Where Next For Vodafone's Dividend?

Published in Company Comment on 7 January 2013

Can Vodafone plc (LON: VOD) afford its dividend payments, or is a dividend cut likely?

Many investors focus on earnings per share when judging a company's performance. However, earnings can be manipulated and adjusted in all sorts of ways, meaning they don't tell you a lot about how much spare cash a company has generated. Similarly, since dividend cover is calculated using earnings, a good level of dividend cover doesn't necessarily mean the payout is actually being funded from a company's profits.

A company's cash flow can tell you a lot about a firm's financial health. Is the company burning up its cash reserves on interest payments and operating expenses, or does it generate spare cash that can fund dividends or be retained for future investment? If a dividend isn't funded by cash flow, then there is a greater chance the payout will become unaffordable and be cut, which is bad news for shareholders like you and me.

In this series, I'm going to take a look at the cash flow statements of some of the biggest names in the FTSE 100 (UKX), to see whether their dividends are being funded in a sustainable way, from genuine spare cash. Today, I'm looking at mobile telecoms giant Vodafone (LSE: VOD) (NASDAQ: VOD.US).

Vodafone's US cash machine

Vodafone is one of the most generous dividend payers in the FTSE 100, and is a big favourite with income investors. The firm's shares currently yield 6.1% and have a five-year average yield of 5.4% -- well above the FTSE 100 average of 3.1%.

Although Vodafone is a profitable, cash-generating business, it is only able to pay shareholders such generous dividends because of the dividends it receives itself from its 45% stake in US mobile operator Verizon Wireless. In the 2011/2012 financial year, for example, Vodafone received a £2.9 billion dividend from Verizon, £2.0 billion of which was paid out to Vodafone shareholders by means of a special dividend.

This year, Vodafone's share of Verizon's dividend is £2.3 billion, but the company does not plan to distribute this directly to shareholders. Instead it will use £1.5 billion to fund a share buyback programme that is currently underway. By reducing the number of shares for which a dividend needs to be paid, this should improve dividend cover for future payouts.

Does Vodafone have enough cash?

As private investors, we want to back businesses that are able to pay their dividends out of free cash flow each year. I define free cash flow as the cash that's left over after capital expenditure, interest payments and tax deductions. With that in mind, let's look at Vodafone's cash flow from the last five years:

Year20082009201020112012
Free cash flow (£m)3853,9094,0268,53514,965
Dividend payments (£m)3,6584,0134,1394,4686,643
Free cash flow/dividend*0.11.01.01.92.3

* A value of >1 means the dividend was covered by free cash flow

Source: Vodafone annual reports

Vodafone's free cash flow situation has improved steadily over the last five years; 2012 was a bumper year, thanks in part to the £2.9 billion dividend it received from Verizon, as well as a £3.5 billion profit it made on the disposal of its stakes in French operator SFR and Polish operator Polkomtel.

Although we can't predict the level of future dividend payments from Verizon, it's worth noting that in 2011, Vodafone still delivered a very healthy level of free cash flow cover and a dividend increase, without receiving a dividend from Verizon. If we strip out Verizon's £2,000m share of Vodafone's 2012 dividends, which were paid as a special dividend, we are left with £4,643m, showing that Vodafone would have delivered a further increase in its payout last year, even without Verizon's contribution.

Is Vodafone's dividend safe?

Vodafone is a more mature business than it was a few years ago, and this, combined with the ongoing eurozone recession, is likely to slow the company's growth. At the same time, I expect its capital expenditure requirements to remain high as the firm rolls out its 4G network across the UK and Europe. These twin pressures could limit the future growth rate of Vodafone's dividend, especially if the dividend from Verizon Wireless is cut or suspended.

However, Vodafone remains a large, profitable business and the company expects its profits to be in line with guidance this year. Vodafone also has growing operations in emerging markets such as India and Turkey, which should help support the company's profits in its more mature European markets. Finally, there's every possibility that the Verizon dividend will continue at current levels.

Overall, I think that the outlook for Vodafone's dividend is fairly robust, but I do expect to see its growth rate slow over the next few years.

Top income tips

One man who really understands how to assess the quality of a company's dividends is legendary City fund manager Neil Woodford, whose High Income fund grew by 342% over the fifteen years to October 2012, during which time the FTSE All-Share index managed a gain of only 125%.

Mr. Woodford selects stocks that he believes are undervalued and likely to deliver strong dividend growth. His record is one of the best in the City and at the end of October 2012, he had £21 billion of private investors' funds under management -- more than any other City fund manager.

You can learn about eight of Neil Woodford's largest holdings and how he generates such fantastic returns in this exclusive Motley Fool report. It's completely free, but is available for a limited time only. I strongly suggest you click here and download the report today to avoid missing out.

> Roland owns shares in Vodafone but does not own shares in any of the other companies mentioned in this article. The Motley Fool has recommended Vodafone.

Share & subscribe

Comments

The opinions expressed here are those of the individual writers and are not representative of The Motley Fool. If you spot any comments that are unsuitable hit the flag to alert our moderators.

paullidd 07 Jan 2013 , 12:47pm

Early on in the article you say that Vod can only afford it's dividend because of the money it received from Verizon. Yet at the end of the article you say that even if you stripped out the Verizon money Vod could still afford the dividend. There is also a year when two thirds of the verizon money was paid as a special dividend, ayear with no verizon money and this year in which the verizon money is being used for a share buyback.
So is the first statement incorrect or a typo or is the final summing up incorrect?

Paul

eccyman 07 Jan 2013 , 1:02pm

Does anyone here have any idea of the logic behind the Indian Government trying to tax VOD for buying a company? I can understand it when a sale of an asset for gain takes place. Indian supreme court also reckons VOD don't owe any tax...

ANuvver 07 Jan 2013 , 1:24pm

Corruption, incompetence, politicking - take your pick.

My own feeling is that this storm is a bargaining position, which will fall away as soon as more sober heads prevail about not queering the pitch for further foreign investment.

sopavest 07 Jan 2013 , 4:03pm

Hello paullid,

I don't think either statement is a typo or incorrect.

Vodafone's bumper dividend payout last year was only affordable due to the Verizon payment, which accounted for around 30% of the total payout. This year's use of the dividend to buyback shares is an indirect way of supporting the dividend payout and funding an increase, too.

Without the Verizon money, I suspect Vodafone's dividend would stagnate, but I'm pretty sure it would still offer a reasonable payout.

Hope this helps clarify things a little -- apologies if my opening remarks appeared to tilt the balance too far in Verizon's direction.

Regards,

Roland (article author)

paullidd 08 Jan 2013 , 7:36am

Hi Roland,

Ok, I think I misinterpretted what you were saying, because I view the special Dividend payment as not being part of the 'normal' dividend, which would have been covered by VOD's earnings. I can see they kept some surplus cash from that as well, but this years dividend was also covered by VOD's own earnings. The share buyback should enhance EPS and that should improve VOD's position going forward.

I do think that VOD is still a good cash generator even though it's European offerings are struggling at the moment.

Of interest I see that the Verizon Boss was talking about buying out VOD's share of VW over on ADVFN. He talks about it being something they could do and not having any other multi-billion aquisitions planned, then goes on to say it's not something they're planning. So a bit confused, but any rumours might boost the VOD SP. ADVFN values VOD's share at approx £100 Billion, not sure how they get that price tag.

My feeling would be that VOD would be foolish to sell.

Regards
Paul

vinchainsaw 08 Jan 2013 , 9:46am

£100bn Paul? Sheesh, thats 25% more than the current market cap!

paullidd 08 Jan 2013 , 9:50am

Hi Vin,

just quoting what I read, but I guess VW earnings and growth potential are definitely worth something.

Regards
Paul

vinchainsaw 08 Jan 2013 , 11:48am

Paul,

I'm not doubting at all - its just, wow.
That being the case, please sell it to them!

Join the conversation

Please take note - some tags have changed.

Line breaks are converted automatically.

You may use the following tags in your post: [b]bolded text[/b], [i]italicised text[/i]. All other tags will be removed from your post.

If you want to add a link, please ensure you type it as http://www.fool.co.uk as opposed to www.fool.co.uk.

Hello stranger

To add your own comment, please login.

Not yet registered? Register now.