No Economic Pain, No Wealth Gain

Published in Investing Strategy on 16 April 2009

Whilst a return to normal economic conditions would be nice, there is a downside. We wouldn’t have nearly as many bargains to choose from.

Wouldn't it be great if this recession was suddenly over?

We could all get back to some sense of normality.

Stock markets would rise and fall by 0.5% on a daily basis and by between 0% and 12% on an annual basis.

The share prices of big FTSE 100 companies like Lloyds Banking Group (LSE: LLOY) and Legal & General (LSE: LGEN) would rise and fall a few percent over the course of a year.

Businesses would grow, steadily. Employers would employ, steadily. Banks would lend, responsibly. Interest rates would rise and fall, slowly.

Consumers would spend, wisely, and within their financial means.

Most of all, confidence would return to the economy. With just a little bit of confidence, the economy could quickly get back onto an even keel, and we could all resume our normal lives again.

Green Shoots Of Recovery…Maybe

Sadly, it's not that easy. We're still in the midst of a major deleveraging, both in terms of businesses and consumers. Stating the bleeding obvious, the economy is going to get worse before it gets better.

Yet, especially in the US, some politicians and economists are prepared to proclaim they are seeing signs of recovery.

Barack Obama said just this week "There is no doubt that times are still tough. By no means are we out of the woods just yet. But from where we stand, for the very first time, we are beginning to see glimmers of hope."

US Federal Reserve chairman Ben Bernanke said he was witnessing "tentative signs that the sharp decline in economic activity may be slowing".

Give Me Hope

Confidence. Hope. Normality. That is what they are trying to bring to the American people, and therefore to the global economy.

The stock market craves normality. It could then get back to the business of valuing most businesses based off somewhat predictable future earnings patterns.

If you could say with certainty that a company like Tesco (LSE: TSCO) could grow at around 8% per annum over the next 10 to 20 years, you'd be able to do a discounted cashflow and value it with a high level of precision, presuming a reasonable average rate of inflation.

Give Me Economic Pain

There is a downside to normality. There would be few stock market bargains, as most shares would be valued by the market at their true worth. Tesco would trade on price to earnings ratio (P/E) of around 16, a fair valuation, but certainly no bargain.

Successful stock market investing is all about buying shares when they trade at cheap prices. It's about buying them below their true value, both to give you a margin of safety, but also so you may benefit exponentially if and when the shares are re-rated by the market.

On the one hand, many of us crave economic normality, a time when our jobs are safer, our house prices are steadily rising, inflation is running at 3%, and consumers are spending.

On the other hand, stock market investors should crave further economic pain. Not because they are sadists, but because they like the share prices pessimism brings. Normality is your enemy.

Forget FTSE 6,750

So what is it to be? The FTSE 100 has had a great run over the past 5 weeks, rising 15% off its low point. Bargain hunters have snapped up shares in beaten down shares like the banks, Xstrata (LSE: XTA), Land Securities (LSE: LAND) and Prudential (LSE: PRU), just to name a few.

Yet the economy remains in a pickle. There may be signs of normality in the US, but at best, 'normal' means 'stopped falling' rather than a return to the debt-fuelled go-go days of 2007.

Make no mistake. The stock market is going to take a hell of a long time to get back to its 2007 level. As a reminder, the 2007 peak for the FTSE 100 was at just over 6,750, in July. With the FTSE 100 currently trading below 4,000, that level seems light years away.

Make no mistake. We are not going to see a repeat of the economic conditions we enjoyed from around 2004 to 2007 for quite a number of years.

On the bright side, what's bad for the economy should be good for stock market investors.

Make sure you are ready, willing and able to take advantage of the opportunities ahead. Whilst it's painful for the economy, it should be beneficial to your long-term wealth.

If you are looking for stock market bargains, why not give the Motley Fool's Champion Shares premium stock picking service a free 30-day try? Click here for more details.

More on the economy and the markets:

> The Motley Fool's Share Dealing Service is pain-free. Buy and sell shares in real time for a flat rate of just £10. It's hard to beat. Open an account for free today. There is no obligation to trade.

> Of the companies mentioned in this article, Bruce Jackson has a beneficial interest in Lloyds Banking Group.

Share & subscribe

Comments

The opinions expressed here are those of the individual writers and are not representative of The Motley Fool. If you spot any comments that are unsuitable hit the flag to alert our moderators.

Terrapin1 16 Apr 2009 , 10:55am

Hopefully we will never see a return to the illusory rise in FTSE-it has damaged our future prospects for decades. The gangsters are solely looking at the next way to scam the most money out of most people, with clever ways of packaging debt, and hey, if it all goes wrong, "it wasn't me guv'nor", and anyway the taxpayer can pick up the pieces.
People were being warned here back in 2007 when Goldman sachs first started packaging the sub-prime mortgages and getting AAA ratings,allegedly.
Housing still has a way to fall -=and frankly people are in denial here- a house is only affordable if it is at most 4x someone's income. The real average wage is probably around £20k so the average house should be 80k-it is still more than double that.
Growth without increasing debt is real, growth based on a credit bubble 50 times bigger than anything ever seen before is frankly an infantile piece of chicanery.History will not be kind to Blair and Brown.

supasap 16 Apr 2009 , 11:55am

yes let's reduce a global problem to a petty UK party political issue...... like the boom and slump scenario never occurred under Conservative administration......

also house prices will not fall radically because only forced sellers need to sell at reduced prices..... the vast majority will sit the house slump out... just continue to live in their houses as they did previous housing slumps .... it may take years but the majority will not have to sell at a loss

LastChip 16 Apr 2009 , 3:14pm

I can see validity in both the first two comments.

To take Terrapin1's view, yes, for property to be affordable again, we do need to see about four times average income and incidentally, the official average salary is so far distorted, as to be unusable. Terrapin1's £20k is probably far closer to the truth.

Therefore, if we (for the moment) assume £80k to be a sensible house price, a 10% deposit is £8k. If you are living a day to day existence on £20k, saving £8k is a huge problem. Further, a potential buyer will probably need at least another £2k, for rip off administration fees and solicitors etc. It 'aint gonna happen for an awful lot of people.

Couple with all that, banks terrified of lending sums which may end up in negative equity and you have a real problem.

Now, to look at supasap's view, yes, there are many hundreds of thousands (if not millions) of people who have no need to move and are quite happy to sit it all out.

In fact, if you consider a mortgage as being your rent, it makes absolutely no difference at all to the individual, except that, at some time in the future, there will be no more rent to pay. The only "value" of an increasing house price, is the feel good factor (or lack of it, as now).

So what has all this got to do with investment? Everything!

People have spent, spent, spent and now most realise it's time to reduce some of that debt. Reducing debt, whether it be a company or individual is a priority, not least, because of the threat of joblessness, or company closure.

If you are reducing debt, there's little in the way of spare cash to invest and all the while that situation is maintained, the markets will at best tread water.

Bruce is always going on about how cheap shares are; but are they?

Any commodity only has a value that someone else is prepared to pay and shares are no exception. In fact, in the "retail" share sector, given the reasons above, it is unlikely they have any value at all.

Taking our mythical £20k earner. If he/she were to get a £2k windfall and have just two choices; pay £2k off your mortgage or invest £2k in the stock market, I would place a bet that in excess of 99% would take the former. Why? Because it's a concrete choice. The mortgage will be reduced by £2k. The later choice may or may not, yield a reward.

Confidence has been shot to pieces in a way that I've never seen before and I'm unlikely to ever see again. Party politics aside, one cannot dispute the present administration are responsible for the financial direction of the country over the last decade.

The Fool tends towards promoting share buying; nothing wrong with that, but always remember the first rule of investing: Do NOT invest money you cannot afford to loose. Simple as that. And in the present climate, that's likely to be on everyone's mind.

supasap 16 Apr 2009 , 5:36pm

I think party politics used to matter eg difference between say Tony Benn and Margaret Thatcher was enormous but the differences between Blair Brown and Cameron and Major are very small so not sure what impact they have had..... they both have let capitalism take its course and seen a period of sustained growth ..... we are just so rich in this society as a result of unrestrained capitalism and a civilised state ...... and now we are in a recession which to the majority of the population does not matter a jot as most are better off (reduced prices including mortgage repayments) and most realise the recession will end and it will be viewed as a mere blip in a few years time. Very sad for the victims but they constitute the minority which is always the case in these recessions. The poor take the hit so let's not pretend we're all in the same boat, that is patronising and a bit cruel to them.

Chancer9 21 Apr 2009 , 3:03pm

Well said, Last Chip. However i don't think any politician would have passed up the economic events of the last ten years, regardless of what they are saying now.

Join the conversation

Please take note - some tags have changed.

Line breaks are converted automatically.

You may use the following tags in your post: [b]bolded text[/b], [i]italicised text[/i]. All other tags will be removed from your post.

If you want to add a link, please ensure you type it as http://www.fool.co.uk as opposed to www.fool.co.uk.

Hello stranger

To add your own comment, please login.

Not yet registered? Register now.