British American Tobacco plc: Buy, Sell Or Hold?

Published in Company Comment on 22 March 2013

What are the long-term prospects for British American Tobacco (LON:BATS)?

I'm always searching for shares that can help ordinary investors like you make money from the stock market.

Right now I am trawling through the FTSE 100 and giving my verdict on every member of the blue-chip index.

I hope to pinpoint the very best buying opportunities in today's uncertain market, as well as highlight those shares I feel you should hold… and those I feel you should sell!

I'm assessing every share on five different measures. Here's what I'm looking for in each company:

1. Financial strength: low levels of debt and other liabilities;

2. Profitability: consistent earnings and high profit margins;

3. Management: competent executives creating shareholder value;

4. Long-term prospects: a solid competitive position and respectable growth prospects, and;

5. Valuation: an under-rated share price.

A look at British American Tobacco

Today I'm evaluating British American Tobacco (LSE: BATS) (NYSE: BTI.US), a British multinational tobacco company, which currently trades at 3482p. Here are my thoughts:

1. Financial strength: British American Tobacco is in a solid financial position with net debt of only 1.5 times operating profits and interest cover a hefty 13 times. The company also generates consistent and stable free cash flows averaging over £3bn per year for the past three years.

2. Profitability: Revenues have increased 7% per year for the past five years while earnings per share have grown by 13% per year and dividends per share by 15% per year for the past decade. Operating margins have expanded from around 10% early in the decade to around 35% the last few years. The 10-year average return on equity (ROE) and return on capital employed (ROCE) have been a remarkable 60% and 35%, respectively.

3. Management: Nicandro Durante assumed the post of CEO in March 2011. He was the company's previous COO and has been with the company since 1981. The company's share buy-back programme, which was suspended in 2009, was resumed in 2011. The company has bought back £750m and £1.25bn worth of shares in 2011 and 2012, respectively. The board has agreed on repurchasing £1.5bn worth of shares for 2013.

4. Long-term prospects: British American Tobacco is the world's second largest tobacco company by market share, with a portfolio of 200 brands sold in around 180 markets worldwide. The group has significant exposure to emerging markets where it derives around 70% of its profits.

The group's four well-known brands, which it refers to as the Global Drive Brands (GDBs, Lucky Strike, Kent, Dunhill, and Pall Mall, accounted for 35% of the group's revenues in 2011, and have performed well the last few years increasing volume and market share. As of the last trading statement, GDBs have increased volume by 3% and market share by 0.3%. However, group volumes declined by 1.6% due to the difficult trading conditions in some of its major markets, particularly Southern Europe. But revenues at constant rates of exchange still grew by 4% and adjusted diluted earnings per share were up by 7%. Also, the group saw increases in underlying market share and an increase of 1.6% in operating margins.

5. Valuation: Shares are trading at a forecast price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio of 15, higher than its 10-year P/E average of 13 and the sector P/E of 11. It also returns a yield of 4%, twice covered.

My verdict on British American Tobacco

British American Tobacco has performed remarkably well the past decade, with consistent above-average growth in revenues, earnings, dividends and free cash flow; healthy operating margins; and excellent returns on capital. Despite increasing government regulation, excise taxes and the threat of illicit trade, plus the continuing economic weakness in some of its major markets, I believe the company can continue to perform well this decade with its scale, pricing power, broad portfolio of products and its significant exposure to developing economies. Although its shares are already quite pricey, I believe the company will continue increasing dividends above the rate of inflation and meet its target of growing earnings in the high single figures annually over the medium to long term.

So overall, I believe British American Tobacco at 3482p looks like a buy.

More FTSE opportunities

As well as British American Tobacco, I am also positive on the FTSE shares highlighted in "8 Dividend Plays Held By Britain's Super Investor". This exclusive report reveals the favourite income stocks owned by Neil Woodford -- the City legend whose High Income fund turned £10,000 into £193,000 during the 25 years to 2012.

The report, which explains the full investing logic behind Mr Woodford's dividend strategy and his preferred blue chips, is free to all private investors. Just click here for your copy. But do hurry, as the report is available for a limited time only.

In the meantime, please stay tuned for my next verdict on a FTSE 100 share.

> Zarr does not own any share mentioned in this article.

Share & subscribe

Comments

The opinions expressed here are those of the individual writers and are not representative of The Motley Fool. If you spot any comments that are unsuitable hit the flag to alert our moderators.

supasap 23 Mar 2013 , 11:14am

Bloody drug barons .... Should be horse whipped and their bank accounts be seized for ill gotten gains

goodlifer 23 Mar 2013 , 1:26pm

The Blessed Woodford loves them though.
So they must be OK.

jackdaww 23 Mar 2013 , 9:02pm

so where does that leave the polititions?

OsbieFeel 23 Mar 2013 , 11:30pm

@supasap - so what about the oil barons, or the banksters, or the pharmaceutical monopolists? They're just peachy folks who work for the good of humanity, right?

If you have notions of moral superiority, then run (don't walk) away from investing in stocks.

goodlifer 24 Mar 2013 , 8:25am

OsbieFeel
"So what about the oil barons, or the banksters, or the pharmaceutical monopolists? They're just peachy folks who work for the good of humanity, right?"

By comparison, yes.
Anyway, we need oil, banks and medicines.
Do we need tobacco?.

I agree with you the free market's pretty dreadful in many ways, but the trouble is most other systems are even worse.

Does supasap really "have notions of moral superiority?"
Or is he just trying to be ordinary, everyday decent?

F958B 24 Mar 2013 , 10:40am

goodlifer

You said: Do we need tobacco?

I'd respond with:
Do we need alcohol?

Drunk drivers, pub brawls, domestic violence, the cost of liver-related medical problems and A&E departments on overload on Friday and Saturday nights due to excessive drinking.

goodlifer 24 Mar 2013 , 11:15am

F958B
"Do we need alcohol?"
No, though I'm not teetotal myself.

If I were I doubt if I'd buy into a brewer or a still.
You're quite right to point out abuse of alcohol causes lots of problems.

There don't seem to be any easy answers, unless money's your religion.

goodlifer 24 Mar 2013 , 11:26am

I'm not teetotal myself.
Nor is my doctor!

OsbieFeel 24 Mar 2013 , 12:11pm

@goodlifer - no, we don't need tobacco, and that's part of the point. Smoking is a voluntary activity. Regardless of the addictiveness of the substance, at some point in their life every smoker made a conscious decision to start smoking. They probably knew about the addiction thing too.

Consider the other industries I mentioned. Most of us couldn't get by without petrol or a bank, and some of us depend on patented drugs. This leaves the megacorps free to exploit a captive market, and God knows they do just that. Does this make them in any way superior to the tobacco giants, or a more justifiable investment on moral grounds?

jaizan 24 Mar 2013 , 12:37pm

There are adequate warnings about the risks of tobacco.
People should be free to smoke if they choose to, providing others are protected from passive smoking.
This is just another investment opportunity. No moral advantage or disadvantage over Glaxo, Tesco or any other. The shares are a tad too pricey for me.

goodlifer 24 Mar 2013 , 2:41pm

OsbieFeel

"Does this make them in any way superior to the tobacco giants?"
Probably No.

"Or a more justifiable investment on moral grounds?"
Probably Yes.

goodlifer 24 Mar 2013 , 3:30pm

OsbieFeel
"Regardless of the addictiveness of the substance, at some point in their life every smoker made a conscious decision to start smoking."

You're probably quite right.
Yet I doubt if many of them make a conscious decision to become addicts.

It seems to me our tobacco giants are now reduced to fishing for addicts in third world countries.
Or have I got it all wrong?

jackdaww 24 Mar 2013 , 4:35pm

i think most smokers and drinkers start when they are young and impressionable, subject to peer pressure from those already hooked and wanting similar company.

moderate drinking is fairly harmless - excessive wreck lives.

any smoking shortens lives which end nastily.

i have tobacco and drinks investments and am teetotal.

tru2me 25 Mar 2013 , 5:00pm

"There are adequate warnings about the risks of tobacco."
"Do we need alcohol?"
I agree.

Strange how this moral angle is not voiced when Diageo is being written about.
Suspect all this has much to do with the status quo which by it's very nature may lull the average investor into a false sense of security.
Look out for the black swan rather than the black label?

goodlifer 25 Mar 2013 , 7:18pm

tru2me
"Strange how this moral angle is not voiced when Diageo is being written about."

I think you'll find many more doctors enjoy a drink than a smoke nowadays..

Join the conversation

Please take note - some tags have changed.

Line breaks are converted automatically.

You may use the following tags in your post: [b]bolded text[/b], [i]italicised text[/i]. All other tags will be removed from your post.

If you want to add a link, please ensure you type it as http://www.fool.co.uk as opposed to www.fool.co.uk.

Hello stranger

To add your own comment, please login.

Not yet registered? Register now.