Skip Navigation
 

House Price Fall Biggest In 15 Years

My latest blog

Should I Sell My Shares?

Published in Property and Home on 5 June 2008

The price of the average UK home fell by £4600 in May. Today's 'no change' base rate decision means that further falls look very likely.

Investors in residential property got more bad news today. The price of the average UK home fell by £4600 in May alone (a 2.4% fall), and prices have fallen 3.8% over the last year, according to the Halifax House Price Index. That's the biggest monthly fall for 15 years.

House prices are also at their lowest point since September 2006.

The reasons for this fall are pretty well known:

  •           The credit crunch has made it harder for some people to get a mortgage which has in turn reduced demand for homes
  •           Rising prices and higher taxes have put pressure on household budgets
  •          The long housing boom has meant that prices have risen to a high level when compared to average salaries

On the other hand, bullish property investors argue that a shortage of land, high employment and relatively low interest rates mean that future house price falls shouldn't be too great.

But I'm not convinced. The problem is inflation. It jumped from 2.5% to 3% in April and things may get worse before they get better. Especially when you look at what is happening to the price of food and other essential resources such as oil.

And that's why The Bank of England didn't cut the base rate today. The bank is mandated to keep inflation at 2%, and a base rate cut would have given a further fillip to inflation just when it isn't needed.

So that's bad news for stretched mortgage borrowers looking for some relief. The only ‘good' news from their perspective is this week's report from The Chartered Institute of Purchasing and Supply. The institute's figures showed that service sector activity slipped from 50.4 to 49.8 in May -- falling below the 50 level indicates stagnation and a slowdown.

A slowing economy may mean that the Bank of England feels able to cut the base rate later this year. But I wouldn't bet on it. The commodities boom may mean we're returning to 70s-style ‘stagflation' when prices rose at the same time as the economy contracted. Scary stuff.......

More: Find a marvellous mortgage via The Fool | Is Gazundering Ethical?

Share & subscribe

Comments

The opinions expressed here are those of the individual writers and are not representative of The Motley Fool. If you spot any comments that are unsuitable hit the flag to alert our moderators.

Swarbs 06 Jun 2008, 8:14am

The price of "the average UK house" did not fall by 2.4%. The price of "the average house bought with a Halifax mortgage" fell by 2.4%. The two are not the same, and I'd have thought the Fool would recognise this. But then of course they wouldn't be able to sell their remortage and investment services as well!

Maybe we should look at this in more detail...

Halifax's index is only made up of properties on which it has provided mortgages. The "credit crunch" has meant that Halifax now lends less money to borrowers, and at higher interest rates. Therefore, people who take out a mortgage with the Halifax now have less purcahsing power. Ergo, they buy smaller houses. A one bed instead of a two bed etc. They don't buy the same house for less money. The Fool's argument is akin to saying "People are now buying smaller cars, hence the price of cars is falling". Apply the same argument to all goods, and there is almost no consumer price inflation - people are simply buying cheaper goods and buying less. Even petrol prices aren't rising all that fast, as people are now buying cars which use less fuel, hence their overall spending on petrol is rising slower than the actual price of petrol. Hmm, maybe that's the method the BoE is using to keep CPI so low... ;)

Obviously those examples are just a touch tongue in cheek! But if you look at data from the Land Registry, which looks at the entire market, the monthly change is just -0.2%, and the annual change is a rise of 2.7%. Not quite the 'largest fall in 15 years', eh Ed? Yes, this data is only from April, and results from May could show a different story. But even if Land Registry prices fall by 2.4% in May, the annual change will still be a 0.3% rise.

Oh, and for all those people still convinced by the 'people can't afford mortgages thus the housing market will die' argument, please read some more solid data from the Fool:

http://www.fool.co.uk/news/Comment/2006/c060510e.htm

Yes, of a total housing market value of £4.7 billion in 2006, just £1.1 billion was secured with mortgages. Hmmm, less than 25% of the value of the UK housing market depends on the mortgage market? And mortgage rates have risen by about 20% over the last year (Best buys have gone from about 5% to about 6%). Hence a 5% fall in overall house prices, but a potential 20% fall in the indexes recorded by the major banks? I think that fits a bit better with what we're actually seeing from the various indices, but then it doesn't make quite so good a headline!

damsquare 06 Jun 2008, 8:39am

Hmm, interesting observations Swarbs. As you say Halifax isn't the only lender in the market but as the uk's largest lender their statistics can hardly be ignored. Remember that the Land Registry does lag behind by a couple of months - it'll be interesting to see their next statistics. I don't see why so many people slate the Fool for using attention-grabbing (and true) headlines - if it weren't for the media we wouldn't have the over-inflated housing market we have at present.

whitehartlad 06 Jun 2008, 8:59am

Here we go again...ore sensationalist rubbish that we are all BORED BORED BORED with zzzzzzz.
I live in Cambridgeshire and whilst there has been some levelling off of house prices in some parts and a reduction of a few percent in others,property is still selling well and viewings whilst slightly down are still happening.
In my village,Hemingford Grey, property sells more or less as soon as it hits the market..and for asking price!
House prices will probably not see massive increases again for a considerable time and this is a good thing but get off the crash bandwagon once and for all Motley Fool..it simple is not happening.

TheHaunted 06 Jun 2008, 9:20am

House prices are on the decline and its about time too. Inflation is only one factor that is contributing to this trend but the real driver was the disproportionate lending that has been available up until the credit crunch. Easy credit coupled with lax lending regulations and sub-prime lending (I recall Mr Brown saying "There is no sub-prime in the UK") has combined with a housing media frenzy to ramp house prices up to unsustainable levels.

Now that the mood has changed and that lending is much, much tighter I would expect to see significant falls over the next 18 months or so, say around 30% to get housing roughly in line with 3 x salary again, where it should be. People must remember that a house is only worth what people will pay for it and the factors behind that are outlook and credit availability. Both of these have dried up.

As a final thought, high house prices that increase over and beyond the general rate of inflation really only benefit property developers and the tax man. The general public do not benefit from this trend unless they are down-sizing. Besides, isn't it time people stopped looking at houses as investments and seeing them as homes again?

beachbug 06 Jun 2008, 9:24am

" Besides, isn't it time people stopped looking at houses as investments and seeing them as homes again?"

What hopes?

bridget015 06 Jun 2008, 9:45am

Falls in house prices must be very area specific, for whatever reason.
I sold near Oxford last October, and the local estate agent has said that the house would go for around £15,000 less now.
I downsized to a place near Rugby, and prices started to fall here last summer. This house is being renovated. Once done it will still have lost some value (though not as steeply as the Oxford house, and also that is very dependant upon who gives the forecast). The market has slowed considerably in both places, and people are either renting out their bigger houses, and renting a smaller house, or they are extending their existing property. Builders in this are are extremely busy.

I can now save, as well as saving on interest payments, which will recoup the loss. I plan to move back in a year or so. Or I may rent this and recoup that way.

rm96696 06 Jun 2008, 10:10am

The truth of the matter is that house prices (unlike share prices) are very difficult to measure. Having said that the halifax prices are mix adjusted so should take into account changes in type of housing people are buying (i.e. studios instead of 4 bedroom detatched houses). I think anyone who thinks that house prices are holding up and have magical properties that allow them to rise 20% per year and never fall in value are dreaming.

NpNp 06 Jun 2008, 10:10am

The Halifax and Nationwide adjust for house types sold to give a more meaningful result. The land registry are something like 3 months behind and give a mathematical average, that is, if only expensive housing sell, then the average appears high.
Looking at all the evidence (and talking to an EA) houses are on the slide. We just don't have the wealth generation to support high prices. The economy has been run on credit for too long, and the bubble has burst. The credit crunch has only shown warning signs so far.

Kapid 06 Jun 2008, 11:16am

After reading the above comments, can anybody please advise me on purchase of a run down house, suffering from some subsidence problems and dampness. the houses in this area are about £300K as per EA's. However, the repair estimate is about £60K. Should I thus offer £240K or say even less than this, considering the housing market is not stable and it also unlikely that the mortgage lender will lend us any money until all the defects are rectified. Or should I just walk away.
Thanks

Jbat001 06 Jun 2008, 11:54am

The old chestnut about only 25% of the national housing stock being mortgaged belies the fact that this is not spread evenly. It's comprised of lots of older people with small mortgages from the last 3 decades, and a large number of younger people mortgaged at 80% LTV or higher.

Looking at the recent Halifax figures, and given that property markets are cyclical, and once they start to move in one direction, they tend to keep going in that direction, to imagine that the current downturn will level off, and we'll then return to 6% house price inflation within a year is not realistic.

To return to the mean house price for the last century will involve falls of at least 30% overall, and probably more in some areas of the UK. A very substantial number of people will have negative equity because of this, in at least some part because they accepted the lie (hook, line and sinker) that house prices were a one-way bet. A depressingly higher number of homebuyers (not BTL landlords) have taken to referring to buying their first home as 'investing in property'. It isn't.

As with all other markets, the key is to understand the fundamentals and to take a reasoned choice of when to enter and exit. The public shed few tears for the masses of FTB's who have been priced out in the last decade, so conversely, those FTB's will show no compassion for the overstretched borrowers who end up in negative equity.

cyprusal 06 Jun 2008, 12:38pm

Lies, damned lies and statistics.
I live in West Lancs and if house prices are meant to have gone down round here then nobody has bothered to tell the vendors or the agents as there has simply been no noticeable reduction.

chasbmw 06 Jun 2008, 12:45pm

savills have produced a report on the resi market today.

Best case: 8% down 2008 and a further 2% down 2009.
Worst case: 10% down 2008, 15% down 2009.

if i was thinking of buying a house that was worth 300K with 60k worth of works needed, I would take at least 20-30% off the £300K, to protect myself from further price falls and i would add 35% onto the cost of repairs to cover contingencies and to give myself some reward for the risks and work involved.On this basis you might be able to borrow on the project.

Chas

billyboy121 06 Jun 2008, 1:08pm

Kapic, I think Chas is bang on the money here, that £60k is purely notional and you'd be a taking a sig risk in not factoring in additional costs. Subsidence and damp are every homeowners' nightmare so be very careful there and if not corrected you could be sitting on a mortgage secured to an unsellable property. (Spot the pessimist!)

pyramidal 06 Jun 2008, 1:30pm

Kapic - how much is the property on the market for? Is the price already reflecting the state it is in? I am also looking at a house which needs 60k at least to do it up - it was priced at £315k and my offer was 275k originally then I had to go to 295k to beat another offer. House prices around here were in Jan around 400k but they may be less now. The area is very desirable but I'm still not sure..and I'm a cash buyer and renting.... Any advice from anyone on this topic would be truly welcome - should I hang in there or not?

chasbmw 06 Jun 2008, 2:06pm

I'm a cash buyer and renting and will be so for at least another 6-12 months.

Property values are on a slide and it will take some time for the market to settle to a level, where you can feel happy buying with a reasonable expectation that the value of your equity won't be reduced by further falls in value

Chas

chasbmw 06 Jun 2008, 2:18pm

there is a neat free little prgramme called 'property bee'that tracks changes in the descriptions and asking prices of properties for sale on rightmove. This allows you to monitor how long a property has been on the market and to track the reduction in asking prices. worth using. google 'property bee' to find the program. chas

Blackbird228 06 Jun 2008, 7:43pm

chasbmw - you can actually trace price falls on propertysnake.co.uk

whitehartlad - Hemingford Grey is a posh village so will be shielded from credit crunch for at least a few more months. I am from St.Ives across the river and a house next door purchased for 180k last year went for 135k at an auction now. 1 bed starter homes are 20k less than in early 2007

Mineworker 06 Jun 2008, 7:46pm

I see that several respondents living in more affluent areas have recorded no noticeable sliding of the housing market, or asking prices, in their areas. I live in south Wales, an area which has seen a greater weakening of the market than most other regions. A contributory factor must be the low wage feature of the local economy. Young people around here have little chance of saving the deposit needed to enter the market and prospective older purchasers are too frightened to make a move. Valley terraced streets are bristling with estate agents' noticeboards and "Sold" signs are as rare as hens' teeth!

Drunsfleet 06 Jun 2008, 9:07pm

It is all spin - the mainstream media presents house-price rises as bad news for buyers then when they stop rising and start falling it is bad news for sellers - the media love pedaling misery.

Your lead headline could just well have said 'Good news for buyers as house prices are now the most affordable they have been in 15 years'?

House price inflation out of sync with wage and general goods inflation is unsustainable - what we are experiencing now is market correction to make properties more in line with our salaries and other disposable incomes. I am on the housing ladder and welcome this.

As long as that is it doesn't slide into negative equity...

roykivaro 06 Jun 2008, 9:27pm

Houses cost more or less depending where you live.If you have a house that you can't or won't sell at the offered or going rate yo pricu have to keep it.Your choices are to live in it or to rent it out.If you sell it and rent another place to live in the hopethat

roykivaro 06 Jun 2008, 9:30pm

you gain by falling prices, but you have to pay rent and that adds up the longer you wait plus you need the will power not too spend any of your house money -how many of us have?

TMFArkle 07 Jun 2008, 11:21pm

I just thought I'd reply to a few comments in these posts.

- regional house price figures vary. That's always been the case in past property cycles and it doesn't surprise me in the slightest that the same is happening now.

- as rm966 says, the Halifax numbers are adjusted to take into account what kinds of property are being bought. I'm in no doubt that overall, Uk house prices are falling. That's important and I don't regret writing about it.

- I completely accept that for many people, falling house prices are a good thing. That's why I said: 'investors in residential property got more bad news today.'
In this article I said that some people gain:
http://www.fool.co.uk/news/your-money/2008/05/13/interest-rate-cut-looks-very-unlikely.aspx

- I also think that a modest fall in property prices followed by some sideways movement for a while would be good for the UK economy.

- I strongly disagree with the argument that because only £1.1bn worth of a £4.7bn market is mortgaged, house prices are safe. Prices in all markets are driven by supply and demand. For the most part, there isn't a vast amount of supply in the UK housing market. That's one reason why house prices have gone up so much in recent years. But if demand falls off - as is happening - then house prices will fall.

And demand is falling off:

- many FTBs can't get mortgages
- it may get harder for some homeowners to get larger mortgages to move upmarket
- budgets are being hit by rising prices which once again reduces the likelihood of people wanting to move upmarket

Ed

jeffslaw 08 Jun 2008, 6:10am

In this market surprisingly we recently found the house of our dreams only to be gazumped or outbid with the house eventually selling for £100,000 above the asking price. the other bidder offering to match or improve any further increase we might care to put up. We had to withdraw. Our own house which in its own way is pretty impeccable has been on the market for four months and we have had hardly any viewings. We have reduced the price 8% from the original asking price. WE have another property in mind now where the price had been reduced by 6% and to purchase it we would probably want a further 5 or 6% reduction. Even then I feel that the price is unlikely to hold up. However, when one is buying to live in the property for at least five years possibly longer, the current trend is not so important. The people who are suffering most probably are the investors, the buy to let market, which has according to information received has taken a real pasting.

advertisment 09 Jun 2008, 2:06pm

Swarbs - HBOS actually publishes an article on their methodology for calculating the Halifax House Price Index on their website. It's not a simple "add up the sterling value of all our mortgages and divide it by the number of mortages" they do account for the type of house. I agree with you though that if their methodology was as simple as you suggest then the index would be pretty useless. As for the official inflation figures produced by Office of National Statistics I think you will find that they also use something more sophisticated than you realise.

Join the conversation

Instructions

Line breaks are converted automatically.

You may use the following tags in your post: <b>bold</b>, <i>quoted text</i>. All other tags will be removed from your post.

Hello stranger

To add your own comment, please login.

Not yet registered? Register now.