AstraZeneca: Buy, Sell Or Hold?

Published in Company Comment on 21 August 2012

What are the long-term prospects for AstraZeneca (LSE: AZN)?

I'm always searching for shares that can help ordinary investors like you make money from the stock market.

Right now I am trawling through the FTSE 100 (UKX) and giving my verdict on every member of the blue-chip index.

I hope to pinpoint the very best buying opportunities in today's uncertain market, as well as highlight those shares I feel you should continue to hold… and those I feel you should sell!

I'm assessing every share on five different measures. Here's what I'm looking for in each company:

1. Financial Strength: low levels of debt and other liabilities;

2. Profitability: consistent earnings and high profit margins;

3. Management: competent executives creating shareholder value;

4. Long-term prospects: a solid competitive position and respectable growth prospects, and;

5. Valuation: an under-rated share price.

A look at AstraZeneca

Today I'm evaluating AstraZeneca (LSE: AZN) (NYSE: AZN.US), one of the largest biopharmaceutical companies in the world with a market cap of £38 billion, which currently trades at 2,992p. Here are my thoughts:

1. Financial Strength: AstraZeneca has a strong balance sheet and robust cash flows. Total debt net of cash is only 16% of total assets, while operating profit is a hefty 26 times interest expense. Furthermore, free cash flow as a percentage of revenues has averaged a super 18% during the last ten years.

2. Profitability: AstraZeneca has been a model of consistency and profitability. During the last decade, revenues have increased by an average of 8% a year from £11 billion to £21 billion, while margins have expanded to beyond 30% and have never fallen below 20%. In addition, earnings per share have compounded at a 17% annual average, while the firm's average return on equity has been 33% per year.

However, revenues from the US and Western Europe were down by 2% and 11% respectively in 2011. This setback was partially offset by a 10% increase to revenues from emerging markets. What's more, results for the first half of this year disappointed, with earnings dropping 15% to £14 billion.

3. Management: Management has consistently delivered rising dividends -- the payout has compounded at 15% per annum for the past 10 years. The company has also bought back 24% of its shares since 2003, with the share count reduced from 1.7 billion to 1.3 billion. Admittedly, leadership is now in a state of flux with CEO David Brennan abruptly retiring this year after disappointing first-quarter results. Current CFO Simon Lowth is now acting CEO.

4. Long-term prospects: Patent protection for three of Astra's best-selling treatments -- Nexium, Seroquel IR and Crestor -- is set to expire during the next four years. These products make up around 40% of AstraZeneca's revenues. With a weak pipeline of products, replacing the revenue contribution of these 'expiring' treatments will be difficult. Meanwhile, margins are under pressure from greater regulation and governments around the world tightening their spending on healthcare.

5. Valuation: AstraZeneca is currently trading at only 6 times earnings and gives an above-average yield of 6%.

My verdict on AstraZeneca

AstraZeneca indeed faces a tough road ahead. However, at its current price, the market is assigning little or no value at all to its:

1. Current products: some of the company's key treatments will lose patent protection only in 2014-2016 and some earlier 'expired' products have retained market share;

2. Pipeline: the company is developing a number of treatments that have multi-billion dollar potential; and

3. Growing presence in emerging markets: revenues from emerging markets have been increasing (10% in 2011). In addition, the company has initiated a cost-cutting programme that will save it £4 billion annually.

AstraZeneca is trading at the lower range of its ten-year P/E average. For investors who are patient and are willing to take on a modicum of risk, AstraZeneca offers an attractive yield and a potential for double-digit returns.

So overall, I believe AstraZeneca at 2,992p looks like a buy.

More FTSE opportunities

Alongside AstraZeneca, I am also positive on the blue chips highlighted in "The Market's Top Sectors". This special report sees three Motley Fool Share Advisor analysts each studying a favourable industry -- and spotlighting a particular share to consider for this year and beyond.

Various opportunities are covered in the report. One might provide "solid returns and... nice dividends", another could offer "global diversification and long-term growth potential", while a third looks a "high-quality business" from a battered sector.

You can read "The Market's Top Sectors" today by requesting the report for free. But hurry, the report is available for a limited time only.

In the meantime, please stay tuned for my next verdict on a FTSE 100 share.

At last -- a special free report that introduces novices to shares! "What Every New Investor Needs To Know" and The Motley Fool are helping Britain invest. Better.

Further Motley Fool investment opportunities:

> Zarr does not own shares in AstraZeneca.

Share & subscribe

Comments

The opinions expressed here are those of the individual writers and are not representative of The Motley Fool. If you spot any comments that are unsuitable hit the flag to alert our moderators.

Rotation96 21 Aug 2012 , 1:20pm

Thanks for that. I think this sort of article is helpful to pretty much anyone. I have found it very helpful to have this sort of check list to assess which shares to buy and the systematic approach is great to keep you grounded and objective. For the record, I pretty much agree that whilst AZN clearly have some challenges ahead of them, at the current price they're well worth a look.

equitybore 23 Aug 2012 , 12:56pm

One should always benchmark a company against its competition. Is AZN best of breed? Would you rather own Roche or Abbott Labs?

ANuvver 23 Aug 2012 , 1:29pm

I've seen AZN come out of the naughty corner to behave itself lately. They keep on paying me to wait though, and GSK continues to clean up after it (for now, at least).

eqbore: I had considered Roche, but balked at the withholding tax issues. Same reason I tend to avoid German companies. A US bio-pharma like Abbot or Bristol would be of more interest to me.

AZN certainly has challenges ahead, of that no doubt. But if you operate primarily in the land of the blue and boring, that aspect can sometimes provide your risk edge.

Join the conversation

Please take note - some tags have changed.

Line breaks are converted automatically.

You may use the following tags in your post: [b]bolded text[/b], [i]italicised text[/i]. All other tags will be removed from your post.

If you want to add a link, please ensure you type it as http://www.fool.co.uk as opposed to www.fool.co.uk.

Hello stranger

To add your own comment, please login.

Not yet registered? Register now.