Turning £36,000 Into £1 Million

Published in Investing Strategy on 11 August 2009

Is it possible to build a million-pound pension pot in just 13 years?

There's an old joke about a lost motorist who pulls over to ask a local for directions to a nearby town. The local replies, "I wouldn't start from here if I were you!"

This came to mind when I read 'The great pension challenge' in the Sunday Times of 2 August. The article is about 47-year-old Mark Strahan, who first posted his idea on one of the Fool's discussion boards. Through a combination of investing and trading, Mark has a bold and daring plan to turn £36,000 into a cool million by 2022.

Mark is doing better than most

When it comes to pension provision, self-employed workers are usually at the bottom of the heap. Mark is a self-employed IT consultant, so he has to make his own pension arrangements. However, I believe that he's already well ahead of the general population. 

For more than 20 years, Mark has been contributing £100 a month into a personal pension with Norwich Union, now Aviva (LSE: AV). These contributions have created a pot currently worth £120,000. Given that the average personal pension pot at retirement is around £25,000, he's already well ahead of most self-employed workers. That's the first piece of good news.

The second piece of good news for Mark is that his personal pension has a guaranteed annuity rate (GAR) of 11%. Thus, his pot will produce a pension of roughly £13,000 a year when Mark reaches 60. At 11% a year, Mark's GAR is hugely valuable, as it's more than twice current annuity rates of around 5% a year. 

In other words, to buy a pension of £13,000 without his GAR would require a hefty £260,000. So, in effect, Mark's GAR makes his pension much more valuable than first appears. On top of that, this fund could grow further by the time he decides to draw an income from it.

Do-it-yourself pensions

Mark also has £36,000 in a self-managed, do-it-yourself pension known as a self-invested personal pension (SIPP). He created this by transferring in a previous Scottish Life pension. The majority of this -- £33,000 -- is now invested this into shares in various blue-chip companies, including Barclays (LSE: BARC) and Tesco (LSE: TSCO).

Also, Mark has put aside £3,000 in his SIPP in order to pursue a high-risk, high-reward strategy designed to make his SIPP worth £1 million by the time he reaches 60 in 2022. So, Mark has 13 years in which to increase the size of his pot by £964,000. What this means is that Mark's pot has to be 28 times as big as it is now in order to be worth £1 million.

Can it be done?

For Mark's pension to leap from £36,000 to £1 million in 13 years, he will need a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 29% a year on the whole amount. Let's be generous and assume that he makes a steady 10% a year on the £33,000 invested in big firms. After 13 years, this will have grown to £113,925.

Thus, to build a million-pound SIPP, Mark's trading pot of £3,000 would need be worth £886,075 by 2022. For this to happen, Mark needs achieve a CAGR of 55% on his £3,000. The problem is that the historic return of the UK stock market as a whole for the last century or so is under 11% a year. In other words, for Mark to succeed, he must beat the market return by a factor of five. This would make him the greatest investor and trader in financial history!

Some of the greatest money managers in history (men such as Warren Buffett of Berkshire Hathaway, George Soros of Soros Fund Management, Julian Robertson of Tiger Management, Peter Lynch of Fidelity Investments and Bill Miller of Legg Mason) have produced annual returns of 20%+ over extended periods. But not one of these greats has achieved a CAGR of 55% for 13 years in a row.

I admire Mark for aiming so high, but I'm pretty certain he'll end up missing his target. His mechanical strategy seems to have an elegant simplicity, as do all mechanical and theoretical strategies. Mark puts the full £3,000 into the shares of one company and cashes in when the share price has risen by 11% to 15%. Conversely, if the shares fall by 15% to 20%, Mark will cut his losses and sell. After each trade, the proceeds will be invested in another company. He carry on this process until 2022.

55 heads in a row

Mark reckons that he needs 55 successful trades in a row -- or roughly one per quarter -- in order to pull off this mighty feat. As an IT consultant, I'm sure that he is good at maths and has done his sums. 

The problem is getting all those winners on the trot. The kind of luck or skill needed would be akin to throwing 55 heads in a row, which is possible but has never happened to my knowledge!

Markets don't move up smoothly in straight lines. Instead, they are subject to periods of intense fluctuation.  For example, since the turn of the century, the FTSE 100 index has halved, doubled, halved again and then risen about 33% since its low this March. These kind of wild gyrations play havoc with even the most ingenious trading strategy!

My advice to Mark is simple: put back your retirement to 65 instead of 60; make the highest monthly contributions you can to your SIPP or another investment such as an ISA

Assuming Mark continues to keep us updated (he's posted some initial trades already) following his progress is going to prove very educational. He's being sensible in that he's keeping the majority of his SIPP in solid blue chip shares and only risking a small part of his wealth in this high-risk strategy. I wish him the best of luck. 

> You can follow Mark's (alias ukpoker) trades on the Fool's Investment Strategies board.

> Keep your trading costs down with The Motley Fool's Share Dealing service. Opening an account is free and real-time trades cost just £10.

Share & subscribe

Comments

The opinions expressed here are those of the individual writers and are not representative of The Motley Fool. If you spot any comments that are unsuitable hit the flag to alert our moderators.

fuwl 11 Aug 2009 , 1:22pm

2^55 = 36,028,797,018,963,968

The chance of winning the lottery with a £1 ticket is 1 in 13,983,816.

Therefore he is far more likely to win the lottery on consecutive weeks than to get 55 heads in a row to succeed in his plan.

What's more interesting is what is likely to happen. Assuming he exits on =-15% with 50/50 chance and £12.50 dealing costs plus stamp duty, his expectancy with £3,000 is to reduce it to £2,231. There is a 23% chance of loosing it all and only 1:1000 chance of making it over £46k.

theRealGrinch 11 Aug 2009 , 2:47pm

dream dream dream with numbers plucked out of the air and I want to turn £1 into a zillion in 4 weeks.

ps try don bradman investments they are producing 99.94% every time.

sedge111 12 Aug 2009 , 12:59pm

You gotta admire his optimism eh !

One small point - I think that the "55 heads in a row" argument is inappropriate here.

I think the chances of throwing a “heads” in stead of a “Tails” (or vice versa) are ALWAYS 50:50. There may be some other factor to consider that I'm missing though.

Investing in a SIPP which owns a commercial property is pretty tax efficient. You don’t pay tax on any rental income and you don’t pay CGT when you sell it later on.

Any, good luck to him

teaboy100 12 Aug 2009 , 1:56pm

presumably Mark is doing some research into his next company before investing, rather than blind guessing, so this also invalidates the head:tails analogy.
He'd be well advised to use that Parrot that beat most South Korean investors recently...

tonygogo 12 Aug 2009 , 2:00pm

sedge111 - I'm no stats anorak, but on each individual spin, I agree the odds are always 50:50, but surely the odds of spinning 55 consecutive 'heads' would be a bit higher?

hiyer 12 Aug 2009 , 2:06pm

I am going to offer a different view to some of the comments above.

I worked in Australia for 12 years and built up a pension (they call it superannuation) and left with a top tier fund manager for 10 years. When I left Australia my pension pot was A$150,000. Last year end the balance grew to A$200,000 over 10 year period. For such pathetic rate of return, they were also charging me hefty fixed fees and charges in additional to performance based fees and charges.

I decided to take my pension of A$200k out of them and started to manage myself (similar to our SIPP). It is 8 months since I took over and I started doing similar to what Mark was talking about. Invested 100% in shares, part in trading stock and others in investing stock. Like investment houses, I have developed strategies to exit at certain profit/loss levels and trade frequently. I also do what the investment houses do which is buy insurance (put and call options) on the underlying shares I own. I only have 3 or 4 shares at any given time with a min. of A$50k in each share. Yes, it is a high risk strategy but manage this risk through options.

My balance today is approx. A$230k - a simple return of 15% over 8 months. I only trade in ASX 200 (which is like our FTSE 100) and similar to SIPP there is no income tax or CGT. Above all unlike our pension, I can encash 100% of my Australian superannuation when I reach retirement age - tax free in Australia (may become taxable here and in which case I will retire in Australia).

I get up early mornings and Australian stock exchange is still trading and getting to the closing hours. This suits me best to do my trades.

My goal is to reach 20% return this year and I am confident of getting there.

On the back of limited success I had with my Australian Superannuation, I am planning to do similar here and open SIPP.

alucarDrM 12 Aug 2009 , 2:49pm

Is 'Mark' attempting to make this million purely by trading existing funds, without contributing further to the fund?

DP130132 12 Aug 2009 , 3:48pm

What if his health cracks up mid term???????

Aleximples 12 Aug 2009 , 4:44pm

As at 6th April 2009 my SIPP value was £23k, today it has a value of £103k.

So in 129 days the value of my SIPP has increased 447.8%. Conservatively I estimate that my SIPP will be worth £1m in 7 years, with no further input of cash.

Just imagine what I could do in 13 years(4745 days).

ronat42 12 Aug 2009 , 6:12pm

I'm more concerned that Mark's 11% is heavily subsidised by my own meagre pension accumulated over 45 years of hard work and topped up by only 20% and not 40%. In fact, there are probably a large number of us who will never get the full benefit of our savings in order to subsidise his.

kenbf 13 Aug 2009 , 11:20am

In theory it is probably easier to make a good return on investments as an individual investor than as a fund manager. The reason is simple, a managed fund is a lumbering dinosaur with a massive portfolio of shares which cannot be moved in an agile way and when a "hit" is scored, it represents such a small part of the overall portfolio that its impact is minimal. Added to which, the manager has to contend with wholesale selling of shares or units by investors when the market falls and massive buying of shares when investors pile into their funds at the top of a bull market, thus the manager is often forced to sell cheap and buy expensive.
As if this isn't enough, most funds are run by a committee or at least are influenced by an "overall investment chief" who has to confront institutional investors such as pension funds where the war cry is "Steady as she goes."

All I can say to Mark is "The best of luck."

Setting aside all this for a moment, here is an interesting fact. Money invested at a regular rate will roughly double in ten or so years and if left invested, it will treble in every further ten years. This is on the assumption that average equities will continue returning 10% to 11% on average every year.

On this basis, £100 invested monthly for ten years will amount to £12,000 and could become around £24,000 at the end of the ten years. If left as an investment it could become £72,000 by trebling in the next ten years and £216,000 after a further ten years, thirty years in all. If this amount remains for a further ten years, forty years from the start, it could treble again to become £648,000. Now consider the saver continuing to save the £100 per month. In this case there will be further amounts of £216,000, £72,000 and £24,000 to be added to the total making a grand sum of £960,000!

Pretty obviously there are snags in this plan. Can a person discipline themselves to save £100 per month for forty years? What about inflation? What about CCT.? What about investment costs?

The point is, the mathematics are accurate and the average growth of average equities is a fact.

If the fund only reaches £500,000 after all this time, so what?

So we can see, Mark's plan is possibly not so ambitious after all!

AleisterCrowley 14 Aug 2009 , 3:29pm

The odds of spinning 55 consecutive heads are the same as any other initially specified combination of heads and tails - miniscule.

The odds on the 55th toss are still 50/50 of course.

davally 15 Aug 2009 , 11:23pm

Hi,

I am looking toaward the markets for my pension, then with the money I create I will focus back onto property. You cannot leave any pension to chance, in fact what is pension any more. Heading into forex now to see how that goes here http://www.fxonlinetrading.net

Dave

Join the conversation

Please take note - some tags have changed.

Line breaks are converted automatically.

You may use the following tags in your post: [b]bolded text[/b], [i]italicised text[/i]. All other tags will be removed from your post.

If you want to add a link, please ensure you type it as http://www.fool.co.uk as opposed to www.fool.co.uk.

Hello stranger

To add your own comment, please login.

Not yet registered? Register now.