Are Tesco's Latest Bonds A Buy?

Published in Company Comment on 9 May 2012

They'll likely be popular. But investors might be misguided.

In the shape of its Tesco Bank operation, Tesco (LSE: TSCO) has returned once again to the bond markets, intending to tap investors for cash.

And the reason is the same as with its two prior bond issues: to raise funds to increase the range of financial services and products that the bank offers to customers -- including mortgages.

Which is presumably good news for Tesco shareholders, speaking as it does to a growing demand for Tesco Bank's services.

But is the bond offering equally good news for fixed-income investors?

Nothing but the facts

The basics of the offer are simply stated.

  • The bonds pay a coupon of 5%, and have a maturity period of eight and half years, being repaid in full on 21 November 2020.
  • Because that seven-year life exceeds the five-year minimum life laid down by HM Revenue & Customs, the bonds can be tucked inside an ISA and a SIPP, with that 5% income subject to no further tax.
  • The bonds will be issued at £1.00 with a minimum investment of £2,000; higher amounts must be a multiple of £100.
  • Income is paid twice annually, on 21 November and 21 May, with the first payment being on 21 November 2012.

Hold to redemption

Once launched, the bond will be traded on the London Stock Exchange's retail bond market. And over that time, its price will vary depending upon what happens to interest rates, inflation and the world economy.

But the income paid will never vary: £2.50 per £100 invested, twice-yearly, until redemption.

At redemption, investors get their money back in full. Sell on the bond market prior to that, and what you get back depends on the price on the day -- you could make a hefty profit, or an equally hefty loss.

If interest rates or inflation rise, expect the price of the bonds to go down, as the fixed-income that they pay becomes relatively less attractive. If inflation or interest rates go down, expect the price of the bonds to rise.

Is your money secure? While your investment isn't covered by any FSA safety net, it will require a default by Tesco Bank -- or its bankruptcy -- before your capital is threatened. That said, as the holder of 'senior' bonds, you'll be ahead of shareholders and many other creditors.

Coupon versus dividends

Is the bond a buy? To me, this question revolves primarily around the reward that an investor gets for lending Tesco money, as opposed to investing in its shares.

Lend the company money, you'll get 5% a year, fixed for eight and half years, irrespective of what happens to interest rates, inflation or anything else.

Invest in the shares, and you'll almost certainly benefit from a rising dividend. A dividend that already -- thanks to Tesco's well-publicised travails -- places the company on a prospective yield of 4.8%, tantalisingly close to the bond's yield of 5%.

Dividend growth

Back in the 1998-99 financial year, Tesco paid a full-year dividend of 4.12 pence, and it has risen steadily since in subsequent years. In fact, over the 14 years since then, this year's latest full-year dividend of 14.76 pence represents an annual growth rate of 9.54%.

Project this year's 14.76 pence dividend forward at that same growth rate of 9.54%, over the eight-and-a-half year life of the bond, and you get a final full-year dividend of 32.0 pence -- equivalent to a 9.8% purchase yield on today's share price of 325 pence.

The bond, meanwhile, carries on paying out 5%, year in, year out.

I know which I prefer.

No brainer

Is that future dividend growth guaranteed, like the 5% coupon on the bonds? No, of course not. But if you believe -- as I do -- that Tesco's problems are temporary, then the shares beat the bonds hands down.

Especially so, given the prospect of an increase in capital, thanks to an increase in the share price. Bond investors, meanwhile, just get their capital back -- unless they sell at a profit or loss before redemption.

Put another way, given Tesco's current prospective yield of 4.8%, the dividend -- and the share price -- would essentially have to go nowhere over the next eight years for the shares to be a worse bet.

Is that likely? I don't think so.

David Kuo challenged his Motley Fool analysts to pinpoint the attractive sectors of 2012 -- and they delivered! Discover the industries they selected in this new Motley Fool guide -- "Top Sectors Of 2012" -- while it's still free!

Further investment opportunities:

> Both Malcolm and The Motley Fool own shares in Tesco.

Share & subscribe

Comments

The opinions expressed here are those of the individual writers and are not representative of The Motley Fool. If you spot any comments that are unsuitable hit the flag to alert our moderators.

putneypunter 09 May 2012 , 9:00am

Mr Kuo's article takes a look at the Tesco bond and concludes "you'd be better off buying equity". Perhaps... certainly that has been the default option for investors twenty or thirty years.

Only problem is, the "just buy equity" strategy hasn't been working very well for over a decade. Even Tesco shares (which are not too bad on the scale of things) are down over 30% over the past five years. Compared to that, compounding the 5% coupon on the bond over a few years looks rather good, with rather less uncertainty.

MDW1954 09 May 2012 , 10:15am

Mr Kuo????

Praise indeed!

Malcolm (author)

putneypunter 09 May 2012 , 11:36am

Well one of those excellent journalists, anyway. ;)

rober00 09 May 2012 , 5:08pm

Every balanced portfolio should have some fixed interest in it. I prefer mine managed by experts such as Causer and Reid, who knowledge in this area is far, far superior to mine.

Investment trust naturally not the prohibitively expnesive OIECS and UTs.

ANuvver 09 May 2012 , 5:23pm

Unmodified adverbial "likely" - uggh...

GrangeInvestor 09 May 2012 , 5:34pm

I think the decision between bonds and equity is often linked to your stage in life. Currently I'm hugely skewed to ordinary equity as I have a 20+ investment horizon. But as I get within a decade or so of retirement I may well switch some of my equity into fixed income.

If I was looking for more fixed income I would snap up this issue. It has an unusually low minimum purchase and the previous Tesco issues have immediately gone up too.

MDW1954 09 May 2012 , 11:12pm

Unmodified adverbial "likely" - uggh...

I'm sorry, Anuvver, we'll have to disagree on that one!

Malcolm (author)

ArkWelder 09 May 2012 , 11:52pm

I'm surprised that the article didn't go on to its next logical step and compare the returns available from a Tesco Bank account with the share price too.

Tortoise1000 10 May 2012 , 8:21am

I thought the Provident ones at 7% for 5 years were a better buy

Sotograndeman 10 May 2012 , 6:44pm

Nice clear piece. Completely agree with the author.

From today's lowly valuation, including divis the stock will certainly trounce the bonds over the 8.5 year period.

Don't forget that both Buffett and value investing outfit Tweedy Browne bought TSCO when it dropped and it is still in deep value territory.

ANuvver 10 May 2012 , 7:35pm

Fair enough, Malc.

Disagreements are likely, even probable or inevitable!
I do agree with your premise, by the way.

DouglasMansion 11 May 2012 , 5:59pm

A dividend yield of 4.8% is equivalent to a gross income of 5.33% if you include the non-refundable tax credit. For a standard rate taxpayer the shares are already ahead of the bonds.
Why does nobody ever mention this aspect of the share yield?

MDW1954 11 May 2012 , 6:42pm

Why does nobody ever mention this aspect of the share yield?

Perhaps because it doesn't really matter? You can't bank it or get it back, so why not focus just on the money you get?

Malcolm (author)

DouglasMansion 12 May 2012 , 10:25pm

But you will pay tax on that nominal yield from the bond - so you are not comparing like with like - net after tax is what you will get in the end

nmmerri1 15 May 2012 , 12:22pm

ANuvver, glad to see it's not just me with the word 'likely'. Without a modifier it is a ghastly Americanism which is creeping into our beloved language. If we need an adverb to describe likelihood, what's wrong with 'probably'?

Join the conversation

Please take note - some tags have changed.

Line breaks are converted automatically.

You may use the following tags in your post: [b]bolded text[/b], [i]italicised text[/i]. All other tags will be removed from your post.

If you want to add a link, please ensure you type it as http://www.fool.co.uk as opposed to www.fool.co.uk.

Hello stranger

To add your own comment, please login.

Not yet registered? Register now.