Skip Navigation
 

Profit From Property Price Falls

Laura Starkey
By Laura Starkey | 27 June 2008

It is a truth almost universally acknowledged... that property prices are falling.

Despite debate about the extent to which house values will drop -- will we see a ‘crash’, a ‘correction’ or just a small ‘dip’? -- most experts now agree prices go down, rather than up in 2008.

Statistics seem to confirm that market has started sliding.  Earlier this month, The Fool's editor, Ed Bowsher, reported that the price of the average home fell by 2.4% in May alone.

It was the biggest monthly drop in 15 years.

Worries

Figures like these strike fear into the hearts of many homeowners. And their worries may be justified.

Statistics released earlier this month from the Council Of Mortgage Lenders suggest that more than 23,000 homeowners across Britain could already be in negative equity.

Winners

On the other hand, there are bound to be winners from a decline in property values.

According to new research from Abbey, around two million homeowners are hoping to take advantage of falls.

So, who stands to profit from the current ‘problems’ in the property market?

First-Time Buyers

As long as they’re in possession of a deposit, first-time buyers stand to profit from decreasing prices.

After all, price falls mean they may be able to afford a more expensive property than they originally set their sights on.

Alternatively, they may be get the home they originally wanted -- but for less. This could save them tens of thousands of pounds over the lifetime of a typical mortgage.

Potential profits:

According to the UK National House Price Index from Halifax, the average price of a home in the UK stood at £184,111 in May 2008.

A 10% drop in house prices would reduce this to £165,589.

So the buyer of the average property would then save £18,411. That means, if they were planning to put down a 10% deposit, they would need to put down £1,852 less cash upfront.

And remember, because they are borrowing less, they will pay less interest to the mortgage lender.

In fact, if prices fall by 10%,  the average property buyer would save £35,112 in mortgage payments over the term of a typical 25-year mortgage.*

And if house prices fell by 20%, the average buyer would save even more: £70,035 on the typical mortgage over 25 years. They would also save £3,682 immediately on the deposit. Happy days!

Upsizers

According to Abbey, 1.2 million homeowners are looking to upsize at ‘bargain’ rates, thanks to the continuing decline in property prices.

As the value of homes will fall proportionately, the most expensive homes will drop furthest in ‘cash’ terms. Consequently, upsizers will have to borrow less in order to move up the property ladder.

Potential profits:

As we’ve seen, a 10% drop in house prices would knock £18,411 off the value of an ‘average’ home. However, a home worth £280,000 would decline in price by a far heftier £28,000.

In this case, buyers with a 10% deposit looking to upsize from the average home would need to borrow £25,200 less.

This means that, over the life of a typical 25-year mortgage,* an upsizer could save as much as £53,430 if prices fell 10%.

If, however, prices fell 20%, the upsizer to a property currently worth £280,000 would save an amazing £106,863 on the typical mortgage over 25 years. They would also save £5,600 immediately on the deposit.

Renting Converts

According to Abbey, over 800,000 homeowners are currently planning to sell their homes and move into rented accommodation. When house prices reach their nadir, they’ll purchase new properties.

If everything works out the way they plan, renting converts will have sold in a better market than they buy in. This could yield a tidy cash profit -- plus the opportunity to buy a far ‘better’ home than they could have otherwise afforded.

Potential profits:

The amount that converts to renting could make is hard to estimate. It all depends on how much their original property sells for -- and how far the market falls.

Some people are convinced that this strategy might make them many thousands of pounds -- and they could be right.

On the other hand, they could be wrong.

Correctly predicting what will happen to house prices over the next few years is not exactly easy (or we'd all be rich). If the renting converts get it wrong, they will not only lose the roof over their heads, they will lose thousands of pounds -- especially when you take into account the cost of renting. 

Investors, Buy-To-Let Landlords & Cash Buyers  

Investors and buy-to-let landlords could also profit from falling prices -- especially as it looks likely that many people will rent, rather than buy, their homes in 2008.

Cash buyers, whether investors or owner-occupiers, are also potentially big winners in these difficult times, as they are not tied to a mortgage lender's purse strings.

With no need to find a cheap mortgage deal, the ability to complete a sale quickly and therefore great leverage for negotiation, anyone who can afford to buy a home outright could soon be laughing all the way to the bank.

Potential profits:

Rents have increased by 13.8% in the past year, according to the National Landlords Association. If this trend continues, potential profits from buy-to-let investments -- bought at bargain prices -- could be significant indeed.

Gazunderers

Gazunderers have already made headlines this year. Some sellers have been shocked to find themselves stung by bolshy buyers, demanding a discount on their property.

However, if prices continue to fall, the market might be even riper for tactics like these.

According to a Fool.co.uk survey, 29% of people said they would consider gazundering if a property fell in price between their offer and the exchange, and more than a third said that if they were gazundered they would pass the problem up the home-buying chain.

Potential profits:

The profit gazunderers could make depends upon individual house prices, the reasons for the gazunder and just how far a buyer is prepared to push their luck.

A friend of mine who recently bought a home in south London gazundered his seller, as the property had decreased in value since he made his original offer. In the end, he saved 10% on the agreed price -- equivalent to around £25,000.

Many Fools see gazundering as underhanded and unethical. But it is not illegal and, in a rapidly falling market, it is coming back into fashion.

Mind you, it’s worth remembering that 24% of respondents to The Fool’s survey said they’d refuse to sell to a gazunderer, even if he or she backed down and re-offered the original offer.

So if you’ve found the property of your dreams, be careful: gazundering could see you lose out rather than profit.

The Waiting Game

With so many ‘ifs’ and ‘buts’ surrounding the question of who’ll profit most from house price falls , perhaps it’s unsurprising that many of us are still sitting on the fence.

Research by Abbey shows 3.9 million people want to wait and see what happens to house prices before they make their next move.

Of course, there are those who won’t want to watch idly -- and they’ll act now, hoping to make money from house price falls.

Hopefully, for some of them, the risk will pay off.

Finding out who, however, is definitely a case of playing the waiting game.

*Assuming the interest rate on the mortgage is 7% throughout the 25-year term.

More:The Time To Buy Property Is Now |Capitalise On House Price Falls | The Property Collapse Is Well Underway

> Find a magnificent mortgage via The Motley Fool's award-winning mortgage service.

Comments

The opinions expressed here are those of the individual writers and are not representative of The Motley Fool.

At 05:27 on June 30 2008, patricktaylor1 said:

Gazundering is an interesting one as there is no doubt there has been a bubble, aided and abetted by all the forces that benefit from higher prices, and what a "real" price is, is no longer obvious.

My initial reaction is that the time scale of the buy/sale is important. A long drawn out sale process by the seller as they pick over the market themselves could easily justify a gazundering.

As a current buyer and seller I note that the best properties for sale do go quickly albeit with some sort of price reduction. There are some people who are holding out for 2007 prices when their properties are either clones or simply bubble priced middling desirable. This is unrealistic when buyers are a rare species.

I have heard of people asking for £1.3M for partially improved properties bought for £670000 six years ago. Their agents follow up viewers with calls offering it at £1M.

I think the bubble has a fair way to deflate but quality properties will always go quickly if offered at a good price comparative to the local competition. So if you love the house you are going to buy don't get too cute, somebody may pay nearer the asking price.

Incidentally given fuel prices we have eschewed desirable country cottages with oil or propane heating, and a guaranteed commute to work. Rising fuel prices are a certainty.

At 06:07 on June 30 2008, jeffslaw said:

Having been gazumped six weeks ago by £100,000 in this a gazunderer's market I have found a property I consider undervalued when compared with similar properties viewed over both a three month, and also a twelve month period. However I have reduced the price of my own house from £795,000 to £669,000. My current property is a detached Edwardian house sympathetically restored with the benefit of airconditioning. It is stunning and so I will proceed with my purchase even if my sale does not materialise, expecting that in years to come the price of my house will recover and my new purchase will grow in any event. Factors which make people decide to move house include but are not limited to possible movements in price. The market has taken a knock and there may be still room for further falls but a change in Government whether it occurs sooner or later should stimulate house prices, and the price of oil is expected to start falling (according to Mr Soros) eventually. I think when that does happen it will fall steeply and quickly.

At 07:14 on June 30 2008, Dhahran2001 said:

Under "First-Time Buyers" Laura Starkey wrote:

"As long as they’re in possession of a deposit, first-time buyers stand to profit from decreasing prices. After all, price falls mean they may be able to afford a more expensive property than they originally set their sights on."

Decreasing house prices may allow first timers to buy a bigger or better property than they originally expected but they will NOT be able to buy a more 'expensive' property; they are limited by their budget and not the cost of things.

At 08:38 on June 30 2008, lollywood said:

cash is king

At 09:07 on June 30 2008, marktheharp said:

We have been looking at country properties (we're already in a rural area) and if we like the property, the first thing we check is the Environment Agency flood maps - it's amazing how many properties being sold don't mention that they're in flood risk areas. But being nearer to transport / shops is also starting to look like a crucial consideration - as patricktaylor1 points out above, prices will continue to rise, both for heating fuel and for road transport. I think buying a house is more than ever, subject to a fairly complex set of considerations beyond the immediate asking price.

At 10:59 on June 30 2008, supasap said:

We seem to be obsessed with property prices in this country, and to the extent that I hold a fascination about the lack of true explanation about the recent rises (since late 90's) I am guilty too - people give various reasons eg land scarcity, planning restrictions, immigration etc but all these factors must be operating also in rest of Europe so have their property prices rose in a similar fashion? Ultimately though we don't benefit because as prices rise we have to save up more for our children's deposits so that they are not stung by huge loans.... and more morbidly as happened to a recent friend of mine, the local state in effect siezes the asset to pay for his mother's care costs which in many ways means his family may have been better just renting all those years.... this will happen more with an ageing population

At 11:22 on June 30 2008, buccaneeruk said:

I have read the comments with great interest and it is good to see at least someone is profiting from the credit crunch! How ever I have friends that have just been to a Land and Property Auction and it seems that land may not be falling in value like houses are!

Has anyone any idea if land will start falling the same as houses are??

At 12:48 on June 30 2008, Norgar said:

Here in Cornwall houses over £800000 are selling like hot cakes.One local estate agent already had a bigger turnover in the last six months than in the whole of last year.So no fall in house prices here.

At 13:57 on June 30 2008, chasbmw said:

First time buyers should sit on their hands and wait for House values to revert to a more sensible relationship with actual earnings.

I my rental market, I see a lot more properties for rent, and no change in asking rents.

At 16:14 on June 30 2008, deeplyblue said:

How long will it be before general inflation (starting with food and fuel, and passing on to everything else, including wages) cancels out the problems in the house market. If a borrower has a 10% wage increase over the next 12 months, then they will be a better position to get a mortgage. And then before you know where you are house prices start to rise again.

The only question is the timescale. I'm just going into rented accommodation, and hoping that house prices will continue to fall for the next 6 months, but I'm quite prepared to see them steady after that.

Meanwhile, as other posters have pointed out, the rent will continue to rise with inflation.

At 19:51 on June 30 2008, alibali102 said:

just sold a house in oban scotland for 10k over the asking price ?

At 19:57 on June 30 2008, 1Dee said:

referring to deeplyblue above I would love to know who gets a 10% pay rise not just this year but any year. I have had a 5% pay rise for the past 5 years and each year when it has been divided over 12 monthly pay packets and the Government has had their bit my salary doesn't seem to have increased at all!! And I work for a multi-national firm of solicitors in the City.

At 21:19 on June 30 2008, BiddlingAlong said:

Regarding marktheharp's post: beware! The Environment Agency's flood maps can be misleading! The "flood areas" marked on the maps are based upon the scenario where flood defences do not exist. It is true that the EA are removing flood defences in a few areas, but most will be retained thus things are not necessarily as bad as they seem.

At 02:17 on July 01 2008, mcafacundo said:

Yes, it seems that long lasting boom is over and prices will continue to fall over the course of the year.

On a positive note, yields on rentals are rising.

Global Property Guide, this great resource I found, has a good grasp on international investment opportunities. Really, a 'guide' so to speak.

http://www.globalpropertyguide.com/Europe/United-Kingdom

At 10:23 on July 01 2008, Hovis747 said:

It is interesting reading the comments on falling house prices. My wife and I are retired and looking to downsize, everyone tells us this is not the right time.
We sold our house easily over 10 mths back then the market was reasonably stable. but now the chain keeps breaking further down as buyers pull out to rent. Three years ago we went through the same process to downsize back then the house prices were rising so fast it was not worth moving. Are we just unlucky or is someone trying to tell us something.

At 17:04 on July 03 2008, everybear said:

To make the price of houses reduce get rid of buy to let and charge the landlords the real price of what they are doing - lack of communities, increased crime, increased greed, young single people unable to buy a house, destruction of environments. Oh by the way, I have a house, all paid for, so this does not affect me. In fact I benefit from buy to let but still think it is wrong.

At 00:35 on July 05 2008, Drunsfleet said:

I am a first-time buyer and welcome the falling house-prices too - I am wanting to purchase a second home and now will get more bang for my buck with each passing day!

It's because we live in a country that sees a property as an investment first, home second that there is so much doom and gloom over falling house-prices led in large part by our shameful mainstream media.

It is the same with their talk of the credit-crunch - we are spending less because we are spending only the money we have and not the money we have borrowed beyond our means - and this is a bad thing apparently!

Join the conversation

Hello stranger. Please [log in] to comment.

Not yet registered? Register now.

 

Switch to a different topic area

Can't find what you need in Property And Home? Try one of our other personal finance areas.

Latest stories

Get all the latest news and editorial comment as it's published – check out our Fool Articles