Why Investors Are Suckers

Published in Investing Strategy on 10 July 2009

Two bubbles, two crashes, and still we come back for more.

If anything was going to demolish our faith in stocks and shares, the last decade would have done it. Two bubbles and two crashes have left markets more than one-third down on the end of the millennium. That's nearly a decade ago.

Equities are supposed to outperform cash over the longer term, but over the last decade they have failed badly. Yet we still believe. One in three people would like to keep their pension invested in the stock market, according to new research from Prudential.

Experienced investors are even more faithful. Otherwise I wouldn't be writing this, and you wouldn't be reading it. But is this blind faith? Are we deluded? Or are we right to hold fast in our belief that equities will come good in the longer run?

Faith no more

The last decade has torpedoed one of the key arguments in favour of long-term equity investing.

Before the crunch, I lost count of the number of brokers and advisers who told me that over a five-year period, stock markets have always made money. Now markets are down over 10 years, and it could easily be 15 years before they return to 1999 levels.

Yet still we believe. It's incredible, when you think about it. What else would you continue to buy despite the fact that it blew up in your face regularly?

At least property keeps you warm and dry at night. Share certificates don't. So why do we keep doing it?

When you look at the competition…

One reason is that most of us view stock markets as a victim of the credit crunch, rather than the cause of it. Equities weren't ludicrously overvalued, as they were at the peak of the technology boom.

Another reason, if a negative one, is that so many rival investments look even less attractive right now.

After the dot.com crash, investors soon found comfort in property, but there is no ready-made alternative right now. House prices could fall further. Bonds have been poor for years. And don't even mention cash.

This isn't exactly a vote of confidence in equities, but confidence is in short supply everywhere at the moment.

First out of the blocks

Another factor is that we can see that shares have taken a bigger battering than, say, property. The benchmark FTSE 100 fell nearly 50% from peak to trough. UK house prices, by comparison, are down just 15%, according to Halifax.

So there is good reason for investors to think they are getting a better bargain on shares than on property. Especially since share prices tend to advance first in a recovery, with property bringing up the rear. 

The anticipated rise in unemployment is also likely to weigh heavily on house prices, as is the continuing reluctance of bankers to grant mortgages to buyers. You don't need to beg your bank for a mortgage to buy stocks and shares.

Hope springs eternal

Yet I'm still impressed that investors believe. What else could be driving them? Fear? Hardly. Greed? Maybe.

Many of us only rediscovered our enthusiasm for equities during the "dash for trash" in March, April and May, when we could bag quick profits from banks and bombed-out stocks.

A bit of short-term profit-making always helps lift the spirits in dark times. Now the chance of a quick buck has gone, some will have cooled off a little. But most of us are still trading.

In for the long haul

Perhaps we are addicts? Throwing good money after bad, convinced that our luck is about to turn. If you are showing signs of addiction, losing money on one "can't fail" share tip after another, get out now. You're hooked, it's not healthy, and that's no way to build a decent portfolio.

But most of us know the key to investment success is finding good companies at attractive valuations, and hanging onto them until they prove us right. A nice dividend also helps.

And that largely explains why so many of us have kept the faith. Because we know this is a long game. It demands patience. We expect false trails and ugly downturns. We know we will lose money at times, sometimes lots of it. So we dig ourselves in, fortify our positions, and prepare for a long -- but ultimately successful -- campaign.

We're not ready to surrender yet.

You gotta have faith

In any case, no rational investor would quit with the market at its bottom, because that is the one surefire way of becoming a loser in the long term. We have to keep believing, because once we lose faith, we have lost everything. And anyway, what else would you do with your time?

> Keep the faith with The Motley Fool Share Dealing service. You can open an account for free and then trade for £10 a time.

Share & subscribe

Comments

The opinions expressed here are those of the individual writers and are not representative of The Motley Fool. If you spot any comments that are unsuitable hit the flag to alert our moderators.

lotontech 10 Jul 2009 , 7:34am

It got me thinking that it would be interesting to discover if there is any correlation between blind faith in stocks and blind faith in God (i.e. religious conviction). Are the people who cling onto stocks through thick and thin the same people who cling to belief in an afterlife -- despite plenty of evidence to the contrary.

I'm making an observation, not a religious point, and so on the other hand I could say:

1) You can't prove a negative. I can't prove that God DOESN'T EXIST, but if he ever turns up then it will be proof that he DOES EXIST. So I can't proof that buy-and-hold won't work.... eventually.

2) Pascal's Wager says that you might as well believe in God. If you don't believe, and he does exist, you will go to hell. If you do believe, and he doesn't exist, then you are no worse off. Except that you have spent all that time in church when you could have been doing something else!

In relation to point 2):

If you do beleive in long-term-buy-hold (LTBH), and it doesn't work, then you ARE WORSE OFF. And all of that time spent in the buy-and-hold church could have been better spent (invested) elsewhere.

Sermon over ;-)

Terrapin1 10 Jul 2009 , 9:21am

you can rent out a house but when your shares are rented out your broker takes the rent.
People buy shares on margin in the US, we don't do that here because we believe in a more cautious approach, but if shares do outperform cash then the banks would be happy to lend to us to buy a portfolio. they fall over themselves to offer car loans- a metal box that loses 25% of its value in a second when bought new.
Oops! Looks like nobody has actually thought this through.
Personally I resent the utter drivel pumped out by the financial meeja-the talking heads like Cramer. What the hell do they mean with their pathetic jargon anyway? Stuff like 'overweight' 'price target' EBITDA. theultimate is calling themselves Bears and Bulls- sorry people Mice and Maggots would be more apt.

rober09 10 Jul 2009 , 5:14pm

"I lost count of the number of brokers and advisers who told me that over a five-year period, stock markets have always made money" And they were ALL LYING!!! So much for IFA's and the like.

I have met some of these so called advisers at conferences, workshops and the like and have never yet met one who impressed.

curedum 13 Jul 2009 , 1:55pm

Provided that the world economy continues to grow, creating more wealth, it will be profitable to have a share in the profits made by good companies.

If you have been to China and seen the speed and strength of their progress, you'll realise that over the next 20 years that will be the place to concentrate a growth-orientated portfolio, with smaller investments in India and maybe Brazil. Forget Russia, burdened by oppressive politics and the Mafia, whilst the USA will slowly decline and we in Europe will just paddle on - barely keeping our heads above water.

Fingered 13 Jul 2009 , 8:22pm

Perhaps a round of Brown Twigging and a Green Shoot rally MkII ( it will no doubt be called something else by then ) will restore ( or test ) the faith of the LTBH'ers into 2010 ( or rinse their pockets a bit more)

As for IFA's, well if they were so good at giving sound advice, why are they not all millionaires as opposed to just IFA's ??
Not too many will say sell out and move to the sidelines........
For the large Funds especially, if you were to do that, hey you just might no longer return
and be a client so hurting their commissions that are based on the "ammount of money under management".

Only 2 bubbles you counting Harvey? Erm... I make it a few more than that. Keep the faith!

Join the conversation

Please take note - some tags have changed.

Line breaks are converted automatically.

You may use the following tags in your post: [b]bolded text[/b], [i]italicised text[/i]. All other tags will be removed from your post.

If you want to add a link, please ensure you type it as http://www.fool.co.uk as opposed to www.fool.co.uk.

Hello stranger

To add your own comment, please login.

Not yet registered? Register now.