RBS Offers Investors 5.1%

Published in Investing Strategy on 1 March 2010

We look at the new corporate bond from Royal Bank of Scotland.

All investors soon learn that risk and return are two sides of the same coin. By chasing greater returns, you risk losing more of your capital. Likewise, by taking next-to-no risk and keeping your money in cash, you can expect very low returns.

The base rate has been stuck at a record low of 0.5% since March 2009. This makes it almost impossible to earn a positive return on cash deposits, after taking tax and inflation into account.

We yearn for yield

In their search for yield, many investors have piled into corporate bonds: IOUs issued by companies which pay a fixed income during their existence. In 2009, investor appetite for bonds saw sales of bond funds easily outstrip those of equity funds.

Growing consumer appetite for corporate bonds led the London Stock Exchange to launch its new Retail Bond market on 1 February. As this gathers pace, trading in retail bonds should become cheaper, simpler and more transparent. 

However, investors need to understand that, although generally less risky and volatile than shares, corporate bonds are a great deal more volatile than cash. Indeed, bond investors face the following risks:

  • Interest-rate risk: When interest rates rise, bond yields go up and, therefore, bond prices go down. With rates expect to rise in the years to come, now may be a bad time to bet on bonds.

  • Credit risk: Buyers of corporate bonds lose out if the issuing company fails to pay each yearly coupon (interest payment) and the full face value of the bond when it matures.

  • Liquidity risk: At times of extreme market volatility, you may even find it difficult to sell particular bonds. Finding a buyer may mean selling at a big discount.

  • Market risk: In financial crises, fear can cause bond prices to swing wildly and fall rapidly.

The Royal Bond

If you buy a bond and hold it until maturity, then it will be redeemed at par (the face value) -- assuming no default, that is. Nevertheless, I would discourage private investors from buying just one or two individual corporate bonds, as this concentrates their default risk. Ideally, you'd want to buy several bonds, spreading your risk exactly as you would do with a portfolio of shares.

Bailed-out bank Royal Bank of Scotland (LSE: RBS) has seized on investor demand by launching its Royal 5.1% Bond. Here are this bond's details:

NameRoyal 5.1% Bond
Ticker/EPICRB51
Issue price/Redemption value£100
Coupon5.1%, paid yearly in February until 2020
Minimum trade size1 bond
Duration10 years
Type of bondSenior, unsubordinated corporate debt
RBS's credit ratingA+ from S&P
TradingListed on London Stock Exchange.
Can be traded in real-time via
stockbrokers during market hours
Tax situationIncome paid gross; any income tax
due must be declared and paid to
HMRC. No stamp duty payable.
Guarantee100% of capital returned on maturity.
Capital is protected at expiry only
ChargesTypical 0.75% bid-offer spread.
No early redemption charges.
Tax sheltersEligible for inclusion in ISAs and SIPPs
Compensation schemeNot covered by the Financial Services
Compensation Scheme (FSCS)

If you're tempted, I'd highlight these four issues:

First, investors are urged to "Lock in 5.1% a year without locking away your capital." While investors can buy and sell the bond very easily, the only way to guarantee a full return of capital is to hold this bond until maturity in February 2020. Hence, I don't really like this promotional message. It may attract people used to fixed-rate savings account but who aren't fully up to speed with the additional risks that corporate bonds present.

Second, RBS seems to be playing on the fact that it enjoys tacit state support, being 84%-owned by the British government. However, this implicit guarantee cannot and will not last forever -- and is unlikely to be in force for the full ten-year life. 

Third, in common with all corporate bonds, it is not covered by the FSCS scheme (which protects the first £50,000 per person of cash deposits). Therefore, without any government-backed safety net, this bond is far riskier than any savings account.

Fourth, when compared to other corporate bonds from financially strong issuers, the yield on offer appears to be slightly lower. For example, here are some UK corporate bonds traded on the new Retail Bond market which seem to offer slightly better value (although some are for longer than 10 years):

IssuerCouponPriceMaturity
GlaxoSmithKline (LSE: GSK)5.25%96.5019/12/33
National Grid (LSE: NG)5.785%102.3502/02/24
Tesco (LSE: TSCO)5.50%104.8813/12/19

Each of the above companies has a strong business franchise and significant cash flows. I reckon this makes them good credit risks on par with a non-state-owned RBS. 

All of the above bonds pay a higher coupon than the Royal Bond's 5.1%, making them more attractive to income-seekers. As you can see, their prices aren't £100, so the actual yield you'd receive if you bought them today will be slightly different from the coupon rate. The National Grid and Tesco bonds both trade above par and are therefore guaranteed to produce a capital loss if held to maturity. 

It's worth noting that RBS issued a similar Royal Bond last year. Although this bond only had a life of six years, it offered a higher coupon rate of 5.3%.

Overall, I think I'll pass on this one. As the new Retail Bond market matures, I'm hoping we'll see some more tempting offers for income investors.

More from Cliff D'Arcy:

> To buy or sell shares, try an online broker account with The Motley Fool's Share Dealing Service. You can deal in real time for a flat rate of just £10 per trade. Click here to find out how to open an account for free today. There is no obligation to trade.

Share & subscribe

Comments

The opinions expressed here are those of the individual writers and are not representative of The Motley Fool. If you spot any comments that are unsuitable hit the flag to alert our moderators.

MrContrarian 02 Mar 2010 , 9:23am

"Lock in 5.1% a year without locking away your capital."

This is so misleading. There's a fixed 0.75p spread, so, other things being equal, you are guaranteed to lose ~0.75% of your capital unless you hold to maturity.

I found the recent RBS adverts for this bond objectionable - they are headlined to sound like a savings account.

The Post Office pays 4.05% on a 2 year bond. You are giving up 100% safety for a measly 1.05% and (costly) flexibility.

elephant888 02 Mar 2010 , 11:31am

> RBS's credit rating A+ from S&P

And we care what S&P think... why exactly?

ronald12345 03 Mar 2010 , 10:19pm

Having invested 28K plus in RBS 2 years ago, and seen values fall to less than 4K I would not touch Bank shares or Bank Bonds again . I was fortunate and reinvested elsewhere in the Oil market Gulf Keystone ad managed to recover all losses
Banks - avoid they are still toxic !

Join the conversation

Please take note - some tags have changed.

Line breaks are converted automatically.

You may use the following tags in your post: [b]bolded text[/b], [i]italicised text[/i]. All other tags will be removed from your post.

If you want to add a link, please ensure you type it as http://www.fool.co.uk as opposed to www.fool.co.uk.

Hello stranger

To add your own comment, please login.

Not yet registered? Register now.