3 Things To Loathe About SSE PLC

Published in Company Comment on 5 February 2013

Do these three things make SSE PLC (LON:SSE) a poor investment?

There are things to love and loathe about most companies. Today, I'm going to tell you about three things to loathe about FTSE 100 electricity group SSE (LSE: SSE).

I'll also be asking whether these negative factors make SSE a poor investment today.

Regulation

Regulation can be a good thing or a bad thing. In the case of utilities, such as SSE, regulation goes hand in hand with a near-monopoly position in the market. Captive customers, good visibility of earnings and the ability to borrow money at cheap interest rates are all positives.

At the end of the day, though, SSE is at the mercy of the regulator. The company is dependent on the regulator allowing the company to make an appropriate return for the equity risk taken by its shareholders. The regulator's view of what is an appropriate return may not be the same as an investor's.

Predictable dividend income is the main attraction of utilities for big pension funds as well as many small private investors. Yet, in recent years, three of the five utilities that are currently constituents of the FTSE 100 have cut their dividends. SSE isn't one of them, but its dividends haven't been covered by free cash flow for a while.

The long wait for dividends

In a review carried out by the Munro UK Dividend Fund, SSE was the worst offender of the UK's top 25 dividend-payers for the delay between the company's year end and paying the dividend into shareholders' accounts.

Despite being unable to use the excuse of delayed receipt of overseas earnings for the late payment of dividends to its shareholders, "SSE's final dividend took an incredible 174 days after the financial year-end to be paid". The review also noted that while there was generally less of a lag for half-year dividends among the 25 companies, "SSE's delay … hardly changed".

The uncertainty of succession

Every company loses its chief executive at some point. While it's hardly SSE's fault that its CEO, Ian Marchant, is stepping down this year, a change at the top always introduces a degree of uncertainty. And, as we all know, the market loathes uncertainty.

Having said that, the departure of the boss of a struggling company and the appointment of a new chief exec can lift investor optimism -- and the company's share price -- at a single stroke.

However, it's often the opposite when the departing CEO has been as successful as SSE's Marchant during his 10 years at the helm. It can take a few years for his replacement -- in this case, current deputy CEO Alistair Phillips-Davies -- to convince the market that he has the wherewithal to continue the work of his esteemed predecessor.

A poor investment?

The three things to loathe about SSE don't seem to me to be fatal to the investment case.

SSE has never cut its dividend yet, and the debt-rating agencies seem happy that the balance sheet and future cash flows can support a forward dividend that yields around 6% at a recent share price of 1,415p.

While it would be nice if SSE could permanently reduce the delay in paying its dividend, there would only be a one-time benefit for shareholders in shifting the whole cycle forward.

Finally, the new CEO was promoted from within and is an SSE veteran, which is about as good as can be hoped for by shareholders looking simply for more of the same from their highly successful company.

If you are looking to buy -- or already own – shares in SSE or other utilities, you may wish to read the Motley Fool's very latest free report.

Our analysts have identified what they believe to be "The Top Income Share For 2013". In fact, they place an 850p value on this company's shares, which represents a potential upside of 23% from where the shares are trading at right now.

To have this free, no-obligation report delivered immediately to your inbox, simply click here.

> G A Chester does not own shares in SSE.

Share & subscribe

Comments

The opinions expressed here are those of the individual writers and are not representative of The Motley Fool. If you spot any comments that are unsuitable hit the flag to alert our moderators.

ScottishDon 05 Feb 2013 , 11:42am

SSE "but its dividends haven't been covered by free cash flow for a while". I query this, because according to Sharescope the cashflow per share has been above 130p for the last 5 years bar 1, whereas dividends have been no higher than 80.10p. Can the author expand on this please?

M0byDick 05 Feb 2013 , 12:21pm

Hi ScottishDon

Calculating free cash flow involves an element of judgement/estimation of the capital expenditure necessary simply to maintain the business and expenditure to grow the business.

I haven't done the calculations for SSE myself, but have relied on sources which have calculated conservatively, such as this article by my Foolish colleague Roland Head:
http://www.fool.co.uk/news/investing/company-comment/2013/02/04/where-next-for-the-sse-plc-59-dividend.aspx
and this data from Selftrade: http://www.selftrade.co.uk/company-sse---1uSSE.L?sort%5Bvar%5D=ASC

Foolish best
MobyDick (G A Chester - article author)

ScottishDon 05 Feb 2013 , 7:43pm

Hi MobyDick,

Thanks for that, and yes, if you include Capex per share then the cash flow falls below the dividend, as you say. I wonder how much of that is really Capex (which should generate additional income) and how much should be classed as maintenance and replacement? Interesting.

Scottish Don

Donaldinho 14 Feb 2013 , 9:06am

Having covered SSE as an analyst, its capex should be fairly clear. The comapny has well-defined capex plans in its regulated business (which is all agreed with the regulator) and in its unregulated businesses eg Generation & Supply. The annual report and various presnetations should give more colour here. In the absence of an explicit number, you can estimate maintenance capex by using depreciation: any (sustainable) company should obviously replace assets if it wants to remain in business. If you want to be conservative, assume maintenance capex is 1.1x depreciation as an approximation.

I should state I am long SSE. Interested investors should investigate the future supply/demand balance in the UK electricity market over the coming 3-5 years for an idea of what could move the needle in terms of profitability and cashflows.

Join the conversation

Please take note - some tags have changed.

Line breaks are converted automatically.

You may use the following tags in your post: [b]bolded text[/b], [i]italicised text[/i]. All other tags will be removed from your post.

If you want to add a link, please ensure you type it as http://www.fool.co.uk as opposed to www.fool.co.uk.

Hello stranger

To add your own comment, please login.

Not yet registered? Register now.