Skip Navigation
 

Buy Now, Pay Later Mortgages

My latest blog

My Ultimate Financial Pet Hates

Published in Mortgages on 21 December 2007

Cutting your monthly payments by taking out an interest-only mortgage is tempting if you're struggling to buy a home, but could prove one of the costliest mistakes you'll ever make.

Buying your very first home has never been easy so I can understand why you might be tempted to go with the seemingly cheapest possible option and deal with the consequences later. Interest-only mortgages fit nicely into this category, but they can be a risky choice.

But before I explain why, let's have a quick look at the difference between interest-only and repayment mortgages first:

Interest-Only

Interest-only mortgages do exactly what they say. Your monthly mortgage payment goes towards repaying the interest on your loan only -- it doesn't repay any of the capital debt you owe your lender. You will still owe the original sum you borrowed at the end of your mortgage term (although bear in mind inflation is likely to have eroded the value of this sum, to some extent).

This type of mortgage should run alongside an investment vehicle, such as an ISA (Individual Savings Account) which, fingers crossed, grows sufficiently in value to repay the capital at the end of the mortgage term. But without any guarantee of how well it might perform you run the risk of a potential shortfall.

All things being equal, interest-only mortgages will cost you more in the long run than repayment mortgages. This is because you are not reducing the capital debt you owe the lender every month, so will have to pay more interest throughout your mortgage term.

Repayment

With a repayment mortgage you chip away at the capital debt every month. And because your debt is smaller every month, you pay less interest -- so, in the end, your total interest bill is lower than an interest-only mortgage.

Don't be fooled by the fact that the monthly payments on a repayment mortgages are more expensive than an interest-only mortgage. At the end of the day, because you pay far less interest on your debt throughout the mortgage term, a repayment mortgage should work out much cheaper.

What's more, a repayment mortgage is the most secure option because, unlike a combined interest-only mortgage and investment vehicle, the mortgage is guaranteed to be repaid in full at the end of the term (as long as you don't fall into arrears).

The popular choice

But even though repayment mortgages are a safer choice, they are becoming less popular. According to Paragon Mortgages, market share has declined from 70% in 2003 to 58% this year while the number of borrowers taking out interest-only mortgages has grown. Indeed, figures from the Council of Mortgage Lenders (CML) also show interest-only applications rose by 33% to 222,400 in 2006.

And it's easy to see why. In the example shown below you could cut your mortgage payments by over £2,700 in just twelve months by going down the interest-only route.

Mortgage Type

Monthly Repayments: £150K @ 5.69% over 25 years

Interest-Only

£711.25

Repayment

£938.23

Difference Over 1 Year

£2,723.76

But let's take a look at the total cost of this mortgage over the full mortgage term:

Mortgage Type

Total cost of £150K mortgage @ 5.69% over 25 years

Interest-Only

£363,375

Repayment

£281,469

Difference over 25 years 

£81,906

As this table shows, an interest-only mortgage appears to cost £2,723.76 less each year - but, because you still owe your original debt of £150,000 at the end of the mortgage term, it actually costs £81,906 more than a repayment mortgage.

However, in my view, there's nothing intrinsically wrong with interest-only mortgages as long as you make payments to a robust investment plan alongside your monthly mortgage payments. That way the mortgage loan should be comfortably settled up at the end of the term - but will mean that your monthly outlay may be similar in size to the monthly outlay of a repayment mortgage.

I should point out here that a particularly well-performing investment plan, which usually invests in shares, could produce a surplus above and beyond your mortgage debt. But bear in mind that, in the example above, it would have to produce a £81,906 surplus just to break even with the repayment mortgage. Many people who took out endowment mortgages in the 1970s and 1980s suffered great losses because their investment vehicles did not perform as well as expected.

Also, interest-only mortgages take more effort than repayment mortgages. You'll need to keep track of your investment vehicle to make sure it's on target to repay your capital debt. And if you need to borrow more then you'll need to step up your savings into your investment plan accordingly.

What greatly concerns me about interest-only mortgages is that research from the Financial Services Authority (FSA), which regulates mortgage lenders, suggests one in ten people who take out interest-only mortgages have little or no idea how they will repay the debt and have no repayment plan in place. 

Make Interest-Only Work For You

I appreciate that, for many first-time buyers, this is the only way to put home-owning within reach. And if affordability is an issue, then the good news is that it's possible to make interest-only mortgages work for you over the short-term.

This is because, if you opt for an interest-only mortgage instead of a repayment mortgage, the smaller monthly payments should be easier on the pocket. You could stick with that approach for say, two years and then switch to a repayment mortgage later on once your finances are in better shape.

Although this will allow you to get on the property ladder sooner, if you want to keep to the original mortgage term expect a significant increase in your monthly outlay after those first two years are up. Your repayments will be greater for two reasons: first, the cost of repaying capital as well as interest has been factored in. Second, you'll need to catch up on capital repayments missed during those first two years.

For this approach to work you'll need to be pretty confident your finances will improve or the new repayment mortgage won't be within your means. And don't, whatever you do, forget to make the switch. This is more easily done than you might think especially if you have got used to budgeting around your lower repayments.

With runaway house price growth over the last few years, you may be tempted to rely on future rises to provide enough equity in your property to repay the capital back to your lender. But this could be very risky if house prices don't increase as anticipated. You could then be faced with a serious shortfall which may force you into selling the property to repay your debt.

And what are you going to do then? Buy another home which will no doubt need a whole new mortgage? Hardly the most effective strategy, is it? Interest-only mortgages certainly have their place but remember when you buy a home you always take on a commitment to repay the interest and the capital and there's just no getting around that. Burying your head in the sand when in comes to your mortgage is foolish, not Foolish, and will only cost you more in the long-term. So don't do it!

More: True Cost Of Buying A HomeSave £2,053 By Christmas 2008 | Try using The Motley Fool Mortgage Service to help find the right deal for you.

Share & subscribe

Comments

The opinions expressed here are those of the individual writers and are not representative of The Motley Fool. If you spot any comments that are unsuitable hit the flag to alert our moderators.

offthepoint 31 Dec 2007, 3:11pm

Good advice - but you have to remember that there is an increasing culture of waiting for an inheritance [from post-war baby-boomers' property values] to cover the capital payback 'at a later date'...

The paradox here is that the nation's property wealth becomes severely devalued by the capital transfer required to maintain current asset value purchase.

But of course, our NL government has known this all along...

surviveditall 31 Dec 2007, 4:41pm

This advice is obviously the best to follow for those fortunates who can, but having recently experienced the right to buy process for an older relative in receipt of state pension, the only way she could get any mortgage offer was to take an interest only mortgage [Currently running at an exhorbitant 10.4%] and use the sale of the property after her death to pay off the capital debt leaving the additional equity estimated at around 40% to her family. She was unable to find any high street lender willing to provide her with a repayment mortgage regardless of the the interest element of the loan being guaranteed to be re-paid direct by the Pension Service, via motgage benefit entitlement. In the light of this situation how can the older generation ever hope to get the best deal?

jaybeebabee25 31 Dec 2007, 5:07pm

I am in this situation and feel uncertain of my security whenever these "one per-
cent-ers" are mentioned. The stategy I've developed to pay off the capital is to buy other property and hope the equity grows enough! The problem is I'm running out of time! Would there be any mileage in asking my lender(s)to extend my mortgage term, after all they make more out of me if the loan extends? I do have a recent loan for a new property taken to my age 75. (My income will continue at least til then)

homerally 31 Dec 2007, 5:39pm

I purchased my first property in 1971 for £5195 with a 8% £4950 mortgage.If I remember correctly the repayments were around £40 a month.If I had opted for interest only it would have been approx £33 and today I would still owe the £5000.(food for thought)

IDPickering 31 Dec 2007, 6:43pm

This is all sound advice.
I speak as someone who has suffered the dysmal performance of an endowment policy taken out with Standard Life way back in Oct 1990 to assist in the purchase of our house.
This was all very nice, paying what I thought was a miniscule £65.50 per month into the policy, and the interest on the £44,000 loan.
We have received "red alert warning" over the last two years to the effect that the policy will NOT be sufficient to pay our mortgage in 2015. Needless to say, my Wife and I are very miffed at how gullable we were.
We are in the process of selling the policy and are going to give what we receive for it back to the bank to reduce the ammount owed, this should be about £20,000.
Luckily, we save into an ISA monthly buying high yielding shares anyway, so can make up the rest of the shortfall ourselves. Some out there are not so fortunate I know.
One things certain though, I will NEVER buy anything so non transparent again as an endowment policy.
Good luck to you if you choose to do so.

Ian.

Dhahran2001 31 Dec 2007, 8:26pm

Endowment life assurance policies come in various flavours and a 'real' endowment policy guarantees to pay full value at some specified time, or on death if earlier - plus the prospect of a terminal bonus. Journalist do none of us a favour by abbreviating 'low cost endowment' or 'minimum cost endowment' (both of which presume these terminal bonuses) to 'endowment'.

JB's article conveniently ignores risk of death. Folk going down the 'interest only' plus 'endowment' (most varieties) route have no extra expense to worry about. All others should factor in something (a term assurance policy maybe) that will payout what is needed to clear the mortgage if they die prematurely.

I started buying 'real endowment' policies in 1962; they paid out with handsome terminal bonuses around 1997; our mortagage was 'interest only'. When MIRAS was allowable that was very Foolish - still it is quite smart.

nikwil 01 Jan 2008, 12:06pm

We have used two interest only mortgages not to save money but to give us greater control and get the best deal. Our first Endowment Mortgage was taken out in 1988 over 20 years for £21,000 and is about to pay out about £17,000! This may be a £4,000 shortfall but could well be cheaper than having had a repayment mortgage and then moving house and having to start again once or twice over 25 years which no one ever mentions but that's another topic.

With our first mortgage the Nat West bank constantly made errors in their calculations over the 3 years it took us to pay the mortgage off and we calculated the balance ourselves (to their rules) and made them agree our settlement figure rather than theirs (don't trust the banks to get it right and it is simple to keep a spreadsheet of the balance as long as you know their rules. It is very satisfying keeping track and seeing the balance reducing).

When we bought our current house 14 years ago for £106,000 and borrowed £80,000 initially before having sold the first house we were offered Interest Only. 9 months later we sold our first house and paid off £50K and then paid off the remainder over a few years when we wanted to. In the article you do not mention the best option which we believe is to pay off the balance as soon as you can rather than saving up elsewhere. This does not have to be in one lump, just repay as much as you can afford to whenever you can. A little each month plus that annual bonus or other gain maybe. This is the safest and best guaranteed return as for every pound paid off you are saving/gaining a return at the mortgage rate. You also reduce the minimum monthly payment (interest) in case you cannot afford to pay so much in future.

We also did the same for my sister who moved house and this allowed us to borrow £160k for 3 months until her old house sold, paying off over £130k without the requirement to take out unnecessary life cover for this amount as we knew the large sum would be repaid quickly. We took out a tracker re-mortgage on our house at 0.25% above base rate for 2 years with no penalties or restrictions on early payments from the start and intend it to be paid off in full within 2 years (the endowment we have due will clear any balance). We are unlikely to be the Banks favourite customer!

I do not like 'Risk' and consider shares as such but Interest Only works fine and is in no way more expensive than repayment if you can manage your money and act responsibly as is true for credit cards and all money matters.

Remember there is more to life than money and also remember to enjoy life, you do not know how long you have got or how long your health will last so get the balance right. Do not be wasteful but enjoy life now. An older friend told me about an acquaintance of his who had several pensions and scrimped and saved for the future and is now a very rich man. However, he is a very rich lonely man. His wife died of cancer in her 50's and he wished they had done more. Plan for the future but not at the total expense of today.

oldmillman 02 Jan 2008, 9:52am

There are a number of mortgage lenders who require the borrower to state what the repayment vehicle will be when you apply for an interest only mortgage. lenders will not always accept 'inheritance' , 'sale of the property', or 'switch to repayment in x years' as bona fide repayment vehicles.

JasKing1 02 Jan 2008, 1:49pm

It is worth remembering that lower rates of interest are available when re-mortgaging for lower loan to value (LTV) percentages.

Over the last decade the large increases in property values have generally reduced LTVs, but we are currently facing a different situation currently (lower rates of house price growth or possibly even reductions).

It would perhaps be prudent to aim to reduce the LTV in the early years (if possible) to secure better rates of interest when re-mortgaging.

This is especially true for first time buyers that need to borrow in the 95-100%+ LTV range. The better deals seem to be available in steps at 90%, 80% and 70% for example.

My sister bought her first house in late 2006, with a 100% interest only mortgage. I have been urging her to make overpayments (£500 per month allowed) so that she can secure the cheapest possible mortgage when she comes off her fixed rate deal in late 2008. Hopefully prices will not drop too far this year, allowing her to stay below the 100% point!

PJH26 03 Jan 2008, 12:44am

The example above doesn't factor in the £226.98 that interest only payers would be saving each month. If that money was saved in a account earning better than the mortgage rate then i would be better off. If the interest rate on my savings was to fall lower than my interest only mortgage then i could pay off some of the capital on the mortgage (subject to dodgy charges?) If you are wise with your money and motivated to save the extra then interest only seems to be a no loose situation.
The difference between payments would =(226.98*12)*25 which is £68.094 not including any interest if you saved it all. You would be far from £81,906 short.
If you can work out what interest you can earn saving 226.98/month for 25 years please post!

SterlingJim 06 Jan 2008, 12:18am

Good point from PJH.

The figure of £81k assumes you don't reinvest the £226.98 that interest only payers save each month. If this saving is reinvested elsewhere and achieves a return above 5.69%pa, the interest only option will cost less than a repayment option.

The most appropriate mortgage will depend on circumstances. If you want the discipline and guarantee of repayment in 25 years then a repayment mortgage is ideal. Those who prefer flexibility and have the discipline could be better off with interest only.

It's also worth noting that there are some interest only mortgages which also allow flexible repayments - giving the best of both worlds!

dominicmessenger 06 Jan 2008, 1:38pm

I am inclined to agree with PJH and SterlingJim. All things being equal, there is no difference between an interest-only and repayment mortgage, except that you have more control of your investment with an interest-only mortgage.

You also need to take account of inflation and property price increases. And you don't have to necessarily "save" the capital proportion. If you spend that now on say, a car, then you are saving the car payments (which are much higher), or credit card payments which are higher again.

Lastly, most people downsize after 30 years of home ownership, once the kids have left home and university is paid for. That extra equity (that you paid for by doing nothing) would come in handy paying off the capital...

Join the conversation

Instructions

Line breaks are converted automatically.

You may use the following tags in your post: <b>bold</b>, <i>quoted text</i>. All other tags will be removed from your post.

Hello stranger

To add your own comment, please login.

Not yet registered? Register now.