Associated British Foods Plc Denies Tax Dodging

Published in Company Comment on 11 February 2013

Associated British Foods plc (LON:ABF) "emphatically" denies claims made by ActionAid regarding Zambia Sugar.

Associated British Foods (LSE: ABF) has been forced to deny allegations that it is illegally or immorally avoiding paying tax in Zambia totalling millions of pounds owed to the country's government.

The British multinational company, whose brands include Silver Spoon, has refuted allegations by anti-poverty charity ActionAid that, after posting record pre-tax profits, its Zambia Sugar company is dodging its tax bill in one of the African states hardest hit by malnutrition. 

In a recent report, ActionAid had stated that Associated British Foods "has found legal ways to siphon over US$83.7 million (US$13 million a year) – a third of pre-tax profits – out of Zambia into tax havens including Ireland, Mauritius and the Netherlands".

ActionAid tax specialist Chris Jordan commented: 

"International corporate tax avoidance is like a cancer eating away at both rich and poor countries. As we've seen with Starbucks and Amazon, many multinationals are not paying their fair share of tax and this hurts ordinary people in the UK and in the developing world. Tax avoidance by Associated British Foods in Zambia is helping to keep people locked in hunger. We know that business can be a force for good in Africa, but this is massively undermined when a company doesn't pay its fair share of tax."

However, Associated British Foods' finance director John Bason responded: "The reason that no corporate tax is paid in Zambia for the last couple of years is because of our £150m investment building the biggest sugar mill in the country. There are capital allowances available on that, in the same way similar reliefs are available to investors in most countries, including the UK." 

Bason continued by saying that it was "absolutely not true" that Zambia Sugar is funnelling a third of its pre-tax profits to sister companies in tax havens including Ireland and the Netherlands, and that no payments went to the Netherlands, as ActionAid claims. "The Netherlands is a holding company to Zambia so dividends go there and dividends come out after pre-tax profit... we've been wronged."

Swiftly and strongly denying the tax-avoidance claims, this ought to be no more than a minor blip on Associated British Foods' track record, after proving to be one of the FTSE 100's best performing shares in 2012. Still, private investors owning or interested in the company's shares would be wise to keep their eyes and ears open to any further developments with this story.

If you're looking to capitalise on the market's positive start this year, then our analysts have picked out a share that they believe could help. "The Motley Fool's Top Income Share For 2013" offers a 5.7% income, and might be worth 850p versus around 700p now. Simply click here to download the report now.

Or, if you're looking for a company that should soar in price, our team have also pinpointed their favourite growth share and produced another free report in which they evaluate its finances and risks, and its growth prospects going forward. Click here to get your copy delivered to your inbox immediately.

> Sam does not own shares in Associated British Foods.

Share & subscribe

Comments

The opinions expressed here are those of the individual writers and are not representative of The Motley Fool. If you spot any comments that are unsuitable hit the flag to alert our moderators.

eccyman 11 Feb 2013 , 3:58pm

Seems companies are now guilty until proven innocent when it comes to tax matters.

In this case, ABF look to have taken up capital allowances offered by the Zambian Government and thus should be applauded for investing in 3rd world countries.

mcturra2000 11 Feb 2013 , 4:47pm

"many multinationals are not paying their fair share of tax"

And how much is that, EXACTLY?

"The reason that no corporate tax is paid in Zambia for the last couple of years is because of our £150m investment building the biggest sugar mill in the country. There are capital allowances available on that, in the same way similar reliefs are available to investors in most countries, including the UK."

Well, there you go, then. One can flip the argument around and say that without capital allowances on investment (which is all perfectly legitimate, there's no "loophole" here), ABF wouldn't build infastructure, and Zambia would be worse off.

What "tax specialist" would really come out with this tripe, anyway?

Join the conversation

Please take note - some tags have changed.

Line breaks are converted automatically.

You may use the following tags in your post: [b]bolded text[/b], [i]italicised text[/i]. All other tags will be removed from your post.

If you want to add a link, please ensure you type it as http://www.fool.co.uk as opposed to www.fool.co.uk.

Hello stranger

To add your own comment, please login.

Not yet registered? Register now.