Skip Navigation
 

Lenders Tighten The Screws On First-Time Buyers

My latest blog

Office Politics

Published in Mortgages on 25 February 2008

Nationwide hit the headlines this week after announcing it was hiking up its mortgage rates for anyone with less than 25% deposit. Is this the start of things to come?

Size isn't everything -- except, it seems, when it comes to mortgage deposits.

This week, Nationwide became yet another lender to tighten the screws on its customers, after telling new borrowers that, unless they have a deposit of at least 25%, they will face higher mortgage rates.

Until last Friday, those with a deposit of 10% qualified for the best deals. But now, the bank which prides itself on offering competitive rates to all its customers, and not just to ‘brand new customers only' has dealt a blow to many new borrowers. It has announced that rates will rise by 0.2% on mortgages between 75% and 95% of the value of a home.

The changes will virtually wipe out the impact of this month's earlier base rate cut. It means that someone taking out a new deal with Nationwide will now have to stump up a mighty £50,000 deposit if they want the best deal on a £200,000 mortgage.

But beyond the headlines and sensationalism, is Nationwide's decision really such a big deal?

Old Dog, New Tricks

In truth, mortgage lenders have offered better rates for those able to raise a bigger deposit for years.

For example, Bristol and West's offers a five year fixed-rate mortgage at a rate of 5.65% if you have a 25% deposit, and 5.95% if you can only manage a 5% deposit (a fee of £999 applies).

Similarly, NatWest offers one fixed rate at 5.39% if you have a 25% deposit, and another at 5.74% if you only have a 5% deposit (product fees of £1,299 and £699 apply respectively).

Some lenders require will even ask for more than a 25% deposit nowadays. For example, to get the best rate for Woolwich's Lifetime tracker mortgage of 5.84%, you'll have to find a mighty 40% deposit.

Not easy, when you consider the average price of a home in England and Wales is around £174,000.

Setting The Trend?

Personally, I think Nationwide's decision - in itself - is not that newsworthy. The real significance lies in the fact that, because Nationwide is such a big mortgage lender, they could be starting a trend that other lenders may decide to follow.

Nationwide said their decision to increase their rates for borrowers with 10% deposits was largely due to higher funding costs and the need to adapt to changes in the market, as lenders now look to manage the risk profile of customers.

Only last week, four of the six lenders which had previously offered 125% loan to value (LTV) mortgages announced they were pulling these products from the market.

And this is not a suprising move, considering the downturn that has recently occurred in the housing market. Lenders were more willing to lend more money to prospective borrowers when house prices were rising, because there was very little risk that a borrower would end up in negative equity (this is when you owe more on your mortgage than your property is worth).

As prices start to cool and the chance of homeowners falling into negative equity increases, lenders are becoming less willing to offer mortgages to borrowers with small deposits.

So to sum up: after a decade of boom, lenders are becoming more cautious about who'll they'll lend to. If you were a lender, wouldn't you avoid borrowers with small deposits who may be overstretching themselves to get on the housing ladder at the beginning of what could be a crash in property prices?

Beginner's (Bad) Luck

Undoubtedly, while the lenders are busy protecting themselves, the biggest losers in all this will - as usual - be first time buyers, who typically haven't got huge deposits.

For years, many first-time buyers have been priced out of the market, especially in urban areas such as London where house prices have risen exponentially over the last decade.

How painfully ironic that, just when prices are starting to cool down and property is becoming more affordable, fewer lenders are willing to offer mortgages to borrowers with small deposits, and are increasing rates on the few deals still available. This means first-time buyers could be priced out of the housing market once again, only this time by the mortgage lenders.

That's quite a bleak vision of the future and, the good news is, there's no need to panic just yet. Right now, there are still many competitive deals to be found for borrowers with 10% deposits. But  bear in mind that the smaller your deposit, the more difficult it will be to find a cheap mortgage deal. If you're in this position, I would highly recommend using a broker who can search the whole of the market and advise you on the best deal available (The Motley Fool Mortgage Service offers such a whole-of-market service).

Playing Detective

If you're determined to hunt out those elusive cheap deals yourself, where should you look?

There are some suggestions that prospective borrowers could turn their attentions to banks funded through the European Central Bank (ECB), such as Abbey or Bank of Ireland, as the ECB is more willing to provide funding for mortgages than the Bank of England.

Abbey's two year fixed rate is currently 5.47% if you can raise a 10% deposit. However, the rate comes with a product fee of £1,999, and the maximum you can borrow is £250,000. So perhaps not so generous after all...

Smaller building societies could be another place to sniff out a good deal. For example, Northern Rock's neighbour Newcastle Building Society is currently offering a rate of 4.84% on its discount rate mortgage for borrowers with a 10% deposit  until March 2010. However, the mortgage comes tied with a hefty completion fee of 2.5% of the loan. For a £200,000 mortgage, that's a massive £5,000. Another reason why it's important to check the small print or get professional advice from a broker about what is the best deal.

Finally, even though there are still some competitive deals around for mortgage borrowers with 10% deposits, never forget that size really does matter in this market. The bigger your deposit, the more likely you are to get a better rate.

More: Death Of The Cheap Mortgage Deal / How To Buy Property At Auction

> Get a great mortgage with The Motley Fool

> Open a market-leading instant access savings account to make the most of your money while you are waiting to take that first step onto the property ladder.

Share & subscribe

Comments

The opinions expressed here are those of the individual writers and are not representative of The Motley Fool. If you spot any comments that are unsuitable hit the flag to alert our moderators.

ngata 26 Feb 2008, 7:15am

I don't agree with figurewizard that the coming crunch for the borrow-to-buy-to-let straw landlords is worrying. It is a cause for celebration. What is sad, but unavoidable, is that some overstretched new buyers will be flushed away too. Once the BTL parasites have been driven out, house prices should return to normal, ie, the average price of a house at 2-3 times average annual earnings. Banks and Building Societies cannot pass on to mortgage customers cuts in interest rates made by an inept BoE (with a mandate, supposedly, to control inflation) because they are competing for scarce savings. Nemesis has caught up with many greedy idiots. Rejoice.

carriemunky 26 Feb 2008, 7:36am

I am quite worried as I have my property on the market just now and it seems as if I will not be selling it any time soon. This will be especially true if first time buyers cannot afford to get on to the property market. My flat is only offers over £64,995 and it has 3 bedrooms. This is turning into a bit of a nightmare as I have now bought a house and I am scared to spend any money in case I have two mortgages to cover for some time.

TheBankManager 26 Feb 2008, 7:54am

The way the financial institutions need to fund their mortgages is via their depositors and as such, they have fewer of these at this time, since certain rates appear less competitive. So they drive up the mortgage rates for those who might have a greater future chance of defaulting, to weed them out and get those whose debt to equity ration will be stronger. It's like the insurance industry, where a policy is priced based upon the risk of the assured. Who complains then? No-one, because we are so used to it. So I consider that Nationwide's stance is appropriate and perhaps the education of the youths of today, is to improve their fiscal understanding and to learn how to respect money....so save first and spend later.

Jalipa 26 Feb 2008, 8:10am

This is merely going back to "old fashioned" lending (pre-1979) policies. Which frankly were financialy sound. Our recent boom-bust (and that of the 90s) was causedby frankly idiotic lending by the "de-mutuals" (hence Northern Crock). The 120%, 100%, 95% & even 90% were all dodgy and only worked in rising markets -- which THEY inflated. (Far more then BTLs)

laislapequena 26 Feb 2008, 8:50am

I'm with ngata on the Buy Toilet landlords. I do hope it's worrying for them as they have been making things very difficult for first time buyers and even second and third timers. With personal experience of being outbid on properties several times which then become Buy Toilet thus turning large areas of once tidy, respectable districts into ghettos in some cases. My heart goes out to first time buyers, they often can't get a mortgage to cover the cost of even a reasonalbe property even with two salaries so are sucked into the letting trap.

Zweiblumen 26 Feb 2008, 9:46am

Small Island, the letting trap is not such a bad place to be right now - it's only marginally more expensive than mortgage interest, without the risk of negative equity, and the minute the market picks up again (in 3 or 4 years' time) you can hope to snap up a bargain. If you're really lucky, your BTL landlord will go bust and you won't even have to move house!

alucarDrM 26 Feb 2008, 9:48am

Why are journalists treating "saving up for a deposit for your home purchase" as such a novel idea? This is the 5th such article I've seen espousing this sort of opinion. 100%+ mortgages are only a recent 'invention,' back in the day you had to have a substantial deposit before banks were willing to lend to you.

Hardtruth 26 Feb 2008, 10:45am

The market force is one of the enduring constants on planet earth so it never ceases to amaze me when people whine about the resulting social injustices of it, right or wrong. You either prosper, survive or succumb but fight it you cannot. BTL investors will be judged by the same forces as everyone else and if they have got it wrong they will be swept away, simple.

stuartpetergraha 26 Feb 2008, 10:52am

Why is there all this anti BTL, as if they are the sole cause of house price increases. There are three much more real causes of excessive house price increases: 1. Banks lending excessive amounts, ie 6 x income etc. 2. Gordon Brown taking house price increases out of the inflation calculations, therefore keeping monetary policy too loose. 3. Sheep who think houses only go one way and bleeted accordingly for the last ten years and now want to blame someone else. I have had three BTL. The first came with a 37 year old unemployed man in place. I re-decorated on the weekends (work all week), he sat on his fat one and watched me most weekends. After two years I sold the house at a good profit, him still in the house and unemployed. The next one I bought and let to a hard working couple, on second marriages and saving for their own house. After two years or so they moved out and my family moved in and we still live here. We sold our old house and bought a rental house with a large garden, have a single Mum in the house whose brother lives with her. She says we are the best Landlords she has had, her employed brother a labourer has helped me do renovations on the weekends. We sub-divided the plot on this house and had a house built, this we sold. I am not a rackman renter, or over stretched financially. I saw a business opportunity and I had the guts to take it. When I did most of my family belittled it, then when it worked got funny, I have my house and a rental both mortgage free, and a good cash deposit, for another house or shares when they drop enough. I am a college lecturer, I work in a tough London College (and would leave tommorrow if I could get back into a City job, lost it a few years back and being over 40 couldn't get back into). After work I do private tutoring and on the weeknds and summer holidays I do all the repairs, re-decoration myself. I charge a fair rent and do two jobs, I have not always been lucky in life second marriage, starting again at 39 with nothing much, at 44 I have built a secure life for my wife and children. I don't drink much, never smoke, have an old car - you make choices.

cazm 26 Feb 2008, 11:29am

This whole thing is ridiculous! Me and my boyfriend are first time buyers and just last week found our dream house. Everything was set for us to 100% mortgage until last week. We both earn a reasonable amount and can well afford to pay it but now we have to struggle to fight for a mortgage. It's typical of the way our generation has been unfairly punished throughout our lives so far....student loans, changes in the way schools are run etc...we have always been the guinea pigs...when will it stop!

Jalipa 26 Feb 2008, 11:50am

People like someone to blame – they especially dislike other people whom they perceive to be “better off” hence the pathetic rants against BTLs on this converstion.

beauwl 26 Feb 2008, 12:36pm

I know it will take me years (and a dead relative or two) to get on the property ladder, however there is a part of me that likes the idea of a larger deposit in exchange for a smaller mortgage and the chance to pay it off earlier with less paid in interest.

Strebor19 26 Feb 2008, 12:58pm

Mortgages may be slightly harder to get for First time buyers, but it has always been the case that small deposit higher rate, and not forgetting the Mortgage indemnity insurance premium. With interest rates on the way down, overall Mortgages will be cheaper, and not more expensive. BTL landlords will not be seeing there costs go up so are unlikely to be forced to sell. With the Introduction of HIP's less property's are coming to Market as the speculative Seller's drop out of the picture. So with supply down, Interest rates down, no pressure for BTL's to offload there properties, there is no reason for property prices to fall never mind crash, indeed where I live in Berkshire prices seem to have risen since the new year. So my view is with more normalised lending criteria and reduced properties to market due to HIP's prices will remain steady or increase slightly. Which is all good news. Less time waster's in the market place, and less over stretched first time buyers, providing a more normalised steady market place, and will be good for everyone in the long run.

divingdancer 26 Feb 2008, 6:43pm

I work as a conveyancing Solicitor and have noted in the past few years lots of first time buyers overstretching themselves and borrowing more than 100% of the property value (Northern Rock Together being a prime example). Todays youth seem to want to buy a house and fill it full of new furniture, plasma tv's and all mod cons. Gone are the days when you cadged second hand furniture from relatives and saved up for new furniture. My parents bought in the early 50's and had orange boxes for furniture and learnt to do DIY on the house. I recall buying in the 80's and having second hand furniture, only buying new when you could afford it. Nowadays everything seems to be on the never never. I can see more repossessions occurring this year. It is about time Lenders got their act together.

andyhayes 26 Feb 2008, 8:18pm

The amount of anti-property sentiment on the Fool staggers me. Look at stuartpetergraha's post and tell me what is wrong with his example. People make their own choices on investments and risk their own hard-earned cash on it. Most Fool readers like making money from shares, and their could be plenty of anti-capitalist arguments about that. Look at how the stock market has performed in recent years, or how certain people have been burned with Northern Rock, Railtrack or Marconi. There are no guarnatees in life, you pay your money and take a chance, so why be envious or spiteful if someone does well out of an investment? I have done a bit of share trading and property investing, and personally have done far better out of property, so I choose to stick with that. As a BTL investor, I'm not concerned if properties become less affordable for first time buyers as it just means that demand for rentals and hence rental yields should increase, then in the future increased yields will lead to higher capital prices. I wish I had bought 10 properties just before the last property crash!!

bowiegirl 29 Feb 2008, 5:19am

I agree it's hard for 1st time buyers but i also agree if you've worked hard & got yourself a few properties good for you! I bought a flat (because, rightly, they wouldn't lend me enough for a house) at 21 with a low interest loan from the company i worked for, and while everyone else was out partying i sat at home on a cushion and with no car. I managed to do a 5 year high workload University course whilst paying the mortgage on my own with a student allowance and several crappy jobs. Some of my friends who'd had nice cars & overseas holidays then started to say how "lucky" i was. It's called responsible borrowing & spending people!!!!
Responsible lending needs to make a comeback too - the 125% lending is just stupid!! I'm a financial idiot & even i can see that!

FAZERSIX 01 Mar 2008, 10:51pm

House rental prices increase that's guaranteed and the effect is house purchase prices rise and its obvious there's a strong link between the two, ie its cheaper to buy than rent.

To put it in a nut shell if buyers rent instead,there's a strong demand for rented property,the knock on effect rents go up up, here comes the balance between renting buying and house prices.


The credit crunch is a fallacy and the lenders will recoup any losses from people who pay,its a very small minority that dont !

Join the conversation

Instructions

Line breaks are converted automatically.

You may use the following tags in your post: <b>bold</b>, <i>quoted text</i>. All other tags will be removed from your post.

Hello stranger

To add your own comment, please login.

Not yet registered? Register now.