The Basics Of Valuing Companies

Published in Investing Strategy on 23 August 2010

Valuation is at the heart of all investment decisions.

Every time you choose to buy or sell a share you take a view on what the share is worth, and whether the market's valuation is high, low, or about right.

So over the next few weeks, we are going to take a look at valuing shares as an explicit, practical discipline. We will first run through the basic methods, and then have a look at how they can be applied in practice on companies in various sectors.

Valuation methods tend to focus on numbers, but they need to be considered in the context of the company's prospects, and the risks in its business.

Two Main Approaches

There are two main approaches:

  • Relative valuation –how does the company's share price compare with other companies in the same sector, or the market as a whole?

  • Future income - by forecasting the future profits, cash flow, dividends or other economic factors of the company.

How Much Time Have You Got?

If investing is your day job, then you have the time to build comprehensive financial models and make sensible forecasts from which discounted cash flow valuations can be derived. That is what a stockbroker's analyst, covering a handful of companies all in the same sector, will do.

But the amount of time and effort required to use DCF and other forecasting methods means that they are not very often practical tools for the individual investor.

The Relative Valuation Approach

So I am a fan of the relative valuation approach -- and not just for basic share valuation metrics such as P/E ratio and dividend yield. It is very instructive, when researching a company, to look at one or more other companies in the same sector. Apart from the numbers, the most useful things to compare include:

  • Business mix and geographical coverage;

  • The business model and strategy; and

  • What the management says about trading conditions and prospects.

If you only look at one comparative company, choose a large, well-researched one which makes some effort, in its accounts and/or on its website, to explain its strategy and the important trends and developments in its industry.

Consensus Forecasts

There is one important area in which private investors can benefit from the analysts' financial models. Consensus forecasts of revenues, earnings and dividends are widely available for most stocks. These are averages of the forecasts of all the analysts covering a stock, and as companies give "guidance" about their prospects, forecasts for the next year end are based on more than just idle speculation.

So where possible I would usually use the prospective P/E ratio and dividend yield (based on the forecast for earnings and dividend for the next year end) in comparing companies.

Approach

Putting all this together, my approach is:

1. Choose one or more comparator companies.

2. Learn about the sector, and how the business and strategy of the company compares with others in the sector. From this you can form a view as to the prospects and downside risks for the company.

3. Compare the basic valuation measures: prospective (or historic) PE, dividend yield, PEG ratio etc. This is a good time to look at analysts' recommendations.

4. If the basic valuation measures do not make sense, then look at other valuation measures such as price/sales or price/book value.

5. Look at how the share price has performed over the past twelve months (or longer).

6. Examine and compare the operating performance: revenues, margins, return on capital etc.

7. Examine and compare the financial strength: gearing, dividend cover, cash flow, tangible assets etc.

8. Look for any hidden liabilities or value, e.g. pension fund deficits, over- or under-valued properties.

A Comparison Table

Drawing up a table such as the one below is a quick and easy process which helps focus attention on what may be driving the market's valuation of a share:

 Company XCompany Y
Size:  
Market capitalisation £m  
Revenues £m  
   
Profitability:  
Operating margin %  
Return on capital %  
   
Financial strength  
Net gearing %  
Dividend cover  
Net cash flow/operating profit %  
Net tangible asset per share (pence)  
   
Growth  
Revenue growth %  
EPS growth %  
Dividend per share growth %  
   
Valuation  
Share price (pence)  
52 week high/low (pence)  
Historic P/E  
Historic dividend yield %  
PEG ratio  
   
Forecasts  
Prospective P/E  
Prospective dividend yield %  
PEG ratio  

All of the numbers can be taken from the Quotes and Data section of this website, with just a little bit of arithmetic required for the revenue growth and cash flow ratios.

In the next article, we will look at the various metrics in more detail.

More from Tony Reading:

> For two weeks in September we will be opening the doors of our Champion Shares PRO newsletter service. In order to keep our exclusivity, only a select number of our readership will be able to join us. This is your chance to guarantee your place! Click here to join the priority waiting list.

Share & subscribe

Comments

The opinions expressed here are those of the individual writers and are not representative of The Motley Fool. If you spot any comments that are unsuitable hit the flag to alert our moderators.

F958B 24 Aug 2010 , 7:46pm

Operating margin is a double-edged sword.
Companies with high margins relative to their sector may be efficiently run (e.g. Tesco), but companies with low margins may have room for some increases in profits, or a takeover by a bigger, more efficient rival (e.g. SBRY).

P.E.G. ratio is best left with tech shares in the 1990's. I have yet to see PEG give many meaningful conclusions.
A utility company might only grow profits in line with inflation - say 3%.
With a typical P/E of about 9-12x, the PEG, at 3-4x, would be considered to be super-bubble valuation.
Inflation can dramatially skew the PEG, since low inflation might mean low profit growth, yet low inflation might mean low interest rates, which might mean that higher P/E's (and higher PEG's) are justified, since investors are starved of any return on cash.

Forward earnings forecasts are almost always too optimistic. Be careful when using forward estimates.

52 week high-low is often misleading.
In my experience, once a share hits a new 52 week low, it then usually continues to make new, lower lows, intermittently, for a year or two (a bear market in that share or sector - bears often last 2-3 years). There are few bargains to be found at fresh 12-month lows.
Perversely, a share that has just made a 52 week high often has a combination of good profitability and momentum behind it. New highs are often followed by a string of higher highs.
Obviously, if a share has had a long run of new highs (or new lows), then beware that a turning point may come.

Net gearing often looks bad for utility companies, but their very stable profits allow a much higher level of gearing to be carried without a problem. Highly cyclical companies (e.g. housebuilders) with lots of gearing are vulnerable.

Benatar 26 Aug 2010 , 1:09pm
Benatar 26 Aug 2010 , 1:13pm

Everything said in the article makes sense, but for some companies, e.g. property companies, the value of the assets has a greater effect than PE etc.

I'm struggling with a specific - Arena - operators of Race Courses. By conventional analysis looking at PE, PEG etc they are v expensive; but their property has a significant part to play in its valuation. There are not enough other plcs in that sector for comparisons to be worthwhile, so any suggestions, would be welcomed.

Sharky101 30 Nov 2010 , 1:39pm

I am trying to get my head around these 'Basics' but they are not as basic (at least for me) as I had hoped.

Trawled through a few sets of Company 'Fundamentals' on the Quotes and Data section of the site but I cannot work out what goes in the "Net cash flow/operating profit %" section of Tony's Comparison Table. I appreciate that this is an important measurement, and I want to get it right!

Can anyone more experienced at valuing companies, or Tony himself, please enlighten me?

Join the conversation

Please take note - some tags have changed.

Line breaks are converted automatically.

You may use the following tags in your post: [b]bolded text[/b], [i]italicised text[/i]. All other tags will be removed from your post.

If you want to add a link, please ensure you type it as http://www.fool.co.uk as opposed to www.fool.co.uk.

Hello stranger

To add your own comment, please login.

Not yet registered? Register now.