What Next For BAE Systems?

Published in Company Comment on 17 October 2012

Is it now business as usual for BAE Systems (LSE: BA.)?

Well, that was a lot of fuss and bother about nothing.

The other month, BAE Systems' (LSE: BA) proposed merger with EADS was all over the front pages of Western Europe's newspapers after the negotiations were leaked. Then it became clear last week that a deal could not be done, not least because the German government just didn't like it.

So it's back to business as usual for BAE, you might think. That would be logical: few were screaming for change before the EADS deal became public. But that doesn't seem to be the market's reaction. The problem with opening a can of worms is that once you've opened it, it's hard to put the worms back.

Legacy

The legacy of the failed merger has, ironically, become BAE's most immediate strategic challenge. What has changed in BAE's world is:

1. The merger has highlighted BAE's strategic dependence on the shrinking US and UK defence markets. That was very well known prior to the  merger talks and most analysts were content to see BAE ride out the cycle, curtailing its cost base while developing new markets. Perhaps the real significance is that the merger talks suggest BAE's own management does not have confidence in a 'go it alone' strategy.

2. The handling of the EADS deal has not won any plaudits for chairman Dick Olver and CEO Ian King, who were hardly the City's favourite duo before this episode. Fund manager Invesco Perpetual, which controls 13% of BAE and is the firm's largest shareholder, was not shy about hauling the company's management over the coals and criticising the planned merger.

3. The company's strategy looks incoherent. One of BAE's justifications for the merger was to get into the booming aerospace sector, and buying back into the Airbus programme that it sold its interest in just six years ago. That doesn't demonstrate the long-term perspective you would expect in such an industry. It is in stark contrast to Britain's biggest defence and aerospace play, Rolls-Royce (LSE: RR).

4. The breakdown of talks has, supposedly, 'put the company in play'. What does that really mean? It suggests the company's management lacks complete faith in BAE's future, and might be open to offers. US defence contractors such as Northrop Grumman (NYSE: NOC.US) have been suggested, but they are similarly under pressure from reduced defence spending and a US bid for BAE would raise big political questions on both sides of the Atlantic.

Options

What are the options now for BAE?

Invesco Perpetual's lead fund manager, Neil Woodford, has called on the company to increase its focus on shareholder value, by returning cash through share buybacks. And there is hope that BAE may be able to secure contracts in Saudi Arabia that would provide the cash flow to fund such expenditure. But cash is also needed to reduce the company's pension deficit, which is about half the current £10 billion market cap. And a change of leadership might be needed to instill confidence, too.

This outcome should be moderately positive for the share price, and good news for income investors.

Becoming the target of an opportunistic bid is not something the company can engineer. If that did happen, shareholders would receive a decent bid premium, but it would hardly be ideal to sell the company at such a low point in the cycle.

Nor does it look as if shareholders would support adventurous or sizeable acquisitions. That option seems to be closed off.

Break-up

A break-up of the group is another option. The company might either sell its US operations, or concentrate on the US by shedding its UK businesses piecemeal. But now is not the best time to obtain good value for defence assets. Disposals might be a dangerous course of action, and not one that is guaranteed to give good value to shareholders.

So the boring option of doing what the company does best -- and rewarding shareholders over the long term -- looks like the most favourable strategy. Perhaps not surprising, then, that this is what is advocated by key BAE shareholder Neil Woodford, one of the UK's best and most renowned fund managers.

And there is much to learn from Mr Woodford. You can find out more about his investing style -- and where he is putting investors' money right now -- within this special report from the Motley Fool: "8 Shares Held By Britain's Super Investor". It's free and you can get it delivered to your inbox by clicking here.

David Kuo challenged his Motley Fool analysts to pinpoint the market's most attractive sectors -- and they delivered! Discover the industries they selected in this new Motley Fool guide -- "Three Top Sectors" -- while it's still free!

More investment opportunities

10 Steps To Making A Million In The Market

> Tony owns shares in BAE Systems.

Share & subscribe

Comments

The opinions expressed here are those of the individual writers and are not representative of The Motley Fool. If you spot any comments that are unsuitable hit the flag to alert our moderators.

eyeball08 17 Oct 2012 , 2:02pm

So Mr Woodford wants BAE to do share buybacks. Would that be to allow him to sell the Invesco holding at a reasonable price?

apprenticeDRL 17 Oct 2012 , 4:14pm

Personally I would rather have increased dividends than share buy backs. At least then I could choose how I wanted to invest the money

goodlifer 17 Oct 2012 , 7:20pm

Please tell us a bit more about this Neil Woodford, the guy you keep trying to sell.
What has he actually achieved?

goodlifer 17 Oct 2012 , 11:32pm

According to today's Daily Mail, Mr Woodford's fund has grown by just under 13% compound over 20 years.
Quite respectable, even for a full time professional, but is it really anything to write home about?

If the Motley Fool is to be believed, Warren Buffett managed more than 27% for 40 years
And even Stephen Bland's Doris made 11% by doing absolutely nothing.


Join the conversation

Please take note - some tags have changed.

Line breaks are converted automatically.

You may use the following tags in your post: [b]bolded text[/b], [i]italicised text[/i]. All other tags will be removed from your post.

If you want to add a link, please ensure you type it as http://www.fool.co.uk as opposed to www.fool.co.uk.

Hello stranger

To add your own comment, please login.

Not yet registered? Register now.