Pros And Cons Of Property ETFs

Published in Investing Strategy on 25 August 2009

Do property ETFs look attractive investments in the current climate?

Property ETFs, ones tracking the returns of the property sector of the equity market, have a number of general strengths to recommend them alongside some particular weaknesses.

First the strengths. If property companies or real estate investment trusts (REITs) are more like investment funds than ordinary businesses, property ETFs both be seen as a kind of fund of funds. The ETF is still an index-tracking investment but the risk spreading is across a broader range of property manager talent as well as across more of the market than investments in individual property companies.

Lack of choice is one problem

While property ETF total expense ratios are middle of the range at 0.4% to 0.6%, the real problem with using ETFs to track the property sector is relative lack of choice. 

For example, for UK investors there are currently no total return ETFs available. REIT regulations require them to pay 90% of rental profits to investors, but a property ETF doesn't have to pass those dividends on to their shareholders; they could be re-invested. 

If it was possible, many investors might prefer to invest in an ETF that tracks an index such as the DJ STOXX 600 Real Estate TR. Comstage ETF actually offer one such, but it's only listed on the Deutsche Boerse. 

A second aspect of the lack of ETF choice is the absence of any ETFs for particular types of property. The reason for this is the specialist indices don't exist in the property company sector. FTSE has a range of indices for different types of property (retail, office and industrial) and these can be tracked by derivatives. Swap-based ETFs to track them could be developed but this will probably have to await a full-scale property upturn, as will a better choice of property ETFs around.

Concentration is the most serious drawback

The biggest problem with the few property ETFs available is the high level of investment concentration that they bring. 

A look at the few property ETFs available in the UK highlights the problem. A £3,000 investment in the iShares FTSE EPRA/NAREIT UK Property Fund (IUKP) would currently concentrate over £1,800 (61%) in just four companies: Land Securities (LSE: LAND), British Land (LSE: BLND), Hammerson (LSE: HMSO) and Liberty International (LSE: LII). 

iShares FTSE EPRA/NAREIT European Property Index Fund (IPRP) avoids those FTSE 100 constituents as its excludes the UK but concentrates 26% of your investment in the giant French REIT, Unibail-Rodamco. 

The best ETF for avoiding this level of concentration is iShares FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Developed Markets Property Yield Fund (IWDP) but it only manages to do so because a mere 20% of its constituents are from the UK or continental Europe compared to the 35% comprised of US constituents. The 'yield' in the name signifies that 'dividend plus' version of FTSE's index is being tracked.

What about property assets?

Since the early March low point, the iShares UK property fund has outperformed the FTSE 100 by a margin of two to one. That said property had fallen a lot further than most other assets in the preceding two years; the iShares UK fund was down almost 80% from March 2007 to March 2009. The iShares European and Developed Markets Property funds fared less badly, partly because the fall in sterling worked in its favour.

Dividends (rental profit) are the main underpinning for REIT and other property company share prices and these could fall either because occupancy rates and rents fall or because of higher interest charges. However, this support for property share prices isn't likely to suffer serious collapse.

The question of property's growth prospects seems more problematic. Is there going to be a fully fledged recovery of the property market that will make current share prices look like bargains in a year or two? Investors have faced down the talk of a dead cat bounce and, latterly, of a bear market rally, but property could miss out on the recovery to a significant degree. 

For those who take a cyclical approach to asset allocation, property should come back into favour as the recovery gets going but, if the next six months are going to see the early stages of the recovery, there are not many signs of growing interest in property to accompany it. So, in these respects, it could be years before we return to the confidence of 2006.

So on balance, I remain wary of property in general and property ETFs as a way into property assets in particular.

More on ETFs:

Share & subscribe

Comments

The opinions expressed here are those of the individual writers and are not representative of The Motley Fool. If you spot any comments that are unsuitable hit the flag to alert our moderators.

theRealGrinch 25 Aug 2009 , 6:02pm

dont touch them with a barge pole!

strategicland 27 Aug 2009 , 12:10pm

Strategic UK Land recommends UK investment land with a potential to be designated for residential development in the medium- to long term. Historically, UK residential land values rose at almost double the rate of UK residential property prices. In addition to organic growth, land increases in value up to 20 times when it is designated for residential development: http://www.strategic-uk-land.com

francisgroves 28 Aug 2009 , 1:24pm

I think I'd want land to be generating rental income rather than hoping for windfalls from redesignation.

Thinkingaloud 29 Aug 2009 , 6:27pm

Just wondering what your views are on ETFs and gold?

Great article by the way.

Join the conversation

Please take note - some tags have changed.

Line breaks are converted automatically.

You may use the following tags in your post: [b]bolded text[/b], [i]italicised text[/i]. All other tags will be removed from your post.

If you want to add a link, please ensure you type it as http://www.fool.co.uk as opposed to www.fool.co.uk.

Hello stranger

To add your own comment, please login.

Not yet registered? Register now.