Skip Navigation
 

Dramatic Stuff From The States...

David Stevenson

By

David Stevenson

From the Fool blog

Local Police Station Is Useless!

Published in Investing Strategy on 10 March 2008

A trilogy of financial time bombs has just gone off in the US as the fallout spreads from the subprime mortgage meltdown.

A new crescendo is building in the credit crunch. US banks are getting more jittery about lending to each other in a stampede to call in loans or demand more collateral as security.

Sorry to be the constant bearer of bad news, but a trilogy of financial time bombs has just gone off as the fallout spreads from the subprime mortgage meltdown.

Citigroup, the fourth largest home lender and the biggest US bank by assets, plans to prune its mortgage holdings by about 20%, equivalent to around $45bn (£22.5bn), over the next year.

Carlyle Capital Corporation (CCC), an offshoot of the US private equity firm Carlyle Group, has admitted being unable to pay margin calls, i.e. collateral required as cover for loans used to buy mortgage-backed securities, forcing emergency restructuring talks with its banks as well as an asset ‘fire sale'.

And Thornburg, the American mortgage lender, is tottering on the brink of bankruptcy, beset by the same collateral problem.

It all points to a lot more trouble ahead for the US housing market. But the ripples could well spread across the pond.

Having already ‘fessed up to a record $9.8bn fourth quarter loss, chopping the dividend by 41%, Citigroup will sharply slash new lending, cutting its exposure to the foundering residential property market as existing borrowings are repaid or sold off. The plan is to sell about 90% of the bank's home loans by the third quarter, up from 65% last year, as new lending drops 50%.

Net result: financing available to US borrowers will fall even further, as investors shun even government-guaranteed mortgage bonds. This is what happens in a credit crunch as the banks themselves feel the pinch.

Following the recent collapse of London-based hedge fund Peloton, the CCC and Thornburg bombshells are another classic case of leverage - buying on borrowed money - fast unwinding.  

Here's how it works...

CCC leveraged its $670m equity base by 32 times (no misprint, it borrowed 32 times its capital!) to finance a $21.7bn fund of residential mortgage-backed securities issued by the housing agencies Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae. The securities were deposited with banks as collateral in exchange for cash.

If these securities fall in value, the lender will ask for more collateral - a margin call - to secure the loan. If the borrower neither meets the margin call by putting up more collateral, nor repays the loan, the lender can sell the securities. Often at knock-down ‘fire sale' values which raise cash at any price.

Even highly-rated assets have been hit hard by the fallout from the subprime credit crisis, so banks including Bank of America, Bear Stearns, BNP Paribas, Citigroup, Credit Suisse, Deutsche Bank and ING have demanded more collateral as guarantees.

Highly-leveraged funds have become increasingly vulnerable as their cash cushions are tiny compared with actual assets, so sudden price moves can quickly deplete a portfolio's liquidity.

CCC has admitted being unable to meet margin calls, so lenders have begun to liquidate as much as $16bn of the securities they hold as collateral. The fund is considering "all available options" and has begged its banks for extra negotiation time.

And what of American mortgage lender Thornburg, in the same margin call boat and now on the brink of bankruptcy?

Despite investing in large, adjustable-rate mortgages, including many with "triple-A" credit ratings, Thornburg is in big trouble.

Its own bankers have demanded collateral of $610m, according to Thornburg, which "significantly exceeds" available cash. Although some creditors are holding fire for now, there are big doubts about the lender's ability to continue trading.

Even worse, Thornburg also said it will restate 2007 results and make a $428m charge as of 31 December for its adjustable-rate mortgage holdings, because its auditor KPMG LLP reckoned the 2006 and 2007 audit reports were no longer reliable.

Again, this is what can happen in a credit crunch.

As investors in Northern Rock know only too well.

One reader's response to the last piece I wrote about US housing market woes was: "So what, that's all in the States".

Very true. But so was the start of the whole credit contraction cycle, as American subprime mortgages went toxic. And we all know how that ‘little local difficulty' has spread all around the world...

More: Housing Market Horrors | US Rate Cut Could Mean More Trouble
Share & subscribe

Comments

The opinions expressed here are those of the individual writers and are not representative of The Motley Fool. If you spot any comments that are unsuitable hit the flag to alert our moderators.

sweetbud 11 Mar 2008, 5:15pm

hi everyone, I am new to this investing game, but fancied trying to make my money grow, I have decided to invest in the American market,i have chosen oil, alternate energy and gold (mining) does anyone have any views/comments on these chosen low risk commodities

paconono 11 Mar 2008, 5:44pm

be aware of the scam re Restricted Shares, Rule 144 , Regulation D and Regulation S shares.

If cold called by anyone - hang up, especially Investors Management Services of Zurich promoting Paco oil ang Gas, American Alternative Energy Systems or Wildwood Management Corp.

Also look out for Steinberg Research Services.....almost guaranteed Boiler Rooms

bobellsmore 12 Mar 2008, 11:17am

sweetbud - don't buy anything yet. the "low risk commodities" you are looking at anything but low risk. Alternate energy relies totally on subsidies and/or government preference to make money. Relying on a politician's word is NOT low risk. Gold mining has been a suckers game since the year dot - tread carefully. As for oil - how close to the peak are we? only way is up? maybe - but, again, NOT low-risk!

bobellsmore 12 Mar 2008, 11:17am

sweetbud - don't buy anything yet. the "low risk commodities" you are looking at anything but low risk. Alternate energy relies totally on subsidies and/or government preference to make money. Relying on a politician's word is NOT low risk. Gold mining has been a suckers game since the year dot - tread carefully. As for oil - how close to the peak are we? only way is up? maybe - but, again, NOT low-risk!

sweetbud 12 Mar 2008, 4:10pm

THANKS FOR THE INFO GUYS...APPRECIATED

sweetbud 12 Mar 2008, 6:10pm

THANKS FOR THE INFO GUYS...APPRECIATED

KerstiW 12 Mar 2008, 9:03pm

Glad to see you've seen off your editor's requirement for fluff, David. This is fairly complicated stuff for the likes of me, but you make it as clear as you can and I can follow it. If you'd added some jazzing up, I'd have been lost. Stick to yer guns.

juustme 01 Apr 2008, 12:14am

There was talk a few years back of a significant portion of Chinese loans held by Chinese banks being non-performing, but I have heard scant hint of it since.

Is this something that the Chinese financial institutions have been able to overcome and do they have lessons for America? Or do China and other Asian Tigers have similar surprises for their investors in the future?

pusser26 29 Apr 2008, 9:00am

I have had the Investors Management Services Zurich PACO oil and gas people. Had me going for a while.

They are (on reflection) a rather transparent but very persistent boiler room operation. Their manner is very insistent, verging on aggressive. The opening line/hook when asked how they got your details is to say that you must have clicked on a link somewhere on line, something we all do and scarcely rememeber.

As per a previous poster - hang up. I have reported them to the FSA. They are not licensed to deal shares in this country. The FSA worker (very helpful) also suggested that I might now get a lot more such calls as these people share or buy contact information. Sadly true, as I have now been cold called by Axa PPP with the same opening line/hook.

FDRA 06 Jun 2008, 5:11pm

What a scam and I fell for it. If anybody knows how to now sell the shares I have in Wildwood Management, this information would be much appreciated.
IMS claim to have offices in Zurich, however according to the Swiss FSA equivalent these offices are nothing more than a phone and mail forwarding service.
thanks

bgowrea 23 Jun 2008, 11:33am

With regards to IMS and Wildwood Management and Paco Oils - I was a also well and truly scammed.

So we know that IMS is a scam. How about Paco and Wildwood? Do they actually exist??

TinyDenZach 30 Jun 2008, 1:40pm

Oh no - this is not good - anyone know how or if you can get any money back on this ?

ziamas 20 Aug 2008, 1:12pm

Wildwood management are on the German exchange under 4IO.
Does anyone know if & and how I can sell their shares? Would I need a German broker?

Join the conversation

Instructions

Line breaks are converted automatically.

You may use the following tags in your post: <b>bold</b>, <i>quoted text</i>. All other tags will be removed from your post.

Hello stranger

To add your own comment, please login.

Not yet registered? Register now.