India: The Safest BRIC

Published in Investing Strategy on 29 May 2009

The four BRIC countries continue to grow in stature, but India looks the safest to invest in.

Until the recession popped the balloon, 'BRIC'-based investment funds and ETFs were all the rage -- with 'BRIC', of course, standing for Brazil, Russia, India and China. It wasn't a logic to which I subscribed.

Russia? With its dubious oligarchs, mafia and opaque business practices? No thanks. Look no further than the mess BP (LSE: BP) got into. China? Again, I'm not persuaded that the investment environment there is yet mature enough for me to invest my hard-earned cash. Brazil? Now you're talking -- although on closer inspection, the Brazil story boils down to worryingly few companies and sectors.

For me, India ticks many more boxes for investors wanting exposure to country-specific emerging markets. And I'm not alone: a number of ETFs and funds have sprung up to capitalise on investors' desire to profit from the fast-growing and fast-globalising Indian economy.

Downsides

That said, as with the other BRIC economies, there are plenty of downsides. Still somewhat hedged in by rules, bureaucracy and restraints, India's growth has substantially lagged China's, and for the foreseeable future will in all probability continue to do so.

Corporate governance is another problem. Earlier this year Indian software giant Satyam messily imploded amid accusations of fraud and larceny, and dynasties and families still dominate too many of India's businesses for my taste. And if sprawling conglomerates like Tata are no longer seen as a suitable business model in the West, why will they fare any better in India?

Corporate debt and leverage is a concern, too. India's quoted businesses are highly geared, carrying a significant amount of debt. Not a problem, perhaps, in good times -- but today's borrowing environment is far from good.

Indian promise

Despite these concerns, India has a lot of good things going for it. The country's stock market leapt 17% on May 18th, for instance, after the Congress Party's resounding victory in the country's general election opened the door to further economic reform.

And today comes news that India seems, like China, to be shrugging off the global recession. The Indian economy grew 5.8% in the first three months of the year, a year-on-year result that was better than analysts had expected. Growth -- and GDP -- are down on last year overall, but the tide seems to have turned.

And that economy is changing in nature. The past ten years has been an export-led success story: Indian companies selling outsourcing services, software, and industrial products to companies in the West. That will continue, but India's rising consumer class will generate vastly more economic wealth. Figures put India's likely middle class at 580 million by 2025 -- more than the population of Europe.

Buying into India

Consequently, I'm bullish on India -- bullish enough to place a chunk of my own cash there.

There are various ways of doing this. Investment funds are a popular choice, if you're prepared to pay the costs involved. As I've argued here, specialist funds like India-only funds are an example of where it may well be worth paying for a fund manager's insights and on-the-ground research. I counted 17 fund managers offering Indian investment funds -- among them companies such as Jupiter, Fidelity, HSBC, F&C, and Neptune.

ETFs are another option, and have lower charges. iShares offer an India-only ETF, for instance, the iShares MSCI India (INDI); as does rival Lyxor, with its Lyxor India S&P CNX NIFTY (LSE: LNFT).

For those of a more nervous disposition, another option is to invest in funds -- or ETFs -- that are only partly exposed to India. There are a huge number of Asian-oriented investment trusts, eTFs, investment funds and index trackers that have a portion of their assets in India, with the balance being spread over the economies of Singapore, South Korea, and Hong Kong.

Check before you buy, though -- some have a worthwhile exposure to India, but others don't, preferring to put their money in other Asian economies. As the saying goes, "you pays your money, and you takes your choice."

More on foreign funds:

Malcolm owns shares in BP.

Share & subscribe

Comments

The opinions expressed here are those of the individual writers and are not representative of The Motley Fool. If you spot any comments that are unsuitable hit the flag to alert our moderators.

IndepObserver 29 May 2009 , 4:48pm

Talking about corporate governance, a current scandal concerns one of India's largest pharmaceutical companies, Ranbaxy. Sold to a Japanese company under false representations, Ranbaxy is currently giving it's new owner headaches both in financial terms, quality control issues, sales to Africa of diluted ineffectual HIV retroviral drugs and an investigation by the US's FDA. What is it with Japanese companies moving into developed world's markets? They had problems back in the 80's buying assets such as property and golf courses then and having to sell them at a loss in the 90's. Don't they ever learn to do their due diligence? Caveat Emptor.

jonesjeff 29 May 2009 , 11:42pm

I wonder why everything is made in China & almost nothing you buy is made in India?

KhannaP 29 May 2009 , 11:59pm

Spot on IndepObserver, a very important point made there. Another recent event that comes to my mind is of Indian 4th largest software services company Satyam. How its promoters have been cooking the books with seal of approvals from none other than PWC. I lost a good amount of money there. Before the scandal broke out the company looked a big bargain with a lot of MoS.
Having said that there are good and growing businesses also.

gordonbanks42 01 Jun 2009 , 6:44pm

Everything tangible you buy is made in China. A lot of India's exports (to the UK, at least) are services, and often services that are embedded in a value chain that makes them more or less invisible. The main time they are visible to a consumer is in the case of the much-reviled Indian call centre.
The Indian export model is in many ways more sustainable in the long run (provided they get the call centre thing right) because it doesn't depend so much on physical resources that might run out or become ludicrously expensive over time.

RobinnBanks 02 Jun 2009 , 1:22am

If you need to check the weather before going on holiday to India: 'phone your bank!

IndepObserver 02 Jun 2009 , 3:41am

To gordonbanks42. Britain was gradually replacing manufacturing industry from the 1970's onwards thinking that services (and in particular banking, finance and pharma) were the way to go. For a brief moment at the turn of the 21st century Britain was the Financial Center. The latest financial meltdown put paid to that. Even in the 80's I thought that you have to have some other types of businesses in the economy to service. It's easier to run a financial (paper) business than to run a business such as manufacturing cars. While the latest bankruptcies for Chrysler and GM seem poignant, it apparently seems that so called bright people can't even run paper businesses such as banking and money management. I've worked for computer manufacturers, money managers, hedge funds in capacities such as help desk, IT production control and computer programming, trader analyst, etc. Help desk is not regarded very highly in the West and is often a stop-gap job. It is however one of the main businesses for call-center work. I can understand why there is a high turnover of staff in call centers. You have bright people dealing with the mass of the great 'unwashed' in technical terms and you have to answer to managers who themselves are under pressure to raise productivity. Generally not what you were expecting when you came out of uni. and a waste of potential as well. China does a lot of manufacturing and most of the IT services in that country caters to that work in their language. The Chinese IT cos., small as they are, are now starting to look at overseas work. I just hope it's at a higher level than the help-desk level.

Join the conversation

Please take note - some tags have changed.

Line breaks are converted automatically.

You may use the following tags in your post: [b]bolded text[/b], [i]italicised text[/i]. All other tags will be removed from your post.

If you want to add a link, please ensure you type it as http://www.fool.co.uk as opposed to www.fool.co.uk.

Hello stranger

To add your own comment, please login.

Not yet registered? Register now.