Skip Navigation
 

Top Performing Sectors Of The Year

<%=_author %>
By Padraig O'Hannelly | 14 May 2008

One year ago, all the talk was of private equity funds and their raids on the market. Credit Suisse estimated their collective buying power at $1.3 trillion -- a trade union estimate put the figure at $2 trillion.

And the targets for this money? Pretty much any company that could take on more debt, and size was no object. Even giants like Unilever (LSE: ULVR) were in the frame, and it was rumoured that Barclays (LSE: BARC) could be a target for an American bank.

Northern Rock (LSE: NRK) could be snapped up, too. Broker Cazenove assured investors that a material fall in Northern Rock's earnings was unlikely, and said it could be trading at £12.80 within a year. Well, I guess it could have been, but it wasn't.

British Airways  (LSE: BAY) and Sainsbury (LSE: SBRY) were also potential targets.

Sainsbury did enter into discussions, but in the end, none of these deals came to fruition.

And now that all that excitement has died down, where is the market? The FTSE 350 is down by about 6.4%, with the FTSE 100 and FTSE All-Share off by similar amounts. Hard to believe that in such a different investment world, shares are within striking distance of where they were during the height of the private equity boom.

So investors got off lightly then? No, not exactly; performance has varied hugely from sector to sector. There are 39 sectors, and of the 35 for which we have reliable data, only twelve are beating the market, and only ten are in profit.

Resource-related sectors dominate the winners: Oil Equipment and Services (up 48.7%), Mining (up 45.5%), and Oil and Gas Producers (up 22.5%). Also doing well were Chemicals (up 28.3%) and Tobacco (up 22.1%).

Meanwhile, the long list of losers is topped by General Retailers (down 38.9%), Real Estate (down 37.6%), and Travel and Leisure (down 30.8%).

Sector

12-month  performance

Oil Equipment & Services

48.7%

Mining

45.5%

Chemicals

28.3%

Oil & Gas Producers

22.5%

Tobacco

22.1%

Mobile Telecommunications

13.8%

Aerospace & Defence

3.4%

Beverages

1.8%

Industrial Engineering

1.4%

Equity Investment Instruments

0.5%

Electricity

-1.1%

Electronic & Electrical Equipment

-6.1%

Food Producers

-6.7%

Gas, Water & Multiutilities

-10.1%

Food & Drug Retailers

-11.8%

Health Care Equipment & Services

-13.1%

Software & Computer Services

-13.7%

Personal Goods

-14.2%

Nonlife Insurance

-15.1%

General Financial

-16.8%

Construction & Materials

-17.1%

Life Insurance

-19.6%

General Industrials

-20.2%

Automobiles & Parts

-20.5%

Media

-20.5%

Support Services

-21.0%

Pharmaceuticals & Biotechnology

-22.0%

Industrial Transportation

-22.6%

Household Goods

-25.8%

Fixed Line Telecommunications

-27.3%

Banks

-28.1%

Technology Hardware & Equipment

-29.1%

Travel & Leisure

-30.8%

Real Estate

-37.6%

General Retailers

-38.9%

Nonequity Investment Instruments

n/a

Forestry & Paper

n/a

Leisure Goods

n/a

Industrial Metals

n/a

Data Source: Digital Look

So sector rotation -- adjusting your investments to the changing economic cycles -- can be a very lucrative strategy if you can do it successfully. That's a big 'if', though; it's not necessarily any easier than stock-picking, as you are still competing against the rest of the market.

Alternatively, buying trackers gives you an average of the good with the bad, so you are going with the market rather than competing against it.

What strategy suits you?

More: What The Investment Gurus Are Buying

Comments

The opinions expressed here are those of the individual writers and are not representative of The Motley Fool.

At 11:07 on May 15 2008, Silveraven said:

Thanks Foolish one, for this interesting info. I would also be interested to see how the different Fund sectors (Absolute return, Active managed, etc.) have done.
I've recently got into funds because now that the fees are reduced heavily by the likes of 'online supermarket' Interactive Investor, they seem to offer a real alternative to trackers. In the past I have always seen sense in Foolish advice favouring trackers against funds, specially when trackers out-perform the majority of managed funds - but is that taking into account that Funds are now available with fees often reduced from 4% to just 1% initial and 1.5% annual?

At 23:34 on May 19 2008, Esquilax100 said:

Silveraven,

a better fee structure would narrow the gap, at the fund level, between your return on an actively-managed fund and a tracker. The question then is whether actively-managed funds, as a group, outperform the market at the portfolio level.

I don't have any evidence to hand on this, but you may be able to calculate some stats using data from www.trustnet.com.

Given that the market is largely comprised of institutional investors (i.e. funds) competing against each other, I would not expect to see funds as a class outperforming the market. But it could happen to some extent, if funds were better at their job than private investors, resulting in a net transfer of wealth from private stock-pickers to funds. Some believe this to be the case.

Worth checking out. If you find any studies on this I'd be interested.

At 09:28 on May 21 2008, Silveraven said:

Thanks 'Equilax100' for some good points and introducing me to trustnet.com. As a relatively novice investor who has only just moved beyond trackers I feel I'm a very long way from 'Foolish' status, but just wished to query The Fool's method of calculation when comparing trackers and funds. I was sort of hoping Padraig might make a comment too...!

Cheers,
Silveraven.

At 13:53 on May 21 2008, Esquilax100 said:

Hi Silveraven,

sorry, I should have made clear that I was the author of that article. (Also, I'm not involved in TMF's comparison of trackers and funds).

- Padraig.

Join the conversation

Hello stranger. Please[log in]to comment.

Not yet registered? Register now.

 

Switch to a different topic area

Can't find what you need in Investments? Try one of our other personal finance areas.

Latest stories

Get all the latest news and editorial comment as it's published – check out our Fool Articles