One Crazy Portfolio

Published in Investing Strategy on 17 March 2010

This is no way to run a portfolio -- but it has worked.

The wealthiest investor I know also has by far the craziest portfolio. No investment advisor or Motley Fool writer would recommend assembling a portfolio made up entirely of shoot-the-lights out gunslingers, but it has worked for him.

I don't know exactly how wealthy he is. He isn't richer than Croesus, but he is certainly a lot richer than Greece (isn't everybody these days?). He runs his own investment website, although I can't tell you which one, because he doesn't want everybody to know he has adopted such a harebrained strategy.

Harebrained, but it works.

You bought what!

He recently walked me through his portfolio, and it was quite a jaw-dropper. He doesn't follow the normal rules of investing, such as building a solid base using low-cost trackers, adding a sprinkling of dividend-paying blue chips, and spicing it up with one or two whizzy small caps. He doesn't have a balance of stocks, cash, property and bonds, spread over different sectors and markets. He doesn't do balanced at all.

He has a sizeable holding in Aer Lingus, whose share price has plunged from €2.1 to just €0.6 over the past two years. Aer Lingus has taken a hammering, and he likes that. He likes this stock fully straightforward reason that "if it doesn't go bust then one day its shares will go through the roof."

He gave me a similar argument for investing in interdealer broker Tullett Prebon (LSE: TLPR), travel and leisure company National Express (LSE: NEX) and Punch Taverns (LSE: PUB) -- "they have all taken a smack, but as long as they don't collapse, one day they'll be back".

Enterprising chap

His portfolio is full of stocks like these. Enterprise Inns (LSE: ETI), whose share price has fallen from 500p to just 119p in the last two years, Songbird Estates (LSE: SBD), down from 550p to 183p over the same period, and waste management company Shanks Group (LSE: SKS), down by half. He also holds BT Group (LSE: BT-A), "'cos it looks pretty cheap".

He is also invested in 3i (LSE: III), Drax (LSE: DRX), John Menzies (LSE: MNZS) and a bunch of other companies, but couldn't remember why. Finally, he also holds Aviva (LSE: AV) and Legal & General (LSE: LGEN), potential takeover targets for Resolution (LSE: RSL).

Method in his madness

You can see a pattern to his portfolio. He is primarily looking for bombed-out companies that may one day rebound. It is the dash for trash all over again, plus the odd takeover target.

I said you had to be rich to be that aggressive, but he disagreed, claiming his strategy is broadly defensive (I told you he was crazy). "I don't care if one or two of those companies goes bust. Some probably will. But they won't all go bust, not unless the global economy falls off a cliff, which it won't. If some of these stocks grow three, four or five times, that will more than offset any losses."

Aggressive, according to his thinking, is the new defensive. Crazy is the new sane.

Why didn't I listen?

And he has done well out of it. At the start of last year, he recommended I invested in car dealer Pendragon. He didn't think that would go bust, and he was right. Instead, it grew about 1,000%. "I've made you rich, Harvey?" he said next time I called, but he didn't make me rich, because I didn't have the guts to invest in Pendragon (LSE: PDG) at the time. He did.

Some of his other bets are also paying off, notably Tullett Prebon, National Express and Enterprise Inns, while Aer Lingus is picking up slightly. Others haven't performed -- yet. Punch Taverns has edged down, Shanks has slipped, Songbird has flatlined, but none of them have gone bust, they are still in the game.

My crazy friend isn't trying to time the market, he says he doesn't know when the stocks in his portfolio will return to favour, if they ever do. He just buys companies that have taken a hammering, but should live to fight another day. And when they do, his portfolio will come out swinging.

You crazy Fool

My friend didn't start by investing so aggressively, but he can afford to do so now. I wish I could too. It sounds a lot more fun than more sensible strategies such as investing for long-term dividend growth (if you can take the rough and tumble).

Everybody should have an investment buddy like mine. Every time I speak to him, I feel like I've been injected with a vial of super-charged investor adrenaline. This is no way to run a portfolio, but I really, really, really wish it was mine.

More from Harvey Jones:

Harvey has an interest in Aviva and is summoning up the courage to invest more bravely.

Share & subscribe

Comments

The opinions expressed here are those of the individual writers and are not representative of The Motley Fool. If you spot any comments that are unsuitable hit the flag to alert our moderators.

rober00 17 Mar 2010 , 4:46pm

If it truely works then "well done" to him Harvey!!!

They say that any new strategy that works will quickly be picked up by the Market and incorporated, but his sounds like it might be one that is crazy enough to avoid that fate.

lotontech 17 Mar 2010 , 5:15pm

Great Article!

There's not just one crazy portfolio out there, there's at least two because -- by sheer coincidence -- you got very close to describing MY crazy portfolio. See my latest portfolio snapshot here:

http://tradingtrail.blogspot.com/2010/03/account-stats-we-2010-03-13.html

Ok, it's not an extact one-for-one match, but only because my 'public' trading account has certain restrictions. But if you could peer inside my other account(s) you would also find Aer Lingus, Songbird, and Pendragon that you mention.

As Rober says, if it works for him (and me) then good luck to us ;-)

I wouldn't like to meet this guy though, as you know what happens when you meet your doppleganger :-(

WealthyInvestor 18 Mar 2010 , 12:15pm

Whilst it may be entertaining from a journalistic perspective to write this article in this way, as though your friend were some off-the-wall radical contrarian 'crazy' investing guru, the reality if indeed he has been as successful as you suggest, is that he is simply adopting very widely known and understood investing principles that have been around for a very long time but don't sound half as entertaining when explained in the style of Benjamin Graham.

Whether he sees the companies he invests in as what Buffet would have termed 'cigar butt' companies with one last puff left in them, or longer term propositions that may stand the test of time, is not really the issue. What he is doing is identifying companies that are, in his opinion, undervalued. It doesn't really matter what approach you take, if you are good at buying undervalued businesses and selling them when they have gone up, there is nothing either radical, crazy, contrarian, or indeed different about that at all. Whether you are buying RBS or BP, the principle of buying it at a 'value' price applies exactly the same. Astrazeneca was £21 a year ago and was nearly £30 last week. Barclays was 60p a year back, now its over £3. Doesn't matter what you are buying, it is a simple principle that just requires skill to apply. I say 'just' as though it were simple, when in fact of course it actually requires capability, knowledge and high level judgement. Skills your friend presumably has. Not quite the normal attributes of a random 'crazy' approach.

I would also make the assumption that your friend is a very capable investor, does his homework, uses specific very targeted and focused criteria on what he is investing in with regard to what he deems to be undervalued etc, and doesn't just buy apparently 'cheap' shares in a 'crazy' way.

Being successful around 60%+ of the time is the kind of benchmark that some of the worlds finest investors use, as Soros once said 'It is not about how much you make when you win, its about how much you lose when you lose'. We all try to optimise the gains and reduce exposure to the losses, whatever approach one takes.

Don't mean to take the wind out of your sales in terms of the article as I am sure that had it been called 'My friend buys undervalued companies and sells them for a profit and he is quite good at it', then nowhere near as many people may have read it. In that sense, job well done.

As for it being a crazy portfolio? Don't make me larf. He is just taking a trader approach, and some people (see Lotontech) are very good at it.

'You only have to do a very few things right in your life so long as you don't do too many things wrong.' Warren Buffet

Jonesey12 18 Mar 2010 , 1:19pm

Thanks rober00 and lotontech, I'll take a look at your portfolio.

You may well be right, WealthyInvestor, I suspect there is more method in my friend's madness than he likes to admit.

geeWCee 18 Mar 2010 , 2:55pm

Nice response Wealthyinvestor, I did chuckle a couple of times.

RobinnBanks 18 Mar 2010 , 11:46pm

This sounds like Bolton's Special Situations to me. I have a few of them, but I didn't realise they were special when I bought them, nor when they went down in 2008!

lotontech 19 Mar 2010 , 7:12am

Robin, I can't speak for the original "crazy" guy, but my 'special situations' holdings can't go down (to zero) without stopping out along the way.

Join the conversation

Please take note - some tags have changed.

Line breaks are converted automatically.

You may use the following tags in your post: [b]bolded text[/b], [i]italicised text[/i]. All other tags will be removed from your post.

If you want to add a link, please ensure you type it as http://www.fool.co.uk as opposed to www.fool.co.uk.

Hello stranger

To add your own comment, please login.

Not yet registered? Register now.