Should I Invest In Royal Dutch Shell Plc?

Published in Company Comment on 15 February 2013

Can Royal Dutch Shell Plc's (LON: RDSB) total return beat the wider market?

To me, capital growth and dividend income are equally important. Together, they provide the total return from any share investment and, as you might expect, my aim is to invest in companies that can beat the total return delivered by the wider market.

To put that aim into perspective, the FTSE 100 has provided investors with a total return of around 3% per annum since January 2008.

Quality and value

If my investments are to outperform, I need to back companies that score well on several quality indicators and buy at prices that offer decent value.

So this series aims to identify appealing FTSE 100 investment opportunities and today I'm looking at Royal Dutch Shell (LSE: RDSB) (NYSE: RDS-B.US), which describes itself as a global group of energy and petrochemicals companies. People often refer to the firm as an oil major.

With the shares at 2153p, Shell's market cap. is £56,425 million.

This table summarises the firm's recent financial record:

Year to December20082009201020112012
Revenue ($m)458,361278,188368,056470,171467,153
Net cash from operations ($m)43,91821,48827,35036,77146,140
Adjusted earnings per share509160304461432
Dividend per share160168168168172

Looking at the figures, I reckon Shell is showing the cyclical nature of its business. Most indicators have been growing since their lows in the table, but over the whole period, performance has been broadly flat.

Nevertheless, Shell has a growth agenda and is expecting around 30 major projects, currently at various stages of completion, to advance financial and production growth by adding about seven billion barrels of oil, or gas equivalents. The company thinks that upstream activity could add some $15 billion of cash flow by 2015, if the oil price holds at about $100 per barrel.

A scoot around Shell's website reveals that, at the end of 2012, the firm had 12.4 billion barrels of oil equivalent (BBOE) of resources on stream, averaging 3.4 million barrels of oil equivalent per day (MBOE/D) of production. It expects that production figure to rise to about four MBOE/D by 2017/18, thanks to around 20 BBOE of resources potential in its development funnel, which the company reckons averages out to about 26 years worth of current production.

However, I think the total-return potential for investors is uncertain as much could depend on the vagaries of oil and gas prices and general macro-economic conditions.

Royal Dutch Shell's total-return potential

Let's examine five indicators to help judge the quality of the company's total-return potential:

1. Dividend cover: adjusted earnings covered the last dividend two-and-a-half times. 4/5

2. Borrowings: net gearing is around 10% with net borrowings about 40% of earnings. 4/5

3. Growth: all of revenue, earnings and cash flow have been growing from a cyclical low. 3/5

4. Price to earnings: a forward eight looks fair compared to growth and yield forecasts. 2/5

5. Outlook: satisfactory recent trading and an optimistic outlook. 3/5

Overall, I score Shell 16 out of 25, which inclines me to be cautious about the firm's potential to out-pace the wider market's total return, going forward.

Foolish Summary

Earnings cover the dividend quite well and borrowing seems under control. There is an element of cyclicality in the figures and forecasts for growth, recent trading and a mild outlook statement, all lack the conviction to reassure me sufficiently about the firm's prospects. I'm not going to invest in Royal Dutch Shell right now.

That said, forecasters expect Shell's dividend yield to be around 5.4%, but how fast can that dividend grow? I'm more certain about another idea from the Motley Fool’s top value investor who has discovered what he believes is the best income generating share-play for 2013. He set's out his three-point investing thesis in a report called "The Motley Fool's Top Income Share For 2013", which I recommend you download now. For a limited time, the report is free so, to download it immediately, and discover the identity of this dividend-generating star, click here.

> Kevin does not own shares in Royal Dutch Shell.

Share & subscribe

Comments

The opinions expressed here are those of the individual writers and are not representative of The Motley Fool. If you spot any comments that are unsuitable hit the flag to alert our moderators.

Excel35 15 Feb 2013 , 5:33pm

Hi Kevin

How are you going to measure whether you individual picks, and portfolio as a whole is beating the market? Including dividends!

I've looked into unitisation, which didnt seem to be what I wanted. Then came across an article that stated "to obtain meaningful results from a comparison of two portfolios, you must evaluate the two portfolios using identical cash flows occurring at the same times. If you contribute to or withdraw money from your portfolio, you'll need historical price and distribution data to properly pit your portfolio against a benchmark return."

Found here http://oreilly.com/pub/h/1911


So I was interested in how you would measure your own performance.

Or anyone else for that matter.

Personally I find it all very confusing. But if Im not beating the markets, I may as well put funds in trackers when i think the market looks good value. Instead of spending time looking for value and alert to individual stocks price dips.

Excel35

vinchainsaw 15 Feb 2013 , 5:55pm

Where do you get a forward PE of eight?

Yahoo finance has it at 5.03 and reuters puts it at 5.88.

Do you know something we dont?

wshana 15 Feb 2013 , 8:29pm

Digital Look shows a forward PE of 8.1.

That seems to include the total number of A shares, B shares and US (ADR) shares in calculating the EPS.

Not entirely sure, but I suspect the Reuters and Yahoo figures do not do this correctly.

wshana 16 Feb 2013 , 12:28am

Scratch that. I think I was finding shares that don't exist.

My best attempt at the PE using Digital Look figures would be Market Cap £79bn (A shares) plus £56bn (B shares) equals £135bn.

Divide £135bn by 2013 forecast pre tax profit of £26bn gives a PE of 5.2.

But, Digital Look says PE of 8.1.

Where am I going wrong?

breelander 16 Feb 2013 , 4:43am

Where am I going wrong?

You're not. Unlike you, DL have forgotten to add the Market Cap of the A and B shares.

KevinGodbold 16 Feb 2013 , 4:09pm

:-)

These dual-listed companies can be a devil to get your head around, no!?

The answer is simple, I suspect:

Digital Look is using a post-tax multiple and those other sites are probably using a pre-tax multiple.

There's usually no need to dig too deeply with DLC's as there's only one set of accounts and the companies always break their earnings down into eps figures that account for all shares in issue: in this case, both A and B shares.

So, the market cap. that Digital Look shows on the RDSB page is that for the B shares, but the eps figures are the eps figures for the whole operation and all its shares.

Make sense? I thought not! :-)

Confused me for the last ten years or so. Maybe I still am confused!

Best regards,

Kevin

wshana 16 Feb 2013 , 8:00pm

@Breelander and Kevin Godbold.

Thank you.

Yeah, I guess tax is the difference. It looks like Shell have been paying about 40% tax on their pre-tax earnings. That would give a forward PE of between 8 and 9. Perhaps the the forward tax rate is a tad lower than 40%.

Thanks again.

Walter Hanagan.

Join the conversation

Please take note - some tags have changed.

Line breaks are converted automatically.

You may use the following tags in your post: [b]bolded text[/b], [i]italicised text[/i]. All other tags will be removed from your post.

If you want to add a link, please ensure you type it as http://www.fool.co.uk as opposed to www.fool.co.uk.

Hello stranger

To add your own comment, please login.

Not yet registered? Register now.