The Easiest Way To Become A Millionaire

Published in Investing Strategy on 28 October 2009

You can get lucky and pick a huge winner, or you can use this time-tested investing strategy.

Sure, there are some people who have become rich finding shares like Capita Group (LSE: CPI) or Soco International (LSE: SIA) when they were tiny companies, then staying with them until their market cap is well over £1 billion.

Others have become wealthy using CFDs and spread-betting, still others by discovering high-momentum growth shares like Autonomy (LSE: AU) or ICAP (LSE: IAP) before other investors caught on.

But these complicated, labour-intensive tactics are ones that many investors don't have enough time to master.

I'd like to share with you a simple, easy strategy for becoming wealthy -- and then give you share ideas based on it. Although it's simple, it takes discipline to adhere to the rules. But if you follow this advice, you'll be well on your way to a million-pound portfolio.

Keep It Simple

One of the biggest mistakes investors make is complicating the process. Academics have proven that more information doesn't necessarily lead to better decisions -- but it does lead to overconfidence. Even worse, the more time and effort you put into researching, analysing, and deciding whether to buy a share, the more likely you are to buy it -- even if it's a horrible company after all.

Overconfidence and overcommitment are counterproductive in investing -- and it's why keeping your investment criteria simple and easy can help you avoid falling into these traps.

What sort of criteria am I suggesting? Just two steps:

1. Find strong, long-term dividend-paying companies

Dividends are the surest gains you can find in any market environment. As Bloomberg recently reported, even though the 10-year trailing return of the Dow Jones Industrial Average was negative as at 30 September, when you factored in dividends, the return was actually a positive 18%. It's a similar story for the UK market too. 

It's best to look for companies with a long history of paying out dividends, and a long history of not cutting dividends. That would mean avoiding companies like BT Group (LSE: BT-A) and even banks like HSBC (LSE: HSBA) and Barclays (LSE: BARC), for example.

You should find companies with predictable, sufficient free cash flow, so you can be reasonably sure these dividends will continue to be paid.

And now for the hard part...

2. Hold forever

The strongest of dividend-paying companies raise their dividend over time. So when you hold one for long enough, you eventually reach a point where you are making more money annually in dividends than you initially invested in the company.

This is hastened when you reinvest your dividends back into the company, with each dividend purchasing even more shares of the company, meaning even more payout at the next interim or final dividend.

So long as the business continues to perform, and the company continues to maintain or raise its payouts, the simplest and oftentimes most lucrative approach is to remain an owner and collect your dividends.

Implementing This Strategy

The FTSE 100 has many steady, large, dividend-paying companies. For example…

CompanyForecast
Dividend
Yield
BP (LSE: BP)6.0%
Vodafone (LSE: VOD)6.1%
Centrica (LSE: CNA)5.5%
British American Tobacco (LSE: BATS)5.3%
Tesco (LSE: TSCO)3.5%

We've seen more than a fair share of dividend blowups over the past year, but if you look for a company with enduring demand, and sufficient free cash flow -- you are following the easiest way to become a millionaire.

More on the economy and the markets:

> If you're in the market for buying shares, consider opening an online broker account with The Motley Fool's Share Dealing Service. You can buy and sell shares in real time for a flat rate of just £10. Click here to find out how you can open an account for free today. There is no obligation to trade.

> A version of this article was originally published on Fool.com. It has been updated by Bruce Jackson, who doesn't have an interest in any of the companies mentioned in this article.

Share & subscribe

Comments

The opinions expressed here are those of the individual writers and are not representative of The Motley Fool. If you spot any comments that are unsuitable hit the flag to alert our moderators.

manney01 28 Oct 2009 , 1:58pm

Interesting article, but you lost me when you said :
"So when you hold one for long enough, you eventually reach a point where you are making more money annually in dividends than you initially invested in the company"

How do you figure this? I presume this would be with the dividends re-invested, but even then and a presumption of a continuous increase (0.01%) increase in dividends, on my calculations you are still looking at approx 48 years before you reach that "magical" tipping point of "aking more money annually in dividends than you initially invested"

Sadiesage 28 Oct 2009 , 2:30pm

In theory, it's right that reinesting dividends makes for a much higher overall return. But how many people do that?

Buying a high yielding share usually attracts the income seeker, so they're likely to need to spend it. Also, 'reinvesting dividends' is not that easy to achieve unless the company operates a DRIP scheme or offers additional shares, in lieu of the cash distribution.

Many don't nowadays, so try buying a few extra shares to top up your holding and after stamp duty, dealing charges etc, you won't acquire many and your broker won't thank you for that type of business, either.

No, without the DRIP facility or similar, the notion remains impractical for most of us.

AChembi 28 Oct 2009 , 2:38pm

I would prefer to invest and HOLD in a company that has no bad debt and strong cash flow. Particular type of company is oil & gas related business and activity. Even without dividend you will feel comfortable to see share price increasing annually.

lemondy 28 Oct 2009 , 2:45pm

Sadie: get a better broker.

I use Interactive Investor (no association) and they charge 1% for dividend re-investment.

Take a small holding of 300 shares of VOD, let's presume (hope!) they pay 2.5p/share interim div this year. That's £7.38 income net of tax+charges, which will buy you 5 new shares at the current price with some change left over. What's impractical?

slauermann 28 Oct 2009 , 2:56pm

Nothing new here - this has been advocated for eons but the most useful things have been left out.
1) Where do you get that list "many steady, large, dividend-paying companies" that they put a snapshot of in the article?
2) Which ones offer the DRIP shceme or offers reinvestment from dividends for free?

Sadiesage 28 Oct 2009 , 3:26pm

Lemondy - I used to be one!

I know the electronic dealing platforms nowadays facilitate very cost effective dealings often without a human interface to frown at such minimal business but buying 5 Vods is still small beer, isn't it?

As that won't materially affect your empire building, I'd rather spend the money myself.

rober09 28 Oct 2009 , 5:05pm

Presumably you mean long term dividend paying quality companies like LLoyds and RBS I presume!!!

snickerdoodle9 28 Oct 2009 , 7:59pm

I live abroad . I was fortunate to escape the market downturn of the last couple of years without any losses . I'm in retirement now and my lifesavings is protected in my retirement account . I'll settle for a 4 or 5% return in interest growth any day than expose my hard earned money to more months or years of market volitily . There are people having to come out of retirement to return to the workforce because of watching there lifesavings vanish . I'm not a millionare , but financially comfortable and debt free . About the only stock that I would trust to buy more shares of would be brk.b . It's holing it's own pretty good outside my retirement savings .

ponym 28 Oct 2009 , 11:37pm

Go take a look at the High yield-HYP Practical Board. The frequently asked questions (FAQ) explain it all and from personal experience of using PYADS simple guidelines it is very easy to generate an income to supplement your retirement income.

Clitheroekid 03 Nov 2009 , 10:12pm

The Easiest Way To Become A Millionaire?

Start off with two million, and give it to a financial adviser.

Jbat001 09 Nov 2009 , 10:03am

Clitheroe Kid Said:

"The Easiest Way To Become A Millionaire?

Start off with two million, and give it to a financial adviser."


Absolute rot. The vast majority of the UK public are ignorant when it comes to finances. They will blithely remain 100% invested in equities in their pension right up until their retirement date, then bleat about 'compensation' when the stock market falls the year before they want to retire. They will stubbornly put regular savings into cash rather than real assets. They will run up massive debts and then default. A very small proportion of the public reads the Fool - and it is a small proportion.

Advisers are there to do a job. Most of us are sick of being abused for the sins of the old guard who were active in the early eighties and are largely retired now. Good advice is worth paying for properly - and if you think that adviser investments are so highly charged, why were people falling over themselves to invest in hedge funds with their 6% initial charge and 20% of growth charges in the period up to 2007?

ajooba 09 Nov 2009 , 3:26pm

SadieSage,

do you mind explaining your problem in a little more detail please ? The reason I ask is that I wish to hold a portfolio of ETFs and the question of dividend reinvestment does arise, however I dont necessarily want to pay a charge to do this.

So, let us take an example of ETFs or even direct shares like BP, Vodafone etc. Presumably you are not buying it every month. Say you buy them 3 times a year at £12.00 per trade : Jan, May, Sep. Whatever you bought in January would have given you dividends, you just wait for it to accumulate. In May, along with new money, you use the accumulated cash from the dividends to make your new purchases.

Surely it it not costing you additional money to reinvest the dividends with the above approach, as you just pool it along with new money. Do you see a problem here ? Do clarify.

If you buy index trackers, I suppose you can hold "accumulation" units instead of "income" units and then you wont have to pay extra to reinvest the dividends ? Am I correct ?

On another note, in America, there is no charge to reinvest dividends (And this doesnt mean we have to buy DRIPs directly from companies). I hold ETFs with Fidelity and Ameritrade from the days I worked in USA, and the dividends are automatically reinvested (which results in fractional shares), and there is no charge for this. I dont know why we cant do the same here in UK.

Join the conversation

Please take note - some tags have changed.

Line breaks are converted automatically.

You may use the following tags in your post: [b]bolded text[/b], [i]italicised text[/i]. All other tags will be removed from your post.

If you want to add a link, please ensure you type it as http://www.fool.co.uk as opposed to www.fool.co.uk.

Hello stranger

To add your own comment, please login.

Not yet registered? Register now.