Will You Buy The Largest IPO Of All Time?

Published in Company Comment on 18 May 2012

Facebook's debut breaks records. Will it also break portfolios?

A version of this article originally appeared on our US site, Fool.com.

WASHINGTON, DC -- Are you ready for the largest IPO of all time? Well, you'd better be. It's coming Friday. After a seemingly endless parade of analysts, expectations and grand proclamations, Facebook is finally making its grand debut. It's been eight years in the making -- 99 months to be exact -- but investors everywhere can finally own a piece of the world's largest social network. No matter what you choose to do with the decade's hottest IPO, you deserve as much information as possible. In that spirit, I've put together a series of graphs that puts Facebook's historic offering in perspective. You might be surprised at where Facebook stands in the sweep of corporate history.

Biggest of all time

One of the recurring threads beneath all this frantic Facebook chatter is a debate over whether it's really the largest IPO of all time. The answer will depend on what measure you use. Most analyses of IPO size use the value of shares offered to the public, and by that metric Facebook falls short. The largest American IPO by initial offer size was post-bankruptcy General Motors (NYSE: GM.US), which offered just over $23 billion of itself to a sceptical public in 2010 and has since lost over a third of its initial valuation.

But there's more than one way to value an IPO. Most of us are more interested in how much value that initial offering places on the entire company. By that measure, Facebook is head and shoulders above General Motors and every other "biggest" IPO that's come along in recent years:

anImage

Sources: Wolfram Alpha and news reports.

Let me note that from here on out I'll be anticipating a $100 billion IPO market cap for Facebook, which skews a little toward the high end of where it's projected to start. Since Facebook's already upped the price range for its IPO shares in anticipation of strong demand, the final score might be quite a bit higher.

Now, Facebook certainly bests these companies in terms of its initial valuation, but let's take this a step further. We know Mark Zuckerberg started the site at Harvard in February 2004. Now, 99 months later, it's worth $100 billion. That's an incredible amount of value to create in a relatively short time, but I didn't truly appreciate how outsized that valuation was until I compared it to these former IPO champions and the length of time each took from founding to reach the IPOs that earned them so much.

anImage

Sources: Wolfram Alpha and publicly available corporate histories.

The amount of value Facebook's created per month of its life so vastly outpaced its IPO "peers" that I had to cut the graph off at the halfway point in order for most of the other results to even show up. AT&T Wireless, which has gone through a complex series of mergers, acquisitions and rebrandings since its birth as McCaw Cellular, was one of the fastest to the public markets and had one of the highest levels of investor interest, and yet its IPO resulted in less than half the value per month of Facebook. No other company comes close to Facebook's more than $1 billion in value created per month of its life.

A competition of high-tech peers

But wait! None of these companies are really in the same class as Facebook, are they? You're not likely to see Facebook regularly compared to GM or UPS, but Apple (NASDAQ: AAPL.US), Google (NASDAQ: GOOG.US) and Microsoft (NASDAQ: MSFT.US) all make ideal peers for the Silicon Valley social network. How did Facebook's tech peers begin their public lives? In every case (even Google's), far more humbly:

anImage

Sources: Historical news reports and company histories.

Facebook's numbers would skew this graph so wildly that you'd be hard-pressed to see AOL (NYSE: AOL.US) at all -- not that it's easy now. The one-time hottest property during the dot-com boom went public way back in 1992 with a tiny, tiny $62 million market cap, a public debut that would later be dwarfed by virtually every major dot-com company (and plenty of trivial ones) that issued shares during the bubble years. Apple and Microsoft were '80s kids, debuting in 1980 and 1986, respectively, but they represented high-water marks for high-tech interest in their days.

If you'd like to think that Apple was more reasonably valued than Facebook at their respective debuts, you're wrong. Facebook's IPO valuation is actually in line with many of its high-tech peers, including two that didn't wait for profitability before going public:

anImage

Sources: Historical news reports and Wolfram Alpha.

With the benefit of hindsight, we can see that most of these companies were bargains at the time, and continued excellence has brought early shareholders some amazing gains:

anImage

Sources: Yahoo! Finance, Morningstar, Wolfram Alpha, and historical news reports.

With the exception of AOL, which has fallen on some hard times of late, and Amazon.com, a longtime high-valuation stock, major tech companies that survive the ravages of age have all seen their valuations shrink and their gains explode. Google, with the least growth of the bunch, has still been a six-bagger for IPO investors. Apple has earned its earliest investors 290 times their initial investments, while Microsoft has a cumulative return of more than 33,000% since going public.

Is there anything left to "like"?

For those of you expecting huge returns from Facebook, here are a few sobering numbers to consider -- assuming, of course, a $100 billion debut that isn't pumped to the moon by rabid demand. For your investment to offer Google-like returns, Facebook would need to be worth more than $600 billion, a market cap no company has held for very long. To approach even Yahoo!'s post-IPO growth, you'd need Facebook to be worth more than $2 trillion. And to become the next Microsoft in terms of share-price appreciation, Facebook would have to someday be worth $3 quadrillion dollars. Good luck with that.

Perspective is important when considering the growth prospects of any hot IPO, and Facebook's public debut will demand it. Do you believe that Facebook can be the next Google, AOL, Apple or Microsoft? I don't -- but I'd love to hear your opinions. Let me know what you think by leaving a comment below.

Are you looking to profit as a long-term investor? "10 Steps To Making A Million In The Market" is the latest Motley Fool guide to help Britain invest. Better. We urge you to read the report today -- while it's still free and available. 

Further investment opportunities:

> The Motley Fool owns shares in Google.

Share & subscribe

Comments

The opinions expressed here are those of the individual writers and are not representative of The Motley Fool. If you spot any comments that are unsuitable hit the flag to alert our moderators.

cnebbia 18 May 2012 , 8:53am

Facebook business model has still to prove it is going to last. GM recently decided to cut its advertisement on FB as they didn't yield the expected results.
I'm on FB since three years but I never bought anything advertised there.
On top of it, I'm disgusted by the hollow chit chat of most of its members, so I just check any message for me twice per week and leave.
FB will go bust in less than 3 years from the IPO.

wiblet 18 May 2012 , 9:07am

If you need any further convincing, read Ben Graham's comments on IPOs.

ANuvver 18 May 2012 , 10:21am

Hmm. A revolution in global communication or puerile wittering shop, lol? Possibly both, depressingly.

I'm getting a bit fed up with Facebook frenzy. Haven't crunched the numbers, but I find the implied market cap staggering for a business that has yet to demonstrate any kind of revenue viability.

My gut take on it is that by way of "assets" it has a sort of portal status - it's a home page/launchpad for one hell of a lot of people, but hasn't got a handle on mobile and I don't fancy its chances re expansion into China. And does anyone else find it at least piquant that at the same time as News Corp is being dragged over coals regarding media control by powerful individual interests, everyone's lining up to buy into another story with ridiculous voting and control issues? But it's alright, because Zuck wears a hoodie...

Facebook has at least passed the first test of internet success - it's become a verb. I know a few others. Unfriend me on this one.

Jimi97 18 May 2012 , 1:45pm

After the feeding frenzy, I see Facebook share value stagnating until it either transforms itself or becomes outdated. For me, this was one to stag - I don't see the long-term value to balance the considerable risk.

supremetwo 18 May 2012 , 3:09pm

Adverts on Facebook?

What adverts?

http://adblockplus.org/en/

eccyman 18 May 2012 , 3:57pm

The Facebook share register will be the worlds largest sucker list

UncleEbenezer 19 May 2012 , 1:22am

Anyone short yet?

I'm tempted. Very tempted. But also too timid, knowing the market can remain irrational. And having been lurking when a bunch of Fools tried shorting Ocado too early.

jf2007 21 May 2012 , 12:03pm

Amazon trades at a p/e of 176 compared to Facebooks 100 but it doesnt get such a hard time. Now that Zuckerberg is answerable to shareholders and that they have raise 16 billion dollars there is opportunity to capitalise on their 1 billion users. It is not cheap but not ridicously expensive. I might buy on a slump

Join the conversation

Please take note - some tags have changed.

Line breaks are converted automatically.

You may use the following tags in your post: [b]bolded text[/b], [i]italicised text[/i]. All other tags will be removed from your post.

If you want to add a link, please ensure you type it as http://www.fool.co.uk as opposed to www.fool.co.uk.

Hello stranger

To add your own comment, please login.

Not yet registered? Register now.