Revealed: The No-Cost Way To Buy Shares

Published in Investing Strategy on 22 October 2010

Pay low -- or zero -- commission through monthly savings schemes.

Those of us old enough to remember the bad old days of full service brokers -- and their eye-watering fees -- appreciate only too well the joys of today's 'execution-only' brokers.

In short, if all you want to do is buy or sell shares (as opposed to receiving advice), then these low-cost brokers are hard to beat.

For a flat fee of typically around £10, the deal is done. It's goodbye to the previous hefty £25 or so fee you'd pay a full service broker for the same transaction, plus -- believe it or not -- sometimes a percentage-based commission as well.

And for those in the know, and who are prepared to buy shares on a regular monthly basis, a number of brokers -- including the Motley Fool's Share Dealing service -- offer an even better option.

For a fixed fee of £1.50 or so -- yes, you read that right -- you can buy shares on a number of set 'dealing days'.

Drip-fed diversification

I'm a big fan of such an approach. It's ideal for regular savers wanting to gain low-cost access to the stock market, and it's a great way for new investors to get started with investing, without paying an arm and a leg in fees.

It also makes it simple to achieve diversification at a low cost. Your £1.50 fee can buy you any number of ETFs or investment trusts, each coming pre-bundled as a basket of shares in different companies. Again, that's great news for those new to investing.

Here at The Fool we're keen to draw investors' attention to the merits of both ETFs and investment trusts, so a commission of just £1.50 has 'bargain' written all over it.

It gets better

But there's an even cheaper way of buying a stake in some (though only some) of Britain's best and most popular investment trusts.

How about a commission of nothing? That's right. Zero, zilch, nada.

A number of investment trusts offer zero-commission purchases of their trusts via monthly savings plans. Yet it's fair to say that these aren't all that well-publicised.

Indeed, I struggled at first to find out which trusts offered such schemes. While monthly savings schemes with a commission of £5 or even £1.50 aren't difficult to find, the only comprehensive list I found of precisely which trust charges what commission was at the Association of Investment Companies (AIC).

The AIC tells me that it eventually plans to provide a direct link to this information on monthly savings plans. In the meantime, you'll have to scroll down to page 48 of this document to get the lowdown.

Top picks

It's not the most exciting material you'll ever read, so to save you the bother I've gone through the list and picked out the 'best buys' for you.

The table below details what I've found. I haven't listed every trust offering zero-commission saving plans, as some of the trusts are either very obscure, very small, or both.

I've also screened for affordability. Fund manager Artemis, for instance, and the well-known Personal Assets Trust (LSE: PNL) both offer zero-commission savings plans. However the minimum monthly subscription is an eye-watering £500. Fine for some, I'm sure, but not best suited to the beginning investor.

Finally, a 'worthy mention' goes to a number of fund managers such as Baring Asset Management and F&C Asset Management who charge just 0.2% -- a sum that still works out cheaper than other brokers' £1.50 charge, even for very modest monthly savings. But free they're not, so they didn't make the cut.

The cheapest savings plans revealed

Here, at last, is the table. Sadly, there isn't space to list the various individuals trust on offer by each manager: some offer just a few, others rather more. And some are definitely worth a second look -- Baillie Gifford, for instance, offers half a dozen or so well regarded trusts, including its flagship Scottish Mortgage Trust (LSE: SMT).

Fund ManagerMinimum
monthly
saving
Buying
commission
Selling
commission
Axa Investment Managers£50NilNil
Baillie Gifford£30Nil£22
Fidelity Investments£50NilNil
Investec Asset Management£50NilNil
Standard Life£50NilNil


Strangely, the AIC doesn't seem to provide an easy way to see which managers offer which trusts. So you'll have to click on the managers' names and dig around.

As far as I can see, for instance, Standard Life offers only four -- including its flagship Standard Life Equity Income Trust (LSE: SLET).

Happy hunting!

More from Malcolm Wheatley:

> Malcolm owns shares in Scottish Mortgage Trust.

>  Claim your FREE financial guides -- The Motley Fool has teamed up with a number of partners to offer our users free financial guides on topics such as tax planning, funds and much, much more. Click here to download your reports today!

Share & subscribe

Comments

The opinions expressed here are those of the individual writers and are not representative of The Motley Fool. If you spot any comments that are unsuitable hit the flag to alert our moderators.

BarrenFluffit 22 Oct 2010 , 2:30pm

Well spotted! Good article;

Tortoise1000 22 Oct 2010 , 6:46pm

I looked into this a while ago, but it seemed to be mainly for people who want to invest directly, not inside an ISA. A self select ISA seems more convenient and flexible for a small saver, in the long run. Individual company ISAs are a pain if you want to change investments, and investing outside ISAs attracts tax.

Juliusz 25 Oct 2010 , 4:14pm

I agree with Tortoise1000. In my opinion there are two scenarios.
Either, you are a small player, invest less than 10k per year and use self select ISA account; or you are doing it for real and in that case 10 pounds of commission does not make difference.

MDW1954 25 Oct 2010 , 4:23pm

Folks, for a basic rate taxpayer, it makes no difference from an income tax point of view if the shares are held inside or outside an ISA.

Malcolm (author)

Tortoise1000 25 Oct 2010 , 5:02pm

Yes, we know that, Malcolm. But not everyone is a basic rate tax payer.

People on higher incomes pay 40%

People who get tax credits pay 61%

Pensioners having the age allowance clawed back pay 30%

We could be all of these at different times in our lives. So it is best to shelter what you can in an ISA, to be on the safe side.

T




rober00 25 Oct 2010 , 5:19pm

Malcolm those who offer zero charges for regular savers also normally offer zero charges for lump sum investments as well.

I started investing in this way in the days of yaw you mention but sadly many of the trusts which offfered this (and it the trusts themselves who decide, not the manager) now charge at a level which is not very competative with discount brokers.

I fear those that still do will die out in due course as the setup and stopping of investments is often outmoded, requiring you to "write" rather than deal with them online!!

MDW1954 25 Oct 2010 , 5:21pm

T, the scenario I had in mind when writing the article was of a basic rate taxpayer putting aside a small amount each month, and doing so commission-free.

There's nothing to stop them transferring the whole lot to an ISA after a few years. And in the meantime, they won't have paid any tax.

Saving the same amount each month in an ISA incurs commission, and often a six-monthly or annual fee, as well.

Malcolm

RobinnBanks 25 Oct 2010 , 7:04pm

There is no CGTax on ISAs, and you do not have to tell the tax man about them; which is a benefit well worth having.

Clitheroekid 25 Oct 2010 , 8:46pm

The EPIC code for Personal Assets Trust is PNL, not PAT.

MDW1954 25 Oct 2010 , 9:13pm

Thanks, Clitheroekid.

I've reported it, and it will be fixed ASAP.

Malcolm (author)

Sidekicker101 26 Oct 2010 , 8:42am

The UK is waaaay behind the US in this regard. £10 is practically robbing you blind. The likes of some US brokers only charge half a cent per share!.
£1.50 is more like it but it's still not great.

soulsaver1 26 Oct 2010 , 11:26am

"Folks, for a basic rate taxpayer, it makes no difference from an income tax point of view if the shares are held inside or outside an ISA.

Malcolm (author)"

Maybe so for those with a small pot; but you Guys at tMF need to start realising about how big peoples S&S ISA pots can be now that cash ISA's can be transfered in. And with miserable deposit interest rates and a good shares run last year I'll bet theres quite a few that could threaten CGT levels if taking profits outside a tax wrapper.

MDW1954 26 Oct 2010 , 12:21pm

Hello soulsaver1,

I agree with you 100%. That's why I was talking about income tax in that quote, not CGT.

But for someone starting to invest (say) £100/ month outside an ISA, CGT won't be a concern for quite a while.

Malcolm (author)

Join the conversation

Please take note - some tags have changed.

Line breaks are converted automatically.

You may use the following tags in your post: [b]bolded text[/b], [i]italicised text[/i]. All other tags will be removed from your post.

If you want to add a link, please ensure you type it as http://www.fool.co.uk as opposed to www.fool.co.uk.

Hello stranger

To add your own comment, please login.

Not yet registered? Register now.