How I Lost My Bacon On Lean Hogs

Published in Investing Strategy on 18 June 2009

The price of pigs is the same as a year ago but this Fool lost 47% on his Lean Hogs index tracker. Is this the worst tracker of all time?

"What is a poke?" A question that has vexed me for a while but I didn't look up the derivation of the phrase to buy a pig in a poke until recently. The poke in question is a small sack or bag, from which we get the work pocket. If you bought a suckling pig wriggling in a bag and didn't bother to open it until you got home you might find it was only a worthless cat. A mute one I guess.

I have to admit that last year I bought a tracker of pig prices in a poke. The poke in this case was an Exchange Traded Commodity (ETC) called ETFS Lean Hogs (HOGS). The price of pigs had slumped in US due to high feed prices causing farmers to slaughter early. That was an unsustainable situation since the supply of pigs would have to fall eventually and moreover if feed prices stayed high (as seemed likely before the world economy tanked) the hogs would cost more to rear. Rapidly increasing meat consumption in Asia gave solid long term support.

ETFS Lean Hogs had fallen from $2.90 in 6 months and had previously averaged just above $3 since the tracker became available in 2006. At $1.93 HOGS seemed a bargain. If only I'd looked inside the wrapper.

The whole hog and nothing but the hog

June Lean Hogs on the Chicago Mercantile Exchange (CME) is $57. This chart shows the price in March 2008 was about the same as now, so why has HOGS lost 47%?

The ETFS factsheet says "ETFS Lean Hogs (HOGS) is designed to track the DJ-AIG Lean Hogs Sub-IndexSM and pays a capitalised interest return which cumulates daily. The Sub-Index is an "excess return" index and the interest component combines to give a total return investment."
I don't know what all that guff means but I can check the DJ-AIG Lean Hogs Sub-Index, which is currently $9.70. It was $18.37 when I bought my HOGS, so it's down 47%. At least this figure lines up.

I've been contangoed

In the year that I've been a piggin' investor the price of Lean Hogs futures has predicted a strong rise coming round the corner. That's good, right? No! Unlike gold where you can store £1m in a child's shoebox, it's not economic to store vast values of commodities like oil, grain and meat for years. 

If you want to profit from a rise in crude oil then you, or a tracker fund, will have to buy a future. If the future for the month of September for example is higher than the spot price it's called contango in big-shot trader jargon. 

The problem I didn't see is that you are paying a premium due to market optimism and if the spot price does not rise by September you have lost money. Come September's you have to close the contract and buy a new one for say December. If that is also in contango the same can happen again.

What now?

I still have my hog tracker. I'm considering selling but I'm not sure yet. Commodity trackers like ETFS Soybeans (SOYB), ETFS Brent Oil 1 Yr (OSB1) and ETFS Commodities (AIGC) are not inherently bad investments; it's simply that for over a year the futures market for the one I bought has turned out to be wrong. It's been expecting a rise in pig prices, as have I and it just hasn't happened.

Lean Hogs futures are showing increasing prices up to Jun 2010. Much of this is seasonality. This chart shows prices peaking in April, May and June. Evaluating this sort of investment is looking like the type of problem Warren Buffett calls "too hard". I'm still very bullish on long-term meat prices but while playing soft commodities is now as easy as purchasing a share in Vodafone (LSE: VOD) it can still be like buying a pig in a poke.

More on this subject:

Share & subscribe

Comments

The opinions expressed here are those of the individual writers and are not representative of The Motley Fool. If you spot any comments that are unsuitable hit the flag to alert our moderators.

gordonbanks42 19 Jun 2009 , 10:03pm

General advice about buying any index tracking instrument - find out which index it tracks and find out how that index works.

Many Fool readers may assume that an index tracker is (a) cheap and (b) harmless, because nearly all the comment on here about index trackers is about the ones which track broad UK indices like the FTSE All Share and the FTSE 100. Such trackers are indeed (generally) cheap and harmless, but not all index tracker are like that. Also you don't have to get into anything quite as obscure as lean hog ITCs before you find clear examples of how different ti can be (although the example given is a real cracker!).

The indices that are used to track a lot of the developing markets (e.g. those in China and India) are very narrow (ie they are composed of relatively few stocks). On the other hand, the iBovespa (Brazil) is much broader. That can be expected to affect the volatility of the index, among other things.

I decided to buy one "Brazil" ETF rather than another on the grounds that one tracked an index whose composition I could find out about and the other tracked an index whose composition, despite much Googling, remained obstinately obscure.

The costs (TERs) on emerging market funds, even index trackers, are generally higher than for developed market index trackers too.

You wouldn't know unless you untied the "poke" and had a good "poke" about.

namron101 22 Jun 2009 , 9:19am

The story is a good example of how the growing popularity of commodity investment has made it less attractive! In the past, most commodities traded in backwardation, the opposite of contango. The far futures price was usually below the spot price, and the investor made an "automatic" profit as the futures contract got closer to maturity and its price rose towards the spot price. The arrival of new investors, who buy up futures contracts, has reversed the traditional relationship. Contangos are now much more common, and the investor will lose money "automatically" unless the spot price of the commodity rises.

Mari11ion 21 Jul 2010 , 11:02am

"you might find it was only a worthless cat".

Hence the phrase "letting the cat out of the bag"

Join the conversation

Please take note - some tags have changed.

Line breaks are converted automatically.

You may use the following tags in your post: [b]bolded text[/b], [i]italicised text[/i]. All other tags will be removed from your post.

If you want to add a link, please ensure you type it as http://www.fool.co.uk as opposed to www.fool.co.uk.

Hello stranger

To add your own comment, please login.

Not yet registered? Register now.