What the Swine Flu Panic Means for Your Portfolio

Published in Investing Strategy on 28 April 2009

The outbreak of this deadly virus is cause for concern. Rather than panic, calm is advised. The same goes with your share portfolio.

It's a delicate subject, and people's lives are at risk, so I'll state right here, up top, that I do not intend to make light of this public health concern. I share the sympathies that we all have for individuals afflicted by the swine flu. (I've experienced a delirium-packed, 10-day version of the usual seasonal flu, and I wouldn't wish this illness on my worst enemy.)

That said, the reactions of the investing community already look ridiculous: "Markets Down on Swine Flu" read the headlines. Other writers will try to convince you to pile into vaccine names like GlaxoSmithKline (LSE: GSK), or companies like British Sky Broadcasting (LSE: BSY), for which a simplistic, "stay-at-home" argument can be made. This is simply rank trend speculation in reverse.

How To Really Profit

If you really want to find opportunities relating to the swine flu story, I suggest you do the opposite of what most people are advocating. For instance, consider inverting one particularly brazen and short-sighted call that was reported by Bloomberg: UBS downgrades Mexican stocks from "top pick" to "underweight" because of the swine flu.

Really? An entire country's strongest businesses will be permanently impaired because of this health crisis? Would you write off entire segments of the UK economy if the illness got worse here? Would you sell Unilever (LSE: ULVR)? Ditch Tesco (LSE: TSCO)?

Sure, the Mexican economy is generally more fragile than ours, but most of the big-name firms trading on our exchanges are anything but weak. Beverage and minimart king FEMSA will likely sell fewer soft drinks and beers over the coming weeks. Will Gruma sell fewer tortillas, Industrias Bachoco fewer chicken chunks? Probably.

Will this matter for the long term?

Very Unlikely

If you are investing in strong names for the long term -- and that's how you should be investing -- these are the times when you should be more interested in buying stocks, not less. Flu epidemics are terrible, but they're also normal. So are economic cycles and (in Mexico) the occasional currency panic.

Buying good companies when the headline news is bad is the hardest thing to do (psychologically), but it's the simplest way to buy low. And buying low makes it a lot easier to sell high.

That's the takeaway from the wealthiest investor in the world -- Warren Buffett, who made his fortune buying companies with competitive advantages on the cheap, often during times of uncertainty. Despite recessions, oil shocks, currency convulsions, SARS, and bird flu, Berkshire Hathaway has made him very wealthy.

Over at The Motley Fool's Champion Shares, Maynard Paton loves to take advantage of exactly this kind of short-term market craziness. At times like this, he is more interested in his favourite shares, not less so. If you want to read his most recent recommendations, a free trial is on the house. Click here to get started.

More on the economy and the markets:

> This article was first published on Fool.com. It has been updated.

> Of the companies mentioned in this article, Bruce Jackson has a beneficial interest in GlaxoSmithKline shares, having bought them way before the outbreak of swine flu.

Share & subscribe

Comments

The opinions expressed here are those of the individual writers and are not representative of The Motley Fool. If you spot any comments that are unsuitable hit the flag to alert our moderators.

supasap 28 Apr 2009 , 9:33am

yet more doom and gloom mongering from TMF - this time about swine flu....... well I remember bird flu, CJD, and AIDS scares of the 1980's....... they really didn't devestate the western world in the end but pick up the newspapers from the respective eras and you would be forgiven for being very fearful of these things

Terrapin1 28 Apr 2009 , 10:32am

All global disasters are irrelevant to stockmarkets in the longer term-and for me that is a week.
Unless this is the new plague, it will have no effect save for the immediate drop which was due in any case.
Let's be clear -airlines have had a shocking time, and all those clver analysts tell us the stockmarket is forward-looking by 6 months-(that's why they didn't see every recession)

Fingered 28 Apr 2009 , 9:02pm

I agree Terrapin. The immediate drop was due anyway .....and is ongoing. Curiously these outbeaks most frequently occur through history during downturns ,they don't cause the downturns in my view. As for the TMF "Hold" position on stocks or rather Hold and Buy More and Hold More and Buy Even More .....the TMF bullish gauge needle been twitching in the exuberant overbought condition for a while now...I wonder when we get a Sell TMF recommendation?

Fingered 28 Apr 2009 , 9:24pm

Like Barclays in another TMF article, I do hope you didn't buy GSK at their peak Bruce (as many would have), or that translates into a 50% loss.

Luniversal 29 Apr 2009 , 11:18am

Mexico has a population explosion, is bust, riddled with gangsters and corruption, cannot control its own borders and needs the poor old US of A as a constant safety valve for immigration, like Ireland after the Famine-- but this time the immigration's illegal.

These are good enough reasons to avoid that train wreck of a country, whether its pigs are running a temperature or not.

Join the conversation

Please take note - some tags have changed.

Line breaks are converted automatically.

You may use the following tags in your post: [b]bolded text[/b], [i]italicised text[/i]. All other tags will be removed from your post.

If you want to add a link, please ensure you type it as http://www.fool.co.uk as opposed to www.fool.co.uk.

Hello stranger

To add your own comment, please login.

Not yet registered? Register now.