very costly over 25 years, making the borrower pay tens of thousands of dollars more in mortgage payments. However, even an extra $100 payment every month could save people tens of thousands of dollars in interest charges. Here's an example from www.2mortgageloancalculator.com

"When it comes to a home mortgage loan, you can actually pay off the loan much more quickly and save a great deal of money by simply paying a little extra each month.

If you take out a 30 year loan for $300,000.00 with a 6.000% interest rate, for example, your monthly payment (interest and principal only) will be $1,798.65. By the time the 30 year time period is complete, you will have paid $647,505.62 for your home.

If you pay just $50.00 more each month, you will pay only $618,298.97 toward your home. This is a savings of $29,206.65. In addition, you will get the loan paid off 2 Years 1 Months sooner than if you paid only your regular monthly payment."

Join the conversation

Hello stranger. Please[log in]to comment.

Not yet registered? Register now.

 

Switch to a different topic area

Can't find what you need in Property And Home? Try one of our other personal finance areas.

Latest stories

Get all the latest news and editorial comment as it's published – check out our Latest Stories

© Copyright 1998-2008, The Motley Fool Limited. All rights reserved. This material is for personal use only.
The Motley Fool, Fool, and the "Fool" logo are registered trademarks of The Motley Fool, Inc.
Place of Reg: England & Wales. Company Reg No: 3736872. VAT Reg No: 735 7818 01. Registered Office: 30 Great Pulteney Street, London W1F 9LT.


USEQ\EQWEB09