Sir Fred Goodwin Would Hate These Small Caps

Published in Investing Strategy on 12 May 2009

Sick of greedy fat cats? Thankfully there are some bosses that show commendable pay restraint.

I don't know about you, but I'm sick to the back teeth of FTSE bosses lining their pockets at the expense of us hard-pressed shareholders. We all know about Sir Fred Goodwin's pension and all the other undeserved banker bonuses, but none of that's stopping many other fat cats from having a laugh at our expense.

Have they no shame?

Take a look at the PIRC website and you'll find plenty of businesses still lavishing generous payments on directors. AstraZeneca (LSE: AZN), Aviva (LSE: AV), Colt Telecom (LSE: CTM), Logica (LSE: LOG), Pearson (LSE: PSON), Royal Dutch Shell (LSE: RDSB), Segro (LSE: SGRO) and Smith & Nephew (LSE: SN), for instance, have all irritated the corporate watchdog of late with their remuneration reports. Excessive salary improvements, unmerited bonuses, undemanding incentive targets -- the greedy boardroom blighters!

Thankfully there are quoted companies out there that have a more responsible attitude to director pay and shareholder value. Scouring the market for outstanding investment opportunities for Champion Shares, the Fool's share-tipping service, I've come across three small-caps whose bosses have showed commendable pay and bonus restraint.

The first is Games Workshop (LSE: GAW), the table-top wargames business. I admit shareholders here have watched earnings collapse over the years and they no longer receive a dividend. But at least executive chairman Tom Kirby has recognise the difficulties. He's not received a pay increase since 2005, ditched his old bonus plan and joined the ordinary staff scheme. His maximum annual bonus now? Just £1,000.

20% cut

STV (LSE: STVG) has also caught my eye. Investors backing the Scottish television group have endured all sorts of problems during the last decade, resulting in management oustings, rescue rights issues, scrapped dividends and major restructures. However, Rob Woodward, the chief exec drafted in to steer a turnaround, has thankfully acknowledged shareholders' plight and, commendably, will take a 20% pay cut this year and not receive a bonus.

Finally, Andrew Perloff, executive chairman at Panther Securities (LSE: PNS), must be the market's angriest -- and cheapest -- boss. His 2008 annual report refers to "the thieving incompetents who currently are in control of... our economy" and rails against overwhelming taxes and stifling bureaucracy. Anyway, Perloff has not collected a salary or a bonus for two years now, despite his property group -- unlike many others -- maintaining its dividend and avoiding a rights issue.

Not for Fred

I'm not sure whether this trio of small caps will prove to be fantastic investments at their current valuations, but certainly their attitude to board pay merits some further research and a spot perhaps on your watch list. Whatever, I'm positive Sir Fred would hate the remuneration terms at all three. If you know of any other shares that boast worthy pay policies, please let me know in the comment boxes below.

Maynard writes Champion Shares, the Fool's share-tipping service. He always considers director pay before recommending a share. You can test drive Champion Shares for 30 days and pay nothing.

Share & subscribe

Comments

The opinions expressed here are those of the individual writers and are not representative of The Motley Fool. If you spot any comments that are unsuitable hit the flag to alert our moderators.

LastChip 12 May 2009 , 1:22pm

So what's going to change?

Who owns the lions share of equities in the UK; the investment houses and pension company's (insurers), all of whom enjoy outrageous terms of employment and are not going to rock the boat. After all, who would vote for a pay cut for themselves?

Just look at the sleaze oosing out of Westminster. The problem is endemic from the Prime Minister down. You can see all the little rats running for cover, but no place to hide. If the media have done anything worthwhile this century so far, it's to bring this into the public domain.

Don't misunderstand me, I agree with you and have been voting against Directors pay for years, but as a small shareholder, who listens?

jonesjeff 12 May 2009 , 8:50pm

Actually, the people who have pensions & investment trusts OWN these shares. That's people like us. Trouble is the fund managers who are administering the funds are creaming off hefty fees themselves & don't want to rock the boat with the PLCs either.
The people who actually own the funds in the pension funds & trusts should get the shareholders votes, not the fund managers.

Join the conversation

Please take note - some tags have changed.

Line breaks are converted automatically.

You may use the following tags in your post: [b]bolded text[/b], [i]italicised text[/i]. All other tags will be removed from your post.

If you want to add a link, please ensure you type it as http://www.fool.co.uk as opposed to www.fool.co.uk.

Hello stranger

To add your own comment, please login.

Not yet registered? Register now.