3 Things To Love About Apple Inc.

Published in Company Comment on 31 January 2013

Do these three things make Apple Inc. (NASDAQ:AAPL) a good investment?

There are things to love and loathe about most companies. Today, I'm going to tell you about three things to love about US tech titan Apple (NASDAQ: AAPL.US).

I'll also be asking whether these positive factors make Apple a good investment today.

Brand loyalty

Until recently, all I wanted from a computer was for it to function well enough to browse the web, put a bit of data in a spreadsheet and type out articles like this one. Computers were little more than a commodity as far as I was concerned.

However, with the idea of being able to work on the hoof, I decided to check out a few laptops. When I tried Apple's MacBook Pro, I was instantly in love. Today, you may even find me with my MacBook sitting in a Starbucks wearing a lightweight roll-neck sweater -- just an iPhone short of a stereotype.

I reckon if Apple can seduce me, it can seduce just about anyone. It's a great thing to be a shareholder in a company that inspires fantastic brand loyalty in its customers.

An abundance of cash

Apple has an enormous hoard of cash and marketable securities. This has grown from $25 billion to $137 billion in five years. Yes, you read that right, $137 billion. Put another way, Apple's cash pile is around a third of the company's market capitalisation.

Such a huge amount of excess cash is quite remarkable and shareholders have already started to see some of it finding its way into their pockets. Apple announced a first dividend in 17 years with its Q3 results for its fiscal year 2012. The $2.65-a-share dividend was repeated in Q4 and again in Q1 of the current year. Regular cash dividends are now firmly established.

Valuation

At a recent share price of $457, Apple is on a trailing 12-month price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio of 10.4. Adjust for the cash pile and the P/E falls to just 7. Meanwhile, if the company declares a fourth $2.65 dividend with its Q2 results, the yield is 2.3% with plenty of scope for growth.

Apple is out of vogue with investors at the moment, and out-of vogue shares can often make good long-term investments. If I were in the market for a tech-sector titan, Apple would certainly be on my list of shares to consider.

Buying great companies when they're reasonably priced is one way investors like you and I can target a million-pound portfolio. A mere dream? It may be easier than you think.

To find out how to go about reaching the magic million, help yourself to a free copy of the Motley Fool guide, "10 Steps To Making A Million In The Market". We urge you to read the free report today – it may transform your wealth. Simply click here.

> G A Chester does not own shares in any company mentioned. The Motley Fool owns shares in Apple.

Share & subscribe

Comments

The opinions expressed here are those of the individual writers and are not representative of The Motley Fool. If you spot any comments that are unsuitable hit the flag to alert our moderators.

TMFBoing 31 Jan 2013 , 5:04pm

I agree completely on all three points - which is why I just added Apple to the Beginners' Portfolio...

http://www.fool.co.uk/news/investing/2013/01/29/beginners-portfolio-we-buy-apple.aspx

Alan
TMFBoing
(bringing you shameless plugs since...)

TMFMarkRogers88 31 Jan 2013 , 11:10pm

Here's the crux of the problem in analysing Apple, and I sympathise with anyone trying to do so, it's very difficult.

Three years ago, an iPad was something a pirate might have worn, there didn't even exist a market for this product. Six years ago, there was no iPhone, and not even a smart phone market. Ten years ago, Apple was a laughing stock amongst investors, and Nokia would reign as King for several years to come in the global cell phone market. Four years before that, Apple was The Future of Global Business, like all the other technology companies seemed to be at the time.

I don't envy anyone having to bet what will happen in the technology sector by 2016, 2020 or 2023, knowing how rapidly fortunes and tech trends can change. Unfortunately, all long term investment requires that type of foresight, or at least some reasonable guesses on the future.

As AAPL's price falls, it becomes cheaper and cheaper against what the market is extrapolating into the future. But what future? The difficulty is in making reasonable assumptions about a very fast changing market, albeit with a company that is still enjoying exceptional growth.

I agree Apple might represent a wonderful opportunity over the next 12 months - but it's far less an easy decision than it might appear, not because the stock is falling, but because the future in tech is far less "knowable" than any other field. We should all be thankful that as investors, we don't get paid more to "make the hard decisions", where the ten year outlook is impossible to guess.

AleisterCrowley 01 Feb 2013 , 10:39am

OK then , so how do I buy some ??! Not that I will (probably)

Clackmannan 01 Feb 2013 , 3:20pm

Always thought Apple products overpriced. I have superb Android products like the Nexus 4 smartphone and Nexus 7 tablet which are superior in my book. Recent downfall in Apple shares down to ANDROID and will continue. Just my view

amsterdamgroove 02 Feb 2013 , 10:48am

Isn't SUPERB a little too much when describing a Nexus? Now, seriously? how shall I describe an iPhone or iPad. More expensive and that's it? Try an iPad yourself and you'll see why you pay more. just my view

ANuvver 02 Feb 2013 , 7:46pm

I think the issue is one of premium pricing. How long can Apple continue to ride what is basically a wave of "reassurably expensive" marketing, particularly in the face of inevitable belt-tightening among their core market?

It's possible they've painted themselves into a corner re margins. Offering second-best products at a lower price point is a dangerous strategy when you style yourself on quality.

"It just works" is the other plank of the marketing strategy. Ecosystem. Fair enough, up to a point. But in an environment when people are increasingly sourcing replacement parts for old washing machines online to make repairs themselves, I'm not sure of the future of this either. I know quite a few Apple devotees who are proudly "jailbroken" and run their devices are what they ultimately are - UNIX-driven media readers.

Incidentally, Apple seem happy to go to law to defend their legal ownership of the act of poking things to make them do something, but they most certainly are treading a legal tightrope by implying that that they eg invented noise reduction through phase-cancellation - as per one of their latest adverts.

Bring on the competition. Apple's kingdom may be painstakingly styled around benign hippie values, but it is still a kingdom and the barbarians are at the gates.

And a propos Apple TV - they're too late to market and they know it.

TMFMarkRogers88 03 Feb 2013 , 12:00am

AN - you'll have to forgive me for not being better informed on their operations, but isn't the core of Apple's base/growth in the US and China?

Considering the absurd growth enjoyed by AAPL during the biggest retrenchment of the US consumer in over a decade between 2007-2012, an Apple Bull might suggest it fair to say they have a track record for withstanding that kind of adversity?

I think the biggest risks aren't in the demand for Apple's goods in 2013 (which are a proven, enormous commercial success) - but the unknowable element of what Apple's business will look like in another five years. On present valuation, Apple doesn't need to justify high levels of growth, only an absence of decline between now and 2020. Extremely difficult to say, when we don't know what technologies will be available/popular in the future, or whether Apple will be the leader in those advances.

amsterdamgroove 03 Feb 2013 , 1:10am

re Apple TV and being too late... I remember Apple being laughed at for the multiple delays in launching a phone. There were many established players. Same with the iPod.

why would Apple be late to market?

There is no decent solution available when it comes to TV.

All I want is to find a better, much better, solution than Sky. Expensive, poor quality, and endless commercial breaks. I pay for torture. I cannot wait for Apple to disrupt yet another industry. I am much better off as a consumer of music, books, etc by and I have no problems paying Apple to make it easier for me.

ANuvver 03 Feb 2013 , 4:48am

Just tossing ideas around here. I've used all kinds of devices from ZX80s to iMacs, and I don't have an axe to grind.

Of course we're looking far forwards here, and AAPL was bid up so high precisely because people thought the growth could continue. There was too much optimism in the price. There's also the issue of that whopping stock price - I'd be fascinated to see the effect of a split.

Sure China is a big market for Apple - hence the launch of the budget mini. I also believe that it's only a matter of time before the cachet crumbles even in the US, and the consumer realises that a device at half the price does the job as well or better. Sony Walkman moment.

As for next-gen TV, it's already here. It's fiddly, but it's here, and I don't think Appleising it is going to be enough to convince even the most devoted.

I have Sky and I'm not displeased with it - the only thing I watch live anymore is news. And if you think that's expensive, imagine what Apple's content model would be like. If you applied the same relative margins to the hardware alone, you'd be looking at £2-3k for a basic TV set...

Interesting that IC says fill your boots and MoneyWeek says avoid. Hey, that's a market.

ANuvver 03 Feb 2013 , 4:53am

Another thought:

Is your "hoover" a Hoover?

amsterdamgroove 03 Feb 2013 , 10:36am

MoneyWeek does NOT say avoid.
And even if it did... the "end of Britain" is coming next month, so why bother AN? Or was it last summer? Moneyweek is a joke. Even worst than Sky (the service, not the share).
Palm vs iPhone comes to mind when you say that next-gen TV is already here.

TMFMarkRogers88 03 Feb 2013 , 11:31am

AN - It's surprising, but by normal standards, AAPL wasn't bid up too outrageously relative to the profits the company was making, and the degree of EPS/revenue growth. One of the most interesting parts of seeing Apple's share price decline has been the analysts saying "it's really cheap" all the way down. Maybe more interesting is that as the price has gone down further and further, they're saying it less and less, probably in fear for their jobs.

We've reached a point now though where on an earnings multiple of 10, the long term expectation being factored in is "low/no growth". In reality it's more like "some people expect mega growth, some people expect some growth, some people expect none, some people expect decline, some people think Apple is finished for good". That may play out in the form of continued high growth for four years before the decline sets in.

But the reason we're seeing such extreme opinions is that nobody knows, and nobody can know. That's the problem with technology, and why many investors won't go near it. Worth keeping in mind though that it was hard to hear a bad word about AAPL one year ago - be wary of the people coming out of the woodwork now the price has fallen, the business really hasn't changed.

ANuvver 03 Feb 2013 , 6:03pm

amsterdamgroove:

Whatever you or I may think about GoldandJapaneyWeek - page 13 of the current issue, Shares in Focus by Phil Oakley - "Verdict: avoid".

BigJC1 04 Feb 2013 , 8:57am

Amsterdamgroove: Sick of Sky, adverts ,etc. Just a buy a SmartTV or Smart Blueray (Samsung, LG Google TV, etc) then download the free apps for lovefilm, netflix, bbc iplayer, etc. You then have HD TV on demand with no adverts, all the films and TV series you will ever need, great quality pictures, voice/gesture control, quad core processors, etc.

Yes I am sure Apple could maybe make a slightly better eco system for their TV but I'm not convinced they will do a better picture than Samsung, Panasonic, or Sony who have spent decades perfecting the technology (which is pretty much the point of a TV).

The problem with technology stocks, as we saw with Nokia riding high at $36 per share and a short few years later $3 per share, is that when they fall they fall from a great height and they fall quickly.

Strip out everything and Apple is about one thing, the iPhone. Most industry experts agree that it is no longer the best on the market and now consumers are following with Android having a 70%+ market share and iOS 15%+ with Android outselling iOS 2 to 1 at the moment. You make an excellent point on Apple taking Palms market and Palm crashing and burning. I think that's where Apple are now.

Join the conversation

Please take note - some tags have changed.

Line breaks are converted automatically.

You may use the following tags in your post: [b]bolded text[/b], [i]italicised text[/i]. All other tags will be removed from your post.

If you want to add a link, please ensure you type it as http://www.fool.co.uk as opposed to www.fool.co.uk.

Hello stranger

To add your own comment, please login.

Not yet registered? Register now.