Lloyds Gets Another £22 Billion From Taxpayers

Published in Company Comment on 26 September 2012

The taxpayer-backed bank is set to benefit from a wave of cheap cash.

In order to get banks lending again and to fund cheaper credit for British businesses and consumers, the Bank of England and HM Treasury launched the Funding for Lending scheme (the FLS) on 13 July.

Big banks get cheap loans

The scheme works by allowing banks, building societies and other lenders to borrow from the Bank of England for up to four years at an ultra-low rate of 0.25% a year. In return for providing collateral (assets such as business loans or mortgage) as security, banks can access a line of cheap credit from the Bank. The FLS runs for 18 months, from 1 August 2012 until 31 January 2014.

The idea behind the FLS is that -- flush with fresh, cheap cash -- banks will lower their interest rates and thus boost lending. The more that banks lend, the more they can borrow from the Bank of England. In addition, banks that reduce their lending will pay higher rates than those that increase their lending.

Having launched last month, the FLS seems to have got off to a decent start. Five of the UK's six biggest lenders have signed up to it and begun accessing this line of cheap credit. The only major bank not to join the FLS is global giant HSBC (LSE: HSBA), which is already awash with cheap funding.

In total, 13 banks and building societies have signed up to date, allowing them to borrow up to a twentieth (5%) of their existing loan books from the FLS. More lenders are expected to join in the coming months, including building societies large and small.

On the other hand, critics of the FLS argue that lowering interest rates won't raise lending. Instead, they argue that lending is declining because of a severe lack of demand from businesses and individuals. They believe that unless it lifts demand for credit, the FLS is doomed to fail.

Lloyds captures cheap cash

One bank looking to grab a large chunk of cheap cash is Lloyds Banking Group (LSE: LLOY) (NYSE: LYG.US). With around £440 billion of eligible loans on its balance sheet, Lloyds could draw down as much as £22 billion from the FLS.

Earlier this month, Lloyds took an initial £1 billion from the FLS, after launching its "Lloyds Funding for Lending loans" two weeks ago. This gives new applicants a 1% discount on Lloyds' usual lending rates for the life of their loans, with a minimum loan of £1,000.

António Horta-Osório, chief executive of Lloyds, said, "This initial £1 billion is just the start. We are committed to helping Britain prosper by encouraging investment and supporting businesses and households with the best possible terms through Lloyds Funding for Lending."

Higher margins boost profits

Following bailouts exceeding £17.4 billion, Lloyds is two-fifths (40%) owned by taxpayers, so it is desperate to return to profitability.

The good news is that by borrowing at 0.25% a year from the Bank of England and lending to businesses and home buyers at high multiples of this rate, Lloyds can boost its net interest margin (NIM). This key performance indicator for banks is the spread between bank funding costs and lending rates.

In its latest half-year results released on 26 July, Lloyds reported a group banking NIM of 1.93%. This was lower than 2.12% in the first half of 2011 and 2.01% recorded in the second half of last year.

With any luck, borrowing cheaply from the FLS and lending at attractive rates to consumers will halt the ongoing decline in Lloyds' NIM. Indeed, if drawn down in full, this extra £22 billion of cheap cash could -- with any luck -- send Lloyds' NIM rising once more.

A snapshot of Lloyds

With Lloyds about to get another shot in the arm from taxpayers, is now a good time to buy its shares? Let's quickly check its fundamentals:

  
Share price40.62p
Market cap£28.2 billion
Forecast price-to-earnings ratio24.9
Forecast dividend yield0.1%
Price-to-book ratio0.6

Source: Digital Look

At Tuesday's closing price of 40.62p, Lloyds shares offer a tiny forward dividend of 0.1% and are priced at a steep rating of nearly 25 times earnings. Also, they trade at 60% of book value, which is a lot higher than they have traded at many points in this post-crash era.

What's more, given the near-20% rise in Lloyds' share price over the past month, I reckon they've gone far enough for now. Hence, I'm not a buyer at these levels, as there are better bargains elsewhere.

Finally, top fund manager Neil Woodford sold out of UK banks long before the crash. Today, he manages £20 billion for British investors and his market-beating performance is second to none. To find out which great businesses Woodford likes, read "Eight Shares Britain's Super-Investor Owns".

For more about these eight money-making machines -- and Woodford's marvellous mind and methods -- download your free copy of our report today.

More from The Motley Fool:

> Cliff does not own any of the shares mentioned in this article.

Share & subscribe

Comments

The opinions expressed here are those of the individual writers and are not representative of The Motley Fool. If you spot any comments that are unsuitable hit the flag to alert our moderators.

BarrenFluffit 26 Sep 2012 , 11:58am

Cheap money will tend to displace expensive money, so companies who tend to use lots of capital would benefit. The most obvious is those involved in property and aviation.

buywhenhigh 26 Sep 2012 , 12:38pm

Has everyone forgot that an excess of borrowing caused the whole problem in the first place.

So solving excess borrowing by encouraging more borrowing is literally trying to put out a fire by dousing it in petrol.

mackeson29 26 Sep 2012 , 2:34pm

'is literally trying to put out a fire by dousing it in petrol'

Good analogy - up to a point - an overdose of petrol would actually put the flames out.

I do wonder if this is the kind of thinking they are aiming with.........

BigJC1 26 Sep 2012 , 5:05pm

"Finally, top fund manager Neil Woodford sold out of UK banks long before the crash. Today, he" - failed to spot the opportunity to buy into Lloyds at 21p and sell out a few months later at 41p making a near 100% return for his investors.

His crystal balls must be clouding over.

mackeson29 27 Sep 2012 , 8:33am

BigJC1 - Yes !!! & Mr. Woodford also missed the opportunity of buying RBS @11p and selling @57p some months later.

Perhaps he hasn't got the right set of tarot cards to go with that crystal ball ?

BigJC1 27 Sep 2012 , 9:57am

mackeson29 - Hee hee, the man is a genius staying clear of the banks and avoiding all those massive gains.

mackeson29 27 Sep 2012 , 12:41pm

Yes, quite all that paperwork to deal with, best avoided !!!

jerryrc 27 Sep 2012 , 4:49pm

For anyone interested - I now hold some Lloyds shares, acquired via owning the doomed HBOS shares pre-crisis. After an inital purchase of some shares in 2007, followed by being conned into 'cut price' rights issues offered by HBOS management as the company continued to sink, my book cost amounted to c£5,000 at the end of my string of purchases.

The current value of these (now Lloyds) shares?

£120.

i.e minus 97.5% total return. I shall not be topping up on these but shall look forward instead to receiving my 12p dividend.

(ps I will never sell these shares, as a permanent reminder of my most valuable investing lesson)
JC

Join the conversation

Please take note - some tags have changed.

Line breaks are converted automatically.

You may use the following tags in your post: [b]bolded text[/b], [i]italicised text[/i]. All other tags will be removed from your post.

If you want to add a link, please ensure you type it as http://www.fool.co.uk as opposed to www.fool.co.uk.

Hello stranger

To add your own comment, please login.

Not yet registered? Register now.