This Recovery Is Gonna Make Me Rich

Published in Investing Strategy on 5 October 2009

Some experts are still saying shares are cheap, yet the economy continues to tank. But these 5 companies are still growing, and growing fast.

Investors today face a dilemma. Although the FTSE 100 is up over 40% from its March 2009 lows, many top investors like Anthony Bolton and Warren Buffett keep reminding us that shares are cheap.

On the other hand, every day we seem to have more bad news, whether that be rising unemployment or the government's massive budget deficit. It all leaves us wondering whether a stock market correction is just around the corner.

So if you think today is an utterly lousy time to invest, well, I certainly can't blame you.

That Pesky Internet Bubble

Do you remember the Internet bubble? I sure do. When that particular bubble burst in 2000, I saw my portfolio fall directly into the commode -- down 40% in the space of a few months.

See, back in 2000, I bought into the worst of the worst tech stocks. The overhyped lastminute.com float. The overpriced Arm Holdings (LSE: ARM) and Autonomy (LSE: AU). And I paid the price for my mistakes. But as the market slowly turned around, I eventually recovered my losses -- and then some.

Of course, the financial crisis and ensuing Great Recession we are facing today is far more widespread and threatening than the Internet bubble was. Nevertheless, over the course of time, I learned that building real wealth consists of three simple, timeless steps:

  • earn as much as you possibly can;
  • save as much as you possibly can from what you earn; and
  • invest those savings.

Living below your financial means is a great way to save money. It means living in modest accommodation, driving an older car and forgoing designer labels. It also means maintaining your spending habits even as your income increases. That way, you can invest more and more money into the stock market.

You Invested In What?

I invested in companies that:

  • had superb management;
  • generated significant free cash flow;
  • grew that cash flow quickly; and
  • traded for cheap prices.

How low? To keep it simple, I like to see companies selling for a price-to-growth ratio (PEG) of less than 1.0. The PEG ratio was popularised by legendary investor Jim Slater.

Now Here's The Best Part

It was easy finding great companies that fit this criterion after the Internet bubble burst. But ever since 2005, I've been having trouble finding many shares selling for as cheap as I'd like to pay -- until recently.

Even after the recovery of the last 6 months, some shares still offer investors the chance to buy good companies on the cheap. Running one of my favourite share screeners in search of bargains, several likely suspects popped right up:

CompanyShare PriceForward P/EPEG
Immunodiagnostic Systems (LSE: IDH)405p130.30
NCC Group (LSE: NCC)389p130.59
Petrofac (LSE: PFC)932p130.43
Healthcare Locums (LSE: HLO)259p100.30
Research Now (LSE: RNOW)363p110.60

One Word Of Warning

Screens like this one can help you to find bargains, but they've got their limits as well. For example, Petrofac provides facilities to the oil and gas industry, and with most oil producers cutting back on expenditure, a company like Petrofac might face more than a few medium-term headwinds.

But by and large, shares that trade on low forward price to earnings ratios (P/E) and low PEGs are usually quite cheap. And still with so many available to choose from, the time to start looking is now.

If you'd like a little help with weeding out the false positives today, you might want to register your interest in Motley Fool's Champion Shares. Due to the imminent arrival of some big changes to our expert share-tipping service, for now we've closed our member list. But if you'd like to be informed when we announce these changes and to guarantee your exclusive invitation to join us when our doors re-open, simply click here.

More on the economy and the markets:

> The Motley Fool's Share Dealing Service may not make you rich, but if you want to buy shares, you will need a broker. It's free to join and cheap to trade. Buy and sell shares online in real time for a flat rate of just £10. Open an account today.

> A version of this article was originally published on Fool.com, and it was also published on Fool.co.uk on 25 March 2009. It has been updated.

> Bruce Jackson does not have a beneficial interest in any of the companies mentioned in this article.

Like this article? Get our best articles delivered direct to your inbox at no cost. Sign up for Foolwatch Daily by entering your email below.

Share & subscribe

Comments

The opinions expressed here are those of the individual writers and are not representative of The Motley Fool. If you spot any comments that are unsuitable hit the flag to alert our moderators.

Gengulphus 05 Oct 2009 , 10:49am

Living below your financial means is a great way to save money. It means living in modest accommodation, driving an older car and forgoing designer labels. It also means maintaining your spending habits even as your income increases. That way, you can invest more and more money into the stock market.

Generally agreed, but maintaining your spending habits as your income increases is IMHO a bit over-the-top. After all, the ultimate purpose of the whole exercise is to end up with money you can spend!

Provided your investment plan is on course to provide you with the income you need in retirement and any other future needs, with a decent safety margin against possible future bad market conditions, there's nothing wrong with increasing your spending habits a bit as your income increases. Keep the spending increases decently below the income increases, and you'll still be in a position to invest more and more money...

Gengulphus

Triassic 05 Oct 2009 , 2:54pm

It looks like all your suggestions as past their sell by date.

You should have tipped these shares in Jan/Feb and not now - far too late.

Triassic 05 Oct 2009 , 2:55pm

It looks like all your suggestions as past their sell by date.

You should have tipped these shares in Jan/Feb and not now - far too late.

AndyEMF 05 Oct 2009 , 2:58pm

What recovery would that be then ? I intend to make my money on the second dip which will come when the stimulus packages wear off - you can't spend your way out of a recession which was caused by excessive and unsustainable borrowing and spending !

CunningCliff 05 Oct 2009 , 4:23pm

"It also means maintaining your spending habits even as your income increases."

I think you mean "restraining", not "maintaining", Bruce!

All the best,

Cliff

jonesjeff 05 Oct 2009 , 11:13pm

The quantity of money directed towards investment depends on ones objectives.
If you are happy to work until 67, but want a prestigious car, by all means save only a small proportion of your income.
If you want to retire before 50 & travel the world, then it's either necessary to earn a very large salary or live well below your means & invest like crazy.

RobinnBanks 07 Oct 2009 , 12:53am

"Bruce Jackson does not have a beneficial interest in any of the companies mentioned in this article."
Say no more!

bouleversee 09 Oct 2009 , 7:19pm

I followed your advice, lived frugally and invested in shares, a wide diversity (including Arm at the height)over a long period and overall have lost far more than I have gained. With hindsight, I would have spent far more and enjoyed life while I was fit enough to travel etc. Investing in shares seems to be all about subsidising the lifestyles of the executives of the companies you invest in. Until there is a better relationship between rewards to shareholders and rewards to employees, I'm out. Property (my own house) is the only thing I have made money on and thanks to that I am OK financially despite the low interest rates at present.

Join the conversation

Please take note - some tags have changed.

Line breaks are converted automatically.

You may use the following tags in your post: [b]bolded text[/b], [i]italicised text[/i]. All other tags will be removed from your post.

If you want to add a link, please ensure you type it as http://www.fool.co.uk as opposed to www.fool.co.uk.

Hello stranger

To add your own comment, please login.

Not yet registered? Register now.