Index Trackers To Get Even Cheaper

Published in Investing Strategy on 10 February 2009

The US fund group Vanguard is coming to the UK. Its cheap index trackers could lead to a long overdue shake up for our investment industry.

When share prices were rising at 20% a year, few people worried that UK investment funds typically charged 5% upfront and 1.5% a year. Now that we’ve had a decade of flat returns, investors are looking at fund charges much more closely. With no growth, every £100 invested shrinks to just £81.67 over the course of 10 years.

The low cost of index trackers is one of the main reasons that they have remained popular despite the struggling stock market. The cheapest UK trackers charge between 0.27% and 0.51% a year but earlier this month came an announcement that could mean they’re set to become even better value for money.

Vanguard comes to the UK

Vanguard, the US fund group which manages almost £700b of investors’ money, announced earlier this month that it will be launching a range of funds in the UK. The company was founded by John Bogle and it launched the world’s first index tracker in 1976.

Its flagship fund is the Vanguard 500, which follows the S&P 500 index (one of the main measures of the US stock market). This fund currently has $75b invested, making it over 17 times larger than the most popular UK index tracker.

It has also returned an average of 9.7% a year since 31 August 1976. Yes folks, shares can go up as well as sideways, down and plummet in a sickening fashion. This figure is even more impressive when you consider that this fund has lost almost 3% a year over the last decade.

The annual charge on this fund is just 0.15% a year. So, with no growth over a decade, every £100 invested would become £98.51. Vanguard has a range of managed funds too, and the charges on these are also very low with some coming in at just 0.25%.  These are Foolish funds indeed.

A fee war beckons

We’re not sure when Vanguard will be launching its UK range but it looks like it will be offering some index trackers, equity income funds, bond funds and a range of international funds. In other words, there should be something for more or less everyone.

Getting hold of these funds may be a little tricky. Vanguard doesn’t pay commission to advisers so it’s mainly going to be talking to fee-based advisers, who are a distinct minority here in the UK. It’s also not known for splashing out serious cash on advertising either.

Still, this move should have a positive impact on the fee levels of UK funds. Other index trackers are likely to follow suit although I’m not convinced the fees charged on managed funds will come down for a while.

As long-terms fans of index-tracking investment, here at the Fool we think this is excellent news and we await Vanguard’s next move with interest.

Learn more and invest in index tracking funds through the Fool.

Share & subscribe

Comments

The opinions expressed here are those of the individual writers and are not representative of The Motley Fool. If you spot any comments that are unsuitable hit the flag to alert our moderators.

Shuggster 10 Feb 2009 , 10:20pm

This is good news. Vanguard is a good US company with a nice track record. I believe you can buy Vanguard tracker via the internet in the US and I hope they do the same here. I also hope that there will be an option to wrap it in an ISA.

gasheads 11 Feb 2009 , 4:40pm

Hmmm. So the Vanguard 500 has lost 3% a year for the last 10 years - and you are suggesting I trust my savings to this company?!

jonathanheenan3 16 Feb 2009 , 8:32am

gasheads, The Vanguards 500 simply tracks the S&P500, which is the largest, broadest range of stocks in the US. The stockmarket has been appalling for the past 10 years which may make it a good time to buy now if you can wait another decade!

Silveraven 16 Feb 2009 , 10:11am

As usual a Fool writer omits to point out that 'fund supermarkets' such as Interactive Investor (www.iii.co.uk) somehow manage to reduce the upfront fees on the majority of funds from 5% to 1%. Yes this is still a lot more than Vanguard's proposed fees and tracker fees as a whole. But the Fool's argument in favour of trackers that claims that they beat a large proportion of managed funds no doubt is based on these high initial fees that these days nobody has to pay if they shop around. I've urged the Fool in a few postings like this to re-do their figures with this in mind and be fair and truly helpful but I've yet to see this happen. Could it be that they don't want people using iii or other 'supermarkets'? Has the Fool got a vested interest and/or protecting their advertisers? Surely not?!

abdiel0 16 Feb 2009 , 2:40pm
abdiel0 16 Feb 2009 , 2:41pm

At last a breach in the cosy cartel operated by the City of London slickers. Hurrah!

TMFTigger 17 Feb 2009 , 8:35pm

Hi Silveraven

To be honest, the fact that you can save most of the initial fees through a fund supermarket makes little difference to the overall result. It's the higher annual management fees and higher turnover of the fund's investments that do the vast majority of the damage.

Over 20 years I think the Vanguard 500 fund beat around 90% of funds that invested in US large cap stocks.

Cheers

Stuart (author of this article)

Silveraven 17 Feb 2009 , 9:14pm

Hi Stuart,
Thanks for picking up this point. You may well be right - I don't have the figures to hand to easily 'do the math', it just made me wonder, and it seemed a bit odd that the Fool generally fails to mention the reduced initial fees available from the fund supermarkets when discussing this sort of thing. Funny how on one hand the site often focuses on saving money with things that aren't financial products (consumer items, hotels, etc) but rarely mentions how to get reduced fund fees. I would have thought it was more relevant and could easily be included without blowing the pro-tracker argument. Though some hard facts would be nice.
I guess I'm a bit bitter because if I'd not been put off funds so effectively by reading the Fool I would have been making considerably more in recent years with my money in BRIC funds rather than trackers. Thank goodness I did get to read about the FTSE 250 in a Fool article which pointed out that it generally made considerably more than the FTSE 100. Though again this info seems not to have been repeated too often since, which again makes me suspect that it is because your advertiser L&G doesn't track the 250 and one has to go to HSBC to do so. Though of course the 250 is as messed up as pretty much everything else right now.
Cheers,
Silveraven.

gordonbanks42 17 Feb 2009 , 10:20pm

I'd like to see them offer their own ISA wrapper, like L&G and lots of the others do - that would help the low TER on the funds get through to the investor rather than being slurped up by the provider of the wrapper.

Same goes for SIPP wrappers too, but I have less hope that things will come out right on that score. I can't see HL offering to hold Vantage units at 0.15% pa in a fee-free SIPP, can you?

Monevator 09 Mar 2011 , 10:39pm

Just a little update to say you can now deal with Vanguard even more cheaply:

http://monevator.com/2011/02/22/vanguard-dealing-fees/

Join the conversation

Please take note - some tags have changed.

Line breaks are converted automatically.

You may use the following tags in your post: [b]bolded text[/b], [i]italicised text[/i]. All other tags will be removed from your post.

If you want to add a link, please ensure you type it as http://www.fool.co.uk as opposed to www.fool.co.uk.

Hello stranger

To add your own comment, please login.

Not yet registered? Register now.