Skip Navigation
 

Why I Don't Trust House Price Indices

<%=_author %>

By

Stuart J Watson

From the Fool blog

How To Bag A Bargain This Christmas

Published in Property and Home on 17 July 2007

The media is obsessed with house price indices. But they're misleading and worse than useless when it comes to forecasting house price movements.

One of my (many) bugbears is house price indices. Or, to be more precise, my issue is the media's obsession with every tiny movement that they have.

There are several surveys to choose from these days. Oh for the good old days when we only had to worry about Nationwide and Halifax numbers. Recent years have seen new measures launched by Hometrack, Rightmove, Financial Times and even the government. To add to the confusion, some surveys are purely on averages of others, rather than analysing their own unique data.

They all say different things

It's rare for two surveys to agree with each other. The differences between their figures can be quite significant. This is mostly due to the fact that they all measure house price growth in different ways. Some have regional biases and others ignore purchases made without a mortgage or make seasonal adjustments. As there's no real definitive index, the press comments on all of them as if they were equally authoritative.

They're analysed to the nth degree

Most of the data is analysed monthly (any bets on how it will be before someone produces a weekly index?). In itself, monthly data isn't a problem. The problem lies in trying to discern anything meaningful from such a small data set. There are around 150,000 residential property sales a month in the UK at the moment. So each month's data represents about 0.5% of our total housing stock of 25 million and most surveys only look at a fraction of sales each month.

It's a bit like trying to calculate someone's average speed on a long car journey by just looking at how fast they're going over a period of a few minutes. They could be speeding down a motorway or waiting at some traffic lights. In either case, you're not going to get any useful information.

The folly of forecasting

Each small bit of data is then used to predict what might happen next. Could the long period of growth we've enjoyed be easing or even reversing? Forecasts, especially those about most people's biggest asset, make cheap and easy copy unfortunately. So they are afforded much more weight than they deserve.

Surely it must be obvious to most people by now that nobody has the slightest idea what house prices will do next. Previous forecasts have been so hopelessly wrong but there is always a new prediction to divert your attention from that fact.

As it happens, I find it oddly therapeutic not knowing which direction the housing market will go next. Everyone else seems a little exasperated by this, convinced that a financial writer should have some special insight. Nobody does though and appreciating this simple fact can save you many hours of futile house price angst.

Share & subscribe

Comments

The opinions expressed here are those of the individual writers and are not representative of The Motley Fool. If you spot any comments that are unsuitable hit the flag to alert our moderators.

Jo3366 10 Jun 2008, 8:09am

I completely agree with your article - I think the media has a lot to answer for. If there were not articles being printed here, there and everywhere, I think most people would still be buying. As there is constantly something on the news about the 'credit crunch' people start to panic. The minute the media stop talking about the credit crunch, is when people start to buy - and the minute people start to buy, and there is a raise in house prices and then this is also reported - people will all jump on the ladder and house prices will go back up!

If you're not buying because you think it's a bad time, I would reconsider. If you are going to move into a new house, and stay there for over 2 years, then why not? house prices will go up. Everything goes up, and we're only reporting this 'credit crunch' so much, as it is something that never happens!

Jimeni 02 Jul 2008, 9:41am

Jo,
Have you ever looked at previous house price crashes? Such as the 90s. Property prices fell 28% and were stagnant for years. 2 Years is not long enough to plan to stay, people should be thinking more like 10.

I almost agree that people should be if they are ready, but I'm here sitting on a healthy deposit and not buying as why should I? Prices are falling £1700 a month and its a real actual saving for me as a first time buyer.

I'll bide my time and take my chances as I've seen the graphs and if we are in for a crash (which I think highly likely) then we can expect stagnant prices for a long time to come. All this talk of 'missing the boat' is estate agent waffle and note based on historical events.

Jim

Join the conversation

Instructions

Line breaks are converted automatically.

You may use the following tags in your post: <b>bold</b>, <i>quoted text</i>. All other tags will be removed from your post.

Hello stranger

To add your own comment, please login.

Not yet registered? Register now.