These Shares Could Make You Truly Rich

Published in Investing Strategy on 28 August 2009

The way to really power your wealth is to nab the odd ten-bagger.

Quite a few people in the financial media (including me, I confess) have been eyeing the rather peaky-looking state of the stock market and pondering defensive moves. Make sure you're really comfortable with your level of risk, we say. Look for value. Buy companies paying juicy dividends.

That's all good advice. But every time I write one of those articles, I hear from Fools who say something like, "Worrying about the state of the market sounds too much like market timing for me. I want shares I can hold for a long time that will make me wealthy."

So here's what I've been pondering: Can you get wealthy -- really wealthy -- by holding shares for a long time?

Really long-term investments

Over the years, my career has brought me into contact with a few wealthy families and their investment portfolios. I'm talking about old-money types, who trace their current wealth to an industrious ancestor a century or more ago, and who have had that wealth professionally managed -- for growth and for income -- for decades.

What's relevant to us is that these family portfolios tend to be built around the shares people now see as rock solid companies, such as Unilever (LSE: ULVR), Tesco (LSE: TSCO), and BP (LSE: BP). These are companies with traditions of excellent management, and their shares, for the most part, have shown decent appreciation over time while paying a good solid dividend.

I like shares like that. And it's easy to look at a wealthy family's portfolio and think, "Hey, they're rich and they own those shares. If I buy shares like that, maybe I'll get rich too."

But is that really how one builds wealth?

"Warehousing" vs wealth-building

In his best-selling book The Millionaire Mind, wealth researcher Thomas J. Stanley notes a survey of millionaires that found that less than half -- 42% -- indicated that "investing in the equities of public corporations" was an important factor in explaining their economic success.

Stanley writes -- and this is consistent with what I've heard elsewhere -- that many millionaires think of the stock market as a great place to "warehouse" wealth built elsewhere, but not as a wealth generator in and of itself.

I think that's both right and wrong.

On the one hand, if you're simply shooting for market-average returns, the numbers don't lie: £10,000 invested at 10% for 20 years turns into £67,275. That's a nice return on savings, but it's not huge wealth.

And when I look at the companies that might be considered as "hold forever" shares nowadays, whether newer firms like Tullow Oil (LSE: TLW) or Autonomy (LSE: AU) or older companies like BG Group (LSE: BG) and Reckitt & Benckiser (LSE: RB), I see great established companies. Companies that might well beat that market average of 10% over time by a considerable margin.

Those are desirable shares to own. But they're not going to build big wealth anytime soon. Without a time machine, you're not going to get rich holding stocks like BG Group.

Risk and wealth-building go hand in hand

Despite their lukewarm feelings about stock market investing overall, 74% of Stanley's millionaires did say that a "willingness to take financial risk given the right return" was an important factor in their success. Many others talked about the importance of being willing to invest in their own businesses, and of other values related to entrepreneurship.

Entrepreneurship is a potent source of wealth -- maybe the best source. Of course, not all of us are entrepreneurs. But we can all invest in entrepreneurs. Putting £10,000 in Tullow Oil might net you a nice solid return over time. But if you had put that £10,000 in Tullow Oil 10 years ago, it'd be worth around £160,000 now -- despite the oil price crash and despite last year's market drama.

That's wealth-building.

Now, I'm not suggesting that you buy speculative oil companies in the hope you'll score a huge winner. But I'm also not suggesting that you buy Tullow Oil or any other shares that have already rocketed higher.

Looking for the next huge winner

Instead, look for the next Tullow Oil. A future super-growth story. It may already be public, but tiny and largely overlooked by the market. Or it might be an established company entering a new phase.

Those are the shares that will really "build wealth."

Are those shares risky? Individually they might be, especially when compared with buying a blue chip. And if you buy a dozen of them, even if you choose really well, you might only make significant money on one or two.

But if you've ever read Peter Lynch, you know that those one or two "10-baggers" every now and then can drive huge gains for your overall portfolio.

And that's how you build real wealth with stocks. Please feel free to post specific ideas/suggestions in the comments area below. We're all ears!

More on the economy and the markets:

> If you're in the market for buying and selling shares, consider opening an online broker account with The Motley Fool's Share Dealing Service. You can buy and sell shares in real time for a flat rate of just £10. Click here to find out how you can open an account for free today. There is no obligation to trade.

> A version of this article was originally published on Fool.com. It has been updated by Bruce Jackson, who doesn't have an interest in any of the companies mentioned in this article.

Share & subscribe

Comments

The opinions expressed here are those of the individual writers and are not representative of The Motley Fool. If you spot any comments that are unsuitable hit the flag to alert our moderators.

tiredoldbroker 28 Aug 2009 , 10:39am

Isn't there a gap in your maths ? If you buy high risk stocks on the basis that one out of ten will generate super-high returns (there's a hidden inference here that the other nine will go bust or do nothing), how is your overall performance significantly better than buying ten solid stocks which perform , well, solidly ? Do you want ten stocks which give you good returns, or nine that go phut and just one super-performer ? Unless you reckon you can pick 10 amazing stocks, your overall returns are likely to be pedestrian.

Rawlplug 28 Aug 2009 , 11:44am

"10-baggers" is a generic term. I bought a load of small companies - most of which I lost money on but one (Griffin Mining) went from 3.875p to 110p, when I sold out. Of course, I sold a few on the way up but I probably got 12-15 times my money back.
Take a look at Yell, once a FTSE 100 stock. Yes, it's got loads of debt, which is why it is now 40p (it did get as low as 14p) but it is a very solid business and the shares are on a prospective p/e of 1.5x. Yes, debt negotiations will probably result in dilution but, leaving aside their balance sheet, there is a pretty sound business underneath, which has weathered the recession pretty well. When the upturn comes, who knows?

tiggerman1 28 Aug 2009 , 11:57am

There are some near certainties about. As long as AVANTI Communication's rocket launches OK next Q1, then you are on a near certain 3/4/5/ bagger.

And when a rig takes anchor in the Kalklands, there are several oil drillers who will probably be even better.

tiggerman1 28 Aug 2009 , 11:57am

There are some near certainties about. As long as AVANTI Communication's rocket launches OK next Q1, then you are on a near certain 3/4/5/ bagger.

And when a rig takes anchor in the Kalklands, there are several oil drillers who will probably be even better.

Rawlplug 28 Aug 2009 , 12:06pm

Ooops, sorry guys. Yell are 46p. I didn't realise I had so much influence! Still worth looking at, though.

Millamba 28 Aug 2009 , 1:17pm

The problem with identifying 10 baggers is that once they have hit the market it is often too late and often they never IPO but exit as trade sales. Unquoteds have a rotten survival rate - VCTs and EIS funds need all the tax breaks they can get - have you ever looked at their survival rates?


I occasionally invest through the small VC networks that raise relatively small amounts of money from HNWs but only the few that invest their own money alongside, stick close to their investments and need exits to thrive, not those that simply take a fee to appear at events. They tend to be the quieter ones like www.endven.com who show me very few but highly scalable businesses such as www.rainbowrewards.com run by Kerry Packer's ex-FD, or their recent take private of former Tadpole Plc where the recapitalisation of potentialy valuable IP assets seemed to have potential for attractive returns. If I'm going into a share where I can lose 100% I need to be in business with exceptional management, a growth market and a highly scalable model, and to raise the hit rate to 2 or even 3 in 5 with EIS tax relief at 48% of any write offs softening helping the ratios.

parity1 28 Aug 2009 , 3:41pm

There have been some good gains recently with some of the developing gold mines on AIM . A popular one at the moment is Frontier Mining which has a mine in Kazacksthan

easygo2009 31 Aug 2009 , 10:52am

Those of us have been around for a bit are wary of 10-baggers. I did once hold a 10-bagger (actually a 15 bagger for me) which was Baltimore back in the tech bubble days and I did pay off a large chunk of my mortgage from the proceeds of holding the stock for a matter of months rather than years.

Looking at my portfolio now I would choose Monitise (MONI) as the stock most likely to increase 10-fold because it has a highly scaleable product/service (ie banking/payments by Mobile phone) and has already signed up the likes of HSBC to use the service but I suspect it will be bought out before it gets there. Nonetheless, should be a fun ride!

mizyss 16 Sep 2009 , 4:06pm

FML is a great example of a 50 bagger in 6 months.

Join the conversation

Please take note - some tags have changed.

Line breaks are converted automatically.

You may use the following tags in your post: [b]bolded text[/b], [i]italicised text[/i]. All other tags will be removed from your post.

If you want to add a link, please ensure you type it as http://www.fool.co.uk as opposed to www.fool.co.uk.

Hello stranger

To add your own comment, please login.

Not yet registered? Register now.