How Rich Investors Stay Rich

Published in Investing Strategy on 10 February 2010

Here's a clue -- find tomorrow's blue chips today.

Ever wonder how rich people invest?

I don't mean hedge funds and the like. I mean the real rich, people with inherited wealth who don't have to spend their days huddled over computers in order to earn a living. They can hire the best help and advice out there -- they must be cleaning up, right?

Pick up any issue of Investors Chronicle, and you'll see a few ads for trading "services" -- tutorials, tip services, gurus, etc. -- that promise spectacular results for those who apply themselves to learning the art of short-term trading. If those sorts of things are available to every Joe and Jane on the street with a few thousand pounds to spend, what do you think the really rich folks are doing?

I'll tell you what they're doing: Nothing.

The real secret of trading

Here's the real secret of trading -- most people who try it lose money. That was true a decade ago, when Brad Barber and Terrance Odean, business school professors at the University of California, published an important study showing that frequent trading was "hazardous to your wealth." If anything, it's even truer nowadays, with new technology giving professional traders an overwhelming advantage over individuals.

So why do ordinary investors do it? Barber and Odean concluded that overconfidence was a key factor -- people overestimated their ability to pick market-trouncing stocks. 

But I think there's another factor at work, one that comes to light when you compare the trading behaviour of people who are building wealth with those of the folks who already have wealth: Simply put, some people are trying to wring more from the market than it has to offer.

Motivated by stories of outrageous returns, these folks aren't content with turning their £100,000 nest egg into a million over 20-plus years. They want to do it by next year. 

They look at how shares like Capita Group (LSE: CPI) and Dominos Pizza (LSE: DOM) have done in the past ten years and want to find the next big growth stories. And so they take the courses and subscribe to the trading tip lines. And usually, they end up underperforming their neighbour's index fund by several percent -- if they don't manage to lose all their money.

Meanwhile, over on Easy Street...

By now, it should be clear that the "trading secret of the super-rich" is to trade as little as possible. Most rich people are just buying and holding. And often, they're holding for decades. We know of one wealthy family whose share portfolio consists entirely of just a short list of blue-chip stocks.

Most of their shares were inherited from an ancestor who simply bought stock in the companies he admired and did business with a couple of generations ago. The dividends paid by these companies provide a great income stream, and as long as that income stream continues, the family won't have any incentive to sell. 

That's their complete stock investment strategy. In fact, it's entirely possible that the family's descendants will still hold much the same shares 50 years from now.

But what about us?

Sitting on Grandpa's dividend-paying share portfolio is a fine approach if your goal is to preserve wealth and generate an income stream. And building your own is a pretty good approach if you want to build wealth, particularly if market volatility makes you nervous. How so? Instead of taking those dividends as income, reinvest them -- use them to buy more shares.

The practice of reinvesting dividends can turn boring performance into market-beating returns, partly because dividend-paying companies tend to be stable and mature. At first glance, that may appear to be a mixed blessing: good because they're much less volatile in choppy markets, bad because they're less likely to rocket to 10-bagger levels of return.

But dividend-payers can also grow over time. Just take a look at these growth-type companies and their current dividend yields:

ShareForward
dividend
yield
Rightmove (LSE: RMV)2.1%
Mitie Group (LSE: MTO)3.8%
Spectris (LSE: SXS)3.3%
Micro Focus (LSE: MCRO)2.5%

When you combine a growing company with a decent payouts with the power of dividend reinvestment, a well-chosen portfolio of dividend-paying stocks has a great chance of outperforming the market over the long haul.

These companies are a little higher risk than your average high-yielding blue chip, but if they can continue their impressive growth records, there's a chance in the years ahead they themselves will become true blue chip shares.

In the meantime, if you're tempted to pore over your share portfolio every minute, do yourself a favour -- don't. You may be surprised how much better you do as a result.

More on the economy and the markets:

> Join us as we invest our £50,000 real-money portfolio in Champion Shares PRO. Although this service is shut to new members at present, leave your details and you can be notified the instant it reopens.

> A version of this article, written by John Rosevear, was originally published on Fool.com. It has been updated by Bruce Jackson.

Share & subscribe

Comments

The opinions expressed here are those of the individual writers and are not representative of The Motley Fool. If you spot any comments that are unsuitable hit the flag to alert our moderators.

JOHORA 10 Feb 2010 , 12:55pm

What's right for today may not be right for tomorrow and while one approach may be right for one investor the same may not be right for another.
Holding is always an option but this time last year - those who - held saw most of their investments plummet!
Had an investor sold this time last year and reinvested in the same stocks a month later [in March] he or she would be laughing. In that particular instance holding was not so hot.
JOH.

Dhahran2001 10 Feb 2010 , 12:56pm

"with new technology giving professional traders an overwhelming advantage over individuals."

Makes you wonder why 'fund managers' do so badly. Well what I mean is: 'do so badly for their clients'- I don't dispute that skimming 1 or 2% per year from their clients 'capital', just for 'churning', ensures that they never loose.

FoxyWeasel 10 Feb 2010 , 1:34pm

I totally agree with the article. We are not talking short term cycles as quoted above. That is being short sighted. Its the long game that pays rewards. What did Warren Buffet do 50 years ago and has done ever since? Focus his portfolio on small and value companies. That's why he got nearly 20% CAR. Just run that through your calculator and see how quickly your capital grows. I would not watch what Buffet is doing today. Because he has so much money he cannot buy small companies anymore.

miriam46 10 Feb 2010 , 2:07pm

i have an annuty can i take it out from where it is and put it somewhere that gives me more profit per month

NeilW 10 Feb 2010 , 2:40pm

You only lose money when you sell. Holders tend not to sell and see the money invested as 'spent'. Therefore shares become more like an annuity than a capital sum.

Cultivating that attitude and reviewing the business performance, rather than the share price, is the secret to growing a portfolio.

Essentially treat share purchases as though they were private companies with no ready secondary market in which to liquidate a position.

supersol42 10 Feb 2010 , 2:55pm

Inherited equity portfolios have been a bit of a drag in the UK for the last few centuries: Estate Duty, Capital Transfer Tax, Inheritance Tax...

Farms, on the other hand...

afamiii 10 Feb 2010 , 6:20pm

There are three (in general) types of investor.

i) People who have money - objective is first to preserve it and secondly to make sufficient income. Buying and holding quality assets over a long period of time makes good sense. And selling them if they appear likely to detorierate in cash generating capability

ii) People who are earning lmoney and need to put it somewhere for the time when their earnings diminish. Quality assets are again the right thing for them (unfortunately few of them have ever been taught to recognise a quality asset so they end up in the hands of low quality mutual fund managers - By law 80% of all managers are mediocre.)

iii) People who have little money, but want much more - objective is to make high returns. The average Joe falls into this category. Trading strategies with leverage are appropriate to them only if they have sufficient knowledge, experience and emotional control. Unfortunately, the average part timer does not have what it takes and will loose what he has to those who do have it. You make money trading by taking outsized risks (which will eventually bankrupt even the best - Jesse Livermore, Lehman Bros, et. al.) Or by having outsize alpha. And when the average Joe realises he doesn't have what it takes, he is seduced by a manager who does, but again he does not have the skill to tell if the manager is making money through high risk (80% of high return managers) or high alpha.

DennyWhite 10 Feb 2010 , 9:55pm

Basic message is OK but somewhat negative.
I have a portfolio of Blue Chips as a solid foundation but the real money has been made on seeking out undervalued companies and watching them rocket( over time of course)

Check out Tom Bulford of Red Hot Penny Shares - This Guy talks more sense than any of the so called investing manuals that I have read.

Questorien 13 Feb 2010 , 9:47pm


[i]Had an investor sold this time last year and reinvested in the same stocks a month later [in March] he or she would be laughing. In that particular instance holding was not so hot.
[/i]

Ah - the benefits of hindsight!

Now you can see which way the graph went - but at the time...

Q.

Questorien 13 Feb 2010 , 9:52pm

Oh - oh. Why didn't my italics work? And why can we no longer preview our posts before submitting them?

Q.

harvz111 17 Feb 2010 , 6:34am

its because of hardwork and luck, you may put the same effort as those rich guys but in the end you need luck too, not everyone gets rich and stays rich

http://thetruemoneymaker.blogspot.com

ramhead39 21 Feb 2010 , 11:30pm

Join the conversation

Please take note - some tags have changed.

Line breaks are converted automatically.

You may use the following tags in your post: [b]bolded text[/b], [i]italicised text[/i]. All other tags will be removed from your post.

If you want to add a link, please ensure you type it as http://www.fool.co.uk as opposed to www.fool.co.uk.

Hello stranger

To add your own comment, please login.

Not yet registered? Register now.