Earn 6% As A Money Lender

Published in Investing Strategy on 14 September 2009

Attractive rates have prompted many to lend through Zopa.

Personal debt as an asset class

Today I'm going to write about an asset class that has only become viable in the UK during the last four years -- personal debt. Basically you lend money to other people at an attractive interest rate, sit back and watch the profits roll in -- just like banks did for 300 years, until they got a little silly. Of course there are risks as well as rewards associated with lending money but I'm convinced this is a pretty good investment.

Zopa 

In March 2005, Zopa launched in the UK. The company enables consumers to lend money to other consumers through rather clever technology. Borrowers register on the Zopa website, stating how much they want to borrow and for how long. They are then credit checked and assigned a credit category, from A* to C or Y (for young borrowers). 

At the same time, lenders deposit money with Zopa and state what interest rate they are prepared to lend at. This decision is made easier by Zopa estimating bad debt and providing expected net returns for each credit category. Risk is reduced by lenders being able to limit their exposure to any single borrower. For example, someone lending £500 can spread it across 50 borrowers with a maximum of £10 with any single borrower.

Borrowers enter into a legally binding contract and repay the debt monthly by direct debit. If the repayments are missed, a collections agency gets involved and uses the same recovery process as that of a high street bank. So essentially you get to become a money lender with none of the hassle. Zopa charges you 1% of your disbursed funds to do all the work.

Impressive growth

In just four years Zopa has attracted more than 300,000 members (lenders and borrowers), has disbursed more than £50 million and is growing at more than 50% a year. Currently on the Zopa marketplace, lenders are offering £1.5 million.

Why has Zopa become so popular? Clearly borrowers get a good deal (especially as they can repay loans early with no redemption fee), and lenders get a relatively high rate of return. How high, though? Well Zopa reckons that, during the last twelve months, lenders have made an annual return of 8.1% before bad debts. I'm a bit cynical about claims like that and I arrived at my own estimate.

At the time of writing, having looked at actual rates being achieved, I think you could make 7.5% after bad debts. Zopa charges lenders 1%, so the rate before tax would be 6.5%. I reckon that's achievable for anyone placing money at the moment.

Based on the Zopa discussion forum (well worth reading for members' forthright views), rates higher than that are being achieved by self-styled 'Zopaholics', who seem to spend considerable time tweaking their rates to feather their nests and earn bragging rights among the cognoscenti. For the sake of balance it has to be said that many people earn lower rates.

Disadvantages and risks

Needless to say there are some potential downsides associated with becoming a money lender on Zopa:

1. Bad debts could be higher than Zopa's estimates, especially in the current climate of high unemployment.

2. The rates quoted above are only available on money lent out. It can take time to lend money at decent rates and re-invest interest and capital, and Zopa pays no interest on cash deposits.

3. In a period of rising interest rates, a lender will not benefit. Their rates remain at the level fixed at the start of the loan.

4. Borrowers can repay a loan at any time. A lender is unable to 'lock in' a rate of interest.

5. There is no secondary market for loans. Your money is tied up for as long as it takes to be repaid.

The only risk that really concerns me is the possibility of worsening bad debts so I'd factor in another half a percentage point off the return quoted earlier, giving a conservative return of between 6% and 6.5% pre tax. That's a comfortable premium over three-year deposit rates, but a lot lower than the rates being achieved a year or so ago.

The initial minimum investment is only £10. At that level, I feel you may as well give Zopa a trial, although I would not be comfortable having less than 20 borrrowers and I'd therefore recommend an initial investment of at least £200. Once in, I would bide my time until those inevitable moments when a shortage of lending funds and heavy demand for borrowing leads to higher rates.

Disclaimer: Tudor is a Zopa member.

More on alternative investments:

Share & subscribe

Comments

The opinions expressed here are those of the individual writers and are not representative of The Motley Fool. If you spot any comments that are unsuitable hit the flag to alert our moderators.

BBBSCarter 14 Sep 2009 , 12:24pm

Regarding your second disadvantage, I was under the impression Zopa has been paying interest on unlent money since the beginning of 2006:
http://blog.zopa.com/archives/2006/01/19/lender-goodness/

elephant888 14 Sep 2009 , 12:56pm

@BBBSCarter: The interest paid to holding account money was cut to zero in March 2009, after the collapse in the base rate and hence what was achievable as a return from their own bank.

Invest2bBlessed 14 Sep 2009 , 7:41pm

I've been a lender on Zopa for about 2 years. On my current statement bad debts and late payments exceed the amount I've received in interest. This despite the fairly middle of the road risk profile of my lending. Beware their bad debt statistics - defaults have ballooned recently.

Andy46 14 Sep 2009 , 8:06pm

Hi, I've read a small number of articles claiming people are still making 6%+ on Zopa in the current climate. Like Invest2bBlessed though, After bad debt / other fees my return over the last 18 months has been around 0%, so i'm unsure as to who the people making 6%+ are.

boonoh 15 Sep 2009 , 12:38pm

Don't forget that for tax-payers, you have to pay your income tax on the interest you receive (so 40%-50% for higher rate taxpayers), but yet any "losses" you make due to debt default cannot be used to offset the tax.

So not only are you paying tax on the small amount of interest you get before a default, but you cannot offset it by the loss. Therefore, one should revise their expected rate of return a bit lower to take this into account.

42boston 15 Sep 2009 , 1:34pm

Thanks to Invest2blessed, Andy46 and boonoh for their very useful contributions. Perhaps the title of the article should be changed to 'Earn 0% as a Money Lender'.

42boston 15 Sep 2009 , 1:34pm

Thanks to Invest2blessed, Andy46 and boonoh for their very useful contributions. Perhaps the title of the article should be changed to 'Earn 0% as a Money Lender'.

42boston 15 Sep 2009 , 1:34pm

Thanks to Invest2blessed, Andy46 and boonoh for their very useful contributions. Perhaps the title of the article should be changed to 'Earn 0% as a Money Lender'.

42boston 15 Sep 2009 , 1:34pm

Thanks to Invest2blessed, Andy46 and boonoh for their very useful contributions. Perhaps the title of the article should be changed to 'Earn 0% as a Money Lender'.

Dozey1 15 Sep 2009 , 11:00pm

The Fool at its best. An interesting informative article, but immediately brought to reality by knowledgable members of the community. I add my thanks to those of 42boston.

bouleversee 16 Sep 2009 , 10:29am

So glad I read all your comments on this somewhat misleading article. I had heard of Zopa and been considering investing a reasonable sum in view of the lack of accounts paying a decent rate of interest plus no return on my premium bonds for several months. I have now decided against. I wonder how Tudor (presumably the author) is getting on with his/her own investment in Zopa. In for a shock perhaps.

Underthemattress 16 Sep 2009 , 10:56am

I'd also like to thank the community members who have detailed their REAL experiences of the Zopa model.

I joined Zopa as soon as it launched but am yet to be convinced that it is a reliable route to profit.

If only there was a scheme LIKE this that was sound and that could truly protect and facilitate ordinary members of the public as lenders both to other individuals and to the small businesses who are currently being rejected by the banks.

savaroony 16 Sep 2009 , 11:44am

Just a few facts and figures for you for the sake of balance here.
Of 11000 loans, just 69 have resulted in default. While clearly some lenders have indeed seen these defaults make significant dents in their earnings, they have been extremely unlucky to participate in one, never mind more than one, of these defaulting loans. Clearly the risks of suffering disprortionate levels of default decrease with increasing diversification.

With regard to taxation, for those not already filling in a self-assessmnet tax return, a simple letter to one's tax office should be sufficient.

chriswalker100 16 Sep 2009 , 6:04pm

Diversify to have a maximum 1% of your investment with any borrower is safer. This requires £1000 at £10 each to 100 borrowers.

I have put in £5600 over 30 months with no defaults and a return of 10.69% before Zopa's fee.

My current rates have increased and for loans in the last month the average is 13.49%

I know I will get defaults sometime and know that I must be disciplined in choosing my market,the appropriate interest rate, and the amount I lend to each borrower. I think this is what intelligent investors would be doing anyway.

Zopa allows me access to a market dominated by the Banks and denied to us before Zopa. By having a go in this market I am participating in loans to people often let down by those Banks. If I get my choices right I too can continue to earn a fair return for the risk involved.




alarmbells 18 Sep 2009 , 8:13am

My return has been about 8% pa over three years. Including bad debt. You would have to try real hard to make as little as 0%. It is true though that IR will not allow bad debt to be deducted from interest before paying tax.

gilgongo 20 Sep 2009 , 12:53pm

My (albeit limited) experience with the bad debt on Zopa leads me to suspect that those who are experiencing losses are lending to the "safest" borrower categories at correspondingly low interest rates. Either that, or they are adjusting their rates down so as to attract borrowers who then default. Low rates amplify the effect of defaults, so I have generally thought it best to lend to as many borrowers as possible at the riskiest levels so as to maximise my rates and minimise the effects of defaults.

So far I have made about 7% AER in just over a year (on a a rather small amount of money, however).



Join the conversation

Please take note - some tags have changed.

Line breaks are converted automatically.

You may use the following tags in your post: [b]bolded text[/b], [i]italicised text[/i]. All other tags will be removed from your post.

If you want to add a link, please ensure you type it as http://www.fool.co.uk as opposed to www.fool.co.uk.

Hello stranger

To add your own comment, please login.

Not yet registered? Register now.