Topping Up My Portfolio

Published in Investing Strategy on 26 August 2010

How do you decide which shares to buy more of?

In my recent article Dealing With An Expanding Portfolio, I confessed that I had stopped hunting for new shares, and was simply looking to average up or down on my existing holdings instead. 

That meant I no longer needed a watchlist, because my portfolio is my watchlist. All I had to do was wait until my favourite stocks lost a little juice, then fill 'em up.

Fellow Fool itsallaguess posted a comment asking for a follow-up, saying: "If your portfolio is your watchlist, then how do you go about using it as such, and in what way do you select the next share to 'top-up'?"

It's a good question. And here's the answer.

As I wrote last time, I have 18 stocks, with holdings ranging between around £800 and £3,600. I reckon I'm spread a bit too thin. Even a 10-bagger won't make you rich if you only invest £800. That's why I'm planning to feed and nurture the stocks I already own, rather than looking for fresh mouths to feed. Here are six ways I select the next share to top up.

1. Recent performance

Cheapness is my weakness. I like buying after a stock has fallen, because I feel I'm getting more for my money. That's why I hold Ladbrokes (LSE: LAD). 

I bought in January at 153p, after noting that it had fallen from 208p over the previous six months. A big name like Ladbrokes isn't going bust, I reckoned, so I positioned myself for a lucrative rebound. It now trades at, um, 131p.

The danger with buying on weakness is that there may be more bad news to come. Ladbrokes posted a fall in profits for the six months to June, from £130 million to £105 million, with the benefits of the World Cup offset by too many favourites winning races. Dang those favourites! It will take time to turn the business around, so although it's cheap, it could get cheaper, and I'm waiting….

2. Portfolio balance

I will focus my early efforts on the thin little squits in my portfolio, to give them a bit more fat and muscle. I have invested just £950 in Royal Dutch Shell (LSE: RDSB), and it looks in need of some nourishment.

Its share price has barely shifted since I bought it in September last year, but at least I've pocketed a 6.6% yield. After nearly touching 2,000p at the start of May, it now trades at 1,646p, a drop of 17%. With the oil price dipping to $73 a barrel, Shell seems to satisfy both points 1 and 2. Tony Luckett has some other oil stock ideas.

By contrast, I've got enough exposure to Aviva (LSE: AV) for now, as it's my largest holding.

The Motley Fool presents an Exclusive 'Behind the Scenes' look at the revolutionary Champion Shares PRO share-tipping service! CLAIM YOUR ACCESS To get a sneak peak of the information and tips normally only available to paying subscribers, CLICK HERE TO JOIN THE PRIORITY WAITING LIST

3. Nasty shocks

A company setback can be a good opportunity to top up existing holdings, which is what I thought when I threw good money at BP (LSE: BP) in April and early August. Oops.

I was also considering investing more in Prudential (LSE: PRU) at around the same time. It made a right hash of its recent Asian shopping trip, and the beginning of July seemed like a good point to buy when it dipped below 500p. 

I thought its price would recover once investors stopped being irritated with chief executive Tidjane Thiam. Indeed, it has rebounded a little. Sadly, I spent my cash on BP instead. At this early stage, it looks like I backed the wrong horse, but we'll see how things develop.

4. The macro view

It's often better to buy on general market weakness, when good companies are unfairly knocked by bearish sentiment. 

As I wrote in Beware the Double Death Cross, I'm looking to buy on future market dips. If the FTSE 100 hits, say, 4800, I'll be looking for old faves that have taken an unfair drubbing. 

That might be Aveva Group (LSE: AVV), which has returned 87% from my two shopping trips in May 2009 and March this year, and is now worth £2,400. The problem with this stock is that it hasn't tended to slip back when the rest of the market has fallen. So I may look at alternatives like Prudential, depending on what looks the best value at the time.

5. Dividends

As investment conditions change, so do our priorities. Like many investors, I've learned to appreciate the joys of dividends. I've got just £900 in Royal Bank of Scotland (LSE: RBS), which fulfills points 2 and 3, but the lack of dividend puts me off from topping it up. 

GlaxoSmithKline (LSE: GSK) has a 5% yield and nice defensive qualities, and that's why I recently topped up my £1,000 holding with another £500, a move that has paid off so far.

6. Getting even

They say you should keep emotion out of investing, but c'mon, we are not robots. I spend £1,000 on mining company Rio Tinto (LSE: RIO) in mid-May at 3,370p then set a nervy stop-loss that triggered a sale at 3,025p one week later. It then rebounded to 3,500p. Silly me. 

Now it trades a bit lower again and if it dips below 3,000p I might buy again, and cheer myself up by claiming it was all part of some grand masterplan.

So there you go, itsallaguess. I hope that answers your question. And even more importantly, I hope my strategy works.

More from Harvey Jones:

> Harvey owns Ladbrokes, Shell, Aviva, BP, Prudential, RBS and GSK. 

> For two weeks in September we will be opening the doors of our Champion Shares PRO newsletter service. In order to keep our exclusivity, only a select number of our readership will be able to join us. This is your chance to guarantee your place! Click here to join the priority waiting list.

Share & subscribe

Comments

The opinions expressed here are those of the individual writers and are not representative of The Motley Fool. If you spot any comments that are unsuitable hit the flag to alert our moderators.

timthegambler 26 Aug 2010 , 1:33pm

Quite a lot of high-risk shares: Rio Tinto, RBS, Aviva and BP! Fan of volatility?

Saying that I hold 4 of the same shares as you mention. For the same reason, they seem cheap!

chilli77 26 Aug 2010 , 3:50pm

The link at the start of the article is broken. Interesting read though , gives you some food for thought.

ht51 27 Aug 2010 , 12:27pm

Do you take your dividends in cash or do you reinvest them in the share?

Sharemaiden 27 Aug 2010 , 3:34pm

I assume you meant AVIVA not AVEVA in point 4, given that you are siting Prudential as an alternative.

Jonesey12 27 Aug 2010 , 3:49pm

Harvey Jones here!

Hi timthegambler. I guess there is a lot of volatility there, and a lot of gambles (BP) that haven't paid off yet. I'm trying to balance this out with the dividend payers.

chilli77 - thanks, I'll alert my editor!

ht51. I take my dividends and reinvest them as soon as I have enough money in my account, usually after topping it up with cash from my bank account.

Sharemaiden. I actually do mean Aveva, by alternative I didn't mean alternative insurer. Perhaps I should have added a seventh point - sector balance.

AChembi 27 Aug 2010 , 6:45pm

I would rather go for the following shares:
PAF.L, GGG.L, POL.L
@ GBP 1000 each, and keep aside for the next 6 months.

SanMiguel101 27 Aug 2010 , 10:03pm

Isn't rebalancing an industry invention to get more commissions?
Am I correct in saying you only add to the ones that have gone down and leave the ones that have gone up?

geeWCee 29 Aug 2010 , 9:44am

AChembi, let us know how you get on with those penny shares!

wastedyouth 30 Aug 2010 , 8:56pm

If you have holdings in the range £800 to £3,600 and say 10 or 20 companies, then its going to be a long time until you can collect enough dividends to re invest a reasonable amount, say £500 - my minimum given the minimum dealing costs (£11.95 ish using Halifax online).

One way to avoid dealing costs is to pick a company which pays dividend in stock , e.g Rolls Royce. RR often hand out "B" shares, which later on get converted to "A" shares, so you can effectively re invest a small dividend of £12 or so, without dealing costs or income tax. Or you can opt for a cash dividend instead of B shares and pay the tax.

Another option is to pick a company which has good earnings, but doesn't pay a high dividend. Instead of paying a dividend, paying tax and reinvesting the dividend back in the same company, thereby incurring dealing spread & trading commission, the money simply stays in the company. The company re invests the dividend for you by retaining it as earnings. Of course, you have to pick a company with prudent management so the retained earnings result in more value and earnings growth, and doesn't get wasted on illogical acquisitions or high exective payouts etc.

I can see how you got into the position of many companies at low amounts £800 upwards. If like me you can only invest say £500 each month or £1,000 every few months, the market moves before you can stock up at a good price, so what was a value stock two months ago may not be so when you get enough money to make a new investment. Therefore you pick the best one at the time. Each purchase made good sense and was value at the time, but by stealth you now have a diversified portfolio, albeit with each stock purchased at a good price.

Following Buffett, theres no such thing as a portfolio management, the portfolio is only the sum of the parts. Therefore, why should it matter that you have many different stocks as long as they were all bought at a good discount to value? Unless of course, you want to save time by only following a few.

bouleversee 31 Aug 2010 , 11:32am

"A big name like Ladbroke's isn't going to go bust, I reckoned". Where have you been living or are you too young to remember? I have had several big names which have gone bust on me (GEC/Marconi, British & Commonwealth, Polly Peck, Anglo Irish Bank immediately spring to mind), much to my surprise. I am also losing money on several long term holdings in big names, including Glaxo, Land Securities, BP, Lonmin, to name but a few. It's all a gamble; you never know what's going to spring out of the woodwork (who could have anticipated the events at De La Rue?) or sometimes creep out of the woodwork but one thinks it was a one-off and things will get better. Sometimes they do, eg Clarkson, James Fisher and British Polythene have recovered substantially from their lows. I'm blowed if I know when to sell, especially if they are companies I like, such as the last few. I bought more of those at a low point which has paid off and probably should sell some now but chances are if I do they will continue to rise, with perhaps a dip in the short term along with everything else if we get a double dip, and if I do sell, chances are that what I put the cash into next won't do as well. I have also bought more in some companies after a drop which have then gone down the drain. I have sold half if a company has doubled (or tripled in the case of Topps Tiles) in a very short period but would have done better to have hung on for a bit longer. In cases like Fisher (and Imperial Tobacco to a lesser extent), it was a steady increase which has now amounted to a substantial sum and I suppose I should rebalance and I am screwing myself up to do that, as I should have done with Anglo Irish Bank (I also used to think that banks and big names couldn't go bust) when I was sitting on a massive gain, but heaven knows where to put the dosh; nothing tempts me at the moment and cash in an ISA earns nothing. Without a crystal ball, as I said, it's all a gamble and if one tends to buy and hold, as I do, the more shares (within reason) in the portfolio, the better. I haven't reinvested divs. in the companies concerned because I couldn't face the calculations for the tax returns when they were sold or taken over, albeit somewhat less onerous now. I don't now spend less than £2000, unless it is a top-up on a holding which has lost but I'm getting wary of those, taking the view that my existing holding is enough to risk and will benefit from a recovery.

bouleversee 31 Aug 2010 , 4:21pm

Just read that Warren Buffet said that "diversion is a protection against ignorance". Sums my situation up to perfection.

AChembi 31 Aug 2010 , 11:32pm

geeWCee, those are few samples to consider in view of the current situation where uncertainty is in the picture. Frankly I am happy with my holdings. I obtained some of them and still keep them with intention to maximise profit later on. The last 12 months show a ' positive' sign in their prices. You can try comparing them with BP, FTIndices and other bluechips even going back to the last 2 yrs. The figures speak themselves!

Join the conversation

Please take note - some tags have changed.

Line breaks are converted automatically.

You may use the following tags in your post: [b]bolded text[/b], [i]italicised text[/i]. All other tags will be removed from your post.

If you want to add a link, please ensure you type it as http://www.fool.co.uk as opposed to www.fool.co.uk.

Hello stranger

To add your own comment, please login.

Not yet registered? Register now.