How to Invest Using the "New" Buy and Hold

Published in Investing Strategy on 15 June 2009

The debate rages. Is buy and hold investing dead? In this exclusive Fool interview, the CEO of the world's largest bond investor talks about the new normal. It's a compelling read.

It's been a trying couple of years for the stock market -- the kind of trying times that shake fundamental market beliefs.

Investments in one-time stalwarts like Royal Bank of Scotland (LSE: RBS), BT Group (LSE: BT-A), and Aviva (LSE: AV) shocked us all when their share prices fell so far so quickly. The severe market losses have caused many to question whether the cornerstone of value investors, "long-term buy and hold," still works.

A New Normal

In an exclusive Fool interview last week, Mohamed El-Erian, the CEO and co-CIO of US-based Pacific Investment Management Co. (the world's largest bond investor) said long-term buy and hold is not dead. However, it has to be modified for a "new normal."

Translation: We are undergoing secular changes, not cyclical ones. The environment as we knew it before the financial crisis isn't going to return anytime soon.

By El-Erian's account, there will be a new normal brought on by de-leveraging, de-globalisation, and re-regulation. Specifically, the new environment is characterised by languid gross domestic product (GDP) growth and high unemployment for some time. The government will play a large role in the private sector, consumers will not spend to oblivion as before, and the trust that has been broken in financial and regulatory sectors will take time to restore.

Although El-Erian was talking about the US economy, he could just as easily have been talking about the UK economy. We're in virtually exactly the same boat.

To that end, El-Erian recommends that investors build a portfolio based on three elements:

  • a long-term view;
  • a cyclical view; and
  • very explicit risk management.

The Elements

The first element of the strategy is to be forward-looking rather than backward-looking. "That speaks to asset allocation and geographical exposures," El-Erian said.

The second element is that the road forward will be mired with sharp turns and bumps. As a result, investors must position their portfolios to benefit from cyclical trends. "That bumpiness constitutes an additional challenge for buy and holds, which is to make sure that people can in fact hold -- because when you have a very bumpy journey, there is a temptation to stop holding at the wrong time," he said.

"So there has to be a much more responsive element of the portfolio that is looking to capture not long-term secular and structural trends, but looking to catch shorter-term cyclical and technical trends," he said.

The third element of El-Erian's plan is conscious risk management, which gets at diversification. In the past, El-Erian said, one of the problems with the buy-and-hold strategy was that it encouraged people to think that diversification was sufficient for risk mitigation.

Buy And Hold And Forget Is Out

"That's no longer the case. Diversification is necessary, but it's not sufficient," he said. It's necessary because it's the best method for mitigation of risk, but it's not sufficient because, as El-Erian points out, you can have years, such as last year, in which all the correlations go against you. Therefore, he said, buy and hold needs to be supplemented with much more responsive risk management.

"It's not enough to say I'm going to be able to buy and hold simply because I'm diversified. One has to go a few steps further and ask what does it look like when I'm actually buying and holding?" he said.

Building on that, El-Erian said a portfolio should be constructed such that only part of it is held for the "long term," which he defines "long term" as three to five years, max -- because it's difficult to forecast what happens much beyond that. "Part of the portfolio is buy and hold where values are going to be realized over a period of time," he said. "What the investor is taking advantage of is the ability to buy and hold, because there are lots of pools of money that cannot hold up through the ups and downs of a market."

More Cracks In The "Old Normal"

To deal with this new normal, El-Erian has some more tactical advice:

  • Start out by defining your objectives and your risk tolerance, because both determine how you build up your portfolio. "The more ambitious you are on your objectives, the more risk that you're going to have to be able to tolerate."

  • Index tracking may not work as well as in the past. In unstable conditions, "it's important that the core product be actively managed."

  • Investing only in the U.S., or the UK for that matter, could lead to sub-par returns, since the U.S. will grow more slowly than the rest of the world.

  • Blue chips like Tesco (LSE: TSCO) or Vodafone (LSE: VOD) will be around for years to come, but they won't dominate the markets, or investors' portfolios as in the past.

  • Inflation is a potential portfolio danger. The best way to guard against inflation right now is with index-linked government securities: "Investors can also protect their portfolios with real assets, but index-lined government securities certainly offer you the more predictable protection against inflation."

Do you agree with El-Erian? Let us know your views in the comment box below.

More on the economy and the markets:

> If you're in the market for buying shares, consider opening an online broker account with The Motley Fool's Share Dealing Service. You can buy and sell shares in real time for a flat rate of just £10. Click here to find out how you can open an account for free today. There is no obligation to trade.

> A version of this article was originally published on Fool.com. It has been updated by Bruce Jackson. He doesn't have an interest in any of the companies mentioned in this article.

Share & subscribe

Comments

The opinions expressed here are those of the individual writers and are not representative of The Motley Fool. If you spot any comments that are unsuitable hit the flag to alert our moderators.

draiochtanois 15 Jun 2009 , 11:14am

This is a poorly written article with little more than big words covering the smallest of ideas.

It's foolish empty tripe rather than anything Foolish.


lotontech 15 Jun 2009 , 12:59pm

"New Formula Washing Powder! Guaranteed to get your clothes whiter-then-white."

Isn't that what the old formula was meant to do?

thriddle 15 Jun 2009 , 1:12pm

It sounds like one of the Wise is trying to get Fools to part with their money.

AndyFD 15 Jun 2009 , 5:41pm

""it's important that the core product be actively managed.""

snakeoil

AndyD 8-)#

toklaye 15 Jun 2009 , 7:53pm

The plain truth is that there is a time to buy and hold and another to actively manage your share portfolio.I have always said one should not stick to a single strategy all the time.

gordonbanks42 15 Jun 2009 , 8:36pm

I'm surprised to find an American backing investment in Index-Linked Government Bonds.

In the UK we have an idea that the RPI doesn't measure inflation all that accurately (to be kind). In the USA, the price index on which index-linked Treasuries are based is very clearly up the creek. When Governments cheat on indexation, investing in their index-linked bonds starts to feel like a game in which there is an "other side" which has contrary interests to one's own and sets all the rules. Not a great game to be playing.

It's more of an act of faith, but I think you'd be better off relying on the longer-term tendency of equity returns to reflect inflation.

His talk of different "pools of money" clearly reflects the perspective of one who manages other people's money. Not particularly useful for private investors, although there is a slight parallel in the structure of a private investor's potential needs for liquidity on various time scales. Personally I don't treat that kind of money as part of my investing activities. I only invest what I don't need back for at least 10 years.

I don't buy his argument (or is it just an assertion?) against index tracking. The burden of proof is on the would-be active manager to show how he is going to outperform. No attempt at that here.

I don't do "long term buy and hold" of individual stocks in any case, and probably never will. I don't even do "long term buy and hold" of whole markets either, although that's rather closer to a description of what I do.

jonesjeff 15 Jun 2009 , 10:14pm

I'm with Gordonbanks42 on this.

RobinnBanks 24 Jun 2009 , 1:52pm

I can't see how we can be "virtually exactly" in the same boat! One or the other, surely?
I agree that Buy And Hold has its limitations:
I have tried that for twelve years and I'm "virtually exactly" at the same level I was when I started! It's great when the market is high, but your portfolio's value drops when the market does. It recovers, peaks, then drops again: as do Index Trackers, naturally.
I'm buying and holding until the next peak of the FTSE 100 at around 7000, then I intend to sell some, if not all stocks. I intended to do so in 2007, but the index never got there!
Fred Schwed (not Goodwin!) says in his excellent book, "Where Are the Customers' Yachts?" that if you do this throughout your life, buying when the market is low (like now) and selling when its high, you will die a rich man!
I think Buffett employs this method to some extent, although he is usually said and thought to be, an only Buy And Hold investor.
I should like to hear what others think of this, and what is their strategy to survive in, if not beat the market.

Join the conversation

Please take note - some tags have changed.

Line breaks are converted automatically.

You may use the following tags in your post: [b]bolded text[/b], [i]italicised text[/i]. All other tags will be removed from your post.

If you want to add a link, please ensure you type it as http://www.fool.co.uk as opposed to www.fool.co.uk.

Hello stranger

To add your own comment, please login.

Not yet registered? Register now.