Should I Invest In Apple Inc.?

Published in Company Comment on 7 February 2013

Can Apple Inc.'s (NASDAQ: AAPL.US) total return beat the wider market?

To me, capital growth and dividend income are equally important. Together, they provide the total return from any share investment and, as you might expect, my aim is to invest in companies that can beat the total return delivered by the wider market.

To put that aim into perspective, the FTSE 100 has provided investors with a total return of around 3% per annum since January 2008.

Quality and value

If my investments are to outperform, I need to back companies that score well on several quality indicators and buy at prices that offer decent value.

Today I'm looking overseas at Apple (NASDAQ: AAPL.US), which is one of the world’s best-known manufacturers of mobile communication devices, personal computers, and portable digital music players.

With the shares at $457, Apple's market cap. is $429,300 million.

This table summarises the firm's recent financial record:

Year to September20082009201020112012
Revenue ($m)32,47942,90565,225108,249156,508
Net cash from operations ($m)9,59610,15918,59537,52950,856
Earnings per share (cents)5489221,5412,8054,464
Dividend per share (cents)0000265

Apple's dedication to quality and innovation became fashionable with hits like the iPod, iPhone and iPad. Mass adoption of the firm's iconic brands led to spectacular success and a share price that increased around 200 times its value between 2003 and 2012.

That's impressive, but I think the firm now has more in common with clothing brands, that move in and out of fashion, than with high-tech or other types of companies. Perhaps Apple is only ever one product launch away from transformational financial results -- but that could go either way. The shares' recent downward movement could be due to that kind of thinking. It's sobering to look at the company's level of dependence on one product. Last quarter, 56% of worldwide sales came from iphone, 20% from ipad, 10% from Mac and 4% from ipod.

During the quarter there was a flat result on earnings per share compared to a year ago, driven by gross margins that have shrunk from 44.7% down to 38.6%. Meanwhile, the company is seeing fast-paced growth in China, which now contributes 13% of total net sales, where the iphone and ipad have stormed forwards whilst sales of Mac and ipod have declined, as in other areas.

So I reckon Apple's total-return outlook is uncertain. A shrinking margin is never a good sign. The shares look cheap on a price-to-earnings basis say some, but I say that's not so if earnings halve from here. When a firm has captured a mass market, the challenge is then to maintain sales and profits going forward. It must do that if growth in new markets, like China, is to boost investor total returns. That's a big ask.

Apple's total-return potential

Let's examine five indicators to help judge the quality of the company's total-return potential:

1. Dividend cover: forward earnings are predicted to cover the dividend over four times. 5/5

2. Borrowings: at the last count, there was net cash on the balance sheet - lots of it! 5/5

3. Growth: all of revenue, earnings and cash flow have been growing strongly. 5/5

4. Price to earnings: a forward nine or so compares well to growth and yield forecasts. 4/5

5. Outlook: satisfactory recent trading and a cautiously positive outlook. 4/5

Overall, I score Apple 23 out of 25, which encourages me to believe that, despite my reservations, the firm has potential to out-pace the wider market's total return, going forward.

Foolish Summary

With lots of net cash on the balance sheet and robust forecast dividend cover, the firm's finances are in good shape. Historical growth has been robust, which presents a stiff comparator for future performance. The valuation looks reasonable compared to forecasts for profit growth and the outlook seems confident.

But how can we really know? If sales or profits start to slip, forecasts will be marked down at a stroke! When a company's market share is so large, there must surely be plenty of downside risk however rosy the valuation looks. But I'm happy to put Apple on my watch list, for now, pending a closer look when there's evidence of a bottoming share price and stabilising margins. 

Apple's growth has been meteoric, but one of the Fool's top investment writers has put his money where his mouth is by investing in a company that he thinks is the "Motley Fools Top Growth Share for 2013". In this new Fool report, you can learn of a company that has re-envisioned itself to allow for tremendous growth along new horizons. Right now, the report is free to download and tells you exactly why our expert has invested in, and expects strong growth from, this changing company with a strong pedigree. To get your copy, click here.

> Kevin does not own shares in Apple.

Share & subscribe

Comments

The opinions expressed here are those of the individual writers and are not representative of The Motley Fool. If you spot any comments that are unsuitable hit the flag to alert our moderators.

BigJC1 07 Feb 2013 , 10:35am

You could learn some lessons from the past - Nokia, remember them. read the links below but here are some quotes.

"Nokia's ascendance to the top of the wireless world by the end of the 1990s could be traced to the company being able to consistently, over and over again, come out with high-margin products superior to those of its competitors and in tune with market demands. The continuation of this trend into the 21st century was by no means certain" - Sound familiar, any pundits saying the same about Apple ?

"Nokia's 25 percent profit margins were enabling it to spend a massive US$2 billion a year on research and development and continue to churn out innovative new products, " - not innovative enough, all that money spent on R&D could not save them.

Nokia, a darling of the tech world with a massive market share, it's own stores, huge R&D developing innovative products ...... saw it's shares fall quickly from almost $30 to $3 - ouch, you'll need an awful lot of dividend to make up for that.

http://www.fundinguniverse.com/company-histories/nokia-corporation-history/

http://uk.finance.yahoo.com/q/bc?s=NOA3.DE&t=my&l=on&z=l&q=l&c=

vinchainsaw 07 Feb 2013 , 11:08am

Yup, and Nokia had a PE of 40 at the top. Hardly comparable.

Anyway, in the long run we're all dead and every company succumbs to competition.

Go have a look at the constituents of the ftse 100 in 1980 versus today... I think all the buy-and-holders out there will be quite shocked...

alarmbells 07 Feb 2013 , 12:25pm

FTSE100 wasn't around in 1980, Vincey babe.

On a more serious note, fashion is high risk investment. I've always avoided (the so far superb) Next for that reason.

My only tech stocks are Sage and Microsoft. Virtual utilities IMHO.

BigJC1 07 Feb 2013 , 12:53pm

Vincey, a P/E 40, that would be Apple back in 2008 so reasonably comparable.

The article was about "Should I invest in Apple" I was simply pointing out the similarities to Nokia. Alarmbells makes the point that few technology businesses (Microsoft, IBM, Sage) stand the test of time and those that do seem to weave themselves into B2B relationships so that they have a long term relationship with customers which allows them to re-invent themselves as markets change.

vinchainsaw 07 Feb 2013 , 2:52pm

BigJC1, my point was similar and probably poorly put across.

My point is simply that very, very few businesses stand the test of time. Its not limited to tech stocks.

Take the 100 largest cap stocks 30 years ago and compare them to the ftse100 now.

BigJC1 07 Feb 2013 , 3:54pm

vinchainsaw, good point although many are lost through M&A activity rather than a significant loss in value.

Join the conversation

Please take note - some tags have changed.

Line breaks are converted automatically.

You may use the following tags in your post: [b]bolded text[/b], [i]italicised text[/i]. All other tags will be removed from your post.

If you want to add a link, please ensure you type it as http://www.fool.co.uk as opposed to www.fool.co.uk.

Hello stranger

To add your own comment, please login.

Not yet registered? Register now.