A Medical Marvel

Published in Company Comment on 3 May 2012

This great British business is riding out the recession with ease -- and Neil Woodford loves it!

Topping the FTSE 100 leader board of elite British companies this morning is Smith & Nephew (LSE: SN), the global medical technology business. As I write, S&N shares are up nearly 4% at 627p, which values the group at £5.6 billion.

Joints and wounds

Unless you've had a nasty sports injury or joint problem, you may never have used a Smith & Nephew product. Nevertheless, this high-tech medical company has built up market-leading positions in five key clinical areas:

  • Orthopaedic reconstruction
  • Advanced wound management
  • Sports medicine
  • Trauma
  • Clinical therapies

In short, S&N is best known for its knee and hip implants, arthroscopic equipment (for keyhole surgery) and its wound pads. Given the technical and regulatory difficulties of entering these medical markets, S&N has a wide competitive moat around its business, which generates high margins.

In other words, S&N is the kind of well-run business that US super-investor Warren Buffett likes to own. What's more, this medical marvel is also a favourite of Britain's super-investor Neil Woodford.

As we revealed in March, Woodford started buying shares in Smith & Nephew in the second half of 2011. Woodford paid an average price around 564p a share, so he's up over 11% so far. Nice work, Neil!

Good growth

This morning, S&N released its first-quarter results for 2012, which it described as "a good first quarter".

In the first three months of this year, revenue climbed to $1.08 billion (£666 million), up 3% on Q1/2011. S&N has two core divisions: in Advanced Wound Management, revenue grew by 5% to $240 million, while its Advanced Surgical Devices arm brought in $839 million, up 3%.

Trading profit rose by 5% to $252 million, with S&N's operating margin rising by 0.5 percentage points to a very healthy 23.3%. As a result, earnings per share rose to $0.18 from $0.175, up nearly 3%.

What's more, S&N's high margins and strong cash flow allowed it to reduce net debt to a mere $28 million, down a whopping 92% from $351 million a year earlier. Thus, S&N will soon have net cash, making it a rare beast among FTSE 100 firms.

A great British business

Commenting on these results, Olivier Bohuon, S&N's chief executive, said:

"Smith & Nephew has had a good first quarter. We grew revenue, increased profit and improved our trading profit margin. We saw the first results of our actions to make Smith & Nephew more fit and effective. 2012 is a critical year for implementing our new strategic priorities. Our plans to progress the structural changes, additional investments and, of course, greater efficiencies, are now underway. Throughout Smith & Nephew, at every level, there is a clear sense of direction, as we work to reshape the Group for future growth."

I rather like the look of Smith & Nephew, despite it not being the typical value or high-yield share that usually catches my eye. That's partly because of its global grasp: S&N has nearly 11,000 employees, a presence in over 90 countries and annual sales approaching $4.3 billion in 2011.

Delving into its fundamentals, at today's price of 627p, Smith & Nephew trades on a forward price-to-earnings ratio of 12.4 and offers a prospective dividend yield of a modest 1.8%, covered 4.3 times over.

While these aren't classic value indicators, S&N is a quality business -- and both its core divisions are growing their revenues, profits and trading margins. Thus, I'm adding Smith & Nephew to my personal watch list as a quality/growth play. Who am I to argue with Neil Woodford, Britain's best investor?

To gain more insight into the mind and methods of Britain's most-admired fund manager, download our special report, "8 Shares Held By Britain's Super Investor". You can find out what Neil Woodford is buying this year...

Further investment opportunities:

> Cliff does not own any of the shares mentioned in this article. The Motley Fool owns shares in Smith & Nephew.

Share & subscribe

Comments

The opinions expressed here are those of the individual writers and are not representative of The Motley Fool. If you spot any comments that are unsuitable hit the flag to alert our moderators.

UncleEbenezer 03 May 2012 , 3:26pm

Looked at them a year or two back. But the support for torture on their website put them onto the boycott list, regardless of financial considerations.

Dozey1 03 May 2012 , 4:02pm

Ummm...The were first over 600p briefly back in 2003 and haven't gone far since. Peg currently is about 2.0 when half that might make it interesting.
Wound management, advanced or not, is no sinecure. Best have a look at Advanced Medical (AMS) listed on AIM. Not so long ago they had big problems with certain implants.
Oh, I see, recommended by Woodford, with whom the Fool seems to have a cosy relationship akin to mutual back-scratching. That explains it.

Not for me.

Dozey1 03 May 2012 , 4:03pm

Sorry, not clear above. The implants problem was S&Ns I believe.

goodlifer 03 May 2012 , 5:34pm

UncleEbenezer
"The support for torture on their website."

All I've been able to find is that they claim to produce treatments for torture wounds,
I'd be very grateful if you could help me find out more.

I'm quite prejudiced in SN's favour - their products helped me greatly in my
youth, when I was burnt quite nastily.
But that was long, long ago.

CunningCliff 03 May 2012 , 6:03pm

Dozey1: "Oh, I see, recommended by Woodford, with whom the Fool seems to have a cosy relationship akin to mutual back-scratching. That explains it."

There is no commercial relationship between TMF and Neil Woodford. Several of us happen to like his style and track record, that's all.

Less of the cynicism, please, Dozey1!

Cliff

goodlifer 03 May 2012 , 9:21pm

Beware of calling anyone a cynic.

If Sir Humphrey is to be believed, "cynic" is an idealist's name for a realist..

F958B 03 May 2012 , 9:57pm

I find SN to be uninspiring.

Growth is mediocre.
Earnings retention ratio is not delivering the growth it should.
Dividend yield is too low.
Company has a track record of share buybacks at high prices.

Simply handing out a little more cash to shareholders - in the form of dividends - would get me interested.
The dividend yield could easily be increased to 4% (25p/share).

With 49p prospective earnings per share and 11p prospective dividend, what the **** are they doing with the 38p per share that they retain?
Such a high earnings retention ratio (or low dividend cover) ought to be generating significant growth. But it isn't.

So we have a basically good, steady company, but with exceptionally poor management.
Show me the growth to justify such a miserly dividend payout, or show me a much-boosted dividend payout if there is not much growth to be had.

C annot
R ecommend
A
P urchase

F958B 03 May 2012 , 9:59pm

Sorry, typo - should have read :

...... high earnings retention ratio (or HIGH dividend cover) ought to be generating significant growth.......

snoekie 04 May 2012 , 3:00am

a paltry yield........

RobinnBanks 05 May 2012 , 7:28pm

Unless you've had a nasty sports injury or joint problem, you may never have used a Smith & Nephew product.
Don't they still make elastoplast?

RobinnBanks 05 May 2012 , 7:37pm

From Wikipedia:
"Elastoplast is a trademark name of a brand of adhesive bandages (also called sticking plasters) and medical dressings made by Beiersdorf.[1] Beiersdorf bought UK and Commonwealth rights from the parent company, Smith & Nephew in 1992 for £46.5 million. It has become a genericized trademark for "sticking plaster" in some Commonwealth countries including the United Kingdom and Australia.[2] In some countries, the line is known as Hansaplast,[3] a brand name started by Beiersdorf in 1922."

RobinnBanks 05 May 2012 , 7:55pm

"The company was founded in 1856 by Thomas James Smith of Kingston upon Hull who went into business as a dispensing chemist.[3] A few months before his death in 1896, Smith was joined by his nephew, Horatio Nelson Smith, and the business became known as T.J. Smith and Nephew.[3]

In 1928 the company developed the wound management product Elastoplast."

Thanks to Wikipedia, and hope this is of interest to fellow Fools.
I have always wondered if he was Smith's nephew, or if that was his surname. We used to stock Elastoplast many years ago (before Bandaid!).

goodlifer 05 May 2012 , 11:11pm

Where, oh where, is UncleEbenezer?

He seemed to suggest that SN supports torture.
I find this difficult to believe, but I'd like to be sure.

Can anyone else offer any help?














on their website put them onto the boycott list, regardless of financial considerations.

Join the conversation

Please take note - some tags have changed.

Line breaks are converted automatically.

You may use the following tags in your post: [b]bolded text[/b], [i]italicised text[/i]. All other tags will be removed from your post.

If you want to add a link, please ensure you type it as http://www.fool.co.uk as opposed to www.fool.co.uk.

Hello stranger

To add your own comment, please login.

Not yet registered? Register now.