Skip Navigation

The Next Bull Run

<%=this._contentDocument.Byline%>
By Maynard Paton | 29 April 2008

The last ten years have been pretty disappointing for the stock market. The FTSE 100 first breached 6,100 during April 1998, since when it has nearly touched 7,000, slumped below 3,300, recovered to 6,700 only to slip back to 6,100. I'm sure many investors have retreated to the savings account during this time.

Though it may not feel like it at the moment, shares will at some point rise and never look back. Certainly the 1970s provide a useful pointer as to what can happen.

Back then, shareholders had to contend with bank collapses, oil shocks, political upheavals, industrial unrest and glam rock. Statistics from the 2008 Barclays Equity-Gilt Study show the market took ten years to beat cash in the bank after its 1972 high. Many investors had probably given up on shares by 1982.

But then the market just kept on rising. You see, everybody finally realised the mountain of economic problems from the 1970s had been resolved and shares were thus free to enjoy a glorious bull run. During the eighteen years between 1982 and 1999, the market recorded fifteen years of 10%-plus returns and just two years of losses. I'm sure when investors can overcome today's worries, shares will be clear to enjoy another bull phase.

Just exactly when the next bull run will occur is difficult to say. Nonetheless, I'm sure the market will correctly anticipate the end of the credit crunch well before it happens -- leaving many people stranded on the sidelines. As such, I'd say do your stock-picking now while share prices remain in the doldrums. I'd also like to think the next bull market will be a major event and last for a decade or so. After ten years of stagnation, the FTSE certainly has some catching up to do if it is to revert to its long-term growth trend.

Maynard writes Champion Shares, the Fool's share-tipping service. This 30-day free and no-obligation trial to the Champion Shares community gives you complete access to what Maynard is recommending for the next bull market.

Comments

The opinions expressed here are those of the individual writers and are not representative of The Motley Fool.

At 12:38 on May 01 2008, gartons said:

Dream on !!

At 12:43 on May 01 2008, OldAubrey said:

Maynard, I believe that the FTSE 100 is becoming less and less any help to mainstream investors. In the Financial Times today, the FTSE actuaries share indices show that it is only down about 5% over the year ago whereas the FTSE 250 is down 15% -- and some of my shares are about 50% off.!

Of course, there are pluses and minuses in any index but the FTSE 100 appears to be an artificial guide based primarily on the oil and minerals together with some foreign companies. It would be even more distorted if it was not being restrained by the banks!

I think that the stock exchange is, once again, failing to think properly. It needs the highlight the 350 index as a better indicator of what is happening with the top 350 companies -- although even that is only down about 6.7%. Presumably, it is distorted by the FT-SE 100, which is its self distorted by taking account of the size of the companys. No doubt there are good reasons for that but it has the disadvantage that its performance bears little relationship to the majority of that 350 companies.

On the basis of the FTSE 100, we are nowhere near the bottom of the market, the fall in which is to be expected in order to correct the gambling which was going on a year ago. On the basis of my shares -- very few of which are Aim -- there is far more sign of a correction.

Of course, the question is then whether the market is achieving its sensible forecasting or is still in its distortive mode pushing things up and down! Moreover and perhaps more important, is it not normally at least 18 months from the time trouble starts before one can judge the extent of it and whether calm is coming?
Old Aubrey

At 12:54 on May 01 2008, McLeodC said:

The stockmarket hasn't been nearly so disappointing when dividends are taken into account - something the The Motley Fool is usually keen to remind us.
Perhaps we should all start to see investments as providing steady long-term returns, rather than a gamble for a quick buck.

At 14:38 on May 01 2008, goodtyneguy said:

One theory is that cycles last 34 years, 17 years up and 17 years down approximately. According to this theory the 17 year down phase started around the year 2000, there will of course be some intermediate highs in this period. Watch out.

At 22:46 on May 01 2008, Silveraven said:

Ah! the seventies - the bare-faced cheek of glam, the splendour of prog, real dance music (funk), plus the true revolution of punk and the even better new wave. And then there was Zeppelin... In those days we used to scorn talent shows like the New Faces (New Faeces) with wannabees singing covers, whereas now? Sad times indeed!

At 12:55 on May 02 2008, TMFMayn said:

Hello Old Aubrey,

Maynard, I believe that the FTSE 100 is becoming less and less any help to mainstream investors. In the Financial Times today, the FTSE actuaries share indices show that it is only down about 5% over the year ago whereas the FTSE 250 is down 15% -- and some of my shares are about 50% off.!

Of course, there are pluses and minuses in any index but the FTSE 100 appears to be an artificial guide based primarily on the oil and minerals together with some foreign companies. It would be even more distorted if it was not being restrained by the banks!

...

On the basis of the FTSE 100, we are nowhere near the bottom of the market, the fall in which is to be expected in order to correct the gambling which was going on a year ago. On the basis of my shares -- very few of which are Aim -- there is far more sign of a correction.


Point taken. But the FTSE 100 and All-Share are essentially the default options for investors that want exposure to the market without having to choose a fund or their own shares. Sure, it is packed with miners now but it has always had a strong weighting to certain sectors (oils, pharmas, telecoms, banks) over time.

Agreed, many shares have been hit much harder than the FTSE indices -- as you may know I've tipped some of them -- but sometimes many shares do much better. All depends really on how in or out of favour mega-cap shares are.

I think there will have to be a major shake-out with mining shares before the market hits bottom, as most other blue-chip shares seem to have some concern depressing their share prices at the moment. I do think the mega BHP Billiton/Rio Tinto merger could be a sign of the commodity top is near, in the way the mega Vodafone/Mannesmann deal signalled the top of the tech boom.

Of course, the question is then whether the market is achieving its sensible forecasting or is still in its distortive mode pushing things up and down! Moreover and perhaps more important, is it not normally at least 18 months from the time trouble starts before one can judge the extent of it and whether calm is coming?

Well, I did say I wasn't sure when any bull run would start. Maybe it will be another year or two, maybe it has already started. It's difficult to say.

Foolish Best

Mayn

At 12:59 on May 02 2008, TMFMayn said:

Hello McLeodC,

The stockmarket hasn't been nearly so disappointing when dividends are taken into account - something the The Motley Fool is usually keen to remind us.
Perhaps we should all start to see investments as providing steady long-term returns, rather than a gamble for a quick buck.


Yes, I did not mention dividends, but I'd say you'd have still got a better return from cash in the bank than the FTSE 100 since April 1998. I think it's fair to say "quick bucks" are made in less than ten years :-)

Foolish Best

Mayn

At 22:20 on May 05 2008, EGYPTMILL said:

One thing for sure - no one will correctly guess the bottom of the bear market, just as they never forecast the top of a bull run! When the market is rising, the "expert" commentators always say "we see no reason why it cannot go even further, there appears to be no dwonside indicators". Six months later, when the market has gone into retreat, they say "there are a lot of negatives around, and we would advise caution before committing any capital to these volatile markets". See what I mean? They just go with the trend at the time, telling us something that we can all see for ourselves. My personal feelings are that when the banking crisis settles down and is partially forgotten (people have short memories of bad times), the banks will start making mega-profits again - their balance sheets will be shorn of all the write-offs next year. The market might then take off again. Trouble is I will not know when the bottom is reached, like everyone else!.

Join the conversation

Hello stranger. Please[log in]to comment.

Not yet registered? Register now.

 

Switch to a different topic area

Can't find what you need in Investments? Try one of our other personal finance areas.

Latest stories

Get all the latest news and editorial comment as it's published – check out our Latest Stories

© Copyright 1998-2008, The Motley Fool Limited. All rights reserved. This material is for personal use only.
The Motley Fool, Fool, and the "Fool" logo are registered trademarks of The Motley Fool, Inc.
Place of Reg: England & Wales. Company Reg No: 3736872. VAT Reg No: 735 7818 01. Registered Office: 30 Great Pulteney Street, London W1F 9LT.


USEQ\EQWEB10