Is Vodafone A DRIP Share For The Long Term?

Published in Company Comment on 27 November 2012

How have investors fared reinvesting their dividends from Vodafone (LSE: VOD)?

Some of the largest companies in the FTSE 100 (UKX) run schemes where investors can take dividends in the form of new shares instead of cash. These schemes are often called Dividend Reinvestment Plans (DRIPs) and distribute what are known as 'scrip' dividends.

If a company with a DRIP scheme pays a large and increasing dividend, such reinvestment can quickly compound the size of your shareholding upwards.

Using dividend data from Vodafone (LSE: VOD) (NASDAQ: VOD.US), you can see how the income produced by company has made dedicated shareholders richer.

My figures are based on a shareholder that bought 1,000 Vodafone shares ten years ago. Here's how dividend reinvestment has rewarded Vodafone's investors:

Shares ownedDividendDividend per share (p)Shares purchased by DRIP schemeNew holding
1,0002002 interim0.7241,004
1,0042002 final0.7571,011
1,0112003 interim0.7971,018
1,0182003 final0.9071,025
1,0252004 interim0.9571,032
1,0322004 final1.0891,041
1,0412005 interim1.91141,055
1,0552005 final2.16151,070
1,0702006 interim2.20191,089
1,0892006 final3.87351,124
1,1242007 interim2.35171,141
1,1412007 final4.41311,172
1,1722008 interim2.49161,188
1,1882008 final5.02421,230
1,2302009 interim2.57221,252
1,2522009 final5.20501,302
1,3022010 interim2.66241,326
1,3262010 final5.65481,374
1,3742011 interim2.85211,395
1,3952011 final6.05501,445
1,4452012 interim7.05571,502
1,5022012 final6.47511,553

With dividends reinvested in Vodafone shares, those 1,000 shares bought ten years ago at 144p each would have grown to 1,553 shares today.

If an investor was prepared to forego income, then an outlay of £1,440 on the shares ten years ago would be worth £2,453 today.

Vodafone has rapidly increased its dividend during those ten years. The interim dividend in 2003 was 0.7946p per share, while Vodafone recently announced its 2013 interim dividend would be 3.27p per share. That's a 411% increase.

With an expected yield for 2013 of 6.4%, £1,440 invested (and reinvested) in Vodafone now brings an expected income of £157 for the year.

Few shares demonstrate the power of dividend reinvestment as well as Vodafone. In the last decade, the company has moved from being considered a growth share to an income share. While dividends have increased significantly, the share price has hardly grown -- and that stagnation has meant more shares could be purchased each year in lieu of dividend cash.

There is scope for things to get even better at Vodafone. For the second year running, the company has received a large dividend from its US joint venture Verizon Wireless. Earlier this year, the first Verizon payment was distributed as a special dividend, which means our hypothetical shareholder could have purchased another 108 Vodafone shares.

From my own research, I have come to the conclusion that this special dividend could become more reliable in the future. To me, the income story at Vodafone has never looked better.

If you are interested in harnessing the power of income shares, I'd urge you to read what Neil Woodford has been buying. The legendary City fund manager has spent decades delivering huge returns to his investors by carefully selecting top income shares. Learn from one of the best in the business here with this free Motley Fool report: "8 Shares Held By Britain's Super Investor". To get the report delivered to your inbox immediately, simply click here.

> David owns shares in Vodafone. The Motley Fool has recommended shares in Vodafone.

Share & subscribe

Comments

The opinions expressed here are those of the individual writers and are not representative of The Motley Fool. If you spot any comments that are unsuitable hit the flag to alert our moderators.

breelander 27 Nov 2012 , 4:20pm

Your table appears to have overlooked the 7 for 8 share consolidation and B-share issue (redeemable at 15p) that took place between the 2006 Interim and 2006 Final.
http://www.investegate.co.uk/vodafone-group-plc-%28vod%29/rns/proposed-return-of-capital/200606141200115638E/

I make that 952 shares held prior to the 2006 Final. AFAIK the B-share return of capital didn't offer a 'reinvest' option, but your hypothetical shareholder could have used the cash to buy more shares.

jaizan 27 Nov 2012 , 8:39pm

For the long term investor, the more important point is to have recognised the blatant over valuation 12 years ago (~400p) and waited to buy at a more reasonable valuation.

elispace 28 Nov 2012 , 9:19am

I've just had a look at this: http://www.funddata.com/invescpdf/225.pdf
Daily Factsheet for The Ediburgh Investment Trust no longer lists Vodafone in top 10 holdings!

http://www.invescoperpetual.co.uk/site/ip/pdf/3303148_EN_GB-ip-hgh-inc-fnd-fctsht.pdf

And neither does the High Income Fund! I wonder, has your friend Neil reduced or even sold out his holding altogether? How does this correspond with your view that they have never looked better? Clearly he does not feel the same.


Either he's a super investor as M Fool keeps telling us with it's out of date "8 Shares Held By Britain's Super Investor" and therefore perhaps your a bit 'out of touch'. Or your the man to follow and he's 'lost his edge' maybe.

The main point is, it's hard to take seriously such consistent discrepancies and it damages credibility of these articles.

paullidd 28 Nov 2012 , 9:43am

I think the drop in SP for VOD has moved it out of his top 10 - Telecomms - 9.9%
BT - 6.2%
are VOD the remaining 3.7%, their SP is about 90% of what it was in Mar 2012

Excel35 28 Nov 2012 , 2:48pm

Does this example of DRIP account for any costs of reinvesting the dividends?

breelander 28 Nov 2012 , 3:10pm

Excel35,

This is an example of a company-run DRIP scheme, available to all who hold the shares in their own name (as certificates or in Crest). There are no dealing costs or stamp duty involved, it's just an alternative way of paying you the dividend.

Few (if any) nominee accounts allow you to participate in a company's DRIP scheme, offering instead their own reinvestment plans. These use the cas dividends to buy shares on the market and DO have costs involved.

timeandpatience 29 Nov 2012 , 1:18pm

Think the article should be re-jigged to demonstrate the dangers of overpaying for even the most prodigious dividend machines.

£1440 tied up with all dividends re-invested for ten years produces £2,453 or a 70% nominal return. Strip out 37% (£533) for inflation leaving a return of 33% or 3.3% a year in real terms. Now we're not really heading off to a cruise-laden retirement with that are we?

Yes 411% dividend growth in ten years is fantastic. Grossly overpaying for it in the first instance isn't.

Join the conversation

Please take note - some tags have changed.

Line breaks are converted automatically.

You may use the following tags in your post: [b]bolded text[/b], [i]italicised text[/i]. All other tags will be removed from your post.

If you want to add a link, please ensure you type it as http://www.fool.co.uk as opposed to www.fool.co.uk.

Hello stranger

To add your own comment, please login.

Not yet registered? Register now.